Current and Emerging Approaches for Pain Management in Hemophilic Arthropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Hemophilia is an inherited bleeding hematological disorder characterized by the partial or complete deficiency of clotting factor VIII or IX. Hemophilic arthropathy is the consequence of repeated joint bleeding (hemarthrosis) and its management is based on the prevention of acute bleeding through the administration of the deficient clotting factor concentrate or non-factor therapies. In addition, the management of acute and chronic pain is pivotal in hemophilic arthropathy in order to restore function and allow rehabilitation of the joint.
METHODS: We conducted a qualitative review of the literature regarding current and emerging strategies for pain treatment in hemophilic arthropathy. This review considers systemic and local pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for acute and chronic pain management.
RESULTS: In hemophilic arthropathy, pain management is based on analgesics such as paracetamol, which represents the first choice for acute and chronic pain in adults and children, in association with opioids for adults. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs inhibit platelet function, so that the currently preferred drugs are short courses of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors. Local treatment with intra-articular injections of corticosteroids is an option for refractory cases and physiotherapy has an important role after hemarthrosis and for the long-term management of chronic pain for both pediatric and adult patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The management of pain in hemophilia requires more standardization. Meanwhile, the safest drugs should be used at the lowest effective dosage and for periods as short as possible. For the non-pharmacological management of pain in these patients, a multidisciplinary team including hematologists, orthopedic surgeons, rheumatologists, and physiotherapists is warranted.

Key Summary Points

Introduction

Hemophilia is a rare, X-linked inherited bleeding disorder characterized by the deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) in hemophilia A and FIX in hemophilia B. The prevalence of hemophilia A is estimated to be around 1 in 5000–10,000 males, and that of hemophilia B 1 in 25,000–30,000 males. Around 30% of new cases have no known familial history [1, 2]. As a consequence of the hemorrhagic diathesis, the clinical manifestations of hemophilia are represented by recurrent bleeding, whose severity is generally directly correlated with the degree of decrease of the deficient clotting factor. Patients with severe hemophilia (factor level < 1%) usually suffer from spontaneous bleedings. In patients with mild hemophilia (factor level > 5%), bleeding mostly occurs after major trauma or surgery. Patients with moderate hemophilia (2–5% FVIII activity) have an intermediate clinical phenotype, but arthropathy may be observed in a relevant proportion of them [3].

Spontaneous musculoskeletal bleeding accounts for 80% of all episodes, particularly in synovial joints and muscles, whereas cerebral and mucosal hemorrhages are less frequently [4, 5]. Ankles, knees, and elbows are the most commonly affected joints, and those undergoing three or more spontaneous bleeds over a 6-month period are defined target joints [6]. Recurrent joint bleeding (hemarthrosis) causes synovial hypertrophy and hemosiderin deposition in macrophage-like synovial cells, as a consequence of the intra-articular shedding of blood and iron. An inflammatory process develops and angiogenesis leads to the formation of fragile vessels, thus exposing the synovial membrane to further bleeding in a vicious circle [7]. Subsequently, fibrosis of the subsynovial layer occurs and the production of proteolytic enzymes has a destructive effect on both cartilage and bone. Thus, patients with severe hemophilia often develop a chronic arthropathy that presents with intermediate characteristics between inflammatory arthropathies such as rheumatoid arthritis and degenerative arthropathies such as osteoarthritis [8].

Despite the fact that hemophilia care improved dramatically over the last decade thanks to the introduction of recombinant factors with extended half-life and non-factor therapies, patients still experience arthropathy, which leads to disability and eventually to the early need of joint replacement, reduced quality of life, and work and school absenteeism, thus causing a relevant burden of illness [9-14]. One of the main unsolved problems for patients with arthropathy is chronic pain, which requires a multidisciplinary approach [15]. In this review, we provide an overview of the systemic and local hematological and non-hematological strategies for pain management, not only at the time of acute joint bleeding but also in the course of chronic arthropathy. This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not involve any new studies of human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Management of Acute Joint Bleeding

Acute clinical signs and symptoms of hemarthrosis include some or all of the following: ‘aura’, i.e., an unusual sensation of tingling inside a joint, pain, swelling, warmth of the skin over the joint, decreased range of motion or full loss of function [6]. One of the biggest issues for patients with hemophilia is the need for a better self-differentiation between acute hemarthrosis and chronic joint pain, and it is still a matter of debate whether or not they are able to distinguish the two conditions [16, 17]. In fact, significant discrepancies have been reported by means of musculoskeletal ultrasound findings between patient and physician classification of pain as due to bleeding or non-bleeding [18]. Moreover, pain acceptance is pivotal in the process of adjustment to chronic pain, which involves the acceptance that trying to avoid or control pain can be counterproductive and that activity engagement means continuing with life activities despite pain [19].

