A Qualitative Examination of Perceived Stigma and its Sources Among Adolescents Living With HIV in Western Kenya.

Introduction. Adolescents (10-19 years) living with HIV (ALWH) face unique challenges in controlling HIV long-term, including stigma and perception of stigma within their communities. Methods. We conducted a qualitative investigation of the sources of perceived HIV-related stigma with ALWH in western Kenya. Forty-six ALWH on ART, aware of their status, and engaged in care were enrolled. Interviews explored perceived stigma by probing the individuals and experiences that adolescents identify as causing or perpetuating their ongoing fears. Results. Participants (54% male, mean age 17.4) reported ongoing fears of stigmatization related to friends and peers not living with HIV. They described previous enacted and first-hand observations of stigma, most often occurring in pre-adolescence, by age mates or peers at school as the most common cause for their ongoing fears. Conclusions. Perceived stigma is prevalent among ALWH and develops from experiences in pre-adolescence. Anti-HIV stigma interventions addressing educators and children in school settings to combat perceived stigma at its source should be investigated.

Introduction

Anti-HIV stigma is among the most complex and multi-dimensional factors impacting the continuum of HIV care and associated clinical outcomes for people living with HIV (PLWH). Previous work to understand anti-HIV stigma has led to the development of the HIV Stigma Framework, which identifies enacted, anticipated and internalized stigma as 3 mechanisms affecting the HIV care cascade. This framework has been validated for use in urban populations of PLWH in the US and has been utilized in adult populations in Sweden. Despite its lack of validation in low-and-middle-income countries (LMIC), previous research has used the HIV Stigma Framework to examine enacted, internalized, and anticipated stigma—commonly referred to as perceived stigma —among adults living with HIV around the world.[6,7] This work is critical, especially in LMIC, as demonstrated by a 2019 review that highlighted negative health-related stigma outcomes in these settings for “high-burden” diseases, including HIV. However, neither the evaluation of stigma-related health outcomes, nor qualitative examinations of anti-HIV stigma experiences, have historically focused on the outcomes and perspectives of children and adolescents living with HIV (ALWH). A recent systematic review of qualitative studies examining the experiences and attitudes of PLWH, where nearly half of all included studies assessed individuals’ perspectives on stigma, did not include a single study assessing this key population.

Worldwide, the WHO estimates that there are 2.2 million children living with HIV, 90% of whom reside within sub-Saharan Africa. In Kenya, there are nearly 230 000 children and ALWH, only 61% of which are estimated to be on anti-retroviral therapy (ART).[12,13] Importantly, ALWH represent the fastest-growing subgroup of PLWH, given both the increased incidence of new HIV infection within this age group and the growing number of perinatally-infected youth reaching adolescence and young adulthood. Adolescence is a critical period of biological, psychological, and socioemotional development [15,16]; for those living with HIV, this also requires significant development of autonomy and self-identification with their status.[17,18] Moreover, ALWH must cope with an awareness of “difference” from their friends and peers that often leads to disruptions in their relationships with others. These differences impact ALWH at a critical time in their development, especially as it relates to social cognition and their perception of others’ responses to their HIV status.[20,21] Anti-HIV stigma and its perceived prevalence by ALWH, therefore, may play a significant role in their development and critically impact their long-term HIV clinical outcomes, including their persistent engagement with HIV care, their adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and their subsequent viral suppression and survival.

Previous studies with PLWH have demonstrated that perceived stigma—defined as a persistent fear of stigmatization or discrimination —negatively impacts their clinical outcomes.[22,23] Studies have demonstrated that perceived stigma was associated with delayed initiation and presentation to HIV care and negative impacts on long-term retention in care and ART adherence.[24-26] For many adults living with HIV, perceived stigma manifests as fear of accidental disclosure of their status and a secondary loss of resources. Given that we know perceived stigma largely affects the interpersonal relationships of adults living with HIV and their care outcomes, it follows that perceived stigma would be a significant threat to achieving robust ART adherence for ALWH,[28-32] who are already at significant risk for treatment failure, early mortality and morbidity.[33-36]

Therefore, a thorough exploration of perceived stigma and its impact on ALWH and their care outcomes is critically needed and should begin with understanding adolescents’ experiences with anti-HIV stigma. These experiences are difficult to measure or define given that there are few validated, quantitative tools for assessing stigma in this population and no tools for qualitatively assessing perceived stigma specifically. Previous work in this setting and other LMIC has utilized cognitive interviewing techniques to identify a high prevalence of perceived stigma amongst parent-child dyads living with HIV, but has not focused on the experiences of adolescents to ascertain the sources of their perceived stigma.

