Literature DB >> 35022234

GATOR2 complex-mediated amino acid signaling regulates brain myelination.

Zongyan Yu1,2,3, Zhiwen Yang2,3, Guoru Ren2,3, Yingjie Wang2,3, Xiang Luo1,3, Feiyan Zhu2,3, Shouyang Yu4, Lanlan Jia4, Mina Chen4, Paul F Worley5, Bo Xiao6,3.   

Abstract

Amino acids are essential for cell growth and metabolism. Amino acid and growth factor signaling pathways coordinately regulate the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) kinase in cell growth and organ development. While major components of amino acid signaling mechanisms have been identified, their biological functions in organ development are unclear. We aimed to understand the functions of the critically positioned amino acid signaling complex GAP activity towards Rags 2 (GATOR2) in brain development. GATOR2 mediates amino acid signaling to mTORC1 by directly linking the amino acid sensors for arginine and leucine to downstream signaling complexes. Now, we report a role of GATOR2 in oligodendrocyte myelination in postnatal brain development. We show that the disruption of GATOR2 complex by genetic deletion of meiosis regulator for oocyte development (Mios, encoding a component of GATOR2) selectively impairs the formation of myelinating oligodendrocytes, thus brain myelination, without apparent effects on the formation of neurons and astrocytes. The loss of Mios impairs cell cycle progression of oligodendrocyte precursor cells, leading to their reduced proliferation and differentiation. Mios deletion manifests a cell type-dependent effect on mTORC1 in the brain, with oligodendroglial mTORC1 selectively affected. However, the role of Mios/GATOR2 in oligodendrocyte formation and myelination involves mTORC1-independent function. This study suggests that GATOR2 coordinates amino acid and growth factor signaling to regulate oligodendrocyte myelination.
Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GATOR2; Mios; amino acid signaling; myelination; oligodendrocytes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35022234      PMCID: PMC8784133          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2110917119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


Brain myelination is essential for the formation of functional neural circuitry in postnatal brain development (1). During the postnatal development, axons of brain neurons are wrapped with myelin sheath/membrane (rich in phospholipid and myelin protein) extended from oligodendrocytes. The myelin sheath facilitates fast conduction of nerve impulses along axons, which is required for neuronal processing and integration of information encoded in nerve impulses. Deficit in oligodendrocyte formation and myelination is implicated in neurological and psychiatric diseases (2, 3). Myelination starts with the commitment of neural stem cells to the oligodendrocyte lineage, the formation of oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs). OPCs divide several rounds before exiting the cell cycle and become postmitotic oligodendrocytes that further mature to myelin-forming oligodendrocytes (4, 5). This process involves extensive growth of oligodendrocyte processes, which demands synthesis of large amounts of biomaterial (e.g., myelin membrane). How the formation of the oligodendrocyte lineage and subsequent myelination are regulated remains incompletely understood. Previous studies have established that cell growth (increase in cell mass), proliferation, and differentiation of the oligodendrocyte lineage are regulated by growth factors that signal through protein kinase B (PKB/AKT), tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), and ras homologue enriched in brain (Rheb) to mTORC1 (mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1) kinase complex (6–11). mTORC1 is a master regulator of cellular metabolism, including protein and lipid synthesis (12). Therefore, mTORC1 plays an important role in tissue/organ growth and development. Tissue/organ growth and development are dependent on the availability of nutrients, in particular amino acids (13, 14), which support cell growth in mass and proliferation (14). Nutrient supply is critically required for the formation of neural tissues (15), and early nutrition influences developmental myelination and cognition in infants and young children (16). The past decade has also seen an enormous progress toward biochemical understanding of amino acid sensing/signaling pathways (17), but the biological functions of amino acid sensing/signaling pathways in tissue growth and development are unknown. We aimed to examine the amino acid signaling pathways that regulate oligodendrocyte formation and myelination in coordination with growth factor signaling. Studies of amino acid signaling pathways have been centered on the conserved lysosome-based GATOR (GAP activity towards Rags)–Rag pathway. Being conserved from the single-cell organism yeast (18) to metazoans (19), the GATOR–Rag pathway is involved in sensing multiple amino acids (20–23). In the presence of sufficient amounts of amino acids, recombination activating gene (Rag, a heterodimeric GTPase complex, RagA/B and RagC/D) recruits/anchors Raptor containing mTORC1 kinase complex to the surface of the lysosome (24, 25), where mTORC1 is activated by the growth factor–stimulated TSC/Rheb axis (26). Rag GTPase is regulated by GATOR1 (composed of DEPDC5, NPRL2, and NPRL3) and its upstream GATOR2 complex [composed of Mios, WDR24, WDR59, SEH1L, and SEC13 (27)]. GATOR1 inhibits Rag GTPase, while GATOR2 suppresses the inhibitory function of GATOR1 (GTPase activating protein) toward Rag GTPase. Therefore, GATOR2 functions upstream of GATOR1 as an activator of mTORC1 in amino acid signaling (22, 27). To examine the role of amino acid signaling in brain development, we asked how disrupting GATOR2 function would affect oligodendrocyte myelination in the brain because GATOR2 is a critical link between amino acid sensors and the downstream protein complex signaling to mTORC1. Studies of heterologous cells and Drosophila predict that genetic knockout of the GATOR2 component Mios in the mouse would disrupt GATOR function, resulting in the reduction of mTORC1 activity (27, 28). We generated Mios genetic conditional knockout (cKO) mice and found in surprise that Mios cKO in neural stem cells and their progeny affects mTORC1 signaling in a cell type–dependent manner and that Mios cKO selectively impairs the formation of the oligodendrocyte lineage and brain myelination, without apparent effects on the formation of neurons and astrocytes. The finding identifies GATOR2 as an important positive regulator of oligodendrocyte formation and myelination. In addition, we show that GATOR2 plays a role in coordinate regulation of oligodendrocyte myelination by amino acid and growth factor signaling pathways.

Results

Mios Deletion in Neural Stem Cells Selectively Affects the Oligodendrocyte Lineage.