Bleeding Control

The primary aim of the management of acute hemarthrosis is to achieve, as soon as possible, the control of bleeding. Factor replacement is the mainstay and should be administered ideally as soon as possible and continued over the next few days. Adequate patient education and empowerment is pivotal, and envisages the ability to promptly recognize bleeding, timely self-administer the deficient factor or other therapeutic products such as by-passing agents and to contact the hemophilia treatment center (HTC) that should keep a record of the bleeds and their management [20]. The therapeutic target of early/moderate bleeds should be plasma factor levels of 40–60 UI/dl, which can be achieved in non-inhibitor patients by means of a dosage of 25–30 UI/kg of factor VIII in severe hemophilia A and 40–60 UI/kg of FIX in severe hemophilia B [20]. Patients with inhibitors should be treated with the activated prothrombin complex concentrate aPCC (50–100 IU/kg) or recombinant activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa) (270 μg/kg as a single dose or 90 μg/kg 2–3 hourly). Repeated doses can be administered if the first is ineffective but the total daily dose of aPCC should not exceed 200 IU/kg in order to decrease the risk of thrombosis. Emicizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that given subcutaneously mimics the activity of FVIII by binding activated FIX to FX and is thus licensed in patients with severe hemophilia A with or without inhibitors [21, 22]. Cases of thrombotic microangiopathy and other thrombotic events have been reported when a cumulative amount of > 100 IU/kg of aPCC was concomitantly administered for 24 h or more to patients on emicizumab prophylaxis [21]. These observations led to the following management guidelines [23, 24]. For patients with inhibitors, 90–120 μg/kg of rFVIIa should be administered and repeated every 2–4 h. Only in case of severe hemorrhages not responsive to rFVIIa and in the presence of a high-titer inhibitor (> 5 BU/ml), aPCC at the initial dose ≤ 50 IU/kg may be administered under medical supervision. If this dose of aPCC is insufficient to control bleeding, repeated low doses of aPCC can be administered every 8–12 h within a total dose < 100 IU/kg in 24 h in order to reduce the risk of thrombotic complications. The platelet count, fibrinogen, and D-dimer levels should be checked in order to exclude and prevent a hypercoagulable state and the related risk of thrombosis [21].

Non-hematological Treatment

In addition to factor replacement, conventional management of joint bleeding envisages the implementation of protection, rest, ice, compression, and limb elevation with the goal to decrease pain, inflammation, and ultimately stop bleeding [25-27]. It has been debated whether or not cryotherapy may delay clot formation by interacting with the coagulation system, beside the fact that ice has a vasoconstricting effect and thus it may help to reduce swelling and pain. Cold application should be implemented only for brief time periods such as for 10 min every 2 h [28]. Even though aspiration of blood from the joints (arthrocentesis) may lead to the rapid resolution of inflammation, the benefits of this procedure remain controversial due to a lack of solid evidence on the prevention of long-term damage. Indeed, preclinical data, in vitro studies, and animal models showed that a shortened exposure to blood may decrease cartilage damage [29, 30], and observational studies support the role of joint aspiration in accelerating recovery after hemarthrosis [31-33]. However, no randomized clinical trials are available. The risk of infection or recurrent bleeding increases with this procedure and long-term data are not available. In case of suspected infection, arthrocentesis is mandatory for making an accurate diagnosis and also when a swollen and painful joint shows no improvement after 24 h, but only if adequate clotting factor replacement is administered prior to the procedure [20]. Intra-articular injections of corticosteroids may also be useful in selected patients after exclusion of infection, although little evidence is available on their efficacy [33, 34]. Similarly, the efficacy of other procedures such as joint lavage, alone or associated with steroid injections, is still elusive [35, 36].

