Literature DB >> 35022849

Inter-specific variability in demographic processes affects abundance-occupancy relationships.

Bilgecan Şen1, H Reşit Akçakaya2.   

Abstract

Species with large local abundances tend to occupy more sites. One of the mechanisms proposed to explain this widely reported inter-specific relationship is a cross-scale hypothesis based on dynamics at the population level. Called the vital rates mechanism; it uses within-population demographic processes of population growth and density dependence to predict when inter-specific abundance-occupancy relationships can arise and when these relationships can weaken and even turn negative. Even though the vital rates mechanism is mathematically simple, its predictions has never been tested directly because of the difficulty estimating the demographic parameters involved. Here, using a recently introduced mark-recapture analysis method, we show that there is no relationship between abundance and occupancy among 17 bird species. Our results are consistent with the predictions of the vital rate mechanism regarding the demographic processes that are expected to weaken this relationship. Specifically, we find that intrinsic growth rate and local abundance are not correlated, and density dependence strength shows considerable variation across species. Variability in density dependence strength is related to variability in species-level local average abundance and intrinsic growth rate; species with lower growth rate have higher abundance and are strongly regulated by density dependent processes, especially acting on survival rates. More generally, our findings support a cross-scale mechanism of macroecological abundance-occupancy relationship emerging from density-dependent dynamics at the population level.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Density-dependence; Intrinsic growth; Macroecology; Mark-recapture; Population demography

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35022849     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-021-05085-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

Review 1.  Causality of the relationship between geographic distribution and species abundance.

Authors:  Michael Krabbe Borregaard; Carsten Rahbek
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.875

2.  Abundance-area relationships in bird assemblages along an Afrotropical elevational gradient: space limitation in montane forest selects for higher population densities.

Authors:  Michal Ferenc; Jon Fjeldså; Ondřej Sedláček; Francis Njie Motombi; Eric Djomo Nana; Karolína Mudrová; David Hořák
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Distributions of habitat suitability and the abundance-occupancy relationship.

Authors:  Robert P Freckleton; David Noble; Thomas J Webb
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Variations on a theme: sources of heterogeneity in the form of the interspecific relationship between abundance and distribution.

Authors:  Tim M Blackburn; Phillip Cassey; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Evaluation of downscaled, gridded climate data for the conterminous United States.

Authors:  R Behnke; S Vavrus; A Allstadt; T Albright; W E Thogmartin; V C Radeloff
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Models for estimating abundance from repeated counts of an open metapopulation.

Authors:  D Dail; L Madsen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.571

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.