Literature DB >> 35020015

Diagnostic performance of MRI in detecting locally recurrent soft tissue sarcoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Robert M Kwee1, Thomas C Kwee2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the diagnostic criteria and performance of MRI in detecting locally recurrent soft tissue sarcoma.
METHODS: Medline and Embase were searched for original studies on the diagnostic performance of MRI detecting locally recurrent soft tissue sarcoma. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a bivariate random-effects model.
RESULTS: Ten studies were included. There was a high risk of bias with respect to patient selection in 2 studies and a high risk of bias with respect to flow and timing in 8 studies. The presence of a mass yielded a pooled sensitivity of 80.9% and a pooled specificity of 77.0%. Hyperintensity at T2-weighted imaging yielded a pooled sensitivity of 82.4% and a pooled specificity of 11.0%. Hypo- or isointensity at T1-weighted imaging yielded a pooled sensitivity of 82.0% and a pooled specificity of 14.3%. Contrast enhancement images yielded a pooled sensitivity of 95.9% and a pooled specificity of 12.3%. Low signal mass on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map yielded a pooled sensitivity of 67.5% and a pooled specificity of 95.3%. Early and rapid arterial phase enhancement at dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI yielded a pooled sensitivity of 91.3% and a pooled specificity of 84.7%.
CONCLUSION: The presence of a mass appears a useful criterion to diagnose locally recurrent soft tissue sarcoma. Signal characteristics at standard T2- and T1-weighted imaging and contrast enhancement seem less useful because they lack specificity. Functional MRI techniques, including DWI with ADC mapping and DCE, may help to make a correct diagnosis. KEY POINTS: • The presence of a mass at MRI appears useful to diagnose locally recurrent soft tissue sarcoma, because both sensitivity and specificity are fairly high. • Signal characteristics at standard T2- and T1-weighted sequences and contrast enhancement suffer from poor specificity. • DWI with ADC mapping and DCE may help to make a correct diagnosis, but further research is needed to better understand the value of these functional MRI techniques.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance imaging; Meta-analysis; Recurrence; Sarcoma; Systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35020015     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08457-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  23 in total

Review 1.  Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.

Authors:  Johannes B Reitsma; Afina S Glas; Anne W S Rutjes; Rob J P M Scholten; Patrick M Bossuyt; Aeilko H Zwinderman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Soft tissue tumors: post-treatment imaging.

Authors:  Mark J Kransdorf; Mark D Murphey
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  [Staging and re-staging of soft tissue sarcoma using MRI. Usefulness of contrast media].

Authors:  A Barile; M Caulo; L Zugaro; E Di Cesare; M Gallucci; C Masciocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Soft-tissue sarcoma in adults: An update on the current state of histiotype-specific management in an era of personalized medicine.

Authors:  Adriana C Gamboa; Alessandro Gronchi; Kenneth Cardona
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 5.  Local recurrence of soft-tissue sarcoma: issues in imaging surveillance strategy.

Authors:  Nisreen S Ezuddin; Juan Pretell-Mazzini; Raphael L Yechieli; Darcy A Kerr; Breelyn A Wilky; Ty K Subhawong
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Soft-tissue sarcoma: MR imaging vs sonography for detection of local recurrence after surgery.

Authors:  H Choi; D G Varma; B D Fornage; E E Kim; D A Johnston
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Soft-tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  Nathan F Gilbert; Christopher P Cannon; Patrick P Lin; Valerae O Lewis
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Does Advanced Imaging Have a Role in Detecting Local Recurrence of Soft-tissue Sarcoma?

Authors:  Patrick England; Zachery Hong; Lee Rhea; Angela Hirbe; Douglas McDonald; Cara Cipriano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Diagnostic value of MRI for detecting recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma in a long-term analysis at a multidisciplinary sarcoma center.

Authors:  Olav Jansen; Marcus Both; Sam Sedaghat; Maya Sedaghat; Jens Meschede
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Could Routine Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detect Local Recurrence of Musculoskeletal Sarcomas Earlier? A Cost-effectiveness Study.

Authors:  Andrew George; Robert J Grimer; Steven L J James
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.