Our study sought to understand first-hand Kenyan adolescent experiences with stigma, how they understand the stigmatizing beliefs of others, and how these experiences impact their ongoing perception of stigma. Our goal is to learn from our participants’ perspectives in order to identify targets for anti-stigma interventions and demonstrate the importance of understanding the impact of perceived stigma on the care cascade for ALWH.

Methods

Study Design

We conducted a qualitative evaluation of the prevalence and sources of perceived stigma via semi-structured interviews with a sub-set of participants enrolled in the Adolescent Sentinel Cohort (ACE), a large study of ALWH established within the East Africa International Epidemiologic Databases Evaluating AIDS (EA-IeDEA) Consortium. The objective of the ACE study is to provide in-depth characterization of a cohort of perinatally infected adolescents both engaged in and disengaged from care, by describing HIV care-related characteristics, virologic outcomes and mental and behavioral health characteristics.

Study Participants and Setting

Participants were eligible for this study if they were adolescent aged 14 to 19 years at the time of their enrollment in the parent study, aware of their HIV status, on ART, and enrolled in care at 1 of 2 clinics affiliated with the Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH) partnership in Western Kenya. AMPATH is a long-standing partnership between a consortium of North American academic medical centers, Moi University, and Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH) in Eldoret, Kenya, which provides comprehensive HIV care for more than 160 000 individuals.[40-42] Participants were recruited from 1 of 2 AMPATH facilities: the Rafiki Center at MTRH, an urban clinic that provides HIV care services for more than 850 children and adolescents, and the AMPATH Kitale Clinic, a peri-urban facility serving over 600 ALWH.

Data Collection and Analysis

Participants were identified through enrollment in the parent study through convenience sampling with equal representation from the 2 identified clinics. Participants were then contacted by research assistants to inform them of the study opportunity, and if interested, were scheduled to complete the interview during their next clinic visit. Participants provided informed consent to participate in a one-time, recorded interview. Interviews were conducted in both Kiswahili and English by research assistants trained in qualitative interview techniques. A private room was used in each clinic to conduct and record interviews via handheld device.

This study utilized cognitive interviewing techniques to assess adolescent sources of perceived stigma. Participants were asked explicit questions in a specific order in order to adequately frame their experiences with stigma. Table 1 includes the stigma-related interview questions in the order in which they were asked. This line of questioning allowed participants to first identify the targets of their ongoing fears of discrimination, in order to better understand the primary perceived perpetrators of that stigma. In this way, participants were primed with an emotional response (fear or worry) before being asked to recall specific previous experiences that caused the emotional response they just described.[43-45] Therefore, participant experiences of stigma—either first-hand, observed, or overheard—were directly connected to their fears of stigmatization and discrimination. This emotional priming before memory acquisition identifies the source(s) of their perceived stigma.

Table 1.

Semi-Structured Interview Guide—Sub-Section on Stigma.

Order of questions	Question content	Probe/Code/Target
1.	Who knows about your HIV status? (friends, family, teachers, neighbors, HIV+ peers)	Assess who patients have already disclosed to in order to understand level of comfort with known status.
2.	Who does not know about your HIV status? What concerns do you have about disclosing to those people?	Assess who patients have not disclosed to and specifically ask what concerns them about disclosing to these groups
3.	Are you ever worried that other people will treat you differently/badly because of your HIV status? If you are afraid that people will treat you badly because of your HIV status, who do you worry about treating you badly? (friends, family, teachers, neighbors, HIV+ peers)	Assess the prevalence of perceived stigma with yes/no responses to first question stem (descriptive data).Identify the primary target of perceived stigma (ie, the person or groups whom the participant fears will stigmatize them).
4.	What experiences have you had that make you worry about those individuals or groups of individuals treating you badly? What experiences have you had personally? What experiences have you heard about others experiencing? What have they done/said to make you feel this way?	Explicitly connects the targets of participants’ perceived stigma with lived experiences of stigma (enacted, observed, or second-hand narrative) to identify the “sources” of ongoing fears.
5.	If you have been treated badly by others because of your HIV status, would you tell me about that experience? Who treated you badly? (friends, family, teachers, neighbors)Where did this experience take place? (at home, at school, in the clinic)	Describe past experiences of enacted stigma in narrative form that identifies the perpetrator of stigma and the location of stigmatizing experience.
6.	If you have ever seen other young people (friends, classmates, etc.) treated badly because of their HIV status, would you tell me about what you saw? Who treated that other adolescent badly? (friends, family, teachers, neighbors)Where did you see this happen? (at home, at school, in the clinic)	Describe past experiences of observed stigma in narrative form that identifies the perpetrator of stigma against a person other than the participant and the location of that stigmatizing experience.
7.	If you have heard stories about other young people being treated badly because of their HIV status, would you tell me about being told those stories? Who did you hear them from? (friends, family, teachers, neighbors)Where have you heard these stories? (at home, at school, in the clinic)	Describe past experiences of overheard or second-hand stigma in narrative form that identifies the storyteller and the location wherein the participant overheard or was told about the stigmatizing event.
8.	How does it make you feel when you see/hear about other young people being treated badly because of their HIV status? (sad, mad, afraid, etc.)	Assess emotional responses to observed and second-hand stigma, with specific interest in fear-based responses as demonstrative of perceived stigma.

