Dana E Loke1, Andra M Farcas2, Justine S Ko2, Laurie M Aluce2, Valerie R McDonald2, Nahzinine Shakeri2, Abra L Fant2. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 211 E Ontario St, Suite 200, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. dana.loke@northwestern.edu. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 211 E Ontario St, Suite 200, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this initiative was to quantify and intervene upon suspected gender disparities in CT turn-around-time and emergency department (ED) length of stay. METHODS: This was a single-site before-after quality improvement initiative including patients aged 12-50 who underwent CT chest and/or abdomen/pelvis. The intervention included protocolization of the pregnancy screening process in triage. Primary outcomes included the difference between women of childbearing age and similarly aged men in regards to CT turn-around-time and ED length of stay. Pre- and post-intervention data were analyzed, including an "intensive intervention period" subanalysis. RESULTS: CT turn-around-time for women of childbearing age was 19 min longer than for similarly aged men at baseline and did not change significantly post-intervention. ED length of stay was 27 min longer for women of childbearing age compared to similarly aged men at baseline and 7 min longer post-intervention, although this was still a significant difference. During the intensive intervention period, CT turn-around-time for women of childbearing age was 15 min longer than similarly aged men but the difference in ED length of stay of 10 min was no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: There is gender disparity in CT turn-around-time and ED length of stay in our ED, highlighting an important area for improvement to promote equitable care. A quality improvement initiative that aimed to protocolize pregnancy testing in triage did not show sustainable improvement in these outcomes but did result in increased pregnancy testing.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this initiative was to quantify and intervene upon suspected gender disparities in CT turn-around-time and emergency department (ED) length of stay. METHODS: This was a single-site before-after quality improvement initiative including patients aged 12-50 who underwent CT chest and/or abdomen/pelvis. The intervention included protocolization of the pregnancy screening process in triage. Primary outcomes included the difference between women of childbearing age and similarly aged men in regards to CT turn-around-time and ED length of stay. Pre- and post-intervention data were analyzed, including an "intensive intervention period" subanalysis. RESULTS: CT turn-around-time for women of childbearing age was 19 min longer than for similarly aged men at baseline and did not change significantly post-intervention. ED length of stay was 27 min longer for women of childbearing age compared to similarly aged men at baseline and 7 min longer post-intervention, although this was still a significant difference. During the intensive intervention period, CT turn-around-time for women of childbearing age was 15 min longer than similarly aged men but the difference in ED length of stay of 10 min was no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: There is gender disparity in CT turn-around-time and ED length of stay in our ED, highlighting an important area for improvement to promote equitable care. A quality improvement initiative that aimed to protocolize pregnancy testing in triage did not show sustainable improvement in these outcomes but did result in increased pregnancy testing.
Authors: Adam J Singer; Merry Taylor; Deborah LeBlanc; Kristen Meyers; Karol Perez; Henry C Thode; Jesse M Pines Journal: J Emerg Med Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Alexander J Towbin; Srikant B Iyer; James Brown; Kartik Varadarajan; Laurie A Perry; David B Larson Journal: Radiographics Date: 2013 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Christian Fromm; Antonios Likourezos; Lawrence Haines; Abu N G A Khan; Janet Williams; Joel Berezow Journal: J Emerg Med Date: 2011-08-27 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Andrew Herring; Andrew Wilper; David U Himmelstein; Steffie Woolhandler; Janice A Espinola; David F M Brown; Carlos A Camargo Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2009-06-15 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Steven L Bernstein; Dominik Aronsky; Reena Duseja; Stephen Epstein; Dan Handel; Ula Hwang; Melissa McCarthy; K John McConnell; Jesse M Pines; Niels Rathlev; Robert Schafermeyer; Frank Zwemer; Michael Schull; Brent R Asplin Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2008-11-08 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Greg Ogrinc; Louise Davies; Daisy Goodman; Paul Batalden; Frank Davidoff; David Stevens Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 7.035