Literature DB >> 35020902

Bridging patients in cardiogenic shock with a paracorporeal pulsatile biventricular assist device to heart transplantation-a single-centre experience.

Sebastian Michel1,2, Stefan Buchholz3, Joscha Buech1, Tobias Veit4, Thomas Fabry1, Jan Abicht5, Nikolaus Thierfelder1, Christoph Mueller1, Laura Lily Rosenthal2, Jelena Pabst von Ohain2, Nikolaus Haas6, Jürgen Hörer2, Christian Hagl1,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the outcome of patients in cardiogenic shock receiving a paracorporeal pulsatile biventricular assist device as a bridge to transplantation.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-centre analysis of all patients who received a Berlin Heart Excor® at our institution between 2004 and 2019.
RESULTS: A total of 97 patients (90 adults, 7 paediatric) were analysed. Eighty-four patients were in Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support level 1 (80 adults, 4 paediatric). Diagnoses were dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 41), ischaemic cardiomyopathy (n = 17) or myocardial infarction (n = 4), myocarditis (n = 15), restrictive cardiomyopathy (n = 2), graft failure after heart transplant (n = 7), postcardiotomy heart failure (n = 5), postpartum cardiomyopathy (n = 3), congenital heart disease (n = 1), valvular cardiomyopathy (n = 1) and toxic cardiomyopathy (n = 1). All patients were in biventricular heart failure and had secondary organ dysfunction. The mean duration of support was 63 days (0-487 days). There was a significant decrease in creatinine values after assist device implantation (from 1.83 ± 0.79 to 1.12 ± 0.67 mg/dl, P = 0.001) as well as a decrease in bilirubin values (from 3.94 ± 4.58 to 2.65 ± 3.61 mg/dl, P = 0.084). Cerebral stroke occurred in 16 patients, bleeding in 15 and infection in 13 patients. Forty-eight patients died on support, while 49 patients could be successfully bridged to transplantation. Thirty-day survival and 1-year survival were 70.1% and 41.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A pulsatile biventricular assist device is a reasonable therapeutic option in cardiogenic shock, when immediate high cardiac output is necessary to rescue the already impaired kidney and liver function of the patient.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biventricular assist device; Cardiogenic shock; Heart transplant; Pulsatile ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35020902     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  2 in total

1.  Long-term paracorporeal pulsatile mechanical circulatory support in adolescent and adult patients.

Authors:  Jamila Kremer; Abbas El-Dor; Wiebke Sommer; Ursula Tochtermann; Gregor Warnecke; Matthias Karck; Arjang Ruhparwar; Anna Lassia Meyer
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-08-03

Review 2.  Mechanical circulatory support devices and treatment strategies for right heart failure.

Authors:  Taiyo Kuroda; Chihiro Miyagi; Kiyotaka Fukamachi; Jamshid H Karimov
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.