Mios, an evolutionarily conserved protein, contains multiple WD40 protein–protein interaction repeats, as illustrated (). It is widely expressed in the mouse tissues (). In the brain, Mios is expressed in neurons and glia (oligodendrocytes and astrocytes), with more abundance in neurons (). To understand the physiological functions of the Mios-containing GATOR2 complex in vivo, we generated the floxed Mios (Mios f/f) mouse (). Germline deletion of Mios caused embryonic lethality around embryonic day 9. Conditional deletion of Mios (Mios cKO) in neural stem cells with Nestin-Cre (29) driver yielded offspring in Mendelian ratios, and the offspring with Mios homozygous knockout grew with normal body weight gain. Western blotting of the adult brain showed a drastic reduction in Mios protein, confirming a robust Mios deletion in neural cells of the brain (). Albeit being slightly reduced in size, the Mios cKO brain was largely comparable with that of the normal control in gross anatomical structures (). Histological examination of the cellular composition of the brain revealed that the formation of neurons and astrocytes in the Mios f/f; Nestin-Cre mouse appeared normal (); however, the formation of the oligodendrocyte lineage was significantly impaired, as indicated by the assessment of oligodendrocyte lineage markers Olig2 and Sox10 (30). We found that the number of Olig2+ Sox10+ DAPI+(4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) cells was significantly reduced in the corpus callosum of the Mios f/f; Nestin-Cre mouse (Fig. 1 ). In addition, brain myelination was significantly impaired; Black Gold staining and Luxol Fast Blue staining each showed reduced staining in gray and white matter of the forebrain of the Mios f/f; Nestin-Cre mouse (Fig. 1 ), indicating hypomyelination in the brain. Antibody staining of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) and myelin basic protein (MBP) also revealed reduced intensity of staining in the corpus callosum and cortex (Fig. 1 ). Western blotting and qRT-PCR further showed that the protein and messenger RNA (mRNA) levels related to multiple myelin proteins were reduced in the cortex and hippocampus (Fig. 1 ). All these findings suggest that deletion of Mios in neural stem cells selectively affects oligodendrocyte formation and myelination in the brain.
Fig. 1.

Myelination deficit in Mios f/f; Nestin-Cre cKO mice. (A and B) Immunostaining and quantitation of Olig2+ Sox10+ DAPI+cells showing decreased oligodendrocyte number in the corpus callosum (CC) of the 3-wk Mios f/f; Nestin-Cre mouse. Arrowheads indicate Olig2+ Sox10+ cells (n = 3 pairs of mice). (C) Black Gold staining and (D) Luxol Fast Blue staining showing reduced staining in the CC of the 4-wk Mios f/f; Nestin-Cre mouse. (E and F) Reduced immunostaining of (E) MOG and (F) MBP in the CC and cerebral cortex (CTX) of the 4-wk Mios f/f; Nestin-Cre mouse. (Scale bars: A, C, and D, 50 μm; E and F, 200 μm.) (G and H) Western blots and quantifications (percentage of control [Ctrl]) showing reduced myelin proteins in the CTX and hippocampus (HIP) of the 6-wk Mios f/f; Nestin-Cre mouse (n = 4 pairs of mice). (I) qRT-PCR analysis showing decreased mRNA levels (percentage of Ctrl) of myelin genes in the CTX and HIP of the 6-wk Mios f/f; Nestin-Cre mouse (n = 5 pairs of mice). Data are represented as mean ± SEM and analyzed with the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.

Myelination deficit in Mios f/f; Nestin-Cre cKO mice. (A and B) Immunostaining and quantitation of Olig2+ Sox10+ DAPI+cells showing decreased oligodendrocyte number in the corpus callosum (CC) of the 3-wk Mios f/f; Nestin-Cre mouse. Arrowheads indicate Olig2+ Sox10+ cells (n = 3 pairs of mice). (C) Black Gold staining and (D) Luxol Fast Blue staining showing reduced staining in the CC of the 4-wk Mios f/f; Nestin-Cre mouse. (E and F) Reduced immunostaining of (E) MOG and (F) MBP in the CC and cerebral cortex (CTX) of the 4-wk Mios f/f; Nestin-Cre mouse. (Scale bars: A, C, and D, 50 μm; E and F, 200 μm.) (G and H) Western blots and quantifications (percentage of control [Ctrl]) showing reduced myelin proteins in the CTX and hippocampus (HIP) of the 6-wk Mios f/f; Nestin-Cre mouse (n = 4 pairs of mice). (I) qRT-PCR analysis showing decreased mRNA levels (percentage of Ctrl) of myelin genes in the CTX and HIP of the 6-wk Mios f/f; Nestin-Cre mouse (n = 5 pairs of mice). Data are represented as mean ± SEM and analyzed with the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.

Mios Regulates Oligodendrocyte Myelination in an Oligodendrocyte-Intrinsic Manner.

The selective effect of Mios deletion on the oligodendrocyte lineage prompted us to examine if the effect of Mios cKO on brain myelination is oligodendrocyte intrinsic. Toward this goal, we genetically deleted Mios in the OPCs (Olig2-cre) (31) and examined how oligodendrocyte myelination in the brain is affected. We found that deletion of Mios in OPCs (Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre) recapitulated the myelination deficit noted in the brain of the Mios f/f; Nestin-Cre mouse, as indicated by reduced intensity of Black Gold and MBP staining in the corpus callosum and cortex (Fig. 2 ) and reduced expressions of myelin genes and proteins in the cortex and hippocampus (Fig. 2 ). Electron microscopy (EM) showed that the number of unmyelinated axons in the optic nerve of the 4-wk Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse was increased to 50% compared with 15% in the control mouse (Fig. 2 ), highlighting a developmental hypomyelination. The myelination deficit in the Mios cKO mouse persists to adulthood; EM revealed that in the 10-wk Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse, the unmyelinated axons in the optic nerves still account for 30% vs. 10% in the control mouse (Fig. 2 ). Additionally, in the corpus callosum, the number of unmyelinated axons was increased to 70%, relative to 30% in the age-matched control (). In addition, the g ratio of the myelinated axons in the optic nerve of the Mios cKO mouse was significantly increased, indicative of a reduction in the thickness of the myelin wraps (Fig. 2). The average diameters of unmyelinated and myelinated axons in the optic nerve of the 4-wk Mios cKO mouse were comparable with those of the control mice, and the distributions of axon diameters in the optic nerves of the Mios cKO and control mice were similar, which suggest no axon degeneration/loss in the Mios cKO brain (). Reduced Black Gold staining intensity and myelin protein expressions were apparent even in the 6-mo mouse (). At this time point, Mios cKO mice did not exhibit apparent abnormalities in motor coordination and general activity levels/gross motor activity (). All these findings indicate that Mios in oligodendroglia plays a cell-intrinsic role in regulating developmental myelination and that the loss of Mios causes persistent hypomyelination to adulthood.
Fig. 2.

Oligodendrocyte-intrinsic Mios regulates myelination in the central nervous system (CNS). (A) Black Gold staining showing decreased myelin staining in the corpus callosum (CC) of the 4-wk Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse. (B) Immunostaining showing decreased MBP staining in the cerebral cortex (CTX; boxed area) of the 4-wk Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse. (C and D) Western blots and quantifications (percentage of control [Ctrl]) showing reduced myelin proteins in the CTX and hippocampus (HIP) of the 6-wk Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse (n = 4 pairs of mice). (E) qRT-PCR showing decreased mRNA levels (percentage of Ctrl) of myelin protein genes in the CTX and HIP of the 6-wk Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse (n = 5 pairs of mice). (F) EM of the optic nerves from 4- and 10-wk Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mice. Red asterisks indicate unmyelinated axons. (Scale bars: A and B, 50 μm; F, 1 μm.) (G) Quantification of unmyelinated axons in F showing reduced myelination in 4- and 10-wk Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mice (n is the numbers of pairs of mice as indicated). (H) The g ratio of myelinated axons in the optic nerves from 10-wk Ctrl and Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mice (n = 3 pairs of mice). Data are represented as mean ± SEM and analyzed with the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.

