Literature DB >> 35018543

Low RUFY3 expression level is associated with lymph node metastasis in older women with invasive breast cancer.

Fernando A Angarita1,2, Masanori Oshi1,3, Akimitsu Yamada3, Li Yan4, Ryusei Matsuyama3, Stephen B Edge1,5, Itaru Endo3, Kazuaki Takabe6,7,8,9,10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is omitted in older women (≥ 70 years old) with clinical lymph node (LN)-negative hormone receptor-positive breast cancer as it does not influence adjuvant treatment decision-making. However, older women are heterogeneous in frailty while the chance of recurrence increase with improving longevity. Therefore, a biomarker that identifies LN metastasis may facilitate treatment decision-making. RUFY3 is associated with cancer progression. We evaluated RUFY3 expression level as a biomarker for LN-positive breast cancer in older women.
METHODS: Clinical and transcriptomic data of breast cancer patients were obtained from the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC, n = 1903) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, n = 1046) Pan-cancer study cohorts.
RESULTS: A total of 510 (METABRIC) and 211 (TCGA) older women were identified. LN-positive breast cancer, which represented 51.4% (METABRIC) and 48.4% (TCGA), demonstrated worse disease-free, disease-specific, and overall survival. RUFY3 levels were significantly lower in LN-positive tumors regardless of age. The area under the curve for the receiver operator characteristic (AUC-ROC) curves showed RUFY3-predicted LN metastasis. Low RUFY3 enriched oxidative phosphorylation, DNA repair, MYC targets, unfolded protein response, and mtorc1 signaling gene sets, was associated with T helper type 1 cell infiltration, and with intratumor heterogeneity and fraction altered. Low RUFY3 expression was associated with LN-positive breast cancer and with worse disease-specific survival among older women.
CONCLUSION: Older women with breast cancers who had low expression level of RUFY3 were more frequently diagnosed with LN-positive tumors, which translated into worse prognosis.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axillary lymph node; Breast cancer; Geriatric oncology; RUFY3

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35018543      PMCID: PMC8844209          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06482-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  71 in total

1.  Randomized trial comparing axillary clearance versus no axillary clearance in older patients with breast cancer: first results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 10-93.

Authors:  Carl-Magnus Rudenstam; David Zahrieh; John F Forbes; Diana Crivellari; Stig B Holmberg; Piercarlo Rey; David Dent; Ian Campbell; Jürg Bernhard; Karen N Price; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Aron Goldhirsch; Richard D Gelber; Alan S Coates
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik; Steven Shak; Gong Tang; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Michael G Walker; Drew Watson; Taesung Park; William Hiller; Edwin R Fisher; D Lawrence Wickerham; John Bryant; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Molecular Biological Features of Nottingham Histological Grade 3 Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Hideo Takahashi; Masanori Oshi; Mariko Asaoka; Li Yan; Itaru Endo; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  The prognostic landscape of genes and infiltrating immune cells across human cancers.

Authors:  Andrew J Gentles; Aaron M Newman; Chih Long Liu; Scott V Bratman; Weiguo Feng; Dongkyoon Kim; Viswam S Nair; Yue Xu; Amanda Khuong; Chuong D Hoang; Maximilian Diehn; Robert B West; Sylvia K Plevritis; Ash A Alizadeh
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Cytolytic Activity Score to Assess Anticancer Immunity in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Sumana Narayanan; Tsutomu Kawaguchi; Li Yan; Xuan Peng; Qianya Qi; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women age 70 years or older with early breast cancer: long-term follow-up of CALGB 9343.

Authors:  Kevin S Hughes; Lauren A Schnaper; Jennifer R Bellon; Constance T Cirrincione; Donald A Berry; Beryl McCormick; Hyman B Muss; Barbara L Smith; Clifford A Hudis; Eric P Winer; William C Wood
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data.

Authors:  Ethan Cerami; Jianjiong Gao; Ugur Dogrusoz; Benjamin E Gross; Selcuk Onur Sumer; Bülent Arman Aksoy; Anders Jacobsen; Caitlin J Byrne; Michael L Heuer; Erik Larsson; Yevgeniy Antipin; Boris Reva; Arthur P Goldberg; Chris Sander; Nikolaus Schultz
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 39.397

8.  Measures of Appropriateness and Value for Breast Surgeons and Their Patients: The American Society of Breast Surgeons Choosing Wisely (®) Initiative.

Authors:  Jeffrey Landercasper; Lisa Bailey; Tiffany S Berry; Robert R Buras; Amy C Degnim; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Joshua Froman; Jennifer Gass; Caprice Greenberg; Starr Koslow Mautner; Helen Krontiras; Roshni Rao; Michelle Sowden; Judy A Tjoe; Barbara Wexelman; Lee Wilke; Steven L Chen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Annexin A1 Expression Is Associated with Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT), Cell Proliferation, Prognosis, and Drug Response in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Oshi; Yoshihisa Tokumaru; Swagoto Mukhopadhyay; Li Yan; Ryusei Matsuyama; Itaru Endo; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.