Smriti Singh1, Yvonne Marquardt2, Rahul Rimal1, Akihiro Nishiguchi1,3, Sebastian Huth2, Mitsuru Akashi4, Martin Moeller1,5, Jens M Baron2. 1. DWI-Leibniz Institute for Interactive Materials, Forkenbeckstrasse 50, Aachen 52074, Germany. 2. Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen 52074, Germany. 3. Research Center for Functional Materials, National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan. 4. Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. 5. A.N. Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds of Russian Academy of Science, Vavilova 28, Moscow 119991, Russia.
Abstract
Psoriasis is an incurable, immune-mediated inflammatory disease characterized by the hyperproliferation and abnormal differentiation of keratinocytes. To study in depth the pathogenesis of this disease and possible therapy options suitable, pre-clinical models are required. Three-dimensional skin equivalents are a potential alternative to simplistic monolayer cultures and immunologically different animal models. However, current skin equivalents lack long-term stability, which jeopardizes the possibility to simulate the complex disease-specific phenotype followed by long-term therapeutic treatment. To overcome this limitation, the cell coating technique was used to fabricate full-thickness human skin equivalents (HSEs). This rapid and scaffold-free fabrication method relies on coating cell membranes with nanofilms using layer-by-layer assembly, thereby allowing extended cultivation of HSEs up to 49 days. The advantage in time is exploited to develop a model that not only forms a disease phenotype but can also be used to monitor the effects of topical or systemic treatment. To generate a psoriatic phenotype, the HSEs were stimulated with recombinant human interleukin 17A (rhIL-17A). This was followed by systemic treatment of the HSEs with the anti-IL-17A antibody secukinumab in the presence of rhIL-17A. Microarray and RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that HSEs treated with rhIL-17A showed downregulation of differentiation markers and upregulation of chemokines and cytokines, while treatment with anti-IL-17A antibody reverted these gene regulations. Gene ontology analysis revealed the proinflammatory and chemotactic effects of rhIL-17A on the established HSEs. These data demonstrated, at the molecular level, the effects of anti-IL-17A antibody on rhIL-17A-induced gene regulations. This shows the physiological relevance of the developed HSE and opens venues for its use as an alternative to ex vivo skin explants and animal testing.
Psoriasis is an incurable, immune-mediated inflammatory disease characterized by the hyperproliferation and abnormal differentiation of keratinocytes. To study in depth the pathogenesis of this disease and possible therapy options suitable, pre-clinical models are required. Three-dimensional skin equivalents are a potential alternative to simplistic monolayer cultures and immunologically different animal models. However, current skin equivalents lack long-term stability, which jeopardizes the possibility to simulate the complex disease-specific phenotype followed by long-term therapeutic treatment. To overcome this limitation, the cell coating technique was used to fabricate full-thickness human skin equivalents (HSEs). This rapid and scaffold-free fabrication method relies on coating cell membranes with nanofilms using layer-by-layer assembly, thereby allowing extended cultivation of HSEs up to 49 days. The advantage in time is exploited to develop a model that not only forms a disease phenotype but can also be used to monitor the effects of topical or systemic treatment. To generate a psoriatic phenotype, the HSEs were stimulated with recombinant human interleukin 17A (rhIL-17A). This was followed by systemic treatment of the HSEs with the anti-IL-17A antibody secukinumab in the presence of rhIL-17A. Microarray and RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that HSEs treated with rhIL-17A showed downregulation of differentiation markers and upregulation of chemokines and cytokines, while treatment with anti-IL-17A antibody reverted these gene regulations. Gene ontology analysis revealed the proinflammatory and chemotactic effects of rhIL-17A on the established HSEs. These data demonstrated, at the molecular level, the effects of anti-IL-17A antibody on rhIL-17A-induced gene regulations. This shows the physiological relevance of the developed HSE and opens venues for its use as an alternative to ex vivo skin explants and animal testing.