Interviews were translated into English (from Kiswahili), and transcribed for analysis. A system of manual, progressive coding of the transcripts using Dedoose software (Sociocultural Research Consultants, LLC) was utilized to identify emerging concepts. Thematic analysis was done through open coding by 2 researchers (GC and FS), involving line-by-line review of transcripts to identify meanings and processes. These researchers independently extracted and compared themes. Along with an additional analyst (AC), the research team reviewed transcripts several additional times to revise the coding structure as needed and compared and collapsed results based on consensus across the 3 analysts (GC, FS, AC). Axial coding, the process of relating categories to their subcategories and linking them together at the level of properties and dimensions, was used to organize the themes into their causal relationships. Hypotheses and concepts were developed inductively from the data. Quotes as presented here are excerpted directly from the English translations of the transcripts.

Ethical Approvals

This study was approved by the Indiana University School of Medicine’s Institutional Review Board, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, and the Moi University / Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital’s Institutional Research and Ethics Committee in Eldoret, Kenya (approval number 0003338). All participants gave informed consent prior to enrollment in the study. Participants received a one-time reimbursement of 500ksh (5USD) for their time and participation in the study.

Results

Participant Demographics

We enrolled 46 participants in the study; 20 participants were recruited from the urban site, Rafiki Center, and the other 26 from the peri-urban site in Kitale. The majority (54.3%) of participants were male, with an average age of 17.4 years.

Adolescents identify sources of perceived stigma

Identified sources were initially defined by the groups or individuals whom participants described as being primarily responsible for informing their ongoing fears. Table 2 stratifies sources of perceived stigma based on the relationship between the participant and the identified source.

Table 2.

Participant Relationship to Sources of HIV-Related Perceived Stigma.

Sources of perceived stigma	Participant quotations
Caregivers	“My mum is the one who disclosed to me and told me not to tell anyone because she will also not tell anyone. So, I just said if you are not going to tell anyone, it will be a secret between me and you. When the family knows, it becomes a disaster.”—female, 17 years
Educators	Respondent: “‘Let us say people know your status, when they see you coming, they leave. When you want to give them something, they refuse. They look at you badly. When you want to bathe, they leave and go and bathe elsewhere’. . . Yes. We were being told [this] by the teacher.”—female, 15 years
HIV+ Peers	Quote 1: Facilitator: Have you ever heard of someone being treated badly because of their HIV status? Respondent: Yes. They don’t take care of him, they don’t give him bedding to sleep on, they don’t give him food, they don’t take him to school. . .Facilitator: Okay. How did that make you feel when you heard that? Respondent: I feared disclosing to friends and neighbors. Those ones Facilitator: So, when you heard of your friend’s story, you feared to disclose? Respondent: Yes.—male, 16 years Quote 2:“And then I have a friend here [in clinic]. She once told me when she was in high school her friends got to know about it [her HIV status] and then they started rejecting her, treating her badly, they could not take anything from her claiming that if they shared anything with her, they will get the virus.”—female, 19 years
Schoolmates	Quote 1: Facilitator: Have you ever heard stories about people being treated badly because of their HIV status? Respondent: Yeah. I have heard. It is a guy who was one class ahead of me. So, the rest found out that he was HIV positive and they decided that they will move away from that class and leave it for him alone. That they don’t want to get infected. . . He said that he will go and commit suicide. But he transferred. Facilitator: Okay. That is something you heard or saw? Respondent: I saw. Facilitator: When you saw that boy being treated like that, how did you feel? Respondent: I did not feel good. I felt so bad. But again, I feared going there and to be asked: “Are you also positive?” [Laughs]—male, 17 years Quote 2: “Like when you are being taught in school about HIV and then the teacher can start saying those who are taking the drugs, they are taking large tablets and then you would hear your friends saying they will not want to socialize with these people, that they would not want to talk with them.”—female, 19 years

Adolescents describe experiences with HIV-related stigma

Once defined by the identity of perceived stigma’s informants, sources were then defined by specific experiences of anti-HIV stigma that inform participant fears. These experiences were divided into 3 categories: stories of stigma, observed stigma, and previously enacted stigma. These categorizations were made based on the relationship of the participant to the individual experiencing discrimination and are differentiated from one another based on the proximity of the participant to the specific discriminatory act. Table 3 includes descriptions of these experiences.