Oligodendrocyte-intrinsic Mios regulates myelination in the central nervous system (CNS). (A) Black Gold staining showing decreased myelin staining in the corpus callosum (CC) of the 4-wk Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse. (B) Immunostaining showing decreased MBP staining in the cerebral cortex (CTX; boxed area) of the 4-wk Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse. (C and D) Western blots and quantifications (percentage of control [Ctrl]) showing reduced myelin proteins in the CTX and hippocampus (HIP) of the 6-wk Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse (n = 4 pairs of mice). (E) qRT-PCR showing decreased mRNA levels (percentage of Ctrl) of myelin protein genes in the CTX and HIP of the 6-wk Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse (n = 5 pairs of mice). (F) EM of the optic nerves from 4- and 10-wk Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mice. Red asterisks indicate unmyelinated axons. (Scale bars: A and B, 50 μm; F, 1 μm.) (G) Quantification of unmyelinated axons in F showing reduced myelination in 4- and 10-wk Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mice (n is the numbers of pairs of mice as indicated). (H) The g ratio of myelinated axons in the optic nerves from 10-wk Ctrl and Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mice (n = 3 pairs of mice). Data are represented as mean ± SEM and analyzed with the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. Then, we asked if the effect of Mios cKO on myelination is region specific. We addressed this question using western blotting to assess myelin protein reduction in multiple brain regions (including the cortex, hippocampus, optic nerve, striatum, and cerebellum). The data show consistent reductions in myelin proteins in all these regions (), albeit with varying degrees to each individual myelin protein. Likewise, MBP staining shows reduced intensity of myelinated fibers in the cortex and cerebellum of the Mios cKO mouse (). Therefore, the hypomyelination is widespread in the brain of the Mios cKO mouse, which supports the notion that the amino acid sensing in oligodendrocyte in which Mios participated plays a general role in oligodendrocyte myelination in the brain. Altered neuronal signaling pathways can also affect oligodendrocyte formation and myelination (32). To rule out a role of neuronal Mios expression in oligodendrocyte myelination, we genetically deleted Mios in neurons (CamKII-Cre) (29). Consistent with the abundant expression of Mios in neurons, CamKII-Cre-mediated deletion of Mios in neurons significantly reduced Mios in the brain (). However, axonal growth and myelination were preserved (). These findings suggest that neuronal Mios does not contribute to the regulation of brain myelination and enhance the point that the myelination deficit in the Mios cKO mouse is an oligodendrocyte-intrinsic effect.

Mios cKO Affects the Proliferation and Differentiation of OPCs.

Now that the myelination deficit of the Mios cKO mouse is an oligodendrocyte-intrinsic effect, we examined how the formation of the oligodendrocyte lineage is altered by Mios cKO in OPCs. Like Mios f/f; Nestin-Cre cKO, the Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre cKO mouse reduced the production of oligodendrocyte lineage cells (Olig2+ Sox10+) to a similar extent (Fig. 3 ), which is consistent with an oligodendrocyte-intrinsic role of Mios. Mios cKO does not affect the survival of oligodendrocytes; no increase in apoptosis of the oligodendrocyte lineage was noted in the brain or in cultures ().
Fig. 3.

Impairment in the proliferation and differentiation of Mios cKO OPCs. (A and B) Olig2 and Sox10 staining and quantitation showing decreased numbers of oligodendrocytes in the corpus callosum (CC) of 6-wk control (Ctrl) and Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mice. Arrowheads indicate Olig2+ Sox10+ cells (n = 3 for Ctrl, n = 5 for Mios cKO). (C–F) Paired Olig2 staining with PDGFRα or CC1 and quantifications (percentage of Ctrl) showing the reduction in the numbers of OPCs and differentiated oligodendrocytes, respectively, in the CC of the Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse. Arrowheads indicate Olig2+ PDGFRα+ and Olig2+ CC1+ cells (P3 to P5: n = 7 for Ctrl, n = 4 for Mios cKO; 2 wk: n = 4 for Ctrl, n = 3 for Mios cKO; 6 wk: n = 4 for Ctrl, n = 4 for Mios cKO). (G–I) BrdU and CC1 double labeling and quantification showing a decreased ratio of BrdU+CC1+/BrdU+ in the CC of the 3-wk Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse. Diagram showing the time points of BrdU administration and perfusion (G). Arrows indicate BrdU+ cells, and arrowheads indicate BrdU+ CC1+ cells (n = 3 for Ctrl, n = 5 for Mios cKO). (J–L) Olig2 and BrdU staining and quantification showing the reduction in the number of proliferating OPCs in the CC of the P3 Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse (K and L). (J) Illustration showing the time points of BrdU administration. Arrowheads indicate BrdU+ Olig2+ cells (J; n = 5 pairs of mice). (M–P) EdU and BrdU labeling showing cycling OPCs in the CC of the P3 Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse (O and P), the experimental paradigm (M) illustrating the sequential labeling of OPCs with EdU and BrdU for the determination of the duration of S phase, and the calculation of Ts (N). Arrows indicate EdU+ BrdU− cells, and arrowheads indicate EdU+ BrdU+ cells (n = 8 pairs of mice). (Q–S) BrdU and Ki67 double labeling and quantification showing the increased ratio of BrdU+ Ki67+/BrdU+ in the CC of the P5 Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse (R and S). Illustration (Q) showing the time points of BrdU administration and perfusion. Arrows indicate BrdU+ cells, and arrowheads indicate BrdU+ Ki67+ cells (n = 5 for Ctrl, n = 6 for Mios cKO). Scells are cells in S phase, and Lcells are cells exiting S phase. Ts is the duration of S phase, and Ti is the interval time of EdU and BrdU. Data are represented as mean ± SEM and analyzed with the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. (Scale bars: A, C, D, H, K, O, and R, 50 μm.) *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001.