When recurrent or massive bleeds do not respond to clotting factor replacement, arterial embolization may be considered. Because angiogenesis is one of the leading causes of recurrent hemarthrosis, selective angiographic embolization is one of the treatment options useful in selected cases of synovitis refractory to other treatments, through the reduction of the burden of inflammation that refuels angiogenesis and synovitis and predisposes to recurrent joint bleeding [37]. As soon as pain and swelling improve, physiotherapy should be promptly started to minimize muscle atrophy, prevent joint contractures, and maintain motion range [38]. A program of isometric muscular exercises and stretching is currently considered to be the best option [39].

Management of Chronic Arthropathy

When chronic synovitis is present, the joint is vulnerable to repeated bleeding, so that the best way to prevent progression to arthropathy is to start early prophylaxis with the deficient coagulation factor. According to the most recent guidelines of the World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH), prophylaxis is defined as the long-term administration of factor replacement at 25–40 IU/kg 2–3 times weekly. In hemophilia A [40], a level of FVIII > 10% appears to be sufficient to prevent joint damage [37], even though further evidence is required to confirm these data stemming from observational studies [41, 42]. Primary prophylaxis is defined as a therapeutic regimen started in the absence of documented osteochondral joint disease, as determined by physical examination and/or imaging studies, before the occurrence of the second clinically evident large joint bleeding the age of 3 years. Secondary prophylaxis is a regimen starting after two or more bleedings into large joints and before the onset of joint disease as documented by physical examination and imaging studies. Tertiary prophylaxis is a treatment regimen started in the presence of established joint disease [40]. The earlier prophylaxis is started, the lower is the risk of hemophilic arthropathy. Recently, through the introduction of a non-replacement therapy endowed with an extended half-life such as emicizumab, an even earlier prophylaxis can be offered to patients by means of subcutaneous administration, thus leading to improved adherence coupled with a likelihood of a higher bleeding protection. Comparative studies conducted to evaluate the long-term effects in terms of efficacy and safety of these different prophylaxis approaches are needed.

Local Treatments

The intra-articular administration of hyaluronic acid is a conservative treatment shown to be effective in osteoarthritis owing to its capability to provide joint lubrication, shock absorbance, and anti-inflammatory analgesic and chondroprotective effects [43]. However, evidence on its long-term efficacy in pain reduction and prevention of arthropathy progression is still limited [36, 44–47]. The injection of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been proposed as an alternative to hyaluronic acid. The rationale for its use is based on its content of growth factors such as platelet-derived growth factor, insulin-like growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor and transforming growth factor beta-1 but also of proteins such as fibrinogen, fibronectin, vitronectin, and thrombospondin-1 that may play a role in cell migration and matrix remodeling [46]. Other local interventions for recurrent joint bleeding in the presence of chronic synovitis refractory to clotting factor replacement include chemical synoviorthesis with rifampicin or tetracycline and radioisotopic synovectomy, which seems more effective in large joints [48, 49].

Rehabilitation

When arthropathy is already present, the role of physiotherapy is to strengthen muscles in order to stabilize the affected joints. Physical activity includes isometric and isotonic exercises within a comfortable range of movement, proprioception training, and stretching exercises in order to improve muscle and tendon flexibility around the affected joints [39]. Exercises should be tailored based on the individual abilities. In addition, a physiotherapy program including educational sessions and home exercises may improve chronic pain in patients with hemophilia [50]. The beneficial effects of physiotherapy range from the improvement of muscle strength with reduction of bleeding in muscles and joints and subsequent damage progression, to the amelioration of the range of motion, walking ability and balance, and emotional and social well-being [51, 52]. To improve adherence, prerecorded or telerehabilitation programs with supervised exercise classes may be organized [39] and the introduction of exertional games (exergames or serious games) has been particularly useful in pediatric patients with hemophilia [53].