Entities:
Keywords:
IL-17A; human skin equivalents; psoriasis; scaffold free; secukinumab
Psoriasis is a chronic
immune-mediated inflammatory disorder mainly
affecting the skin of 2–3% of the general population.[1] Histologically, it is characterized by raised,
well-demarcated, erythematous oval plaques. Psoriatic plaques are
characterized by an abnormal proliferation and differentiation of
keratinocytes, leading to epidermal hyperplasia and results in the
reduction or complete absence of the epidermal granular layer. This
causes incomplete cornification of the keratinocytes with retention
of nuclei (parakeratosis) in the stratum corneum. On the other hand,
compared to the normal skin, the mitotic rate of the basal keratinocytes
is increased. This gives rise to thickened epidermis.[2] Since, in psoriasis, premature cell death is combined with
accelerated keratinization, late differentiation markers of keratinocytes
such as profilaggrin and loricrin are downregulated. Moreover, keratinocyte
differentiation markers such as keratin (K) 1 and 10 are reduced,
while an increase in expression of proteins KALP/elafin, K6, K16,
and K17, which are absent in healthy skin,are expressed. Pathologically,
immune cells infiltrate the dermis and epidermis of the psoriatic
lesion. This involves the innate and adaptive immune systems, where
dendritic cells (DCs) and T cells, among other cells, play a major
role.[2,3] Due to the presence of CD4+ Th1 and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells type 1 (Tc1), tumor necrosis factor
(TNF)-α, high levels of interferon (IFN)-γ, and IL-12
in psoriatic lesions, initially, psoriasis was considered to be a
T helper cell type 1 (Th1) cell-mediated disease. A “type
1” inflammatory environment is created by the interaction of
T cells with DCs, subsequently releasing Th1-type cytokines.
Lately, an added role of Th17 cells and their main effector
cytokines IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21, and IL-22 as well as a granulocyte-macrophage
colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)[4−6] has been demonstrated
in the pathogenesis of psoriasis.[7] In addition,
reports also show the involvement of Th22 cells in the
pathogenesis of psoriasis due to their ample secretion of proinflammatory
IL-22.[8]Beyond affecting the skin,
psoriasis exposes the patient to an
increased risk of many other diseases like psoriatic arthritis, metabolic
syndrome, autoimmune conditions, cardiovascular disease, malignancies,
and psychiatric disorders.[9−11] Thus, psoriasis is a complex
and multifactorial disease involving multiple interactions between
different cell types and impacts on virtually all aspects of health.
Despite the challenges put forward by this debilitating disease, its
immune pathogenesis still lacks complete understanding. Therefore,
a better understanding of the mechanisms of psoriasis is required
so that new therapeutic agents can be developed for better patient
outcomes. Over the years, many in vitro models of
psoriasis are developed to study the pathogenesis of psoriasis and
to explore for new therapeutic drug candidates.[12−15] Currently, the cytokine stimulation
approach for developing disease pathogenesis is mainly applied to
collagen-based full-thickness skin models. In the collagen models,
fibroblasts are embedded in collagen I gels, which function as dermal
equivalents.[16] Collagen models can demonstrate
characteristic psoriatic phenotypes like epidermal hyperplasia and
hypogranulosis and express typical disease markers like HBD-2, SKALP/elafin,
and/or S100A7,[4,17] but these models suffer from
poor mechanical strength, contraction, and a limited life span.[18] Typically, these full-thickness skin models
start to degrade after approximately 14 days. One of the main causes
of the limited life span of these models is the upregulation of collagenase,
which deteriorates the existing extracellular matrix (ECM).[19] After stimulation with a disease-specific cytokine
cocktail, it generally takes at least 5 days for the development of
the disease phenotype like psoriasis.[4,20] Thus, the
relatively short life of the current skin models does not allow testing
the treatment/therapy after full development of the disease, thereby
failing in mimicking the realistic clinical scenario.To replicate
the clinical drug testing condition on skin models,
we can divide the study into three phases. Phase I is the development
of the model, phase II is the development of characteristic disease
phenotype, and phase III is the start of the treatment protocol. Due
to the short longevity of the existing models, mostly phases II and
III are combined, which minimizes the duration between the actual
disease onset and treatment. Eventually, this can give rise to testing
results that do not correlate to the clinical situation. Hence, it
is imperative to develop skin models that are viable for long-term
treatment. Such models can better mimic clinical situations of diseases
such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis and will enable a time-course
study during treatment, equivalent to sequential biopsies. Due to
ethical reasons, it is not possible to derive sequential biopsies
from patients in clinical studies since biopsies involve the risk
of anaphylactic reactions to local anesthesia and always lead to scaring,
sometimes even hypertrophic scars or keloids. Therefore, most psoriasis
studies often only monitor the clinical condition of the patient (psoriasis
area and severity index (PASI) score) and analyze blood samples derived
at every patient visit.Long-term skin models would further
assist the development of more
complex models with incorporated immune cells and vascularization.
