Sha He1, Zeneng Cheng1, Feifan Xie1. 1. Division of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Appropriate gentamicin dosing in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) patients remains undefined. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of gentamicin in CRRT patients and to infer the optimal dosing regimen for gentamicin. METHODS: Fourteen CRRT patients dosed with gentamicin were included to establish a population PK model to characterize the variabilities and influential covariates of gentamicin. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment and risk of toxicity for different combinations of gentamicin regimens (3-7 mg/kg q24h) and CRRT effluent doses (30-50 mL/h/kg) were evaluated by Monte Carlo simulation. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was determined for the PK/PD indices of the ratio of drug peak concentration/minimum inhibitory concentration (Cmax/MIC > 10) and the ratio of area under the drug concentration-time curve/MIC over 24 h (AUC0-24h/MIC > 100), and the risk of toxicity was estimated by drug trough concentration thresholds (1 and 2 mg/L). RESULTS: A one-compartment model adequately described the PK characteristics of gentamicin. Covariates including body weight, age, gender, and CRRT modality did not influence the PK parameters of gentamicin based on our dataset. All studied gentamicin regimens failed to achieve satisfactory PTAs for pathogens with an MIC ≥2 mg/L. A good balance of PK/PD target attainment and risk of toxicity (>2 mg/L) was achieved under 7 mg/kg gentamicin q24h and 40 mL/kg/h CRRT dose for an MIC ≤1 mg/L. CRRT dose intensity had a significant impact on the target attainment of AUC0-24h/MIC >100 and risk of toxicity. CONCLUSION: A combination of 7 mg/kg gentamicin q24h and 40 mL/kg/h CRRT dose might be considered as a starting treatment option for CRRT patients, and drug monitoring is required to manage toxicity.
PURPOSE: Appropriate gentamicin dosing in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) patients remains undefined. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of gentamicin in CRRT patients and to infer the optimal dosing regimen for gentamicin. METHODS: Fourteen CRRT patients dosed with gentamicin were included to establish a population PK model to characterize the variabilities and influential covariates of gentamicin. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment and risk of toxicity for different combinations of gentamicin regimens (3-7 mg/kg q24h) and CRRT effluent doses (30-50 mL/h/kg) were evaluated by Monte Carlo simulation. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was determined for the PK/PD indices of the ratio of drug peak concentration/minimum inhibitory concentration (Cmax/MIC > 10) and the ratio of area under the drug concentration-time curve/MIC over 24 h (AUC0-24h/MIC > 100), and the risk of toxicity was estimated by drug trough concentration thresholds (1 and 2 mg/L). RESULTS: A one-compartment model adequately described the PK characteristics of gentamicin. Covariates including body weight, age, gender, and CRRT modality did not influence the PK parameters of gentamicin based on our dataset. All studied gentamicin regimens failed to achieve satisfactory PTAs for pathogens with an MIC ≥2 mg/L. A good balance of PK/PD target attainment and risk of toxicity (>2 mg/L) was achieved under 7 mg/kg gentamicin q24h and 40 mL/kg/h CRRT dose for an MIC ≤1 mg/L. CRRT dose intensity had a significant impact on the target attainment of AUC0-24h/MIC >100 and risk of toxicity. CONCLUSION: A combination of 7 mg/kg gentamicin q24h and 40 mL/kg/h CRRT dose might be considered as a starting treatment option for CRRT patients, and drug monitoring is required to manage toxicity.
Authors: Anand Kumar; Daniel Roberts; Kenneth E Wood; Bruce Light; Joseph E Parrillo; Satendra Sharma; Robert Suppes; Daniel Feinstein; Sergio Zanotti; Leo Taiberg; David Gurka; Aseem Kumar; Mary Cheang Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Nadezda Petejova; Jana Zahalkova; Jana Duricova; Ivana Kacirova; Hana Brozmanova; Karel Urbanek; Milan Grundmann; Arnost Martinek Journal: J Chemother Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 1.714
Authors: Jeannet C Bos; Jan M Prins; Mabor C Mistício; Ginto Nunguiane; Cláudia N Lang; José C Beirão; Ron A A Mathôt; Reinier M van Hest Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2019-03-27 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Jose Garnacho-Montero; Jose Luis Garcia-Garmendia; Ana Barrero-Almodovar; Francisco J Jimenez-Jimenez; Carmen Perez-Paredes; Carlos Ortiz-Leyba Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: C Fleischmann-Struzek; L Mellhammar; N Rose; A Cassini; K E Rudd; P Schlattmann; B Allegranzi; K Reinhart Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Deirdre M D'Arcy; Eoin Casey; Caitriona M Gowing; Maria B Donnelly; Owen I Corrigan Journal: BMC Pharmacol Toxicol Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 2.483
Authors: Hinojal Zazo; Eduardo Lagarejos; Manuel Prado-Velasco; Sergio Sánchez-Herrero; Jenifer Serna; Almudena Rueda-Ferreiro; Ana Martín-Suárez; M Victoria Calvo; Jonás Samuel Pérez-Blanco; José M Lanao Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2022-09-28 Impact factor: 5.988