| Literature DB >> 35015109 |
Angelina Wójcik-Fatla1, Barbara Mackiewicz2, Anna Sawczyn-Domańska3, Jacek Sroka3,4, Jan Siwiec2, Mariola Paściak5, Bogumiła Szponar5, Krzysztof Pawlik6, Jacek Dutkiewicz3.
Abstract
OCCURRENCE: Gram-negative bacteria occur commonly in the inner tissues of stored coniferous and deciduous timber, showing a marked variation in numbers. The greatest maximal numbers are found in the sapwood of coniferous timber. The common constituents of the Gram-negative biota are potentially pathogenic species of Enterobacteriaceae family of the genera Rahnella, Pantoea, Enterobacter, and Klebsiella. The air of wood-processing facilities is polluted with the wood-borne Gram-negative bacteria and produced by them endotoxin, as demonstrated worldwide by numerous studies. EFFECTS: There are three potential pathways of the pathogenic impact of wood-borne Gram-negative bacteria on exposed woodworkers: allergic, immunotoxic, and infectious. Allergic impact has been underestimated for a long time with relation to Gram-negative bacteria. Hopefully, the recent demonstration of the first documented case of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) in woodworkers caused by Pantoea agglomerans which developed in extremely large quantities in birch sapwood, would speed up finding of new wood-related cases of HP caused by Gram-negative bacteria. The second pathway is associated with endotoxin, exerting strong immunotoxic (excessively immunostimulative) action. It has been demonstrated that endotoxin is released into wood dust in the form of nano-sized microvesicles, by peeling off the outer membrane of bacteria. Endotoxin microvesicles are easily inhaled by humans together with dust because of small dimensions and aerodynamic shape. Afterwards, they cause a nonspecific activation of lung macrophages, which release numerous inflammatory mediators causing an inflammatory lung reaction, chest tightness, fever, gas exchange disorders, and bronchospasm, without radiographic changes. The resulting disease is known as "Organic Dust Toxic Syndrome" or "toxic pneumonitis." The potential third pathway of pathogenic impact is infection. The suspected species is Klebsiella pneumoniae that may occur commonly in wood dust; however, until now this pathway has not been confirmed.Entities:
Keywords: Endotoxin; Gram-negative bacteria; Hypersensitivity pneumonitis; Microvesicles; Occupational health; Pantoea agglomerans; Rahnella; Toxic pneumonitis; Wood dust
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35015109 PMCID: PMC9273545 DOI: 10.1007/s00420-021-01829-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health ISSN: 0340-0131 Impact factor: 2.851
Levels of Gram-negative bacteria and endotoxin in logs of various tree species, stored on lumber yard or in forest
| Species of timber log, location | Tissue | Concentration of gram-negative bacteria (CFU × 103 g−1, range) | Prevailing genera of gram-negative bacteria | Percent of total microbiota (%, range)a | Concentration of endotoxinb (ng × 103 g−1, range) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scots pine ( | Sapwood | 0.0–6,050,400.0 | 0.0–100 | 0.0–2000.0 | (Dutkiewicz | |
| Heartwood | 0.0–24.0 | 0.0–99.8 | 20.0–40.0 | |||
