| Literature DB >> 35012192 |
Abstract
Sustainable biomass has attracted a great attention in developing green renewable energy storage devices (e.g., supercapacitors) with low-cost, flexible and lightweight characteristics. Therefore, cellulose has been considered as a suitable candidate to meet the requirements of sustainable energy storage devices due to their most abundant nature, renewability, hydrophilicity, and biodegradability. Particularly, cellulose-derived nanostructures (CNS) are more promising due to their low-density, high surface area, high aspect ratio, and excellent mechanical properties. Recently, various research activities based on CNS and/or various conductive materials have been performed for supercapacitors. In addition, CNS-derived carbon nanofibers prepared by carbonization have also drawn considerable scientific interest because of their high conductivity and rational electrochemical properties. Therefore, CNS or carbonized-CNS based functional materials provide ample opportunities in structure and design engineering approaches for sustainable energy storage devices. In this review, we first provide the introduction and then discuss the fundamentals and technologies of supercapacitors and utilized materials (including cellulose). Next, the efficacy of CNS or carbonized-CNS based materials is discussed. Further, various types of CNS are described and compared. Then, the efficacy of these CNS or carbonized-CNS based materials in developing sustainable energy storage devices is highlighted. Finally, the conclusion and future perspectives are briefly conferred.Entities:
Keywords: carbon nanofibres; cellulose-derived nanostructures; nanocellulose; specific capacitance; supercapacitors; sustainable biomass
Year: 2022 PMID: 35012192 PMCID: PMC8747565 DOI: 10.3390/polym14010169
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Ragone plot comparison of various energy storage technologies for energy vs. power density [21].
Figure 2Schematic illustration of the charging process (a): charged state (b), discharging process (c) [26].
Figure 3EDL model, (a) Helmholtz model, (b) Gouy–Chapman model, and (c) Stern model. Reprinted with permission from ref. [1]. 2016 Elsevier.
Figure 4Different type of pseudocapacitances and the nature of the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curve. Reprinted with permission from ref. [22]. 2019 American Chemical Society.
Figure 5Schematic illustration of hierarchical structure of wood, from macroscopic to molecular level. Reprinted with permission from ref. [71]. 2018 American Chemical Society.
Figure 6Schematic representation of the (a) fabrication of nanocellulose-derived HPC and HPC/NiCo2O4 composite aerogels and (b) their asymmetric assembly into an all-nanofibre ASC device. Reprinted with permission from ref. [112]. 2019 American Chemical Society.
Figure 7Schematic representation of the synthesis and ionic and electronic transport research mechanisms of rGO aerogel as a capacitor electrode within a KOH electrolyte. Reprinted with permission from ref. [115]. 2017 Elsevier.
Figure 8Schematic process of the fabrication and layered structure of supercapacitor cell. Reprinted with permission from ref. [124]. 2016 Elsevier.
Figure 9Schematic of the preparation process of CNFs/CNTs/PANI-NW/CC electrodes. Reprinted with permission from ref. [152]. 2018 IOP Publications.
Figure 10Schematic representation of a PANI@rGO/PMFT. Reprinted with permission from ref. [155]. 2021 John Wiley and Sons.
