| Literature DB >> 35019111 |
Marina Bakri1,2, Fernanda Christo Lovato1,2, Géssica de Mattos Diosti1,2, Yorgos Luiz Santos de Graça Salles2, Paulo Henrique Brites Moreira1,2, Luiz Martins Collaço2, Nicolau Gregori Czeczko1,2, Osvaldo Malafaia1,2, Luiz Fernando Kubrusly1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of polypropylene meshes for surgical repair of the abdominal wall contributes to a reduction of the of recurrence rates of hernias or defects. However, its intra-abdominal use comes along with the formation of adhesions and several complications. The study and the search for alternative materials, including bovine pericardium, have been regarded as an option for the correction and treatment of resulting hernias with better adaptations and effectiveness. AIM: Evaluating the inflammatory process of the bovine pericardium in comparison with the inflammatory process of synthetic polypropylene mesh.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35019111 PMCID: PMC8735132 DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020200003e1527
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arq Bras Cir Dig ISSN: 0102-6720
FIGURE 1Meshes inserted into the abdominal wall: A) Left side with polypropylene mesh; B) right side with bovine pericardium mesh; C) cut meshes; D) after abdominal closure.
FIGURE 2Mesh analysis by transparency
FIGURE 3Photomicrographs evidencing alterations in the abdominal wall (400x H&E): A) connective tissue with congested vessels (arrows); B) granulation tissue (arrow).
FIGURE 4Photomicrograph demonstrating giant cell (400x H&E - arrow)
FIGURE 5Photomicrographs evidencing changes of chronic inflammatory process (A - arrows) and minimal scar area (B - arrow) - 100x H&E
FIGURE 6Photomicrographs showing changes to Mallory’s trichrome: A) photomicrograph demonstrating on the arrow cuts of skin with presence of polypropylene and slight deposition of collagen around (Mallory 50x); B) photomicrograph demonstrating on the arrow area cicatricial with remnants of the polypropylene mesh and moderate degree of fibrosis around (Mallory 400x)