Literature DB >> 35020188

Office Operative Hysteroscopy for the Management of Retained Products of Conception.

Aya Mohr-Sasson1,2, Tomer Gur3, Raanan Meyer3,4, Roy Mashiach3,4, David Stockheim3,4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare office to conventional operative hysteroscopy for the treatment of retained products of conception (RPOC). This retrospective cohort study included all women who underwent hysteroscopy due to RPOC between January 2018 and December 2019, in a single tertiary medical care center. Exclusion criteria for hysteroscopy included the following: (1) proximity to delivery (up to 3 weeks); (2) hemodynamic instability; (3) active massive bleeding; and (4) genital tract infection. See-and-treat hysteroscopy (study group) outcomes were compared to operative hysteroscopy (controls). Data were collected from women's medical records. Primary outcome was defined as successful removal of all suspected RPOC with no need for additional intervention. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. During the study period, 222 women underwent hysteroscopy due to RPOC. Of them, 138 (62%) and 84 (38%) underwent see-and-treat and operative hysteroscopy, respectively. Symptomatic women were more commonly referred to operative hysteroscopy (60 (71%) vs. 54 (39%); p = 0.001). Maximal diameter of the suspected finding was smaller both by ultrasound examination (13 (10-18) vs. 18 (13-32) mm; p = 0.001) and by surgeon estimation during diagnostic hysteroscopy (12 (8-20) vs. 20 (14-30) mm; p = 0.001), in the see-and-treat compared to the operative hysteroscopy group, respectively. While comparing success rate between groups, no difference was observed. Sub-analysis by the maximal diameter of RPOC findings revealed that see-and-treat success rate is reduced as the RPOC is larger. Success rate was high and comparable to operative hysteroscopy for findings ≤ 2 cm (102/117 (87%) vs. 49/54 (91%); p = 0.79). Nevertheless, for RPOC > 2 cm, success was significantly more frequent in the operative hysteroscopy group (28/30 (93%) vs. 9/16 (57%); p = 0.002). This finding was supported by logistic regression analysis that found maximal diameter of RPOC as the only parameter associated with success rate (B = 0.96; p = 0.03). Office operative hysteroscopy is a feasible treatment option for the removal of RPOC when maximal diameter is taken under consideration due to its association to success rate.Clinical trial registration: The study protocol was approved by the "Sheba Medical Center" Review Board (ID 5200-18 SMC) on June 24, 2018.
© 2022. Society for Reproductive Investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Office operative hysteroscopy; Operative hysteroscopy; Placenta; Retained products of conception; See and treat hysteroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35020188     DOI: 10.1007/s43032-022-00849-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1933-7191            Impact factor:   3.060


  7 in total

1.  Managing residual trophoblastic tissue. Hysteroscopy for directing curettage.

Authors:  M Goldenberg; E Schiff; R Achiron; S Lipitz; S Mashiach
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 0.142

2.  Comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of uterine pathologies.

Authors:  Ali Babacan; Ismet Gun; Cem Kizilaslan; Okan Ozden; Murat Muhcu; Ercument Mungen; Vedat Atay
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-03-15

3.  Use of contact hysteroscopy in evaluating postpartum bleeding and incomplete abortion.

Authors:  J G Tchabo
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 0.142

4.  Office hysteroscopy: comparison of 2.7- and 4-mm hysteroscopes for acceptability, feasibility and diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Sandro Rullo; Giuseppe Sorrenti; Massimiliano Marziali; Beatrice Ermini; Francesco Sesti; Emilio Piccione
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 0.142

Review 5.  "See-and-Treat" Hysteroscopy in the Management of Endometrial Polyps.

Authors:  Morris Wortman
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2016-04

6.  Transvaginal duplex Doppler ultrasonography in bleeding patients suspected of having residual trophoblastic tissue.

Authors:  R Achiron; M Goldenberg; S Lipitz; S Mashiach
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Modern operative hysteroscopy.

Authors:  Gabriele Centini; Libera Troia; Lucia Lazzeri; Felice Petraglia; Stefano Luisi
Journal:  Minerva Ginecol       Date:  2016-03-01
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  See-and-treat in-office hysteroscopy versus operative hysteroscopy for the treatment of retained products of conception: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Nili Raz; Emiliya Sigal; Fernando Gonzalez Arjona; Carmelo Calidona; Simone Garzon; Stefano Uccella; Antonio Simone Laganà; Sergio Haimovich
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 1.697

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.