Cellulose-derived nanostructure-based supercapacitors.
| CNS-Type | Processing | Electrode-Type | Electrolyte | Specific Capacitance | Energy Density | Power Density | Capacitance Retention (%) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNFs | Electrospinning, regeneration, and carbonization (800 °C) | N-doped CBNFs/CA/SPI | 6 M KOH | 219.3 F/g at 0.2 A/g | 5.6 W h/kg | 16.8 kW/kg | 98.9 after 50,000 cycles at 20 A/g | [ |
| CNCs/CNFs | Carbonization (800 °C) | SSAD/CBNFs | 6 M KOH | 149 F/g at 0.25 A/g | 20.64 W h/kg | 0.25 kW/kg | 500 cycles | [ |
| CNFs | Carbonization (900 °C) | CBNFAs-17% | 1 M H2SO4 | 440.29 F/g at 1.0 A/g | 0.081 mW h/cm2 | 100 after 7000 cycles | [ | |
| BCNFs | Chemical mixing | CBNFs/PDA-Fe2+ | 1 M H2SO4 | 219.0 at 10.0 A/g | 10.07 W h/kg | 1.0 kW/kg | 95 after 10,000 cycles | [ |
| BCNFs | Submerging in NH2H2PO4, and then pyrolysis | N/P co-doped CBNFs | 2 M H2SO4 | 204.9 F/g at 1.0 A/g | 7.76 W h/kg | 186.03 kW/kg | Very stable upto 4000 cycles | [ |
| BCNFs | N/P/S co-doped CBNFs | 2 M H2SO4 | 255.0 F/g at 1.0 A/g | 8.48 W h/kg at 1.0 A/g | 489.45 W/kg | slight change after 3500 cycles | [ | |
| Co3O4 NPs/CNFs | Carbonization at 200 °C for 20 min under H2/Ar ambience | Co3O4@CNFs | 3 M KOH | ∼214 F/g at 1.0 A/g | 10 W h/kg | ∼94 after 5000 cycles | [ | |
| ACNFs | Specimen was fabricated on the Al substrate via slip casting | N/A | 13.1 W/kg | Cs = 1.85f−0.494 (r2 = 0.9984) | [ | |||
| CNFs/zeolite | In-situ chemical process followed by pyrolysis | HZNPC & (1,3,5%) CNF-HZNPC coated GCE | 1 M KOH | 115 F/g & (130,147,101) at 1 A/g | [ | |||
| TEMPO-CNFS/MnO2 | Pyrolysis followed by hydrothermal process | TEMPO-CNFS/MnO2 and activated C | 171.1 F/g at 0.5 A/g | 8.6 W h/kg | 619.2 W/kg | 98.4% after 5000 cycles at 3 A/g | [ | |
| Ti3C2Tx/CNFs | Vacuum filtration process | PC/PTFE/ | PVA/KOH gel | 143 mF cm−2 at 0.1 mA cm−2 | 2.4 µW h/cm2 at 17.5 | 50% after enhancing power density by 100 times | [ | |
| Ti3C2Tx/CNFs | Delaminated Ti3C2Tx flakes modified by alkalization and annealing at 400 °C | 3 M H2SO4 | 303.1 & 211.4 F/g at 1.0 & 10.0 mA/cm2 | 92.84% after 10,000 cycles | [ | |||
| NPCNs/CNFs | Activating co-assisted carbonization process and vacuum filtration | NPCN-f and NPCN/MnO2-f | 2 M KOH and 1 M Na2SO4 | 351, and 318 F/g for NPCN, and NPCN-f at 1 A/g | 41.5 W h/kg | 182.0 W/Kg | 93% after 10,000 cycles | [ |
| GO/CNCs | Non-liquid crystal spinning and chemical reduction | rGO/CNC-20 | PVA/H2SO4 gel | 208.2 F/cm3 | 5.1 W h/cm3 | 496.4 W/cm3 | 92.1% after 1000 cycles | [ |
| HPC/NiCo2O4 | Pump filtration process | HPC & | 6 M KOH | 64.83 F/g & 32.78 F/g at 0.25 & 4 A/g | 23.05 W h/kg | 213 W/kg | 96.8% after 1000 cycles at 10 A/g | [ |
| J11/CNTs/BCNFs | One pot esterification process | CNTs/BCNFs & J11/CNTs/BCNFs | 1 M H2SO4 | 461.8 F/cm3 at 10 A/g | 41.9 W h/kg | 1.0 KW/Kg | 82.4% after 10,000 cycles at 10 A/g | [ |
| Fe3O4/CNTs/CNCs | Hydrothermal reduction process | N doped MWCNT | 2 M KOH | 562 F/g at 0.5 A/g | 94.6% after 5000 cycles | [ | ||
| rGO/CBNFs | Low temperature thermal treatment | rGO350 | 6 M KOH | 210 F/g at 10 A/g | 97% after 100 cycles | [ | ||
| rGO/SnO2/CNFs | Hydrothermal reduction process | CNFs/RGO/SnO2 | 1 M H2SO4 | 4.314 F/cm2 at 1 mA/cm2 | 60.47% after 2000 cycles at 10 mA/cm2 | [ | ||
| rGO/CNFs | Hummers process | GO/GO-CNF | PVA/H3PO4 | 120 mF/cm2 | 536 W h/kg | 193 mW/cm2 | [ | |
