Literature DB >> 35020174

A dosimetric comparison of CT- and photogrammetry- generated 3D printed HDR brachytherapy surface applicators.

Corey A Bridger1,2, Paul D Reich3,4, Alexandre M Caraça Santos3,4, Michael J J Douglass3,4.   

Abstract

In this study, we investigate whether an acceptable dosimetric plan can be obtained for a brachytherapy surface applicator designed using photogrammetry and compare the plan quality to a CT-derived applicator. The nose region of a RANDO anthropomorphic phantom was selected as the treatment site due to its high curvature. Photographs were captured using a Nikon D5600 DSLR camera and reconstructed using Agisoft Metashape while CT data was obtained using a Canon Aquillion scanner. Virtual surface applicators were designed in Blender and printed with PLA plastic. Treatment plans with a prescription dose of 3.85 Gy × 10 fractions with 100% dose to PTV on the bridge of the nose at 2 mm depth were generated separately using AcurosBV in the Varian BrachyVision TPS. PTV D98%, D90% and V100%, and OAR D0.1cc, D2cc and V50% dose metrics and dwell times were evaluated, with the applicator fit assessed by air-gap volume measurements. Both types of surface applicators were printed with minimal defects and visually fitted well to the target area. The measured air-gap volume between the photogrammetry applicator and phantom surface was 44% larger than the CT-designed applicator, with a mean air gap thickness of 3.24 and 2.88 mm, respectively. The largest difference in the dose metric observed for the PTV and OAR was the PTV V100% of - 1.27% and skin D0.1cc of - 0.28%. PTV D98% and D90% and OAR D2cc and V50% for the photogrammetry based plan were all within 0.5% of the CT based plan. Total dwell times were also within 5%. A 3D printed surface applicator for the nose was successfully constructed using photogrammetry techniques. Although it produced a larger air gap between the surface applicator and phantom surface, a clinically acceptable dose plan was created with similar PTV and OAR dose metrics to the CT-designed applicator. Additional future work is required to comprehensively evaluate its suitability in a clinically environment.
© 2022. Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Brachytherapy; Photogrammetry; Skin; Surface moulds

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35020174     DOI: 10.1007/s13246-021-01092-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 2662-4729


  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of camera settings for photogrammetric reconstruction of humanoid phantoms for EBRT bolus and HDR surface brachytherapy applications.

Authors:  Corey A Bridger; Michael J J Douglass; Paul D Reich; Alexandre M Caraça Santos
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2021-04-12

2.  Assessing the fit of 3D printed bolus from CT, optical scanner and photogrammetry methods.

Authors:  S K Maxwell; P H Charles; N Cassim; T Kairn; S B Crowe
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2020-03-23

3.  Comparison of 3D printed nose bolus to traditional wax bolus for cost-effectiveness, volumetric accuracy and dosimetric effect.

Authors:  Christine Albantow; Catriona Hargrave; Amy Brown; Christopher Halsall
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-02-03
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Can optical scanning technologies replace CT for 3D printed medical devices in radiation oncology?

Authors:  Michael John James Douglass
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2022-04-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.