Pharmacological Treatment

Medications are often needed for the acute and chronic management of pain in hemophilia [20]. The appropriateness of the chosen drug depends on the intensity of the pain. As for other musculoskeletal conditions such as knee osteoarthritis [54], pain-relieving drugs should be used in a crescendo stepwise progression [55], starting from drugs with lower potency but also lower incidence of adverse events such as paracetamol/acetaminophen towards the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids [20, 56]. However, in patients with hemophilia, the interference of NSAIDs with platelet function led to the preferred use of selective COX-2 inhibitors (COXIB) owing to their limited adverse effects on platelet function and gastrointestinal tract, and aspirin and other NSAIDs should be avoided. In the field of analgesic management of hemophilic arthropathy, there are few evidence-based studies on efficacy and safety and information mainly stems from small observational studies, case series, and expert opinion. Systemic corticosteroids have a limited efficacy and are not currently recommended in the management of acute and chronic pain in hemophilic arthropathy [20].

Paracetamol/Acetaminophen

Paracetamol (British approved name, acetaminophen is the US, Canada, and Japan) is an antipyretic drug with peripheral and central antinociceptive effects. Given its wide use and acceptable safety profile [57], it is currently the first-choice medication for mild-to-moderate acute or chronic joint pain in patients with hemophilic arthropathy [20]. Paracetamol exerts a moderate analgesic effect by inhibiting the same cyclooxygenase (COX1) targeted by NSAIDs and aspirin [9]. At the central level, paracetamol also acts by increasing serotonin release [58]. Paracetamol blocks COX for its peroxidase catalytic activity rather than at the COX catalytic site. Thus, the effect of this drug is sensitive to changes in the tissue levels of peroxide and activated leukocytes and platelets contain high concentrations of peroxide, thus explaining the poor activity of this drug on inflammation and platelet function. Data of an increased cardiovascular risk and blood pressure are inconclusive following standard doses of paracetamol [59, 60], but it appears that its effect on blood pressure is smaller than that of NSAIDs. Although the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding is much lower than for NSAIDs, it should be considered for doses greater than 2 g daily [61]. Paracetamol metabolism envisages glucuronidation and sulphation or oxidation by the cytochrome P450 system, particularly through CYP1E2 which produces the toxic intermediary N-acetyl-p-benzo-quinone-imine (NAPQI). NAPQI can be conjugated by glutathione S-transferase and excreted in the urine, with a wide interindividual and ethnic variation in metabolism [62]. NAPQI production may increase in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, so that liver function should be assessed in order to adjust paracetamol dosage [62].

Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are endowed with analgesic, antipyretic, and anti-inflammatory effects and are widely used to tackle joint pain due to osteoarthritis. They exert action by the non-selective inhibition of prostaglandin synthetase (PGHS), thus blocking the transformation of arachidonic acid in prostaglandins, prostacyclin, and thromboxanes. PGHS has two main isoforms, known as COX-1 and COX-2. COX-1 is expressed constitutively in all cells and is important for platelet aggregation by blocking the upstream pathway to thromboxane A2 (TXA2) production and has also the undesirable effect of reducing gastric mucus secretion, thus resulting in an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.

NSAIDs are also known to increase the risk of cardiovascular events, renal failure, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Eyster et al. demonstrated that the GI bleeding risk is significantly increased within  one month after NSAID use but not with the use of COXIBs [63]. Considering that patients with hemophilia have an increased risk of upper GI bleeding (up to ten times higher compared to the general population) and that selective COX-2 inhibitors carry a lower risk, COXIBs are the drug of choice and other NSAIDs should be avoided [64], according to guidelines on hemophilia for the management of joint pain in hemophilic arthropathy [20, 40]. These guidelines describe three levels of analgesic therapy and place COXIBs as a second-line choice after paracetamol (Fig. 1) [20].

Fig. 1

Pain management strategies in patients with hemophilia. COX-2 cycloxygenase-2.

See the WFH Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia, 3rd edition and Young et al. [20, 56]

Celecoxib [65] and etoricoxib [66] are effective against pain in hemophilic arthropathy when used for up to 30 days for pain control. According to Tsoukas and colleagues [66], celecoxib or etoricoxib did not increase the risk of bleeding compared to placebo, and the safety profile of these drugs in a 6-week case–control study was acceptable. However, the use of COXIBs is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, including death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke, even though the degree of risk is not higher than that for other non-selective NSAIDs [67]. Therefore, before prescribing COXIBs and NSAIDs in general, each patient should undergo an accurate evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors, particularly in aging persons with hemophilia. Furthermore, as for other NSAIDs, COXIBs should be used with caution in patients with hypertension and renal dysfunction, which is common in patients with hemophilia, even though data from the PRECISION trial indicate a lower incidence of renal adverse events with COXIBs compared with other NSAIDs [67, 68].

