Literature DB >> 35018752

A Conceptual Framework for Use of Increased Endurance Time During Constant Work Rate Cycle Ergometry as a Patient-Focused Meaningful Outcome in COPD Clinical Trials.

Richard Casaburi1, Debora D Merrill2, Gale Harding3, Nancy K Leidy3, Harry B Rossiter1, Ruth Tal-Singer2, Alan Hamilton4.   

Abstract

The Chronic Lung Disease Biomarker and Clinical Outcome Assessment Qualification Consortium (CBQC) evaluates the potential of biomarkers and outcome measures as drug development tools. Exercise endurance is an objective indicator of treatment benefit, closely related to daily physical function. Therefore, it is an ideal candidate for an outcome for drug development trials. Unfortunately, no exercise endurance measure is qualified by regulatory authorities for use in trials of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and no approved COPD therapies have claims of improving exercise endurance. Consequently, it has been challenging for developers to consider this outcome when designing clinical trials for new therapies. Endurance time during constant work rate cycle ergometry (CWRCE), performed on an electronically braked stationary cycle ergometer, provides an exercise endurance measure under standardized conditions. Baseline individualized work rate for each participant is set using an incremental test. During CWRCE the patient is encouraged to continue exercising for as long as possible. Although not required, physiological and sensory responses (e.g., pulmonary ventilation, heart rate, dyspnea ratings) are frequently collected to support interpretation of endurance time changes. Exercise tolerance limit is reached when the individual is limited by symptoms, unable to maintain pedaling cadence or unable to continue safely. At exercise cessation, exercise duration is recorded. An CWRCE endurance time increase from the pre-treatment baseline is proposed as a key efficacy endpoint in clinical trials. In COPD, improved exercise endurance has a direct relationship to the experience of physical functioning in daily life, which is a patient-centered, meaningful benefit. JCOPDF
© 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical outcome assessment; copd; drug development; exercise endurance; physical functioning

Year:  2022        PMID: 35018752      PMCID: PMC9166337          DOI: 10.15326/jcopdf.2021.0258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis        ISSN: 2372-952X


  24 in total

1.  Building a roadmap to biomarker qualification: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Shashi G Amur; Sarmistha Sanyal; Aloka G Chakravarty; Marianne H Noone; James Kaiser; Susan McCune; ShaAvhree Y Buckman-Garner
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.851

Review 2.  Outcomes for COPD pharmacological trials: from lung function to biomarkers.

Authors:  M Cazzola; W MacNee; F J Martinez; K F Rabe; L G Franciosi; P J Barnes; V Brusasco; P S Burge; P M A Calverley; B R Celli; P W Jones; D A Mahler; B Make; M Miravitlles; C P Page; P Palange; D Parr; M Pistolesi; S I Rennard; M P Rutten-van Mölken; R Stockley; S D Sullivan; J A Wedzicha; E F Wouters
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 16.671

3.  The COPD Biomarker Qualification Consortium (CBQC).

Authors:  Richard Casaburi; Bartolome Celli; James Crapo; Gerard Criner; Thomas Croxton; Alasdair Gaw; Paul Jones; Nancy Kline-Leidy; David A Lomas; Debora Merrill; Michael Polkey; Stephen Rennard; Frank Sciurba; Ruth Tal-Singer; Robert Stockley; Gerry Turino; Jorgen Vestbo; John Walsh
Journal:  COPD       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.409

4.  The dyspnoea-inactivity vicious circle in COPD: development and external validation of a conceptual model.

Authors:  Maria A Ramon; Gerben Ter Riet; Anne-Elie Carsin; Elena Gimeno-Santos; Alvar Agustí; Josep M Antó; David Donaire-Gonzalez; Jaume Ferrer; Esther Rodríguez; Robert Rodriguez-Roisin; Milo A Puhan; Judith Garcia-Aymerich
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 16.671

5.  Qualifying biomarkers for use in drug development: a US Food and Drug Administration overview.

Authors:  Janet Woodcock; Shaavhree Buckman; Federico Goodsaid; Marc K Walton; Issam Zineh
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2011-09

Review 6.  Experience of advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: metasynthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Rebecca T Disler; Anna Green; Tim Luckett; Phillip J Newton; Sally Inglis; David C Currow; Patricia M Davidson
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 7.  Plasma Fibrinogen Qualification as a Drug Development Tool in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Perspective of the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Biomarker Qualification Consortium.

Authors:  Bruce E Miller; Ruth Tal-Singer; Stephen I Rennard; Armin Furtwaengler; Nancy Leidy; Michael Lowings; Ubaldo J Martin; Thomas R Martin; Debora D Merrill; Jeffrey Snyder; John Walsh; David M Mannino
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Development of a shuttle walking test of disability in patients with chronic airways obstruction.

Authors:  S J Singh; M D Morgan; S Scott; D Walters; A E Hardman
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Responsiveness of Various Exercise-Testing Protocols to Therapeutic Interventions in COPD.

Authors:  Benoit Borel; Steeve Provencher; Didier Saey; François Maltais
Journal:  Pulm Med       Date:  2013-01-28

10.  The PROactive innovative conceptual framework on physical activity.

Authors:  Fabienne Dobbels; Corina de Jong; Ellen Drost; Janneke Elberse; Chryssoula Feridou; Laura Jacobs; Roberto Rabinovich; Anja Frei; Milo A Puhan; Willem I de Boer; Thys van der Molen; Kate Williams; Hillary Pinnock; Thierry Troosters; Niklas Karlsson; Karoly Kulich; Katja Rüdell
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 16.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.