Tae-Kyung Yoo1,2, Jun Kang3, Awon Lee3, Byung Joo Chae4. 1. Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea. 2. Cancer Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea. bj.chae@samsung.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study developed a triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) surrogate subtype classification that represents TNBC subtypes based on the Vanderbilt subtype classification. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary curative surgery for TNBC were included. Representative FFPE blocks were used for gene expression analysis and tissue microarray construction for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. The Vanderbilt subtypes were re-classified into four groups: basal-like (BL), mesenchymal-like (M), immunomodulatory (IM) and luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtype. Classification and regression tree (CART) modeling was applied to develop a surrogate subtype classification. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients were included. The study cohort was allocated to the Vanderbilt 4 subtypes as LAR (n = 22, 15.2%), IM (n = 32, 22.1%), M (n = 38, 26.2%), BL (n = 25, 17.2%) and unclassified (n = 28, 19.3%). After excluding nine (6.2%) patients due to poor IHC staining quality, CART modeling was performed. TNBC surrogate subtypes were defined as follows: LAR subtype, androgen receptor Allred score 8; IM subtype, LAR-negative with a tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) score > 70%; M subtype, LAR-negative with a TIL score < 20%; BL subtype, LAR-negative with a TIL score 20-70% and diffuse, strong p16 staining. The study cohort was classified by the surrogate subtypes as LAR (n = 26, 17.9%), IM (n = 21, 14.5%), M (n = 44, 30.3%), BL1 (n = 27, 18.6%) and unclassified (n = 18, 12.4%). Surrogate subtypes predicted TNBC Vanderbilt 4 subtypes with an accuracy of 0.708. CONCLUSION: We have developed a TNBC surrogate subtype classification that correlates with the Vanderbilt subtype. It is a practical and accessible diagnostic test that can be easily applied in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: This study developed a triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) surrogate subtype classification that represents TNBC subtypes based on the Vanderbilt subtype classification. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary curative surgery for TNBC were included. Representative FFPE blocks were used for gene expression analysis and tissue microarray construction for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. The Vanderbilt subtypes were re-classified into four groups: basal-like (BL), mesenchymal-like (M), immunomodulatory (IM) and luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtype. Classification and regression tree (CART) modeling was applied to develop a surrogate subtype classification. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients were included. The study cohort was allocated to the Vanderbilt 4 subtypes as LAR (n = 22, 15.2%), IM (n = 32, 22.1%), M (n = 38, 26.2%), BL (n = 25, 17.2%) and unclassified (n = 28, 19.3%). After excluding nine (6.2%) patients due to poor IHC staining quality, CART modeling was performed. TNBC surrogate subtypes were defined as follows: LAR subtype, androgen receptor Allred score 8; IM subtype, LAR-negative with a tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) score > 70%; M subtype, LAR-negative with a TIL score < 20%; BL subtype, LAR-negative with a TIL score 20-70% and diffuse, strong p16 staining. The study cohort was classified by the surrogate subtypes as LAR (n = 26, 17.9%), IM (n = 21, 14.5%), M (n = 44, 30.3%), BL1 (n = 27, 18.6%) and unclassified (n = 18, 12.4%). Surrogate subtypes predicted TNBC Vanderbilt 4 subtypes with an accuracy of 0.708. CONCLUSION: We have developed a TNBC surrogate subtype classification that correlates with the Vanderbilt subtype. It is a practical and accessible diagnostic test that can be easily applied in clinical practice.
Authors: Brian D Lehmann; Joshua A Bauer; Xi Chen; Melinda E Sanders; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Yu Shyr; Jennifer A Pietenpol Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Rebecca Dent; Maureen Trudeau; Kathleen I Pritchard; Wedad M Hanna; Harriet K Kahn; Carol A Sawka; Lavina A Lickley; Ellen Rawlinson; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-08-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Matthew D Burstein; Anna Tsimelzon; Graham M Poage; Kyle R Covington; Alejandro Contreras; Suzanne A W Fuqua; Michelle I Savage; C Kent Osborne; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Jenny C Chang; Gordon B Mills; Ching C Lau; Powel H Brown Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Hiroko Masuda; Keith A Baggerly; Ying Wang; Ya Zhang; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Vicente Valero; Brian D Lehmann; Jennifer A Pietenpol; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; W Fraser Symmans; Naoto T Ueno Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Brian D Lehmann; Bojana Jovanović; Xi Chen; Monica V Estrada; Kimberly N Johnson; Yu Shyr; Harold L Moses; Melinda E Sanders; Jennifer A Pietenpol Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 3.240