| Literature DB >> 35012191 |
Lăcrămioara Rusu1, Cristina-Gabriela Grigoraș1, Andrei-Ionuț Simion1, Elena-Mirela Suceveanu1, Alexandra-Cristina Blaga2, Maria Harja2.
Abstract
Pharmaceuticals are recognized as emerging water microcontaminants that have been reported in several aquatic environments worldwide; therefore, the elimination of these pollutants is a global challenge. This study aimed to develop a biosorbent based on Saccharomyces pastorianus residual biomass encapsulated in a calcium alginate matrix and to evaluate its biosorption performance to remove Ethacridine Lactate (EL) from aqueous solutions. Firstly, the synthesis and characterization of biosorbent has been carried out. Then, the impact of main parameters on biosorption process were investigated by batch experiments. Finally, the kinetics behavior and equilibrium isotherms were evaluated. The resulted beads have an irregular and elongated shape with about 1.89 mm ± 0.13 mm in size with a homogeneous structure. The best removal efficiency for EL of over 85% was obtained at acidic pH 2 and 25 °C for 50 mg/L initial concentration and 2 g/L biosorbent dose. The pseudo-second-order and intraparticle diffusion kinetics describe the biosorption process. The maximum calculated biosorption capacity was 21.39 mg/g similar to that recorded experimentally. The equilibrium biosorption data were a good fit for Freundlich and Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherms. Our findings reveal that the low cost and eco-friendly obtained biosorbent can be easily synthesized and suitable to remove Ethacridine Lactate from water matrices.Entities:
Keywords: encapsulation; natural polymer; pharmaceuticals; water treatment; yeast biomass
Year: 2022 PMID: 35012191 PMCID: PMC8747389 DOI: 10.3390/polym14010170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Ethacridine lactate (EL) structure (CAS 1837-57-6; molecular formula: C18H21N3O4; MW = 343.4 g/mol).
Figure 2Photographs of the synthesized biosorbent before adsorption (A) and after adsorption (B) of Ethacridine lactate from aqueous solution.
Figure 3SEM images of the synthesized biosorbent before adsorption (A) and after adsorption (B) of ethacridine lactate from aqueous solution.
Figure 4FTIR spectra of the synthesized biosorbent before adsorption and after adsorption of Ethacridine lactate from aqueous solution.
Figure 5Point of zero charge of the synthesized biosorbent.
Figure 6Effect of working conditions on EL removal efficiency and on the biosorption capacity (A): influence of pH (EL solution volume: 10 mL; EL initial concentration: 60 mg/L; biosorbent dose: 2 g/L; room temperature); (B): influence of biosorbent dose (EL solution volume: 20 mL; EL initial concentration: 60 mg/L; pH: 2; room temperature); (C): influence of EL initial concentration (EL solution volume: 30 mL; biosorbent dose: 2 g/L; pH: 2; room temperature); (D): influence of temperature (EL solution volume: 10 mL; EL initial concentration: 60 mg/L; biosorbent dose: 2 g/L; pH: 2).
Figure 7Pseudo-second-order (A) and intraparticle diffusion (B) kinetic models for the biosorption of EL on the synthesized biosorbent.
Biosorption kinetic parameters of EL on synthesized biosorbent.
| Kinetic Model | EL Initial | Kinetic Parameters | Correlation Coefficient, R2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Pseudo-second-order | 20 | 5.6932 | 0.0031 | - | - | 0.9917 |
| 30 | 9.2236 | 0.0062 | - | - | 0.9927 | |
| 40 | 13.0694 | 0.0086 | - | - | 0.9906 | |
| 50 | 17.1651 | 0.0144 | - | - | 0.9944 | |
| 60 | 21.3909 | 0.0194 | - | - | 0.9951 | |
| Intraparticle diffusion | 20 | - | - | 0.4321 | 0.0587 | 0.9755 |
| 30 | - | - | 0.6879 | 0.3664 | 0.9696 | |
| 40 | - | - | 0.9889 | 0.4344 | 0.9703 | |
| 50 | - | - | 1.2558 | 1.1923 | 0.9651 | |
| 60 | - | - | 1.5669 | 1.6801 | 0.9618 | |
Figure 8Freundlich (A) and Dubinin–Radushkevich (B) equilibrium isotherms for the biosorption of EL on the synthesized biosorbent.
Freundlich and Dubinin–Raduschkevich isotherm models of EL biosorption process on Saccharomyces pastorianus/calcium alginate beads.
| Parameter | Freundlich Model | Dubinin–Radushkevich Model |
|---|---|---|
|
| 0.5232 | - |
| 2.8394 | - | |
| - | 28.8765 | |
| - | 0.000023 | |
| - | 147.4420 | |
| R2 | 0.9942 | 0.9369 |