| Literature DB >> 35018526 |
Shapour Fereydouni1,2, Simon Forstmeier3.
Abstract
Previous research demonstrated that spiritually sensitive psychotherapy is an effective treatment for clients with depression or anxiety, with outcomes equivalent to secular control interventions. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of spiritually sensitive logotherapy intervention in the treatment of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms in university students in Iran. Sixty students with elevated depression symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory II, BDI-II, 22 or greater) were randomly assigned to either a twelve-session group logotherapy programme or a control group. Results showed that spiritually sensitive logotherapy significantly reduced depression, anxiety, and stress, and significantly more so than in the control group (e.g. interaction effect for BDI-II: F = 56.8, p < 0.001, with a large effect size).Entities:
Keywords: Anxiety; Depression; Logotherapy; Spiritually sensitive psychotherapy; Stress; University students
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35018526 PMCID: PMC8837512 DOI: 10.1007/s10943-021-01495-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Relig Health ISSN: 0022-4197
Description of sessions
| No | Topic | Content of the sessions |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Introduction | Examining the expectations of the participants; outlining therapeutic programme and session content; basic information about mental disorders, in particular depression, anxiety and stress |
| 2 | Positive memories | Aim: Keeping positive memories alive Theoretical background: Search for meaning (Frankl, Therapeutic strategy: Sharing personal memories of pleasant religious events such as the birthday of Prophet Muhammad and the Shiite Imams |
| 3 | Cultural memories | Aim: Preserving positive cultural memories; using past experiences to confront the problems of the present time Theoretical background: Reminiscence (Pinquart & Forstmeier, Therapeutic strategy: Sharing pleasant memories cultural events such as the Feast of New Year's Eve, the celebration of Charsanbeh Suri, etc. We used two short films for illustration (e.g. biography of Stephen Hawking, Frankl’s life in the concentration camp, visiting holy sites) |
| 4 | Personally significant memories | Aim: Review of personally significant memories in order to increase well-being Homework from the previous session: Thinking about personally significant memories (e.g. the birth of a sister or brother, marriage, etc.) and bringing notes to the session Theoretical background: Existentialism (Søren Kierkegaard) Therapeutic strategy: Sharing personally significant memories; reliving (imagining) the memories and focusing on positive emotions such as pleasure |
| 5 | Finding meaning in critical life events | Aim: Finding meaning in critical life events, suffering and hardship Homework from the previous session: Making a note of critical life events and suffering such as failure to complete lessons, love affairs, financial and educational problems, discomfort from a near-death experience, and then writing down religious or cultural ways of reducing or confronting suffering Theoretical background: Logotherapy (Frankl, Therapeutic strategy: Based on the examples from the homework, finding common and severe types of spirituality-related suffering (e.g. divine test by suffering and difficulty), or tolerance of suffering in culture and customs (e.g. boys learn from childhood that they should not be scared or cry); analysing problems and suffering with regard to their potential meaning |
| 6 | Meaning in life | Aim: Finding meaning in life Homework from the previous session: Thinking about your reason for living: why do you keep on living your life and not commit suicide? Theoretical background: Logotherapy; existential theory Throughout history, humanity has engaged with existential questions. Why are we here? For what purpose do we live in the world? Why are we standing here? What does life mean? (Okan & Eksi, Therapeutic strategy: Group discussion about potential answers to the question of the meaning of life; examining the purposefulness of life in accordance with the recommendations of religion and culture |
| 7 | Values | Aim: Discovering meanings and values and hope for life, and making an effort to live up to values Homework from the previous session: Thinking about the following question: What is valuable in life? Why is life worth living for you? Can a person live and die for his aspirations and values? Are you ready to sacrifice your life for your values? Theoretical background: Logotherapy; relationship between values and meaningfulness of life Therapeutic strategies: Two short films were presented, one on religious values and one on cultural values, and the answers were then discussed. Various values such as inherent cultural credentials were examined to find the relationship between meanings and values |
