| Literature DB >> 35024186 |
Hui Li1,2, Linlin Liu1, Zhiwen Cao1, Wen Li1, Rui Liu1, Youwen Chen1, Chenxi Li1, Yurong Song1, Guangzhi Liu1, Jinghong Hu1, Zhenli Liu3, Cheng Lu4, Yuanyan Liu1.
Abstract
Introduction: Endothelial damage (ED) has been implicated in accelerating the development of atherosclerosis. The latter condition is a risk factor for developing several cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) associated with high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide.Entities:
Keywords: AMPKα/Sirt1 signaling pathway; Endothelial damage; Naringenin; RNA-Seq; eNOS
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35024186 PMCID: PMC8655233 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2021.01.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Res ISSN: 2090-1224 Impact factor: 10.479
Fig. 1Initial exploration of the potential protection and probable pathway of Nar. (A) Effects of different concentration of Nar on cell viability. (B) Effects of different concentration of Hcy on oxidative stress. (C) Effects of Nar on cytoplasmic and mitochondrial ROS. (D) Ca2+ level in different groups. (E) The expression level of NMDA-R1 in different groups. (Scale bar, C: 70 μm; D: 33 μm).
Fig. 2RNA-seq analyses. (A) The DEGs between control and Hcy group. (B) The DEGs between Hcy and Nar group. (C) Cluster analysis of DEGs. (D) GO enrichment analysis of DEGs. (E) KEGG analysis of DEGs.
Fig. 3Effects of Nar on AMPKα/Sirt1 signalling pathway in HUVECs. (A-C) RT-PCR results of AMPKα, Sirt 1 and eNOS. (D) The relative expression of Sirt1 in different groups. (E) The relative expression of AMPKα in different groups. (F) The relative expression of eNOS in different groups.
Fig. 4Effects of siRNA transfection on AMPKα/Sirt1 signalling pathway, ROS generation and NO production. (A-B) Knockdown efficacy of AMPKα and Sirt1. (C-D) Production of NO in different group. (E-F) Relative amount of ROS in different group. (G) Relative expression of eNOS in different group. (H) Relative expression of AMPKα in different group. (I) Relative expression of eNOS in different group. (J) Relative expression of Sirt 1 in different group.
Fig. 5Effects of Nar on mitochondrial dysfunction, histomorphology and in vivo AMPKα/Sirt1 signaling pathway. (A) Concentration of cytochrome c level in mitochondria or cytoplasm in different groups. (B) Mitochondrial membrane potential in different groups. (Scale bar: 33 μm). (C) Concentration of Hcy in rat plasma after H-Met fed for 4 weeks. (D) The expression level of SOD in different groups. (E) The concentration of NO in rat’s plasma. (F) The concentration of MDA in rat’s plasma. (G) Histopathology of thoracic aortas in control group. (H) Histopathology of thoracic aortas in H-Met group. (I) Histopathology of thoracic aortas in Nar group. Distinct histopathological characteristic in each group are indicated by arrowhead. (Scale bar = 10 μm, Magnification: 200×). (J) Western blotting analysis of AMPKα, Sirt 1 and eNOS in different groups. (K) The relative expression of AMPKα in different group. (L) The relative expression of Sirt 1 in different group. (M) The relative expression of eNOS in different group.
Fig. 6The schematic diagram of therapeutic mechanism of Nar against Hcy induced endothelial dysfunction. Obviously, Nar can elevate AMPKα/Sirt1 signaling pathway consequently rescue the Ca2+ disrupted mitochondrial function and reduce the ROS production. Furthermore, activated AMPKα/Sirt1 signaling pathway will upregulate the activity of downstream protein of eNOS subsequently increase the production of NO, ultimately ameliorate the ED.