Impairment in the proliferation and differentiation of Mios cKO OPCs. (A and B) Olig2 and Sox10 staining and quantitation showing decreased numbers of oligodendrocytes in the corpus callosum (CC) of 6-wk control (Ctrl) and Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mice. Arrowheads indicate Olig2+ Sox10+ cells (n = 3 for Ctrl, n = 5 for Mios cKO). (C–F) Paired Olig2 staining with PDGFRα or CC1 and quantifications (percentage of Ctrl) showing the reduction in the numbers of OPCs and differentiated oligodendrocytes, respectively, in the CC of the Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse. Arrowheads indicate Olig2+ PDGFRα+ and Olig2+ CC1+ cells (P3 to P5: n = 7 for Ctrl, n = 4 for Mios cKO; 2 wk: n = 4 for Ctrl, n = 3 for Mios cKO; 6 wk: n = 4 for Ctrl, n = 4 for Mios cKO). (G–I) BrdU and CC1 double labeling and quantification showing a decreased ratio of BrdU+CC1+/BrdU+ in the CC of the 3-wk Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse. Diagram showing the time points of BrdU administration and perfusion (G). Arrows indicate BrdU+ cells, and arrowheads indicate BrdU+ CC1+ cells (n = 3 for Ctrl, n = 5 for Mios cKO). (J–L) Olig2 and BrdU staining and quantification showing the reduction in the number of proliferating OPCs in the CC of the P3 Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse (K and L). (J) Illustration showing the time points of BrdU administration. Arrowheads indicate BrdU+ Olig2+ cells (J; n = 5 pairs of mice). (M–P) EdU and BrdU labeling showing cycling OPCs in the CC of the P3 Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse (O and P), the experimental paradigm (M) illustrating the sequential labeling of OPCs with EdU and BrdU for the determination of the duration of S phase, and the calculation of Ts (N). Arrows indicate EdU+ BrdU− cells, and arrowheads indicate EdU+ BrdU+ cells (n = 8 pairs of mice). (Q–S) BrdU and Ki67 double labeling and quantification showing the increased ratio of BrdU+ Ki67+/BrdU+ in the CC of the P5 Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse (R and S). Illustration (Q) showing the time points of BrdU administration and perfusion. Arrows indicate BrdU+ cells, and arrowheads indicate BrdU+ Ki67+ cells (n = 5 for Ctrl, n = 6 for Mios cKO). Scells are cells in S phase, and Lcells are cells exiting S phase. Ts is the duration of S phase, and Ti is the interval time of EdU and BrdU. Data are represented as mean ± SEM and analyzed with the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. (Scale bars: A, C, D, H, K, O, and R, 50 μm.) *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001. To better understand how Mios deletion reduces the formation of the oligodendrocyte lineage, we assessed the numbers of OPCs and differentiated oligodendrocytes in the Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse by immunostaining. During the early postnatal stage, OPCs proliferate and form a stable pool, with OPCs evenly distributed in the brain and maintained throughout the adult brain (33). In the rodent brain, the great majority of oligodendrocyte lineage cells are formed during the first 6 wk after birth. We found that the numbers of both OPCs (Olig2+ PDGFRα+) and differentiated oligodendrocytes (Olig2+ CC1+) were reduced in the brain of the Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse (Fig. 3 ). The reduction in the number of differentiated oligodendrocytes is consistent with the finding obtained by cumulative 5-bromo-2'-dexoyuridine (BrdU) labeling to examine the production of differentiated oligodendrocytes from proliferative OPCs. The number of differentiated oligodendrocytes (BrdU+ CC1+) derived from the initially BrdU-labeled OPC pool was reduced in the corpus callosum of the Mios cKO mouse (Fig. 3 ). Acute BrdU labeling (2 h) in the early postnatal mice revealed that the number of proliferative cells of the oligodendrocyte lineage (BrdU+ Olig2+) was reduced in the Mios cKO mouse (Fig. 3 ), suggesting that Mios plays a role in the regulation of OPCs proliferation. DNA replication is a key event in cell division; altered S-phase length is characteristic of dysregulated cell proliferation (34). We assessed the duration of the DNA synthesis phase (Ts) of OPCs through sequentially injecting BrdU and EdU (5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine). The data we obtained show that the Ts of the Mios cKO OPCs was prolonged (Fig. 3 ). To further assess the cell cycle progression of Mios cKO OPCs in the corpus callosum, we performed BrdU and Ki67 (antigen identified by monoclonal antibody Ki67) double labeling. BrdU+ Ki67+ colabeling indicates OPCs in the cycling mode, whereas BrdU+ Ki67− OPCs are out of the cell cycle. We found that the proportion of BrdU+Ki67+ OPCs in the corpus callosum of the Mios cKO brain was significantly higher than that of control brain (Fig. 3 ). This result is consistent with the increase in Ts (duration of S phase) of the Mios cKO OPCs and indicates that the cell cycle progression of Mios cKO OPCs was impaired. In further support of the notion that Mios cKO impairs the progression of S phase, S phase–related proteins Cyclin A2 and CDK2 (35) were reduced in the Mios cKO OPCs (). The increased OPCs in cycling mode suggest that the cell cycle exit of the Mios cKO OPCs would be delayed, which could reduce the differentiation of OPCs to postmitotic oligodendrocytes expressing the CC1 marker.

Mios Transgene Restores Oligodendrocyte Myelination in Mios cKO Mouse.

To further validate that the loss of Mios function is responsible for the deficit in oligodendrocyte formation and myelination, we generated Mios conditional transgenic (cTG) mouse using Rosa26 knock in () and performed genetic rescue of the Mios cKO mouse. First, we validated the Cre-dependent expression of the Mios transgene. Expression of the Mios transgene tagged with hemagglutinin (HA) was readily detected in the brain by western blotting (). Also, the Mios transgene expression did not alter myelin protein expressions in the brain (). We then expressed one copy of the Mios transgene in the Mios cKO mouse under the control of Olig2-Cre. The Mios transgene compensated for the loss of Mios expression from the endogenous loci and restored oligodendrocyte linage (). Black Gold staining and Luxol Fast Blue staining each showed comparable staining intensity in the corpus callosum of control and Mios cKO; cTG mice (). In addition, the Mios transgene restored the expressions of most myelin proteins to >90% of the control level (). These studies validate that the phenotype of oligodendrocyte myelination in the Mios cKO brain is indeed due to the loss of Mios function.

Mios Participates in Maintaining mTORC1 Activity in a Cell Type–Specific Manner.

