| Literature DB >> 35018129 |
Abstract
Due to the advent of coronavirus disease in most nations throughout the world, the manner of education altered from traditional face-to-face to remote or online teaching. As a result, the new normal necessitates the adoption of an online teaching and learning platform for all levels of education. The study tested the effectiveness of a flipped classroom instructional technique on children's development of sound knowledge of Basic Science concepts. Thirty-one primary three children took part in the treatment session, which was conducted using a simple repeated measures design. The study collected data using the Basic Science Achievement Test (BSAT), which was adequately validated and trial-tested. The children were given two distinct pretests before the treatment and two different posttests afterward. The data were analyzed using a mixed-design repeated-measures analysis of variance. The findings demonstrated that using a flipped classroom instructional technique boosted children's development of a good understanding of Basic Science significantly (p = 000) with an effect size of 0.953. The implementation of a flipped classroom instructional technique in teaching and learning Basic Science was advocated as a result of these results.Entities:
Keywords: Basic science; Children; Developing; Flipped classroom; Simple repeated measures; Sound knowledge
Year: 2022 PMID: 35018129 PMCID: PMC8739516 DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10850-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Educ Inf Technol (Dordr) ISSN: 1360-2357
Participants demographic characteristics
| Demographics characteristics | n (%) | χ2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location | Urban | 18(58.06) | 32.76 | < .050 |
| Rural | 13(41.94) | |||
| Age | 6–7 Yrs | 24(77.42) | 34.41 | < .050 |
| 8–9 Yrs | 6(19.35) | |||
| > 9 Yrs | 1(3.22) | |||
| Gender | Male | 15(48.39) | 1.05 | > .050 |
| Female | 16(51.61) |
Fig. 1Schematic Representation of the Methodology
Mean analysis of the achievement scores of the participants at four different test occasions
| Test occasion | n | Mean | Std. Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pretest 1 | 31 | 10.51 | 1.96 |
| Pretest 2 | 31 | 10.12 | 1.96 |
| Posttest 1 | 31 | 33.00 | 5.23 |
| Posttest 2 | 31 | 33.67 | 4.62 |
Repeated measures analysis of variance of the difference in the test occasions
| Source | Type III Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig | Partial Eta Squared | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time | Sphericity Assumed | 16,431.444 | 3 | 5477.148 | 602.395 | .000 | .953 |
| Greenhouse–Geisser | 16,431.444 | 1.590 | 10,334.831 | 602.395 | .000 | .953 | |
| Huynh–Feldt | 16,431.444 | 1.664 | 9871.994 | 602.395 | .000 | .953 | |
| Lower-bound | 16,431.444 | 1.000 | 16,431.444 | 602.395 | .000 | .953 | |
| Error(Time) | Sphericity Assumed | 818.306 | 90 | 9.092 | |||
| Greenhouse–Geisser | 818.306 | 47.697 | 17.156 | ||||
| Huynh–Feldt | 818.306 | 49.934 | 16.388 | ||||
| Lower-bound | 818.306 | 30.000 | 27.277 | ||||
Post-Hoc pairwise comparison test for the significant difference in the test occasions
| (I) Time | (J) Time | Mean Difference (I-J) | Std. Error | Sig.b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | .387 | .216 | .406 |
| 3 | -22.484* | .961 | .000 | |
| 4 | -23.161* | .711 | .000 | |
| 2 | 1 | -.387 | .216 | .406 |
| 3 | -22.871* | .988 | .000 | |
| 4 | -23.548* | .780 | .000 | |
| 3 | 1 | 22.484* | .961 | .000 |
| 2 | 22.871* | .988 | .000 | |
| 4 | -.677 | .677 | .906 | |
| 4 | 1 | 23.161* | .711 | .000 |
| 2 | 23.548* | .780 | .000 | |
| 3 | .677 | .677 | .906 |
Process analysis of the influence of the moderators
| Model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| coeff | se | t | p | LLCI | ULCI | |
| Constant | 83.2940 | 11.8342 | 7.0384 | .0000 | 59.2167 | 107.3714 |
| Posttest | -4.0841 | 1.1250 | -3.6302 | .0009 | -6.3730 | -1.7951 |
| Gender | .0967 | 9.9449 | -1.1928 | .0872 | -61.9302 | -21.4631 |
| Age | .1844 | 5.9815 | -.2544 | .0809 | -25.6540 | -1.3148 |
| Location | .0345 | 6.4591 | -.9315 | .1461 | -32.0759 | -5.7932 |