Dany Barrak1, Anthony M Villano1, Nicole Villafane-Ferriol1, Leah G Stockton1, Maureen V Hill1, Mengying Deng2, Elizabeth A Handorf2, Sanjay S Reddy3. 1. Departments of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA. 2. Departments of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA. 3. Departments of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA. Electronic address: sanjay.reddy@fccc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multiple neoadjuvant therapy protocols have been proposed in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, including chemotherapy (CT), chemoradiation (CRT), and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), defined as a CT plus CRT. A pathologic complete response (pCR) can be achieved in a minority of cases. We hypothesize that TNT is more likely to confer pCR than other neoadjuvant therapies, which may improve overall survival (OS). METHODS: A retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2006 to 2016 was performed, identifying patients who underwent any neoadjuvant therapy followed by definitive pancreatic resection for locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A pathologic complete response was defined as down-staging from any clinical stage to pathologic stage 0. RESULTS: A total of 5402 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection were identified. 177 patients (3.3%) achieved a pCR. Of the patients who achieved a pCR, 57 received CT, 41 CRT and 79 received TNT. On multivariate analysis, TNT was more likely to confer a pCR than CRT (OR 1.67, CI 1.13-2.46, p = 0.0103) or CT (OR 2.61, CI 1.83-3.71, p < 0.0001). Patients who achieved pCR had a significantly higher OS, with median survival of 64.9 months, compared to 21.6 months in patients who did not achieve pCR (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: TNT may be more likely to achieve a pCR than CT or CRT. Patients who achieve a pCR have a significant OS benefit as compared to those who have residual disease. TNT should be considered for patients requiring neoadjuvant therapy, as it may increase the likelihood of achieving a pCR, thus potentially improving OS.
BACKGROUND: Multiple neoadjuvant therapy protocols have been proposed in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, including chemotherapy (CT), chemoradiation (CRT), and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), defined as a CT plus CRT. A pathologic complete response (pCR) can be achieved in a minority of cases. We hypothesize that TNT is more likely to confer pCR than other neoadjuvant therapies, which may improve overall survival (OS). METHODS: A retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2006 to 2016 was performed, identifying patients who underwent any neoadjuvant therapy followed by definitive pancreatic resection for locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A pathologic complete response was defined as down-staging from any clinical stage to pathologic stage 0. RESULTS: A total of 5402 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection were identified. 177 patients (3.3%) achieved a pCR. Of the patients who achieved a pCR, 57 received CT, 41 CRT and 79 received TNT. On multivariate analysis, TNT was more likely to confer a pCR than CRT (OR 1.67, CI 1.13-2.46, p = 0.0103) or CT (OR 2.61, CI 1.83-3.71, p < 0.0001). Patients who achieved pCR had a significantly higher OS, with median survival of 64.9 months, compared to 21.6 months in patients who did not achieve pCR (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: TNT may be more likely to achieve a pCR than CT or CRT. Patients who achieve a pCR have a significant OS benefit as compared to those who have residual disease. TNT should be considered for patients requiring neoadjuvant therapy, as it may increase the likelihood of achieving a pCR, thus potentially improving OS.
Authors: Jashodeep Datta; Gregory C Wilson; Michael I D'Angelica; Matthew H G Katz; Shishir K Maithel; Nipun B Merchant; Syed A Ahmad Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Daniel J Boffa; Joshua E Rosen; Katherine Mallin; Ashley Loomis; Greer Gay; Bryan Palis; Kathleen Thoburn; Donna Gress; Daniel P McKellar; Lawrence N Shulman; Matthew A Facktor; David P Winchester Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Christina L Roland; Matthew H G Katz; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Heather Lin; Gauri R Varadhachary; Rachna Shroff; Milind Javle; David Fogelman; Robert A Wolff; Jean N Vauthey; Christopher H Crane; Jeffrey E Lee; Jason B Fleming Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Francesco Polistina; Giuseppe Di Natale; Giorgio Bonciarelli; Giovanni Ambrosino; Mauro Frego Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-07-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Janet E Murphy; Jennifer Y Wo; David P Ryan; Jeffrey W Clark; Wenqing Jiang; Beow Y Yeap; Lorraine C Drapek; Leilana Ly; Christian V Baglini; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Cristina R Ferrone; Aparna R Parikh; Colin D Weekes; Ryan D Nipp; Eunice L Kwak; Jill N Allen; Ryan B Corcoran; David T Ting; Jason E Faris; Andrew X Zhu; Lipika Goyal; David L Berger; Motaz Qadan; Keith D Lillemoe; Nilesh Talele; Rakesh K Jain; Thomas F DeLaney; Dan G Duda; Yves Boucher; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo; Theodore S Hong Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Mark J Truty; Michael L Kendrick; David M Nagorney; Rory L Smoot; Sean P Cleary; Rondell P Graham; Ajit H Goenka; Christopher L Hallemeier; Michel G Haddock; William S Harmsen; Amit Mahipal; Robert R McWilliams; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Axel F Grothey Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Matthew H G Katz; Fang-Shu Ou; Joseph M Herman; Syed A Ahmad; Brian Wolpin; Robert Marsh; Spencer Behr; Qian Shi; Michael Chuong; Lawrence H Schwartz; Wendy Frankel; Eric Collisson; Eugene J Koay; JoLeen M Hubbard; James L Leenstra; Jeffrey Meyerhardt; Eileen O'Reilly Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 4.430