A long-term organotypic skin that can accurately model the diseased
tissue architecture, with the added potential of the introduction
of multiple cell types, however, has not been previously reported.Different from the approaches used so far, our approach of making
a full-thickness skin model is neither based on scaffolds nor hydrogels
but instead on the targeted physical modification of cells. In this
approach, seeded single cells carry a minimum ECM nanocoating to generate
tissue. The approach is based on recent reports by Akashi et al.[21] who have shown that primary human cells (fibroblast,
endothelial, and epithelial cells) equipped with layer-by-layer nanocoating
of fibronectin and collagen can (i) spontaneously form 3D tissue and
(ii) can be cultivated in hetero-cell cultures. This concept has led
to entirely new and extremely promising hetero-cell tissue models
in which contacts between different cell types can direct the differentiation
from an unstructured cell assembly to an organized and functional
microtissue. However, the capability of this technique for long-term
skin models has not been explored and such models have never been
used to study disease progression and remission. In this study, we
could demonstrate the benefits of a long-term HSE to investigate the
role of the inflammatory cytokine IL-17A in the pathogenesis of psoriasis
and the molecular effects of systemic targeted treatment with secukinumab.
Results
and Discussion
To prepare the HSEs, normal human epithelial
keratinocytes (NHEKs)
and normal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDFs) were obtained from specimens
of cutaneous surgery in healthy volunteers, after informed consent
and according to the institutional guidelines and the Declaration
of Helsinki principles. The models were prepared using a layer-by-layer
coating and accumulation approach.[21,22] This process
is based on preconditioning of cells by ECM proteins, thereby recapitulating
the cell adhesive properties of the ECM surrounding cell microenvironment.
For fabrication of the models, NHDFs were coated with nanometer-thick
fibronectin–gelatin (FN-G) films. The films were coated on
the surface of a single cell in a layer-by-layer process (FN-G)8-FN. After coating, cells were allowed to assemble to form
a 3D tissue by cell accumulation in a confined space. This adhesion
of the matrix to the cells and itself is solely by integrin binding
and protein–protein interaction, equivalent to those present
in the natural ECM. For fabrication of the HSEs, 15 layers of coated
fibroblasts were assembled on day 1 to form dermis. This was followed
by the addition of a monolayer of keratinocytes on day 2. The HSE
was introduced to the air–liquid interface (ALI) on day 3 and
cultured up to 7 weeks. Histological examination of the HSEs was conducted
every week.Histological examination of the 3D HSEs (Figure ) revealed a well-stratified
epidermis, which
is differentiated into four distinct layers—cornified, granular,
spinous, and basal. The image clearly shows the formation of a basement
membrane separating the homogeneous dermis from the epidermis layers.
As expected, the thickness of cornified epidermis was increased with
increasing the duration of ALI culture. For the first time, we show
that up to 7 weeks, no histological changes owing to the instability
of the model could be observed. Staining with Ki67, which is a proliferation
marker, further confirmed the viability of the epidermis for the cultured
time (Figure S1). Measuring the thickness
of the dermis for each time point showed a maximum increase in thickness
after 49 days (Figure S2). Additionaly,
the fibroblast density used to make the model can further augment
the ECM production. Conventional collagen gels used for skin models
suffer from contraction due to the exertion of traction force by the
fibroblasts on local collagen fibers[23] and
are prone to degradation by matrix metalloproteases after 2 weeks,[24] making them unstable for long-term culture.
Contrary to this, FN-G nanofilm coating onto single-cell surfaces
promotes the formation of an ECM, while van der Waals interactions
and biological recognitions between layers ensure the arrangement
of macromolecules in their most stable conformation. The integrins
on the cell membrane link the actin cytoskeleton within the cell to
external structures in the ECM, allowing cell–cell contact
and cell–ECM contact. Based on these characteristics, HSEs
that were produced by the cell accumulation technique can be cultivated
over a longer period than collagen-based models (Figure S3).
Figure 1
Histological analysis of the developed HSEs up to 7 weeks
of culture
on the paraffin section. The scale bar represents 100 μm. HSEs
older than 28 days are n = 3, while models younger
than 28 days are n > 3.
Histological analysis of the developed HSEs up to 7 weeks
of culture
on the paraffin section. The scale bar represents 100 μm. HSEs
older than 28 days are n = 3, while models younger
than 28 days are n > 3.A fine balance between cellular proliferation and differentiation
is required to maintain epidermal homeostasis. Therefore, to better
characterize the proteins of the epidermis and the dermis, various
immunomarkers were used (Figure ). Filaggrin staining in Figure b shows the staining of well-developed keratin
fibers in epithelial cells that forms a cornified envelope of stratum
corneum. Filaggrin is an S100 fused type of protein essential for
epidermal function.[25,26] Its disruption or deficiency
leads to abnormal epidermal differentiation and epidermal barrier
defects, as seen in the case of atopic dermatitis and psoriasis.[27,28] Cytokeratin 10 (K10) is the early differentiation marker of keratinocytes.