Mios, a lysosomal protein (22), participates in amino acid signaling to mTORC1 (22, 27). Mios colabeling with the lysosomal marker Lamp2 shows that Mios is primarily localized to the lysosomes in OPCs (); no apparent staining was detected in the nucleus. To examine the molecular mechanism by which Mios deletion impairs the oligodendrocyte lineage, we first assessed the effect of Mios deletion on mTORC1 in the brain of the Mios f/f; Nestin-Cre mouse. Surprisingly, western blotting to assess mTORC1 activity in the brain of the Mios cKO mouse showed almost comparable levels of mTORC1 activity–related phosphorylated substrates, including phosphorylated S6 kinase (p-S6K; Thr-389), phosphorylated S6 (p-S6; Ser-240/244), and p-S6 (Ser-235/236) (). In the adult brain, the bulk of mTORC1 activity is contributed by neurons; therefore, we differentiated neuronal and oligodendroglia mTORC1 activity by p-S6 staining. We found that all neurons (NeuN+) in the cortex are p-S6 (Ser-240/244)+ in both control and Mios f/f; Nestin-Cre mice (). Therefore, we further quantified the fluorescence intensity of p-S6 (Ser-240/244)+ and found that the intensity was comparable between the Mios cKO and control mice (). To further validate the effect of the Mios cKO on developing neurons, we assessed mTORC1 activity of the embryonic cerebrum by western blotting and found no reduction in mTORC1 activity in the Mios cKO brain where Mios reduction was apparent (). In glial cells, the basal mTORC1 activity is much lower but readily detectable in the oligodendrocyte lineage by p-S6 staining. We then examined oligodendroglial mTORC1 activity in the Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse. We found that the numbers of p-S6 (Ser-240/244)+ and p-S6 (Ser-235/236)+ oligodendrocyte lineage cells (Olig2+) were significantly reduced in the corpus callosum of the Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse (Fig. 4 and ). Meanwhile, we assessed mTORC1 activity in OPC cultures derived from the Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse. Western blotting showed that the amounts of phosphorylated p-S6K and p-S6 were reduced in Mios cKO OPC cultures (Fig. 4 ), indicative of reduced mTORC1 activity in OPCs. Then, we asked if the Mios cKO renders OPCs unresponsive to the change of amino acid availability by examining how these cultured OPCs would respond to amino acid starvation/refeeding. We used culture medium that lacked arginine (Arg) and leucine (Leu) to starve cultured OPCs because these two amino acids have been reported to potentiate mTORC1 activity through GATOR2 (23, 36–38). After 2 h of starvation, standard OPC culture medium was readded to cell cultures for 30 min. We found that wild-type (WT) control cultures responded to amino acid refeeding by increasing mTORC1 activity, whereas Mios cKO cultures did not (Fig. 4 ). Because cells respond to amino acid starvation normally by increasing the phosphorylated eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (p-eIF2α) to reduce protein synthesis (39), we assessed how p-eIF2α was altered by the loss of Mios function under amino acid starvation. While WT OPCs responded to amino acid starvation by increasing p-eIF2α, Mios cKO OPCs did not, suggesting that Mios cKO OPCs have lost their capacity of dynamically changing eIF2α phosphorylation status in response to amino acid availability (Fig. 4 ). All these results indicate that Mios cKO impairs mTORC1 activity of OPCs and their response to amino acid availability.
Fig. 4.

Impaired oligodendendroglia amino acid signaling to mTORC1 in the Mios cKO lineage. (A and B) Olig2 and p-S6 (Ser-240/244) staining and quantification showing the decreased percentage of p-S6+ Olig2+/Olig2+ in the corpus callosum of the P4 Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse. Arrows indicate Olig2+ cells, and arrowheads indicate Olig2+ p-S6+ cells (n = 5 pairs of mice). (Scale bars: A, 50 μm.) (C and D) Western blots and quantification of phosphorylated mTORC1 substrates (percentage of control [Ctrl]) showing reduced mTORC1 activity in cultured OPCs from the Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse (n = 5 independent experiments with five batches of OPCs). (E and F) Western blots and quantifications of phosphorylated mTORC1 substrates (percentage of Ctrl) showing mTORC1 activity after amino acids starvation (−AAs) and refeeding (+AAs) in OPCs (n = 5 independent experiments with five batches of OPCs). (G and H) Western blots and quantification of the relative changes to p-eIF2α level normalized to total eIF2α in amino acid–starved and refed OPCs from Ctrl and Mios cKO mice (n = 6 independent experiments with six batches of OPCs). Data are represented as mean ± SEM and analyzed with the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.

Impaired oligodendendroglia amino acid signaling to mTORC1 in the Mios cKO lineage. (A and B) Olig2 and p-S6 (Ser-240/244) staining and quantification showing the decreased percentage of p-S6+ Olig2+/Olig2+ in the corpus callosum of the P4 Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse. Arrows indicate Olig2+ cells, and arrowheads indicate Olig2+ p-S6+ cells (n = 5 pairs of mice). (Scale bars: A, 50 μm.) (C and D) Western blots and quantification of phosphorylated mTORC1 substrates (percentage of control [Ctrl]) showing reduced mTORC1 activity in cultured OPCs from the Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mouse (n = 5 independent experiments with five batches of OPCs). (E and F) Western blots and quantifications of phosphorylated mTORC1 substrates (percentage of Ctrl) showing mTORC1 activity after amino acids starvation (−AAs) and refeeding (+AAs) in OPCs (n = 5 independent experiments with five batches of OPCs). (G and H) Western blots and quantification of the relative changes to p-eIF2α level normalized to total eIF2α in amino acid–starved and refed OPCs from Ctrl and Mios cKO mice (n = 6 independent experiments with six batches of OPCs). Data are represented as mean ± SEM and analyzed with the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.

Brain Myelination Is Coregulated by Amino Acid and Growth Factor Signaling Pathways.

Previous studies have established that the growth factor–activated AKT–TSC–Rheb–mTORC1 pathway plays a critical role in oligodendrocyte formation and myelination in the brain (6–11). Recent studies also indicate that GATOR2-mediated amino acid signaling coregulates with growth factor signaling the lysosomal translocation and activity of TSC–Rheb and thus, mTORC1 activation (40–42). Little is known about the coordinate regulation of brain myelination by growth factor and amino acid signaling pathways. We asked if enhancing growth factor–activated mTORC1 activity could rescue the myelination deficit in the brain by crossing the constitutively active Rheb S16H transgene into the Mios cKO mouse. The Cre-dependent expression of the Rheb rescues mTORC1 and myelination deficit in the Rheb cKO mouse (43). First, we validated that the expression of the Rheb transgene in the oligodendrocyte lineage did not accelerate or impair brain myelin protein expression (), unlike what we noted in the transgenic mice expressing Rheb S16H in neural stem cells (43). Then, we examined the Mios cKO mice expressing the Rheb transgene (Mios cKO; Rheb cTG). As suggested from the Mio/TSC1 double mutation in Drosophila oocytes (28), the expression of the Rheb transgene restored mTORC1 activity in the oligodendrocyte lineage of the Mios cKO mice, with the proportion of p-S6+ oligodendrocytes slightly exceeding the control level (Fig. 5 ) and the phosphorylation of mTORC1 substrates elevated in western blotting (). This finding, together with the finding that Mios/GATOR2 is not required in neurons for mTORC1 signaling, suggests that the cytosol to lysosome translocation of the mTORC1 complex is not dependent on amino acid signaling to GATOR2. Presumably, a certain amount of mTORC1 might be constitutively recruited to and retained on the lysosome, regardless of the amino acid availability or Rag deletion (40, 41). Even though mTORC1 was restored in the oligodendrocyte lineage by the Rheb transgene, the number of oligodendrocyte lineage cells was not improved (Fig. 5 ). Differentiated oligodendrocytes expressing CC1 marker were increased modestly by the Rheb transgene (Fig. 5 ), but the expressions of myelin genes were not improved at both mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 5 and ). Accordingly, the myelination deficit remained in the Mios cKO mouse with the Rheb transgene, as shown by Black Gold, Luxol Fast Blue, MBP staining, and EM (Fig. 5 and ). This finding suggests the codependence of amino acid and growth factor signaling in oligodendrocyte formation and brain myelination, and the role of Mios/GATOR2-mediated amino acid signaling in oligodendrocytes goes beyond to mTORC1 (Fig. 6).
Fig. 5.