| Norway spruce ( | Sapwood | 0.0–200.0 | N. t | N. t | Prażmo and Dutkiewicz ( | |
| Heartwood | 0.0–33.0 | N. t | N. t | |||
| Silver fir ( | Sapwood | 0.0–2000.0 | N. t | N. t | Prażmo and Dutkiewicz ( | |
| Heartwood | 0.0–160.0 | N. t | N. t | |||
| White warty birch ( | Sapwood | 0.0–4.0 | 0.0–28.6 | N. t | (Dutkiewicz | |
| Heartwood | 0.0–400.0 | N. t | 0.0–1710.0 | |||
| European hornbeam ( | Sapwood | 0.0–5.0 | 0.0–7.9 | N. t | Dutkiewicz ( | |
| European alder ( | Sapwood | 0.0 | None | 0.0 | N. t | Dutkiewicz ( |
| European beech ( | Sapwood | 0.01–46.0 | N. t | N. t | (Prażmo et al. | |
| English oak ( | Sapwood | 0.0–1.0 | N. t | N. t | Prażmo and Dutkiewicz ( | |
| Heartwood | 0.0 | None | N. t | N. t | ||
| American basswood ( | Sapwood | 0.0–300.0 | 0.0–39.1 | 0.04–33.0 | Dutkiewicz et al. ( | |
| Heartwood | 0.0–12,000.0 | 0.0–99.9 | 0.13–0.4 | |||
| Bark | 0.0–650.0 | 0.0–20.6 | 0.22–1.3 | |||
| Soft maple ( | Sapwood | 0.0–4.5 | 0.0–50.0 | 0.16–1.0 | Dutkiewicz et al. ( | |
| Heartwood | 0.0–6.0 | 0.0–25.0 | 0.003–0.13 | |||
| Bark | 0.0–3.7 | 0.0–1.2 | 0.13–0.65 | |||
| Black cherry ( | Sapwood | 0.0 | None | 0.0 | 0.0016–0.13 | Dutkiewicz et al. ( |
| Heartwood | 0.0 | None | 0.0 | 0.0011–0.033 | ||
| Bark | 0.0–2.5 | 0.0–0.1 | 0.033–0.16 | |||
| Black locust ( | Sapwood | 0.0–5.5 | 0.0–60.0 | 0.16–0.5 | Dutkiewicz et al. ( | |
| Heartwood | 0.0–5.2 | 0.0–11.8 | 0.01–0.5 | |||
| Bark | 0.0–7.5 | 0.0–97.6 | 0.0–26.0 | |||
| Red oak ( | Sapwood | 0.0–3.2 | 0.0–1.0 | 0.013–0.16 | Dutkiewicz et al. ( | |
| Heartwood | 0.0 | None | 0.0 | 0.002–0.006 | ||
| Bark | 0.0 | None | 0.0 | 0.0–2.1 | ||
| White poplar ( | Sapwood | 0.0–7.3 | 0.0–99.6 | 0.007–10.0 | Dutkiewicz et al. ( | |
| Heartwood | 0.0–5.3 | 0.0–50.0 | 0.002–1.3 | |||
| Bark | 0.0–5.7 | 0.0–31.3 | 0.2–6.5 |
N. t. not tested, WV West Virginia
aEstimated by recalculating authors’ data
bAssuming 1 ng = 10 EU
Concentration of Gram-negative bacteria in the air of wood-processing facilities
| Country | Type of facility | Concentration of Gram-negative bacteria in the air (CFU × 103 m−3) (range) | Prevailing genera of gram-negative bacteria | Percent of total microbiota (%)a | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finland | Paper mill | 1.3b | N. e | Niemela et al. ( | |
| Poland | Sawmill processing birch ( | 0.0–0.48 | N. e | Prażmo et al. ( | |
| Australia | Sawmills processing eucalyptus | 3.3–14.1 | N. r | 8.1–44.5 | Alwis et al. ( |
| Australia | Joineries (processing various woods) | 0.4–15.1 | N. r | 7.7–41.8 | Alwis et al. ( |
| Poland | Sawmill processing pine ( | 0.0–0.6 | N. e | Prażmo et al. ( | |
| Poland | Sawmill processing beech ( | 7.8–13.0 | N. e | Prażmo et al. ( | |
| Poland | Sawmills | 0.04–21.9 | 0.3–55.0 | Dutkiewicz et al. ( | |
| Poland | Fiberboard and chipboard factories | 0.3–5.7 | 4.0–25.0 | Dutkiewicz et al. ( | |
| Poland | Furniture factories | 0.0–5.7 | 0.0–20.6 | Krysińska-Traczyk et al. ( | |
| Poland | Paper mills | 0.01–0.31 | N. e | Prażmo et al. ( | |
| Switzerland | Sawmills | 0.0–0.8 | 0.0–2.5 | Oppliger et al. ( | |
| Italy | Sawmills and carpentries | 0.0–0.16 | 0.0–5.5 | Gioffré et al. ( | |
| Poland | Joineries | ≤ 0.08 | ≤ 1.0 | Górny et al. ( | |
| Poland | Wood pellet production | 0.0 | None | 0.0 | Górny et al. ( |
