| Literature DB >> 35016641 |
Juan Li1, Min Zhou2, Yuhai Wang3, Sze Chai Kwok4,5,6, Jia Yin7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the first choice in patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) that could not be sufficiently controlled by pharmacological treatment. However, neurovascular conflict (NVC) could not be identified during MVD in all patients. To describe the efficacy and safety of treatment with aneurysm clips in these situations.Entities:
Keywords: Microvascular decompression; Offending vessel; Trigeminal neuralgia; neurapraxia
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35016641 PMCID: PMC8750803 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01469-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Surg ISSN: 1471-2482 Impact factor: 2.102
Fig. 1A representative case with no OVs and separate sensory vs. motor trigeminal nerve root. SR: sensory root of trigeminal nerve, MR: motor root of trigeminal nerve, AC: aneurysm clip, VC: vestige of clamp at the sensory root of trigeminal nerve
Fig. 2A representative case with no OVs and united sensory and motor roots. TN: trigeminal nerve, AC: aneurysm clip, VC: vestige of clamp at the whole trigeminal nerve
Fig. 3A representative case of recurrent TGN, with no OVs and united sensory and motor root. TN: trigeminal nerve, AC: aneurysm clip, Teflon: Teflon pad, VC: vestige of clamp at the whole trigeminal nerve
Demographic and baseline characteristics of the patients
| Cohort size (n = 26) | |
|---|---|
| Female sex, no. (%) | 15 (57.7%) |
| Age (y), median (range) | 64 (33–81) |
| Disease duration (y), median (range) | 3.25 (0.5–14.0) |
| Affected side, no. (%) | |
| Right only | 14 (53.8%) |
| Left only | 12 (46.2%) |
| Territory involved | |
| V1 | 1 |
| V2 | 3 |
| V3 | 5 |
| V1 + V2 | 2 |
| V2 + V3 | 12 |
| V1 + V2 + V3 | 3 |
Post-operative complications
| Complications | Cohort size (n = 26) (%) |
|---|---|
| Hemifacial numbness | 26 (100) |
| Herpes labialis | 9 (34.6) |
| Masseter weakness | 8 (30.7) |
| Hemifacial formication | 2 (7.7) |
| Blunted corneal reflex | 2 (7.7) |