These keratin filaments are present in the intracytoplasmic cytoskeleton
of the stratum spinosum of the epithelium (Figure c). Integrin β4 (ITGβ4) is a
receptor for laminin. It plays a structural role in the cell–cell
contact of hemidesmosomes in epithelial cells of the epidermis. ITGβ4
staining shows the polarizing keratinocytes adjacent to the basement
membrane (Figure d),
while Figure e shows
the proliferating keratinocytes by Ki67 staining. Figure f shows the staining for collagen
IV, which is a major component of the basement membrane, while vimentin
is the cellular marker for the fibroblast layer (Figure g).
Figure 2
Immunohistological characterization
of the HSEs after
3 weeks of
cultivation. (a) HE staining. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrates
the presence of (b) filaggrin, (c) cytokeratin 10, (d) integrin β,
(e) Ki67, (f) collagen IV, and (g) vimentin. Representative images
are shown. The scale bar represents 100 μm.
Immunohistological characterization
of the HSEs after
3 weeks of
cultivation. (a) HE staining. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrates
the presence of (b) filaggrin, (c) cytokeratin 10, (d) integrin β,
(e) Ki67, (f) collagen IV, and (g) vimentin. Representative images
are shown. The scale bar represents 100 μm.To validate the potential applications of the HSE as a disease-specific
skin model and as a model for pharmacological examinations, the model
was utilized for a study of psoriatic phenotype progression and remission.
For disease progression, rhIL-17A was used, while for disease remission,
fully humanized IgG1κ monoclonal antibody secukinumab was applied.
This anti-IL-17A antibody selectively targets IL-17A and blocks its
interaction with the IL-17 receptor (IL-17RA/IL-17RC receptor complex).In the pathogenesis of chronic plaque psoriasis, the cytokine IL-17A
functions as an important effector cytokine of the Th17
cell lineage. It exerts its biologic function through binding to the
respective transmembrane IL-17 receptor (IL-17R), which is highly
expressed on the surface of keratinocytes. In addition to T cells,
IL-17A is also secreted from mast cells and neutrophils during the
development of psoriasis.[29] This maintains
a positive flux for increased production of IL-17A and other mediators
involved in the psoriasis gene signature. To model this pathomechanism,
after ALI, rhIL-17A was added for 5 days. This was followed by the
addition of secukinumab, an antibody against IL-17A, along with the
addition of rhIL-17A for 14 days (Scheme ). As controls, we used untreated and rhIL-17A-treated
HSEs.
Scheme 1
Study Design
The study was divided into
three phases: The first phase (day 0) comprised the reconstruction
of the dermis and epidermis. Within the second phase (days 1–5),
HSEs were lifted to the ALI and stimulation with rhIL-17A was conducted.
The third phase was divided into three different approaches. While
an untreated model served as a control (healthy), one model was stimulated
further with rhIL-17A (diseased) and the third model was treated with
the anti-IL-17A antibody, with or without rhIL-17A (rescue).
Study Design
The study was divided into
three phases: The first phase (day 0) comprised the reconstruction
of the dermis and epidermis. Within the second phase (days 1–5),
HSEs were lifted to the ALI and stimulation with rhIL-17A was conducted.
The third phase was divided into three different approaches. While
an untreated model served as a control (healthy), one model was stimulated
further with rhIL-17A (diseased) and the third model was treated with
the anti-IL-17A antibody, with or without rhIL-17A (rescue).Histological assessment of HSEs treated with rhIL-17A
for a total
of 19 days demonstrated strong inhibition of keratinocyte differentiation.