N. e not estimated, N. r. not reported
aEstimated by recalculating authors’ data
bUpper limit of coliform bacteria
Concentration of bacterial endotoxin in the air of wood-processing facilities
| Country | Type of facility | Concentration of endotoxin (ng m−3) (average values) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sweden | Furniture factories | 1.2–350.0 | Wilhelmsson et al. ( |
| Poland | Sawmill | 75.0 | Prażmo et al. ( |
| Australia | Sawmills | 1.3–21.1 | Alwis et al. ( |
| Australia | Joineries | 0.7–9.8 | Alwis et al. ( |
| Sweden | Paper mill (bark cleaning) | 23.0–220.0 | Rylander et al. ( |
| Canada (British Columbia) | Sawmills | 1.0–3.6 | Dennekamp et al. ( |
| Canada (Quebec) | Sawmills | 32.3–594.4a | Duchaine et al. ( |
| New Zealand | Sawmills | 2.8–29.5a | Douwes et al. ( |
| Poland | Sawmills | 240.0–4000.0 | Dutkiewicz et al. ( |
| Poland | Fiberboard and chipboard factories | 0.0125–197.4a | Dutkiewicz et al. ( |
| New Zealand | Plywood mill | 1.2 –7.6a | Fransman et al. ( |
| Poland | Paper mill | 20.0–207.7 | Prażmo et al. ( |
| Tanzania | Joineries | 4.0–38.4a | Rongo et al. ( |
| Switzerland | Sawmills | 0.04–1.8a | Oppliger et al. ( |
| USA | Joineries | 1.1 | Harper and Andrew ( |
| Croatia | Sawmills | 26.2–28.1a | Pipinić et al. ( |
| Italy | Sawmills and carpentries | 0.14–6.93 | Gioffré et al. ( |
| Poland | Joineries | 2.51 | Górny et al. ( |
| Poland | Wood pellet production | 4.1–214.7 | Górny et al. ( |
| Ethiopia | Particleboard factories | 6.2a | Asgedom et al. ( |
| Norway | Sawmills | 1.2a | Straumfors et al. ( |
aValue(s) converted from Endotoxin Units (EU) assuming 10 EU = 1 ng
Fig. 1Cylindrical block cut from the transverse section of birch (Betula pendula) log. A central, brownish ring; B peripheral, yellowish ring. Hollows in the wood indicate sites of sampling with the drilling device (according to Mackiewicz et al. 2019)
Fig. 2Results of inhalation challenge with the extract of Pantoea agglomerans in patient No. 4 compared to the response after exposure to NaCl. Note distinct drops of FVC and FEV1 values 8 h post exposure to P. agglomerans (unpublished graph)
Fig. 3Thin-sectioned sample of pulverized wood from American basswood stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, showing two cells of Gram-negative bacteria (presumably Pantoea agglomerans) and numerous membrane vesicles (some marked with arrows) in the lumen of a wood cell, TEM (according to Dutkiewicz et al. 1992b)
Fig. 4Thin-sectioned sample of pulverized wood from American basswood immunostained with the rabbit antiserum against LPS of P. agglomerans and gold-labeled with anti-rabbit IgG. Structure corresponding to the cell of P. agglomerans is seen, stained positively with immunogold. Arrows outside the cell show aggregations of gold particles to smaller structures corresponding in shape and size to membrane vesicles, TEM (according to Dutkiewicz et al. 1992b)
Fig. 5Thin-sectioned sample of pulverized wetwood from white warty birch stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, showing two cells of Gram-negative bacteria (presumably Pseudomonas spp.) and numerous membrane vesicles (some marked with arrows) peeling from the outer membranes of these bacteria, TEM (according to Prażmo et al. 1996)