Opioids

Opioids in combination with paracetamol are considered a second-line or third-line choice for pain management in patients with hemophilia. Long-term use of opioids as analgesics should be avoided because of the chronic nature of arthropathy in people with severe hemophilia and thus the risk of medication addiction [20]. Particularly in low-income countries with limited access to replacement therapy, the associated chronic overuse of opioid drugs is a significant problem, which, however, should not be overlooked, even in high-income countries such as the United States of America (USA), where COXIBs have no indication in hemophilia and an opioid overdose crisis is currently ongoing [69, 70].

There is no literature on the use of opioids in hemophilic arthropathy, so that evidence stems from studies on osteoarthritis. The recent hemophilia guidelines [20] recommend a gradual initiation of analgesic therapy with opioids, starting with "soft opioids", such as codeine or tramadol in association with paracetamol up to 3–4 times a day. Codeine is a pro-drug requiring hepatic metabolism that produces morphine and the codeine-6-glucuronide, which are active on opioid μ-receptors. There is low-to-moderate evidence stemming from systematic reviews and meta-analyses that analgesic drugs containing a small amount of codeine (e.g., codeine/paracetamol) are effective for acute musculoskeletal pain or in multiple doses for hip joint pain [71]. Tramadol is a synthetic prodrug that requires hepatic metabolism to be turned into O-desmethyltramadol. In addition to its analgesic effects on μ-receptors, the active molecule acts as an inhibitor of the reuptake of serotonin and noradrenaline, which seems to determine a direct and indirect analgesic action on central pain transmission. The maximum dose of tramadol should not exceed 400 mg per day and should be even lower when associated with antidepressants that inhibit the reuptake of serotonin and noradrenaline, in order to avoid the risk of the serotonin syndrome [72]. In many studies, the effect of tramadol and the tramadol/paracetamol combination is effective in pain control and safe as gradually titrated [73]. However, in osteoarthritis, the effect of soft opioids, associated or not with paracetamol, offers a smaller analgesic effect than NSAIDs but with fewer side effects in the frame of chronic use. Codeine should not be administered to children under 12 years of age.

In some studies, “strong opioids” are reported to be used more frequently by patients with hemophilia than “soft” ones [74]. Among them, two classes of medicines can be identified [75]. Short-acting opioids (SAOs) have shorter peak time and half-lives and thus are more useful for acute over chronic intermittent pain and in breakthrough pain. This group includes the immediate-release (IR) formulations of morphine, fentanyl and oxycodone, of which there are pharmacological associations with paracetamol. On the other side, the long-acting opioids (LAO) have pharmacokinetic characteristics that favor a longer action duration. They include extended-release (ER), sustained-release (SR), or controlled-release (CR) formulations of oxycodone, fentanyl, and morphine. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses report conflicting data on the use of strong opioids in osteoarthritis [76, 77]. In a systematic review, Megale and colleagues [76] highlighted that the regular use of opioids (from 10 days to 24 weeks, from 10 to 300 mg of oral morphine equivalents) is more often discontinued, not because of analgesic ineffectiveness, but rather side effects. Similarly, in a meta-analysis, Fuggle et al. [77] reported an increased risk of gastrointestinal and neurological side effects, albeit mostly minor and non-lethal ones (Table 1).

Table 1

The most frequently reported side effects of opioids

System involved	Adverse effect
Gastrointestinal	Constipation
	Nausea, vomiting
	Dyspepsia, gastritis, heartburn
	Dry mouth, oral ulceration
Neurological	Headache
	Dizziness
	Fatigue, insomnia, weakness, nervousness

The use of soft opioids in association with paracetamol or strong opioids alone is effective in reducing pain and improving symptoms. However, these drugs are often discontinued due to unpleasant side effects such as nausea and reduced gastrointestinal transit. In addition, they can lead to abuse, misuse, addiction, and dependence, so that these adverse effects must always be considered when prescribed as analgesics for chronic conditions. The most dangerous side effect is respiratory depression, which requires slow titration in particular in older patients and in those with respiratory ailments. Therefore, the management of acute and chronic pain in patients with hemophilia should be done in collaboration with experts of pain therapy.