As a result, hyperproliferative epidermis with premature differentiation
of keratinocytes is seen in these models. In psoriatic lesions, the
granular layer is reduced and the stratum corneum is formed by incomplete
cornified keratinocytes—a phenotype that occurred in the HSEs
treated with rhIL-17A (Figure b) compared to the non-treated control (Figure a). These morphological features of psoriasis
were completely negated when the HSEs were treated with anti-IL17A
antibody for 14 days with (Figure c) or without rhIL-17A (Figure d). These results suggest that secukinumab
reverts psoriasis-like morphology in HSEs, and for the first time,
we show that the HSEs could be “rescued” after the induction
of psoriasis-like phenotype for 14 days along with the antibody. Our
characterization of the established HSEs shows that these models can
mimic the clinical scenario where Th17 cells in diseased
skin constantly produce IL-17 and new biologicals such as an anti-IL17A
antibody are administered to achieve therapeutic effects. To show
the longevity of models, as a follow-up, the HSEs were treated by
rhIL-17A for 5 days followed by the addition of secukinumab for 23
days. It could be seen that the models were stable and were completely
recovered from the psoriatic phenotype (Figure S4). This was further confirmed by immunofluorescence staining
of CK 6, CK 16, and Ki67 (Figures S5–S7)
Figure 3
Treatment with an anti-rhIL-17A antibody reverted the cytokine-induced
psoriatic phenotype in HSEs. Representative HE images of (a) untreated
controls, (b) rhIL17A-stimulated HSEs, (c) HSEs that were stimulated
with rhIL-17A for 5 days and then additionally treated with an anti-IL17A-antibody
for 14 days (+rhIL17A), and (d) HSEs that were stimulated with rhIL17A
for 5 days and then only treated with an anti-IL17A-antibody for 14
days (−rhIL17A). Scale bars: 100 μm
Treatment with an anti-rhIL-17A antibody reverted the cytokine-induced
psoriatic phenotype in HSEs. Representative HE images of (a) untreated
controls, (b) rhIL17A-stimulated HSEs, (c) HSEs that were stimulated
with rhIL-17A for 5 days and then additionally treated with an anti-IL17A-antibody
for 14 days (+rhIL17A), and (d) HSEs that were stimulated with rhIL17A
for 5 days and then only treated with an anti-IL17A-antibody for 14
days (−rhIL17A). Scale bars: 100 μmThe effect of rhIL-17A inhibition on the filaggrin expression was
further evaluated using immunofluorescence staining (Figure ). In psoriasis, late differentiation
markers like profilaggrin and loricrin disappear as a result of accelerated
keratinization with premature cell death. Additionally, IL-17A down-regulates
the expression of filaggrin as well as the genes that encode filaggrin
processing and inhibits the expression of tight junction desmosome
proteins and the epidermis-associated adhesion molecules such as ZO-1
and ZO-2, E-cadherin, and various integrin molecules. In both models
treated with anti-IL17A-antibody for 14 days (+/–rhIL17A),
filaggrin expression could be restored (Figure c, d, respectively) compared to the rhIL-17A-stimulated
models (Figure b).
The relative fluorescence intensity of both models (Figure c,d) was normalized to the
untreated control condition (Figure a). In the psoriasis-like model, the intensity was
reduced to 15% (Figure b). However, treatment with anti-IL-17A antibody restored the filaggrin
expression up to 80% (Figure e) in both models +/–rhIL-17A in phase III. This shows
that filaggrin expression could be restored in a psoriasis-like condition
using anti-IL-17A antibody, even after the HSEs were continuously
subjected to rhIL-17A.
Figure 4
Effects of anti-IL-17A antibody treatment on rhIL-17A-induced
impairments
were evaluated based on its impact on the filaggrin expression using
immunofluorescence staining. (a) Untreated control, (b) rhIL17A-stimulated
HSEs, (c) HSEs that were stimulated with rhIL-17A for 5 days and then
additionally treated with an anti-IL17A-antibody for 14 days (+rhIL17A),
and (d) HSEs that were stimulated with rhIL17A for 5 days and then
only treated with an anti-IL17A-antibody for 14 days (−rhIL17A).
The scale bar represents 100 μm. (e) Evaluation of fluorescence
intensity, normalized to the untreated control. Error bars indicate
standard deviation (n = 3).
Effects of anti-IL-17A antibody treatment on rhIL-17A-induced
impairments
were evaluated based on its impact on the filaggrin expression using
immunofluorescence staining. (a) Untreated control, (b) rhIL17A-stimulated
HSEs, (c) HSEs that were stimulated with rhIL-17A for 5 days and then
additionally treated with an anti-IL17A-antibody for 14 days (+rhIL17A),
and (d) HSEs that were stimulated with rhIL17A for 5 days and then
only treated with an anti-IL17A-antibody for 14 days (−rhIL17A).
The scale bar represents 100 μm. (e) Evaluation of fluorescence
intensity, normalized to the untreated control. Error bars indicate
standard deviation (n = 3).Investigating the molecular effects in more detail, we additionally
performed gene expression profiling (Figure a,b). Models that were treated with rhIL-17A
showed, on the one hand, a downregulation of differentiation markers
(e.g., FLG and KRT13) and, on the other hand, an upregulation of chemokines
and cytokines (e.g., CXCL5 and IL-36) (Figure a). Similar gene regulations can be found
in skin lesions of psoriasis patients. Interestingly, treatment with
an anti-IL17A antibody reverted these gene regulations only 14 days
after initiation of the treatment (Figure b). These data demonstrate at the molecular
level the “reversing” effects of anti-IL-17A antibody
on rhIL-17A-induced gene regulations.
Figure 5
Gene expression profiling. Using microarray
analyses, we investigated
(a) the effects of rhIL-17A stimulation on HSEs and (b) the effects
of treatment with an anti-IL-17A antibody on rhIL17A-stimulated HSEs.