Codependence of Mios/GATOR2-mediated amino acid signaling and growth factor signaling for proper myelination. (A and B) Olig2 and p-S6 (S240/244) staining and quantification (percentage of control [Ctrl]) showing restored mTORC1 activity in the corpus callosum (CC) of the 2-wk Mios f/f; Rheb tg/+; Olig2-Cre mouse by Rheb cTG. Arrowheads indicate Olig2+ p-S6+ cells (n = 7 for Ctrl, n = 4 for Mios cKO, n = 6 for Mios cKO; Rheb cTG). (C and D) Olig2 and PDGFRα staining and quantification (percentage of Ctrl) showing lower numbers of OPCs in the CC of 2-wk Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre and Mios f/f; Rheb tg/+; Olig2-Cre mice relative to the normal Ctrl mouse. Arrowheads indicate Olig2+ PDGFRa+ cells (n = 4 for Ctrl, n = 3 for Mios cKO, n = 3 for Mios cKO; Rheb cTG). (E and F) Olig2 and CC1 staining and quantification (percentage of Ctrl) showing decreased numbers of differentiated oligodendrocytes in the CC of the 2-wk Mios f/f; Rheb tg/+; Olig2-Cre mouse compared with Ctrl. Arrowheads indicate Olig2+ CC1+ cells (n = 4 for Ctrl, n = 3 for Mios cKO, n = 3 for Mios cKO; Rheb cTG). (G and H) Western blots and quantifications of myelin protein levels (percentage of Ctrl) showing reduction in the cerebral cortex (CTX) and hippocampus (HIP) of 6- to 8-wk Mios f/f; Rheb tg/+; Olig2-Cre and Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mice (n = 9 for Ctrl, n = 3 for Mios cKO, n = 5 for Mios cKO; Rheb cTG). (I) Black Gold staining shows hypomyelination in the CC of 6-wk Mios f/f; Rheb tg/+; Olig2-Cre and Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mice. (J and K) EM images and quantification showing comparable numbers of unmyelinated axons in the optic nerves from 4-wk Mios f/f; Rheb tg/+; Olig2-Cre and Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mice (n = 3 pairs of mice). Data are represented as mean ± SEM and analyzed with One-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparison test. (Scale bars: A, C, E, and I, Lower, 50 μm; I, Upper, 200 μm; J, 1 μm.) *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.

Fig. 6.

A model for the role of the Mios/GATOR2 in brain myelination.

Codependence of Mios/GATOR2-mediated amino acid signaling and growth factor signaling for proper myelination. (A and B) Olig2 and p-S6 (S240/244) staining and quantification (percentage of control [Ctrl]) showing restored mTORC1 activity in the corpus callosum (CC) of the 2-wk Mios f/f; Rheb tg/+; Olig2-Cre mouse by Rheb cTG. Arrowheads indicate Olig2+ p-S6+ cells (n = 7 for Ctrl, n = 4 for Mios cKO, n = 6 for Mios cKO; Rheb cTG). (C and D) Olig2 and PDGFRα staining and quantification (percentage of Ctrl) showing lower numbers of OPCs in the CC of 2-wk Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre and Mios f/f; Rheb tg/+; Olig2-Cre mice relative to the normal Ctrl mouse. Arrowheads indicate Olig2+ PDGFRa+ cells (n = 4 for Ctrl, n = 3 for Mios cKO, n = 3 for Mios cKO; Rheb cTG). (E and F) Olig2 and CC1 staining and quantification (percentage of Ctrl) showing decreased numbers of differentiated oligodendrocytes in the CC of the 2-wk Mios f/f; Rheb tg/+; Olig2-Cre mouse compared with Ctrl. Arrowheads indicate Olig2+ CC1+ cells (n = 4 for Ctrl, n = 3 for Mios cKO, n = 3 for Mios cKO; Rheb cTG). (G and H) Western blots and quantifications of myelin protein levels (percentage of Ctrl) showing reduction in the cerebral cortex (CTX) and hippocampus (HIP) of 6- to 8-wk Mios f/f; Rheb tg/+; Olig2-Cre and Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mice (n = 9 for Ctrl, n = 3 for Mios cKO, n = 5 for Mios cKO; Rheb cTG). (I) Black Gold staining shows hypomyelination in the CC of 6-wk Mios f/f; Rheb tg/+; Olig2-Cre and Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mice. (J and K) EM images and quantification showing comparable numbers of unmyelinated axons in the optic nerves from 4-wk Mios f/f; Rheb tg/+; Olig2-Cre and Mios f/f; Olig2-Cre mice (n = 3 pairs of mice). Data are represented as mean ± SEM and analyzed with One-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparison test. (Scale bars: A, C, E, and I, Lower, 50 μm; I, Upper, 200 μm; J, 1 μm.) *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. A model for the role of the Mios/GATOR2 in brain myelination.

Discussion

GATOR2 in Oligodendrocyte Formation and Myelination.

This study demonstrates that GATOR2-mediated amino acid sensing/signaling plays an important role in the formation of oligodendroglia and brain myelination, as illustrated in Fig. 6. We show that GATOR2’s function in the oligodendrocyte lineage is disrupted as a result of the loss of its component Mios, which is consistent with the result of Mio deletion in Drosophila oocytes (22). Therefore, Mios deletion mimics a condition of amino acid insufficiency. Because amino acid availability is crucial for cell growth and proliferation and GATOR2 is critically positioned between cytosolic amino acid sensors for Leu and Arg (Sestrins and Castors) and GATOR1 in the amino acid signaling pathway (20, 23, 36), one would think that disrupting GATOR2 would severely affect neural stem cells during early embryonic development and therefore, could impact the formation of all types of neural cells (neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes). Surprisingly, loss of Mios in neural stem cells does not apparently affect the formation of astrocytes and neurons; the numbers and distributions of astrocytes and neurons were comparable between Mios cKO and normal control mice. Only the oligodendrocyte lineage was affected by Mios cKO. The role of Mios in the regulation of oligodendrocyte formation is oligodendrocyte intrinsic. Genetic deletion of Mios in OPCs reduced oligodendrocyte formation and recapitulated the myelination deficit noted in Mios deletion in neural stem cells, whereas deletion of Mios in neurons had no effect. The myelination deficit is widespread in the brain and persists to adulthood, which suggests a fundamental role of Mios/GATOR2 in developmental oligodendrocyte myelination. It remains to be seen if Mios plays a role in the maintenance of myelin. The hypomyelination in the Mios cKO mouse could be a result of reduced proliferation and differentiation of OPCs in the early postnatal stage. This early-stage proliferation is critical to the formation of a stable pool of OPCs that is maintained until old age in rodents (1, 33). Reduced proliferation of OPCs as a result of disruption of GATOR2 is consistent with the role of amino acid in the regulation of cell proliferation through cell cycle control (44, 45). We found that Mios deletion prolonged the length of the OPC cell cycle and increased the number of OPCs in the S phase, suggesting that GATOR2 regulates cell cycle progression. Altered cell cycle exit of OPCs could account for the reduced differentiation of OPCs to postmitotic mature oligodendrocytes that myelinate axons (hence, hypomyelination in brain). Future work should identify the roles of Mios in differentiated oligodendrocytes. Earlier studies show that the amino acid stress sensor GCN2 kinase–mediated signaling is essential for oligodendrocyte development, survival, and myelin formation in the brain (46). Under amino acid deficiency, oligodendrocytes activate the GCN2 kinase to reduce general protein synthesis and nutrient and energy expenditure. Such reduction confers resistance to oligodendrocyte injury in amino acid stress (46). Studies suggest that GCN2-mediated amino acid stress sensing could be linked to amino acid signaling to mTORC1 via the Leu sensor Sestrin2 (47), which through Mios/GATOR2, transduces signals eventually to lysosomal Rag–GTPase/mTOR. The study of the zebrafish RagA mutant indicates that the lysosomal Rag–GTPase plays a role in the regulation of myelination involving the lysosomal transcription factor EB (TFEB) (48). Activated TFEB represses the expression of myelin genes (48). It is unknown if TFE3/TFEB family transcription factors are involved in Mios/GATOR2-regulated oligodendrocyte myelination.