Table 3.

Descriptions of Experiences Participants Identify and Connect to Ongoing Perceived Stigma.

Types of previous experiences with stigma	Participant quotations
Stories of Enacted Stigma	Quote 1: Respondent: So, there is someone with HIV and then people found it out. From what people think, they think that those who are positive should not be loved, should not be doing many other things because they think they can infect others. So, if you were staying in one room, they separate you to another room. If you were sharing a comb, you will no longer share it. They will give you your own comb. You will be left out and you will start asking yourself, was I born to be tortured? Facilitator: Okay. So that is a story that you heard? Respondent: Yes. The counselor told me. Facilitator: How did it make you feel when you heard that story? Respondent: I was saying to myself that should never happen to me. I felt like if it was me.—female, 15 years Quote 2: Facilitator: Have you ever heard stories of people being treated badly? Respondent: Yes. . . Facilitator: How does it make you feel when you see or hear other young people being treated badly about their HIV status? Respondent: I don’t feel good because I imagine it is me, I put myself in that situation, someone mistreats you, underrates you and that. . . I don’t feel good.—male, 21 years
Direct Observation of Stigma	Quote 1: Facilitator: What experiences have you had that make you worry about those individuals or groups treating you badly? Have you had any worries about disclosing to them? Respondent: There was this girl in the village who they found out she was positive. So, they were like “this girl is positive, I cannot go near her, let her do her own things.” So, what if they know I have it? Will they not just do the same? Before they knew about that girl, they were just interacting well but after they knew it, they discriminated her.—male, 20 years Quote 2: Facilitator: Who do you worry about treating you badly? Respondent: My friends. Facilitator: What experiences have you had of those individuals or groups treating you badly? Have you had an experience that makes you worry? Respondent: Yes. It was in school. There were people who come to act, and they were positive. So, they acted, and they used the cups of the school. We went and someone wanted to use that cup and then my friend told them, “wash that cup, they were all positive and you want to use the cup.”—female, 17 years
Previous Enacted Stigma	Quote 1: Facilitator: What experiences have you had with your friends that you worry about? Respondent: I remember a time I was in primary when the person who knew my status was only the school director. Then there was this friend of mine, he was my friend and also my competitor in class. We would share clothes and then the director saw like I may infect him. So, he [the director] told his father to tell his son to stop sharing everything with me. His father told him: “don’t share everything with that one who is HIV positive.” So, when we crossed ways with that friend - we didn’t even cross ways - I defeated him in class like four consecutive exam times. So, he got angry and said “this boy is HIV positive and defeats me? I will not accept.” He said it in a group and that way it spread to the entire school and everyone knew that I was HIV positive. So, I fear something like that happening again.—male, 17 years Quote 2: Facilitator: Have you had any experiences that you have been stigmatized because of your status? Respondent: First of all, it was only one time when I was in primary school. I shared my story with a friend, I thought my friend was good. He was laughing and it was a disaster. He was a pretender. So, I told my friend and my friend told out and it was rumors between the class and the teacher knew. So, I was like discriminated, I was the topic. Facilitator: How did that make you feel? Respondent: Hey, I just felt like killing myself, to take away my life. You see. But after all I transferred school and at least things changed and then I continued with life. Facilitator: Okay. So, with that experience, it has made. . .[interrupted] Respondent: Until now I have that fear to speak out.—female, 17 years

In this study, participants’ caregivers, their fellow ALWH, and their schoolmates were identified most often. While other individuals (schoolmates, peers, etc.) often contributed to more concrete experiences of discrimination, participants’ caregivers were associated with a more general sense of stigma’s prevalence—highlighted by quotations advising against HIV disclosure and the importance of secrecy to “protect” oneself from stigmatization. Importantly, these individuals inform participant fears through their words and actions but are not necessarily the perceived potential perpetrators of discrimination. Moreover, many of these individuals who contribute to participants’ perceived stigma continue to play ongoing, important roles in participants’ lives.

Participants frequently reported having previously heard stories of stigma occurring, with storytellers representing myriad areas of participants lives—from parents and friends to teachers and healthcare staff. These stories were most often primary accounts of previously enacted stigma that participants had heard from friends and peers living with HIV. Other times the stories were second-hand accounts shared by adults whose intentions cannot be known.