RT-PCR analyses confirmed the gene regulations of specific (c) antimicrobial
peptides and (d) chemokines and cytokines in HSEs that were treated
with the anti-IL17A antibody. S, secukinumab.
Gene expression profiling. Using microarray
analyses, we investigated
(a) the effects of rhIL-17A stimulation on HSEs and (b) the effects
of treatment with an anti-IL-17A antibody on rhIL17A-stimulated HSEs.
RT-PCR analyses confirmed the gene regulations of specific (c) antimicrobial
peptides and (d) chemokines and cytokines in HSEs that were treated
with the anti-IL17A antibody. S, secukinumab.To confirm the microarray data, real-time PCR was performed (Figure c, d). In in vivo, IL-17A activates CCL20, CXCL1, CXCL2, and CXCL8/IL-8
synthesis, leading to the recruitment of more IL-17-producing T cells
and neutrophils into the skin. Thus, blocking IL-17A using anti-IL17A
antibody downregulated CXCL1, CXCL2, and CXCL8 and antimicrobial peptides
DEFB4-α, DEFB4-β, CCL20 (a chemotactic for T cells and
DCs), CCL8, IL-6, and IL-33. IL-36 cytokines are induced in response
to IL-17A in HSE, inhibiting IL-17A-downregulated IL-36 expression,
which leads to the interruption of a feedback loop of the IL-17 signal
pathway, which might explain the rapid onset of the IL-17A antagonist
compared to other biologics used in the treatment of psoriasis (anti
IL-23 and anti-TNFα).Interestingly, after treatment with
the antibody upregulation of
two other markers, IGFL-2 and IL-18 were observed. The potential role
of IGFL in psoriasis is not well understood. IGFL proteins demonstrate
the closest similarity with IGF family; however, their physiological
functions are not defined yet.[30] A former
study revealed that IGFL-2 downregulation is detected in skin samples
of psoriasis patients.[31] Interestingly,
treatment of the psoriasis-like HSE with secukinumab led to a significant
upregulation of IGFL-2 expression. Its structural similarity to IGF
family suggests that these proteins could act as growth regulators,
and hence understanding its role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis
may further give an insight into its role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis
and its treatment.[32]Keratinocytes
in all living layer of epidermis show the presence
of IL-18 and its receptors. The release of IL-18 affects the surrounding
keratinocytes in an autocrine and paracrine manner. In normal skin,
this results in preserving the homeostasis of a Th1-dominant
state.[33] However, psoriasis-like symptoms
are aggravated in the combination of IL-18 with IL-17.[33] We assume that the addition of rhIL-17A further
upregulates the IL-18 production in our model and blocking rhIL-17A
mechanistically did not influence IL-18 regulation. Further dynamics
of IL-18 and the IL-18 receptor in diseased skin as compared to normal
skin have to be investigated to have a better insight.Gene
ontology (GO) analysis revealed an impact of rhIL17A on biological
processes such as “regulation of epithelial cell proliferation”,
“positive regulation of cytokine production involved in immune
response”, and “positive regulation of chemokine secretion”
(Figure ). These data
substantiate the proinflammatory and chemotactic effects of rhIL17A
on the established HSEs.
Figure 6
Gene ontology (GO) analysis revealed an impact
of rhIL17A on the
developed HSEs.
Gene ontology (GO) analysis revealed an impact
of rhIL17A on the
developed HSEs.
Conclusions
We used the cell coating
technique to fabricate the 3D skin equivalents.
This technique involves layer-by-layer assembly of extracellular matrix
nanofilms on the cell surface and allows the rapid fabrication of
scaffold-free skin models. After lifting the model to the air–liquid
interface on day 3, keratinocytes as a major cell population showed
homogeneous differentiation into four layers on the surface of the
dermis. Histological examination revealed a stable skin equivalent
in long-term cell culture (49 days), and this is beyond any reported
state of the art.Owing to the long-term stability of the skin
models, we further
developed a 3D psoriatic skin model that mimics the clinical psoriatic
phenotype. The pilot study consisted of inducing the psoriasis phenotype
by stimulation of the skin equivalents with 50 ng/mL rhIL-17A for
5 days followed by a systemic treatment from day 6 to day 19 with
the monoclonal antibody secukinumab along with rhIL-17A. After treatment
with an anti-IL7A antibody, upregulation of keratinocyte differentiation
markers such as FLG, KRT1, KRT10, DSG1, and DSG4 and downregulation
of antimicrobial peptides such as DEFB4B and DEFB4A (HBD-2) were observed.