Coordinate Regulation of Oligodendrocyte Myelination by Amino Acid and Growth Factor Signaling.

Oligodendrocyte lineage formation and myelination are regulated by growth factor signaling through TSC and Rheb to mTORC1 (9–11, 43, 49). Mios deletion impairs mTORC1 activation in the oligodendrocyte lineage, suggesting that mTORC1 deficiency could contribute to the myelination deficit in brain, as indicated by mTORC1 deficiency mouse models (e.g., Raptor and Rheb cKO) (8, 9, 11, 43). The effect of Mios deletion on the oligodendrocyte lineage is different. Unlike Raptor and Rheb cKO, Mios cKO significantly reduces the number of OPCs, highlighting a critical role of GATOR2-mediated amino acid signaling in the regulation of the early expansion of OPCs. GATOR2-regulated mTORC1 is involved in the regulation of cell mitosis and meiosis (50, 51) and oocyte development (28). Therefore, it seems that GATOR2 regulates oligodendrocyte biology through mTORC1. However, we found that mTORC1 deficit in the oligodendrocyte lineage can be rescued by the expression of the active Rheb transgene. Rescuing mTORC1 by TSC1 knockdown in GATOR2 depletion oocytes corrects defects in oocyte development (28); however, restoring mTORC1 in the oligodendrocyte lineage of Mios cKO mice does not restore the oligodendrocyte lineage and myelination. These results suggest that Mios-containing GATOR2 engages an mTORC1-independent role in the control of the oligodendrocyte lineage or that Mios regulates oligodendrocyte biology independent of GATOR2. However, the GATOR2-independent role of Mios has not been reported. GATOR2-mediated amino acid signaling intersects with growth factor signaling to regulate the lysosomal translocation and activation of TSC and Rheb (40, 41, 52), both of which are regulators of oligodendrocyte myelination (11, 53, 54). Now, we show that the GATOR2-mediated amino acid sensing/signaling pathway plays an important role in the formation of the oligodendrocyte lineage and brain myelination, suggesting that GATOR2-mediated amino acid signaling regulates oligodendrocyte lineage function in coordination with growth factor signaling (Fig. 6). The molecules involved in sensing different amino acids are found on the plasma membrane (55) and in the cytosol (23, 38, 56) and organelles, including mitochondria and lysosome (57, 58). Presumably, oligodendrocyte lineage cells could employ multiple mechanisms to sense the availability of different amino acids. This study of GATOR2 in the oligodendrocyte lineage will usher in more investigations into the roles of the complex amino acid–sensing mechanisms in oligodendrocyte biology.

Materials and Methods

Mice Strains.

The generation of the Mios f/f mouse is described in . Additionally, the generation and characterization of Rheb knockout and transgenic mice have been previously described (43). Nestin-Cre (29), Olig2-Cre (31), and CamKII-Cre (59) mice were from The Jackson Laboratory.

Detection of Brain Myelination.

Brain myelination was assessed by using multiple methods, which include Black Gold staining, Luxol Fast Blue staining, western blotting and immunostaining for myelin proteins, and EM to visualize myelinated axons in mouse brains. More details on the detection of myelination are provided in . To quantify the myelination of axons, we performed EM of the optic nerves and corpus callosum from three to five mice per group. The percentage of unmyelinated axons was calculated based on the counts of at least 500 axons per mouse. The g ratio (the ratio of the diameter of the axon over the diameter of the entire myelinated axon) was calculated based on the measurements of 150 axons of the optic nerves per mouse with ImageJ. The two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test was used for the statistical significance for two-group comparison, and one-way ANOVA and the Tukey test were used for multiple-group comparison. Measurements of the diameters of myelinated and unmyelinated axons in comparable electron microscope images were performed using ImageJ. The perimeter (c) of the axon was measured, and the diameter was calculated using the formula d = c/2Π. This analysis was done with three pairs of mice, with 500 axons per mouse analyzed.

Immunostaining Analysis of Neurons and Neuroglia.

Standard immunostaining with anti-NeuN (neuronal nuclei) antibody was performed to assess the formation of neurons in the cortex and hippocampus of Mios cKO and control brains. To assess the formation of astrocytes, anti-GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein) staining was performed to quantify the number of astrocytes in the corpus callosum. To examine the oligodendrocyte lineage, anti-Olig2 and anti-Sox10 staining was performed to quantify the oligodendrocyte lineage cells in the corpus callosum of the brains. To differentiate OPCs and differentiated oligodendrocytes, we performed anti-PDGFRα and anti-CC1 staining, respectively. At least three comparable brain sections per mouse were included in each experiment, and three or more pairs of mice were examined for statistical analysis. The number of cells per area (millimeters squared) was counted using ImageJ. For Olig2+PDGFRα+ cells and Olig2+CC1+ cells, cell numbers per area in the corpus callosum of Mios cKO were normalized to control mice of comparable ages. The statistical significance was assessed using the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test for two-group comparison and one-way ANOVA and the Tukey test for multiple-group comparison.

OPC Proliferation and Differentiation with BrdU and EdU Single or Dual Labeling.

