Literature DB >> 3501976

Comparative antimicrobial activity of aminothiazolyl methoxyimino cephalosporins against anaerobic bacteria, including 100 cefoxitin-resistant isolates.

R N Jones1, A L Barry, K E Aldridge, E H Gerlach.   

Abstract

Three aminothiazolyl methoxyimino cephalosporins (ceftizoxime, ceftriaxone, and cefotaxime with and without its metabolite) were tested against 500 strains of anaerobic bacteria using the NCCLS reference agar dilution procedure. Eighty-seven percent of all strains tested were from the Bacteroides fragilis group. When tested against a collection of 100 cefoxitin-resistant isolates, ceftizoxime and the cefotaxime/desacetyl-cefotaxime combination were the most active in vitro, inhibiting 32-38% of strains. Ceftriaxone inhibited the greatest number (87%) of cefoxitin-susceptible anaerobes at less than or equal to 32 micrograms/ml. A regional variation in the activity of these drugs was confirmed when an additional 300 isolates were examined from three medical centers. Cefotaxime, ceftizoxime, and ceftriaxone were essentially equal in overall antimicrobial activity, although each drug was judged the best at one of the three locations. Cefoxitin resistance (MIC greater than or equal to 32 micrograms/ml) was consistent among the institutions at a 25% incidence for all organisms tested, and 28% cefoxitin resistance among the B. fragilis group strains. Cefoxitin resistance was not determined to be associated with a beta-lactamase mechanism, but ceftriaxone and other aminothiazolyl cephems were hydrolyzed, thus elevating their MICs. Regional variation in anaerobic organism susceptibility to cephamycins and cephalosporins in company with the variable beta-lactam resistance mechanisms seems to require periodic, epidemiologic monitoring of in vitro drug activity by appropriate methods to assure continued antimicrobial efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3501976     DOI: 10.1016/0732-8893(87)90166-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  4 in total

1.  Using cost of infection as a tool to demonstrate a difference in prophylactic antibiotic efficacy: a prospective randomized comparison of the pharmacoeconomic effectiveness of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime prophylaxis in abdominal surgery.

Authors:  John C Woodfield; Andre M Van Rij; Ross A Pettigrew; Antje van der Linden; Donna Bolt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  The antimicrobial activity of cefotaxime: comparative multinational hospital isolate surveys covering 15 years.

Authors:  R N Jones
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 3.  Ceftriaxone. A reappraisal of its antibacterial activity and pharmacokinetic properties, and an update on its therapeutic use with particular reference to once-daily administration.

Authors:  R N Brogden; A Ward
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Comparative in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of a special panel of 74 Bacteroides fragilis group isolates in Wilkins-Chalgren agar with and without sheep blood.

Authors:  C J Gill; D L Shungu; S Ponticas
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.191

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.