| Biomass carbon/rGO/CNFs | One-step self-assembly process | Bio-AC/rGO/CNF | 1 M Na2SO4 | 4.8 F/cm2 | 365 mW h/cm2 | 18,000 mW/cm2 | 99% after 500 cycles | [ |
| Graphene QD/CNFs | Electrolysis and liquid phase dispersion | CNF@GQD | 1.5 M Li2SO4 | 118 mF/cm2 | 5961 W h/cm2 | 782 mW/cm2 | >93% after 500 cycles | [ |
| PANI/BCNFs | In situ polymerization | Acetylene/PTFE | 1 M H2SO4 | 273 F/g at 2.0 A/g | 94.3% after 500 cycles | [ | ||
| PANI/CNFs | In situ polymerization | PANI/CNF/GNP | PVA/H2SO4 | 421.5 F/g at 1.0 A/g | 78.3% after 1000 cycles | [ | ||
| PPy/CBNFs/Ni(OH)2 | Electrospinning, deacetylation and polymerization | N-CBNFs/CBNFs-Ni(OH)2 | 6 M KOH | 1045 F/g | 51 W h/Kg | 117 kW/Kg | 84% after 5000 cycles | [ |
| PPy/TEMPO/BCNFs | In situ polymerization | PPy-TOBC | PVDF-EMIMBF4 | 153 F/g | 21.22 W h/Kg | 93% after 100 cycles | [ | |
| PEDOT/CNCs | Electrochemical polymerization | ITO/Pt/Ag/AgCl | 1 M NaCl | 117.02 F/g at 0.2 A/g | 11.44 W h/Kg | 99.85 W/Kg | 86% after 1000 cycles | [ |
| Graphene/PANI/BCNFs | Polymerization and filtration | PANI/GN/BC | 1 M H2SO4 | 1.32 F/cm2 | 0.12 mW h/cm2 | 91.5% after 2000 cycles | [ | |
| Graphene/PANI/BCNFs | In situ polymerization | PANI/PG–BC4 | PVA/H2SO4 | 1389 mF/cm2 at 2 mA/cm2 | 9.80 mW h/cm3 | 0.20 mW/cm2 | 89.8% after 5000 cycles | [ |
| PPy/rGO/CNFs | Vacuum filtration and chemical reduction | PPy@rGO/CNFs | 1 M H2SO4 | 625.6 F/g at 0.22 A/g | 21.7 W h/Kg | 0.11 kW/Kg | 75.4% after 5000 cycles | [ |
| TEMPO/rGO/PPy/CNFs | Vacuum filtration and chemical reduction | CNFs/RGO@PPy-2 FSCs | 1 M H2SO4 | 647 F/g at 0.1 mA/cm2 at 0.1 mA/cm2 | 14.37 mW h/cm2 | 20 mW cm−2 | 92.6% after 10,000 cycles | [ |
| TEMPO-NC/CNT/PS | Extraction and chemical oxidation of bleached wood pulp | TC-s-CNT-PS | 1 M H2SO4 | 65 F/g | 60% after 2000 cycles | [ | ||
| PPy/rGO/TEMPO/BCNFs | Chemical mixing and sonication | PPy@TOBC/rGO | PVA/H2SO4 | 391 F/g at 0.5 A/g | 4.1 mW h/cm3 | 429.3 mW/cm3 | 79% after 5000 cycles | [ |
| PPy/CNT/BCNFs | Chemical mixing and In-situ polymerization | PPy@CNT/BC | PVA/H2SO4 | 228 F/g at 0.5 A/g | 4.2 W h/kg | 454.5 W/Kg | 79% after 5000 cycles | [ |
| PPy/Ni-Mn/BCNFs | In situ layered-by-layer deposition | BiVO4, BiVO4/Ni(OH)x, BiVO4/Mn(OH)x or BiVO4/NiMn-LDH | 0.5 M Na2SO4 | 653.1 F/g at 0.5 A/g | 29.8 W h/kg | 299 W/Kg | [ | |
| CNT/PVAB-CNFs | Chemical mixing and sonication | CNT-CNF/PVAB-2 | H3PO4/PVA | 117.1 F/g at 0.5 A/g | 96.4% after 1000 cycles | [ | ||
| MWCNT/PANI/CC/CNFs | In situ polymerization | CNFs/CNTs/PANI/CC | 1 M H2SO4 | 318 F/g at 10 mA/s | 72.09% after 1000 cycles | [ | ||
| PAM/H2SO4/BCNFs | Electrostatic self-assembly approach | PANI/RGO/PMFT | BC/PAM | 564 mF/cm2 | 50.1 μW h/cm2 | 20 mW/cm2 | 97.5% after 2000 cycles | [ |
| NiS/BCNFs | Dissolution/gelation/carbonization | NiS/BC & BC | 2 M KOH | 21.5 W h/kg | 700 W/kg | 87.1% after 10,000 cycles | [ | |
| PPy/GO/BCNFs | Chemical mixing and pyrolyzation | N doped/RGO/BCNFs | 6 M KOH/1 M H2SO4 | 0.1 mW h/cm2 in KOH & 0.1 mW h/cm2 in H2SO4 | 27.0 mW/cm2 in KOH & 37.5 mW/cm2 in H2SO4 | 99.6% after 10,000 cycles | [ | |
| PEDOT/CNFs | Hybrid formation through in situ polymerization | NFC@PEDOT | 1 M H2SO4 | 1.1 mW h/cm3 | 900 mW/cm2 | 93% after 15,000 cycles | [ | |
| PANI/G/BCNFs | Hybrid formation with PANI and graphene | PANI/GO/BCNFs | 1 M H2SO4 | 1.9 F/cm2 0.25 mA/cm2 | 0.2 mW h/cm2 | 0.1 mW/cm2 | 53.6% after 5000 cycles | [ |