BrdU and EdU labeling was performed to analyze the proliferation and differentiation of OPCs. BrdU (Sigma; 19-160) and EdU (Invitrogen; C10337) were dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) in 5 mg/mL and always preserved at −20 °C from light. Acute BrdU labeling (2 h) was performed by intraperitoneally (i.p.) injecting BrdU (100 μg) for labeling proliferative OPCs in the early postnatal (P3 [postnatal day 3] to P4) mice. The brains were isolated and fixed with 4% PFA (paraformaldehyde) at 4 °C for 48 h, followed by sequential immersion in 20 and 30% sucrose for cryopreservation. Frozen brains were sectioned at 40-mm thickness. Brain cryosections were processed with heat-induced antigen retrieval for 10 min at 95 °C in sodium citrate buffer (10 mM, pH 6). Sections were washed three times and stained with rat anti-BrdU (Abcam; ab6326; 1:500) and rabbit anti-Olig2 (Millipore; AB9610; 1:200) antibodies. The number of BrdU+ Olig2+ OPCs per area (millimeters squared) in the corpus callosum of mice was counted. Cumulative BrdU labeling was performed by i.p. injecting P3 and P4 mice with 100 μg BrdU for 2 consecutive days, and then, at 3 wk, the brain samples were harvested after perfusion with cold PBS and 4% PFA (as described above). After cryopreservation, 16-mm brain sections were cut and stained with antibodies of rat anti-BrdU and mouse anti-CC1 (Sigma; OP80; 1:100). The index indicative of the differentiation capacity was calculated as the percentage of the BrdU+ CC1+ cells divided by total BrdU+ cells in the corpus callosum. BrdU and EdU dual labeling was performed to measure the cell cycle length (Ts) of OPCs in the early postnatal stage mice. EdU (100 μg) was administered to neonatal mice (P3 to P4) through i.p. injection, which was followed by i.p. injection of BrdU (100 μg) 2 h later. Thirty minutes after the BrdU injection, the mouse brain was isolated and fixed at 4 °C as described above. The brains were collected for immunostaining with antioligodendrocyte lineage antibody to visualize BrdU- and EdU-labeled OPCs or differentiated oligodendrocytes. EdU was detected according to Click-iT EdU imaging kits’ instructions (Invitrogen; C10337). The formula for calculating Ts is illustrated in Fig. 3. BrdU and Ki67 double labeling was performed to examine the cell cycle exit of OPCs. BrdU (100 μg i.p.) was injected to P4 mice to assess proliferating OPCs; 24 h later, brain tissues were processed and stained with rat anti-BrdU and rabbit anti-Ki67 (Abcam; ab16667; 1:500) antibodies to identify OPCs that are BrdU+ Ki67+ or BrdU+ Ki67−. For the assessment of the cell cycle exit, the percentage of the BrdU+Ki67+ cells relative to BrdU+ cells was calculated as an index of cell cycle exit. The statistical significance was assessed using the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test.

Amino Acids Starvation and Refeeding to OPC Cultures.

The method of setting up OPC cultures is described in . Amino acid starvation and refeeding experiments were conducted based on the previous study (27). Primary OPCs cultures were washed once with Dulbecco’s PBS and then, incubated with Arg- and Leu-free medium (custom made) for 2 h, which was supplemented with 2% B-27 serum-free supplement, 10 ng/mL PDGF-AA (platelet-derived growth factor-AA), 10 ng/mL bFGF (basic fibroblast growth factor), 1 ng/mL NT3 (neurotrophin-3), and penicillin–streptomycin–glutamine. For refeeding, the medium was then replaced with routine OPC medium (DMEM/F-12 (Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium/nutrient mixture F-12) and additives mentioned above); 30 min later, the cells were harvested for western blotting.

Detection of mTORC1 Activation.

mTORC1 activation was assessed by detecting the phosphorylation of its canonical substrates, such as S6 kinase and its phosphorylated substrate, the ribosomal protein S6. We used western blotting to detect p-S6K (Thr-389; CST 9234), p-S6 (Ser-240/244; CST 2215), and p-S6 (Ser-235/236; CST 2211) in mouse brains and OPC cultures. We also performed immunostaining with p-S6 (Ser-240/244; CST 2215) and p-S6 (Ser-235/236; CST 62016) antibodies to assess mTORC1 activity of different cell types in the brain. The antibody dilutions were as follows: p-S6K at 1:2,000 for western blotting, p-S6 (Ser-240/244; CST 2215) at 1:1,000 for western blotting and 1:500 for immunostaining, and p-S6 (Ser-235/236; CST 2211) at 1:1,000 for western blotting and 1:500 for immunostaining (CST 62016). For quantifying the mTORC1 activity changes detected by western blotting, the relative amount of the phosphorylated amount vs. its total amount of the individual protein in the brain or cell cultures under indicated conditions was quantified using ImageJ. For quantifying cellular mTORC1 activity detected by immunostaining, the ratio of Olig2+ p-S6+ cells divided by total Olig2+ cells in the corpus callosum and the ratio of NeuN+ p-S6+ cells divided by total NeuN+ cells in the cortex were computed. Fluorescence intensity of p-S6 in neurons was also calculated with Zen software. The statistical difference was assessed using the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test.
  59 in total

Review 1.  White matter in learning, cognition and psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  R Douglas Fields
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Early nutrition influences developmental myelination and cognition in infants and young children.

Authors:  Sean Deoni; Douglas Dean; Sarah Joelson; Jonathan O'Regan; Nora Schneider
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  mTORC1 senses lysosomal amino acids through an inside-out mechanism that requires the vacuolar H(+)-ATPase.

Authors:  Roberto Zoncu; Liron Bar-Peled; Alejo Efeyan; Shuyu Wang; Yasemin Sancak; David M Sabatini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Conditional ablation of raptor or rictor has differential impact on oligodendrocyte differentiation and CNS myelination.

Authors:  Kathryn K Bercury; JinXiang Dai; Hilary H Sachs; Jared T Ahrendsen; Teresa L Wood; Wendy B Macklin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  TORC1 regulators Iml1/GATOR1 and GATOR2 control meiotic entry and oocyte development in Drosophila.

Authors:  Youheng Wei; Brad Reveal; John Reich; Willem J Laursen; Stefania Senger; Tanveer Akbar; Takako Iida-Jones; Weili Cai; Michal Jarnik; Mary A Lilly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  mTOR Signaling in Growth, Metabolism, and Disease.

Authors:  Robert A Saxton; David M Sabatini
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Balanced mTORC1 activity in oligodendrocytes is required for accurate CNS myelination.

Authors:  Frédéric Lebrun-Julien; Lea Bachmann; Camilla Norrmén; Martin Trötzmüller; Harald Köfeler; Markus A Rüegg; Michael N Hall; Ueli Suter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The G protein-coupled taste receptor T1R1/T1R3 regulates mTORC1 and autophagy.

Authors:  Eric M Wauson; Elma Zaganjor; A-Young Lee; Marcy L Guerra; Anwesha B Ghosh; Angie L Bookout; Chris P Chambers; Arif Jivan; Kathleen McGlynn; Michele R Hutchison; Ralph J Deberardinis; Melanie H Cobb
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Anaplastic lymphoma kinase spares organ growth during nutrient restriction in Drosophila.

Authors:  Louise Y Cheng; Andrew P Bailey; Sally J Leevers; Timothy J Ragan; Paul C Driscoll; Alex P Gould
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Seh1 targets GATOR2 and Nup153 to mitotic chromosomes.

Authors:  Melpomeni Platani; Itaru Samejima; Kumiko Samejima; Masato T Kanemaki; William C Earnshaw
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.