Surgical Treatment

For hemophilic arthropathy, surgical treatment for pain should be regarded as a last choice when every other intervention has failed. Arthroscopic synovectomy is useful in the case of ankle, elbow, or knee chronic synovitis refractory to factor replacement or when radioisotopic or chemical synoviorthesis were unsuccessful [78]. The presence of severe disabling pain is the primary indication for joint replacement, particularly of the knee, thus helping to restore function in case of deranged joint structure involving the cartilage and the subchondral bone associated with pain and disability [79]. Prosthetic surgery or arthrodesis may be useful for advanced disease of the ankle, based on residual function, pain, and patient preference [80].

Emerging Approaches

Beside the traditional approach to pain, emerging treatments include physical therapies, systemic and local treatments, and lastly behavioral approaches (Table 2). Some of these techniques have already been evaluated in patients with hemophilia, whereas some others have only been validated for osteoarthritic pain.

Table 2

Emerging approaches in hemophilia

Classification	Treatment	Evidence in hemophilia
Physical therapies	Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)	Roche et al., Pain. 1985;21(1):43–8 De la Corte-Rodriguez, Rodriguez-Merchan, Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis. 2012 Sep;24(1):1–9
	Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NEMS)	No evidence
	Spinal cord stimulation (SCS)	No evidence
	Low-level laser therapy (LLLT)	Eid et al., Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Nov;30(8):2179–87
	Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF)	Eid et al., Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Nov;30(8):2179–87
	Acupuncture	Oliveira et al., Haemophilia. 2020 Nov;26(6):e315–e22
	Scrambler therapy	No evidence
	Kinesiotaping	Azab et al., Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions. 2020;20(2):256–64
Local treatment	Transplantation with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell	Buda et al., Cartilage. 2015 Jul;6(3):150–5
	Intra-articular injections of ozone	No evidence
Systemic treatment	Endocannabinoids	No evidence
	Antidepressants and anticonvulsants	Stromer et al., Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2021 Mar 4
	Iron chelators, anti-inflammatories, anti-fibrinolytics	Pulles et al., Pharmacol Res. 2017 Jan;115:192–9
Behavioral approaches	Mindfulness	No evidence
	Cognitive behavioral therapy	García-Dasí et al., Haemophilia. 2021 May; 27 (3), e357–e367

Physical therapies, such as low-frequency electrotherapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), have been applied for at least 30 years to relieve arthropathic pain in hemophilia [81]. According to the gate control theory, the perception of pain can be modulated by acting on spinal interneurons, with related synaptic inhibition of neurons responsible for the transmission of pain information. TENS inhibits peripheral nerves involved in nociceptive transmission, although also the release of neuropeptides such as endorphins could be a mechanism of action. Another physical therapy option is the application of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NEMS), which improves muscular strength and breaks the vicious circle of pain leading to reduced motility and worsening of arthropathy [82].

Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) envisages the application of light in the range of 1–500 mW, thus promoting tissue regeneration, inflammation modulation, and pain relief enhancements. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) was reported to be effective in reducing pain, healing ulcers, promoting bone healing, and treating osteoarthritis and musculoskeletal inflammatory diseases. Eid et al. recently conducted a study on 30 children with hemophilia comparing and investigating the effects of LLLT and PEMF. Both treatments led to pain improvement and swelling reduction, increased range of motion, and improved physical fitness after 12 weeks of therapy [83].

Another promising approach for the management of chronic pain is spinal cord stimulation (SCS), which has its roots in the concept of gate control theory. SCS has already been applied with beneficial effects in chronic neuropathic pain [84]. The SCS works through the application of tonic 40–60-Hz stimulation that activates dorsal columns in order to interfere with the transmission of nociceptive impulses. Concern exists about the possible development of epidural hematoma but this procedure may be safely carried out under appropriate prophylaxis. A spinal cord stimulator was placed with no bleeding in a patient with von Willebrand disease type 1 in order to treat a complex regional pain syndrome [85]. Nevertheless, solid evidence on the efficacy of SCS in hemophilic arthropathic pain is missing.

