Literature DB >> 35022937

Evaluation of multimodal intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during supratentorial aneurysm surgery: a comparative study.

Júlia Miró Lladó1,2, P López-Ojeda3, J Pedro4, A Marnov3, L Contreras5, L Pariente5, A Gabarrós3, I Fernández-Conejero4.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine the role of multimodal intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) in the overall outcome of intracranial aneurysms surgery, and the risk factors associated with ischemic complications. We grouped 268 ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms surgically treated at our institution into 2 cohorts, based on the use of IONM (180; 67.16%) or non-use of IONM (88; 32.84%). The IONM technique used was multimodal: electroencephalogram (EEG), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), transcranial (TES), and direct cortical (DCS) stimulation motor evoked potentials (MEPs). There was a significant difference, with a reduction in perioperative strokes (p = 0.011) and better motor surgery-related outcome in the IONM group (p = 0.016). Independent risk factors identified for surgery ischemic complications were temporary clipping time ≥ 6'05″ (odds ratio [OR]: 3.03; 95% CI: 1.068-8.601; p = 0.037), aneurysm size ≥ 7.5 mm (OR: 2.65; 95% CI: 1.127-6.235; p = 0.026), and non-use of IONM (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: 1.171-6.636; p = 0.021). Conversely, aneurysm rupture was not detected as an independent risk factor (OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 0.55-4.55; p = 0.4). Longer temporary clipping time, larger aneurysm size, and the non-use of IONM could be considered as risk factors for ischemic complications during microsurgical clipping. A standardized designed protocol including multimodal IONM with DCS provides continuous information about blood supply and allows reduction of treatment-related morbidity. Multimodal IONM is a valuable technique in intracranial aneurysm surgery.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous monitoring; Evoked potentials; Intracranial aneurysms; Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring; Supratentorial aneurysm surgery

Year:  2022        PMID: 35022937     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01710-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  3 in total

1.  Motor evoked potential monitoring during cerebral aneurysm surgery: technical aspects and comparison of transcranial and direct cortical stimulation.

Authors:  Andrea Szelényi; Karl Kothbauer; Adauri Bueno de Camargo; David Langer; Eugene S Flamm; Vedran Deletis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Prevention of ischemic complications during aneurysm surgery.

Authors:  Andreas Raabe; Kathleen Seidel
Journal:  J Neurosurg Sci       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Monitoring cerebral ischemia during cerebrovascular surgery.

Authors:  Hong Zhang; Ling-Zhong Meng; Russ Lyon; Dong-Xin Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2017-07-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.