| Literature DB >> 35020222 |
Nonhlanhla Lunjani1, Werner C Albrich2, Noémie Suh3, Beatrice Barda4, Laura A Finnegan5, Sarita A Dam5, Jens Walter1,6, Corinna Sadlier6,7, Mary Horgan6,7, Paul W O'Toole1,8, Liam O'Mahony1,6,8.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35020222 PMCID: PMC9303653 DOI: 10.1111/all.15218
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Allergy ISSN: 0105-4538 Impact factor: 14.710
FIGURE 1Bacterial DNA levels in serum. (A) Bacterial DNA levels were quantified in serum samples obtained during week 1 (n = 207 samples from 171 patients), week 2 (n = 82 samples from 82 patients), week 3 (n = 38 samples from 38 patients), week 4 (n = 13 samples from 13 patients), or week 5 (n = 11 samples from 11 patients) following hospitalization for COVID‐19. Serum samples from healthy volunteers (controls, n = 29 samples from 29 healthy volunteers) were included for comparison. (B) Bacterial DNA was quantified in serum samples from healthy volunteers (n = 29 samples from 29 healthy volunteers), Long COVID patients 4–6 months (n = 30 samples from 24 patients), or 6–9 months (n = 26 samples from 24 patients) following hospital discharge. *p < .05 ANOVA analysis
FIGURE 2Serum bacterial DNA levels correlate with severity. Bacterial DNA levels were quantified in serum samples from healthy controls (n = 29), and the first serum sample obtained following hospitalization for patients with mild COVID‐19 (n = 11), moderate COVID‐19 (n = 28), patients with severe COVID‐19 who survived (n = 90), and patients with severe COVID‐19 that died (n = 42). The dotted line indicates the cut‐off value for the highest bacterial DNA level in serum from healthy volunteers. Bacterial DNA levels were higher than the highest level observed in healthy volunteers for 0%, 21%, 21%, or 39% of patients with mild COVID‐19, moderate COVID‐19, severe COVID‐19 that recovered, or severe COVID‐19 with a fatal outcome, respectively. Statistical significance was determined using the Kruskal‐Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison test