Literature DB >> 35018141

The PRONTO study: Clinical performance of ID NOW in individuals with compatible SARS-CoV-2 symptoms in walk-in centres-accelerated turnaround time for contact tracing.

Isabelle Goupil-Sormany1,2, Jean Longtin3,4, Jeannot Dumar4,5, Marieve Jacob-Wagner3, Frédéric Bouchard6, Liliana Romero7, Julie Harvey8, Julie Bestman-Smith3,4, Mathieu Provençal9, Stéphanie Beauchemin9, Valérie Richard2, Annie-Claude Labbé9,10,11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This PRONTO study investigated the clinical performance of the Abbott ID NOWTM (IDN) COVID-19 diagnostic assay used at point of care and its impact on turnaround time for divulgation of test results.
METHODS: Prospective study conducted from December 2020 to February 2021 in acute symptomatic participants presenting in three walk-in centres in the province of Québec.
RESULTS: Valid paired samples were obtained from 2,372 participants. A positive result on either the IDN or the standard-of-care nucleic acid amplification test (SOC-NAAT) was obtained in 423 participants (prevalence of 17.8%). Overall sensitivity of IDN and SOC-NAAT were 96.4% (95% CI: 94.2-98.0%) and 99.1% (95% CI: 97.6-99.8), respectively; negative predictive values were 99.2% (95% CI: 98.7-99.6%) and 99.8% (95% CI: 99.5-100%), respectively. Turnaround time for positive results was significantly faster on IDN.
CONCLUSION: In our experience, IDN use in symptomatic individuals in walk-in centres is a reliable sensitive alternative to SOC-NAAT without the need for subsequent confirmation of negative results. Such deployment can accelerate contact tracing, reduce the burden on laboratories and increase access to testing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abbott ID NOW; COVID-19; Canada; SARS-CoV-2; diagnostic performance; nucleic acid amplification tests; point-of-care testing; predictive value; rapid tests; sensitivity and specificity

Year:  2021        PMID: 35018141      PMCID: PMC8699396          DOI: 10.14745/ccdr.v47i12a04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep        ISSN: 1188-4169


  32 in total

1.  Delays in testing as a source of COVID-19 false-negative results.

Authors:  Rudy Zimmer
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress and the Abbott ID NOW assay for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonghoo Lee; Jae-Uk Song
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.327

3.  Comparison of Abbott ID Now and Abbott m2000 Methods for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Nasopharyngeal and Nasal Swabs from Symptomatic Patients.

Authors:  Amanda Harrington; Brian Cox; Jennifer Snowdon; Jonathan Bakst; Erin Ley; Patricia Grajales; Jack Maggiore; Stephen Kahn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.

Authors:  Victor M Corman; Olfert Landt; Marco Kaiser; Richard Molenkamp; Adam Meijer; Daniel Kw Chu; Tobias Bleicker; Sebastian Brünink; Julia Schneider; Marie Luisa Schmidt; Daphne Gjc Mulders; Bart L Haagmans; Bas van der Veer; Sharon van den Brink; Lisa Wijsman; Gabriel Goderski; Jean-Louis Romette; Joanna Ellis; Maria Zambon; Malik Peiris; Herman Goossens; Chantal Reusken; Marion Pg Koopmans; Christian Drosten
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2020-01

5.  Real Time PCR and Culture-Based Virus Isolation Test in Clinically Recovered Patients: Is the Subject Still Infectious for SARS-CoV2?

Authors:  Viviana Manzulli; Giulia Scioscia; Giulio Giganti; Maria Rosaria Capobianchi; Donato Lacedonia; Lorenzo Pace; Dora Cipolletta; Pasquale Tondo; Rosella De Nittis; Valeria Rondinone; Luigina Serrecchia; Antonio Parisi; Domenico Galante; Sergio Lo Caputo; Teresa Antonia Santantonio; Damiana Moschetta; Vitangelo Dattoli; Antonio Fasanella; Maria Pia Foschino Barbaro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  The diagnostic accuracy of isothermal nucleic acid point-of-care tests for human coronaviruses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pakpoom Subsoontorn; Manupat Lohitnavy; Chuenjid Kongkaew
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Performance of the Abbott ID NOW rapid SARS-CoV-2 amplification assay in relation to nasopharyngeal viral RNA loads.

Authors:  Jorge L Sepulveda; Rami Abdulbaki; Zachary Sands; Maria Codoy; Salome Mendoza; Nancy Isaacson; Olga Kochar; John Keiser; Tenagne Haile-Mariam; Andrew C Meltzer; Christopher N Mores; Antonia R Sepulveda
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.168

8.  Can We Test Our Way Out of the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Authors:  Matthew A Pettengill; Alexander J McAdam
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of water gargle samples for SARS-CoV-2 detection using Abbott ID NOW COVID-19 assay.

Authors:  Simon Lévesque; Stéphanie Beauchemin; Maud Vallée; Jean Longtin; Mariève Jacob-Wagner; Jeannot Dumaresq; Carlos Dulcey; Annie-Claude Labbé
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 20.693

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.