Inhibiting rhIL-17A also downregulated CCL20 (a chemotactic for T
cells and DCs), CCL8, CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL8, IL-6, IL-33, and IL-36.
To conclude, we could induce a psoriatic-like disease phenotype in
a 3D organotypic skin model and showed the restoration of the model
by antibody treatment. For the first time, the performed study aimed
at mimicking the clinical situation in psoriasis. In the next step,
we plan to induce the psoriasis phenotype for 5 days followed by 14
days of treatment with biologicals and then withdraw the treatment
and monitor the washout phase for an additional 14 days. Furthermore,
we know from our clinical practice that, especially, laser and aesthetic
treatments reveal clinical effects up to 2 months after treatment,
and these effects can only be monitored in a long-term 3D skin model.
We contemplate the use of developed skin models as an alternative
to diseased tissue biopsies and animal testing.
Materials
and Methods
Materials
Normal human epithelial keratinocytes (NHEK)
and normal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) were isolated and cultured
as previously described.[34] NHEKs and NHDFs
were obtained from
foreskin or specimens from cutaneous surgery in healthy subjects,
after informed consent and according to the institutional guidelines
and the Declaration of Helsinki principles. The ethics committee of
the University Hospital, RWTH Aachen, Germany, approved this study.
3D Human Skin Equivalents
Individual fibroblast cells
were ECM-coated with fibronectin (FN) and gelatin (G) as previously
described.[21] Briefly, dermal fibroblasts
were trypsinized, centrifuged, washed with PBS, and mixed with 0.04
μg/mL FN and 0.04 μg/mL G with an intermediate PBS washing
step. After each mixing step, the cells were centrifuged for 1 min
at 400g. A total of nine coating steps were performed.
Coated fibroblasts were then seeded inside 6.5 mm trans-well inserts
with 0.4 μm pore size. We used a total of 1.5 × 106 and 0.5 × 106 coated NHDFs for 15 layers
and 5 layers of dermis, respectively. The NHDFs were used from passage
4–9. The formed dermis was incubated for 24 h (37 °C,
5% CO2) with DMEM, 1% penstrep, and 5% FBS before the addition
of human keratinocytes. The next day, 1.8 × 105 keratinocytes
in 300 μL of keratinocyte media (DermaLife K Serum-Free Keratinocyte
Culture Medium) were seeded on top of the formed dermis layer. The
lower compartment of the trans-well was filled with 1 mL media. The
construct was incubated for 2 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2 to allow optimal attachment of keratinocytes to the dermal compartment.
After the incubation time, the media from the outer and inner parts
of the trans-well inserts were extracted and 2.3 mL of fresh growth
media (Dermalife K serum-free keratinocytes medium/DMEM (50:50), 0.5%
penstrep, and FBS 5%) was added. The models were incubated for 24
h. The next day, media from the well plate were extracted and the
outer compartment of the trans-well was filled with 1 mL of differentiation
media (Dermalife without TGF alpha/DMEM (50:50), FBS 5%,0.5% penstrep,
1 mM CaCl2, and 50 μg/mL ascorbic acid), whereas
no media was added on the inner compartment. The models were cultured
in ALI for 7 weeks with media changes every alternate day.Psoriasis-like
skin conditions were generated by adding rhIL-17A (50 ng/mL, Peprotech)
to the basolateral compartment when models were lifted to the air–liquid
interface. 3D models were stimulated for a total of 19 days. To assess
the impact of secukinumab, 3D models were concurrently treated with
secukinumab (6 μg/mL in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and rhIL-17A
(50 ng/mL)). 3D skin cultures were harvested 19 days after stimulation
with the cytokine and rhIL17A with or without pretreatment of 5 days
with rhIL17A. The culture medium was changed, and stimulation was
repeated every other day. To ensure reproducible results, all experiments
were performed in triplicate.
Collagen-Based HSE
Collagen-based full-thickness 3D
skin equivalents were constructed as described previously.[35] In brief, to establish the dermal part of the
skin equivalents, ice-cold bovine collagen I solution (Vitrogen, Cohesion
Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and 10× concentrated Hank’s
balanced salt solution (Gibco/Invitrogen, Darmstadt, Germany) were
mixed in 8:1 by volume ratio. This was neutralized with 1 M NaOH followed
by addition of one volume of FCS containing 1 × 106 NHDFs. Four milliliters of this solution (4 × 105 cells) was seeded into polycarbonate cell culture inserts for a
six-well plate (3 μm pore size, Nunc; Thermo Fisher Scientific,
Langenselbold, Germany). The dermal equivalent was seeded with 1 ×
106 NHEKs after 2 days and submerged in equal volumes of
DMEM and keratinocyte growth medium (Dermalife K serum-free keratinocytes
medium) with 5% FCS, 50 μg of ascorbic acid, and 5 μg/mL
aprotinin (Applichem, Chicago, IL, USA). On day 3, the HSEs were lifted
to the air–liquid interface.