When asked about previously observed discrimination, participants most often identified their friends, schoolmates, and community/village peers as perpetrators of stigma. Respondents described discriminatory beliefs or actions that their peers had expressed or undertaken in their presence and directly connected those experiences to their own ongoing fear of disclosure and subsequent isolation from their school-based peers. It follows that participants were most often concerned with being stigmatized by their friends and schoolmates, and specifically concerned about being socially isolated because of their HIV status. In fact, schoolmates—largely believed by participants to be adolescents not living with HIV—were the most commonly reported group to act as both a source and as perceived perpetrators of stigma.

Finally, participants described their own experiences as the direct targets of enacted stigma. The most common form of enacted stigma our participants had experienced was vengeful or purposeful disclosure by their peers. Participants often described being young and socially close to the perpetrators of discrimination in their stories, which led to very deep emotional responses to being stigmatized. Moreover, participants readily connect these specific experiences with their ongoing fears of stigma and cite them as reasons for their purposeful non-disclosure as adolescents.

Discussion

HIV-related stigma remains a prominent source of fear and influence among ALWH. In order to differentiate sources of perceived stigma from the individuals whom participants perceive as potential perpetrators of stigma, we sought to facilitate the connection between ongoing fears of stigmatization and specific actions or experiences that inform those fears. Participants were primed to focus on the identities of perceived potential perpetrators before being asked to describe specific past experiences that made them “worry” about being stigmatized by these individuals or groups in the future.[46,47] The dialog between the facilitator and the respondent in several quotations throughout Tables 2 and 3 demonstrates participants’ understanding of the relationship between these experiences and their enduring concerns. From this line of questioning, we extrapolate that the experiences participants cite are some of the most salient in relation to their ongoing perception of stigma and therefore function as the sources of their fear.

Our data demonstrate that for many ALWH, the fear of stigmatization based on one’s status is rooted in childhood experiences with anti-HIV stigma, often perpetrated by age mates and peers. These fears are then reinforced by observations of stigmatizing beliefs and discriminatory practices amongst their friends and schoolmates. Other times, they are reinforced by the stories these adolescents hear from their peers living with HIV and from trusted adults, including caregivers and educators. The relationship between individuals as sources of perceived stigma and as perceived potential perpetrators is complex. For example, participants frequently identified their caregivers’ perceptions of stigma to express how it informs their own fears of discrimination without identifying their caregivers as individuals whom they feared. On the other hand, participants often cited their schoolmates as perpetrators of anti-HIV stigma whose stigmatizing statements and discriminatory beliefs inform participant perceptions of the prevalence of stigma among this group and lead to very specific fears of vengeful disclosure and social isolation. These findings are consistent with previous literature addressing the concerns of adults living with HIV, as well as parent-child dyads.[39,52]

Conclusions

Perceived stigma is a common issue affecting ALWH and may exacerbate existing mental health challenges for this group. Given the pervasiveness of ongoing fears of discrimination, it is critical to understand the way that these fears impact ALWH and their engagement in the HIV care cascade. Our data demonstrate how participants connect previous anti-HIV stigma with their understanding of themselves and their own HIV status—often highlighting how these experiences made them feel badly about themselves and worry about being stigmatized in the future. Therefore, anti-HIV stigma interventions remain a critical component of successful long-term HIV care for children and adolescents living with HIV[49,50]. Our results suggest that anti-stigma interventions meant to target the sources of perceived stigma should begin with primary school-aged children and not be delayed until adolescence. Furthermore, our participants identify the school environment as a critical setting for anti-HIV stigma interventions—particularly for faculty, staff, and students who perpetuate stigmatizing beliefs and discriminatory behaviors. Ongoing work with education stakeholders in this setting has demonstrated strong acceptability and desirability for anti-HIV stigma training and support for expansion of resources to local educators and other community groups. Although not specifically probed, school-based anti-stigma interventions were suggested by several participants. One young woman, when asked how we should use the data collected in this study to better care for ALWH, plainly said: “You need to visit schools and teach these other students that we are not different from them.”

Limitations

There are several limitations to this study. The perspectives gathered in this study are from a specific population in western Kenya and may not be generalizable to other regions in SSA or resource-limited settings. Moreover, inclusion criteria for this study required adolescent to be between the ages of 14 and 19 at the time of enrollment in the parent study, which may limit generalizability to other age groups. Lastly, participants were recruited from 2 HIV clinics within the same care system (AMPATH). Despite adolescent services being differently organized at both sites, their affiliation with the same care system may limit their generalizability to other ALWH and their experiences, especially in more rural communities.