The paradigm of the gate control theory of pain has been recently overturned by the appearance of scrambler therapy. Scrambler therapy is an electro-analgesia vehiculated by five artificial nerves that transmit “non-pain” information by C-fiber surface receptors. This therapy is apparently able to interfere with the plasticity of the pain system and induce its regression by providing “no pain” information repeated over time [86, 87]. Scrambler therapy has been episodically applied for the treatment of osteoarthritis pain, and it may be a promising physical therapy for the future of hemophilic chronic pain, but solid evidence is currently lacking.

Kinesiotaping is a novel technique that envisages the application of an elastic, adhesive bandage on the skin overlying the injured tissues that can stretch up to 140% of its original size, supporting muscles and joints and improving blood circulation and lymphatic drainage. It has been applied to adolescents with hemophilia as an adjunctive therapy to reduce lower back pain, improve back muscle endurance, and enhance functional capacity. In the future, it may be considered in addition to systemic treatment to improve recovery after acute hemarthrosis [88].

A few reports on the adoption of local regenerative medicine in hemophilia are available. In a small group of patients, synovectomy and arthroscopic debridement of the ankle were combined with autologus bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell implant and platelet-rich fibrin showed improvement of symptoms, functional ability, and signs of regeneration of cartilage and bone after a mean follow-up of 2 years [89].

Medical ozone is composed by a mixture of oxygen and ozone gas with unique mechanisms of action, including oxygenation, immune modulation, and anti-inflammatory properties. Although the exact biochemical mechanisms of action of its intra-articular injection are still unclear, there is increasing evidence that this therapy might be effective for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. In a recent review of the literature comprising five randomized clinical trials and 428 subjects, intra-articular injections of ozone resulted superior to placebo and in relieving knee pain in a follow-up of 6 months [90]. There is no evidence available in pain management in hemophilic arthropathy.

One of the goals in tackling pain in hemophilic arthropathy is to interrupt pain chronicization. Repeated acute pain during hemarthrosis together with chronic pain due to arthropathy may lead to sensitization of noxious stimuli vehicled by peripheric nerves and to an increased susceptibility to non-painful stimuli. If central sensitization is suspected, antidepressants and anticonvulsants should be considered as comedications. Caution must be used when prescribing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) because of their activity on platelet serotonin reuptake and related inhibition of platelet aggregation with an increased risk of bleeding [91]. The endocannabinoid system is a promising target for osteoarthritis pain [92]. The role of cannabinoids in hemophilic arthropathy has not been studied yet, so in the future these molecules may be used to tackle chronic pain management. Recently, Pulles et al. described the emerging roles of disease-modifying therapies in hemophilic arthropathy: iron chelators, anti-inflammatories, anti-fibrinolytics, and bone remodeling agents have been predominantly studied in a preclinical setting, paving the way for future approaches based on the pathogenesis of the hemophilic arthropathy [93].

Chronic pain management also envisages enhanced self-management, and behavioral and motivational changes. Among these techniques, mindfulness exercises, cognitive behavioral approaches, and biofeedback have been proposed in hemophilia [91]. Cognitive behavioral therapy has been studied in a prospective two-arm single-blind parallel-group controlled trial showing to be effective in improving chronic pain, quality of life, and emotional status of  patients with hemophilia [94].

Conclusions

In conclusion, a number of different drugs are available for pain control in hemophilia and many novel approaches are gaining interest. Standardization in the choice of treatment for pain is ongoing. In the meantime, an appropriate evaluation by a multidisciplinary team involving hematologists, orthopedic surgeons, rheumatologists, and physiotherapists, and the use of the safest drugs at the lowest effective dosage and for periods as short as possible will allow reducing the incidence of adverse effects.

Why carry out this study?

Notwithstanding the fact that the care of hemophilia patients has improved dramatically over the last decade, some of them still experience joint bleeding.

Hemarthrosis is associated with acute pain and its recurrence leads to hemophilic arthropathy, which in turn leads to disability and chronic pain.

This review considers systemic and local pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the management of acute and chronic pain in hemophilia.

What was learned from the study?

Acute and chronic pain in patients with hemophilia requires a multidisciplinary approach.

The management of pain due to hemophilic arthropathy still requires standardization. Meanwhile, the safest drugs should be used at the lowest effective dosage and for periods as short as possible.