RNA Isolation
Total RNA was isolated from psoriasis-like
3D skin models. Whole tissue was lyzed with a tissue lyzer II (Quiagen)
in lysis buffer of nucleospin RNA kit (Macherey-Nagel, Duren, Germany),
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quantity
of the RNA was measured (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA),
and the integrity was confirmed (Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer; Agilent
Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA).
Quantitative Real-Time
PCR
Purified RNA was reverse-transcribed
into cDNA using the SuperScript VILO Mastermix (Life Technologies,
Langenselbold, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Quantitative real-time (qRT) PCR analyses were performed on an ABI
Prism 7300 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Weiterstadt,
Germany) using Assays-on-Demand gene expression products (Applied
Biosystems) for human CCL8 (HS00271615_m1), CCL20 (HS01011368_m1),
CXCL1 (HS00236937_m1), CXCL5 (HS00171085_m1), CXCL6 (HS00605742_g1),
CXCL17 (HS01650998_m1), CRNN (HS00211833_m1), FLG (HS00856927_g1),
DSC1 (HS00245189_m1), DSG1 (HS00355084_m1), DSG4 (HS01125472_m1),
IL-1beta (HS00174097_m1), IL-6 (HS00985641_m1), IL-18 (HS01038788_m1),
IL-24 (HS01114274_m1), IL-33 (HS01125943_m1), IL-36alpha (HS00205367_m1),
IL-36beta (HS00758166_m1), IL-36gamma (HS00219742_m1), IL36RN (HS00202179_m1),
IGFL-2 (HS03645208_m1), KRT1 (HS01549614_g1), and KRT10 (HS00166289_m1),
according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. An Assays-on-Demand
product for HPRT (Hs99999909_m1) was used as an internal standard.
Microarray Analysis
For microarray analysis, purified
mRNA was amplified, labeled, and hybridized to Human Clariom S Array,
according to the manufacturer’s instructions as previously
described.[34] Data were analyzed using GeneSpring
GX 14.9 software (Agilent Technologies, Frankfurt am Main, Germany).
Gene ontology enrichment analysis was performed using http://www.geneontology.org/.
Light Microscopy, Immunofluorescence, and Immunohistochemistry
The tissues were either fixed in 10% formalin for paraffin embedding
or embedded in Tissue Tek O.C.T.for cryosections. For light microscopy,
4 μm paraffin sections of 3D models were stained with hematoxylin
and eosin (H&E). For immunohistochemistry, paraffin-embedded tissue
was cut into 4 μm sections, mounted on Superfrost slides (Menzel,
Braunschweig, Germany), deparaffinized, and rehydrated. To unmask
antigens, the specimens were treated with “Target Retrieval
Solution Citrate” (pH 6.0, Dako), according to the manufacturer’s
instructions, and rinsed in distilled water. Specimens were incubated
for 60 min with primary mouse anti-human monoclonal antibodies: filaggrin
(clone AKH1, 1:100; Santa Cruz Biotech, Santa Cruz, USA), cytokeratin
10 (1:500), Ki67 (1:50), collagen IV (1:50; Dako Glostrup, Denmark),
integrin β4 (1:200; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and vimentin (1:200;
Sigma Aldrich, Missouri, USA). Binding of the antibodies was visualized
by the Dako “Real Detection System Alkaline Phosphatase/RED”
on a universal staining system (Dako), as specified by the manufacturer.
Finally, specimens were counterstained with hematoxylin and mounted
with coverslips. For immunofluorescence, 4 μm cryosections were
fixed in acetone and incubated for 1 h with primary antibodies as
described above. Goat anti-mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary
antibody (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) was added for epifluorescence
detection using a Leica DM IL photomicroscope (Leica Microsystems,
Wetzlar, Germany) with digital photo documentation (DISKUS; Hilgers,
Konigswinter, Germany).The illustrations used in the publication
were created with BioRender.com
Authors: Andrew M Lin; Cory J Rubin; Ritika Khandpur; Jennifer Y Wang; MaryBeth Riblett; Srilakshmi Yalavarthi; Eneida C Villanueva; Parth Shah; Mariana J Kaplan; Allen T Bruce Journal: J Immunol Date: 2011-05-23 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Adrian A Lobito; Sree R Ramani; Irene Tom; J Fernando Bazan; Elizabeth Luis; Wayne J Fairbrother; Wenjun Ouyang; Lino C Gonzalez Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-03-31 Impact factor: 5.157