| 8 | Meaning of life in death | Aim: Finding meaning in death and nonexistence; hope and confidence Homework from the previous session: Thinking about the following questions: Does thinking about death make you feel hopeless or hopeful? Theoretical background: Logotherapy Therapeutic strategy: Presenting a film on the life of Steven Hawking, the physicist, and several other films on stories of people’s efforts to survive; discussing homework and looking for the meaning of life in death. Discussing the message that life is not eternal, therefore, we must make the most of it, and death is a part of life. Using religious resources to show that, with death, another life begins in heaven. Use of cultural heritage resources to argue that if we must die let it not be in bed but in struggle |
| 9 | Positive thoughts | Aim: Negative thoughts, positive thoughts, optimism and hope Theoretical background: Logotherapy; cognitive therapy (Beck et al., Therapeutic strategy: The session started with a brief reception with small pieces of chocolate. A half-full glass of water was then brought into the meeting and participants were asked whether it was half-full or half-empty. Several experimental and objective activities were also carried out. Afterwards, the subjects were asked to state if they had positive or negative thoughts,And how many times they had the negative thoughts each day. A few religious and cultural examples were provided. This session mostly used the cognitive therapy technique (to switch to positive thoughts instead of negative thoughts) |
| 10 | Freedom of will | Aim: Understanding the freedom of will, the meaning of love, responsibility, and morality Homework from the previous session: Thinking about the following questions: Do you have freedom in various different areas? Do you consider freedom to be free from restraints and obligations? Can you name different types of human responsibility? What is the meaning of love? What is the meaning of human morality? Theoretical background: Logotherapy; existential philosophy Therapeutic strategy: The homework was discussed, with a focus on the concept of freedom of will. A short film of hope and love of life was shown about a person who was perfectly successful with no hands and feet (Nick Vujicic, “Conquer the Peak of Success without Hands and Feet”) |
| 11 | Prayer as coping strategy | Aim: Investigating the effect of prayer as a coping strategy Homework from the previous session: Participating in Komeil Prayer on Friday. The prayer ceremony was part of the intervention programme Theoretical background: Theory of Frankl, various religious resources and a large body of research Therapeutic strategy: Discussing their experiences of praising god and praying; discussing the role of religious ceremonies in increasing well-being |
| 12 | Summary | Summarising the results of all therapeutic strategies and activities; evaluating the success of the intervention |
A Comparison of Intervention and Control Group Characteristics at Baseline
| Variables | Total | Logotherapy | Control | t/χ2 | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M (SD) | M (SD) | M (SD) | |||
| Age | 22.3 (2.14) | 22.4 (2.19) | 22.1 (2.11) | −.54 | .591 |
| Gender (Female) | 80% | 83.3% | 76.7% | .42 | .519 |
| Marital status | |||||
| Single | 71.7% | 66.7% | 76.7% | .83 | .661 |
| Married/cohabitation | 23.3% | 26.7% | 20.0% | ||
| Separated/divorced | 5.0% | 6.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Depression (BDI-II) | 31.6 (7.51) | 31.2 (8.34) | 32.1 (6.69) | .44 | .659 |
Results of the two-way analyses of variance of the effect of the treatment
| Variables | Group | Pretest | Post-test | Group effecta | Time effecta | Interaction effect1 | Within | Between | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M (SD) | M (SD) | Etab | Etab | Etab | Cohen’s d2 | Cohen’s d3 | ||||||||
| Depression | Logotherapy | 31.2 (8.3) | 10.2 (7.1) | 58.2 | < .001 | .50 | 73.3 | < .001 | .56 | 56.8 | < .001 | .50 | 2.72 | 2.55 |
| (BDI-II) | Control | 32.1 (6.7) | 30.7 (7.5) | 0.20 | ||||||||||
| Depression | Logotherapy | 23.3 (4.03) | 15.5 (1.3) | 39.9 | < .001 | .41 | 37.9 | < .001 | .40 | 29.8 | < .001 | .34 | 2.61 | 1.76 |
| (DASS) | Control | 23.6 (4.08) | 23.1 (3.9) | 0.13 | ||||||||||
| Anxiety | Logotherapy | 25.5 (2.47) | 21.7 (2.0) | 28.9 | < .001 | .33 | 26.2 | < .001 | .31 | 19.8 | < .001 | .25 | 1.69 | 1.51 |
| (DASS) | Control | 25.9 (2.04) | 25.6 (2.1) | 0.15 | ||||||||||
| Stress | Logotherapy | 24.8 (3.8) | 14.9 (1.5) | 68.5 | < .001 | .54 | 59.9 | < .001 | .51 | 46.4 | < .001 | .44 | 3.43 | 2.40 |
| (DASS) | Control | 25.1 (3.79) | 24.5 (4.2) | 0.15 | ||||||||||
| Total Symptom Score | Logotherapy | 73.6 (9.8) | 52.1 (3.8) | 55.4 | < .001 | .48 | 48.3 | < .001 | .45 | 37.4 | < .001 | .39 | 2.89 | 2.06 |
| (DASS) | Control | 74.6 (9.3) | 73.2 (9.7) | 0.15 | ||||||||||
aANOVA group, time, and interaction (group x time) effects
b“Within Cohen’s d” are within-effect sizes, computed as the difference between means of an outcome variable at the two time points divided by the pooled standard deviation for these means
c“Between Cohen’s d” are between-effect sizes, computed as difference of the differences between the means, divided by the pooled standard deviation at pretest
Fig. 1Depression (BDI-II) scores before and after the intervention