| Literature DB >> 35012119 |
Kristina Peranidze1, Tatiana V Safronova1,2, Nataliya R Kildeeva3.
Abstract
Currently, the significantly developing fields of tissue engineering related to the fabrication of polymer-based materials that possess microenvironments suitable to provide cell attachment and promote cell differentiation and proliferation involve various materials and approaches. Biomimicking approach in tissue engineering is aimed at the development of a highly biocompatible and bioactive material that would most accurately imitate the structural features of the native extracellular matrix consisting of specially arranged fibrous constructions. For this reason, the present research is devoted to the discussion of promising fibrous materials for bone tissue regeneration obtained by electrospinning techniques. In this brief review, we focus on the recently presented natural and synthetic polymers, as well as their combinations with each other and with bioactive inorganic incorporations in order to form composite electrospun scaffolds. The application of several electrospinning techniques in relation to a number of polymers is touched upon. Additionally, the efficiency of nanofibrous composite materials intended for use in bone tissue engineering is discussed based on biological activity and physiochemical characteristics.Entities:
Keywords: bone tissue engineering; electrospinning; extracellular matrix; nanofibers; polymer scaffolds
Year: 2021 PMID: 35012119 PMCID: PMC8747636 DOI: 10.3390/polym14010096
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1The number of published papers on nanofibrous polymer scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Modern natural and synthetic polymers for BTE.
| Polymer Type | Suitable Composite | Feature | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Collagen | collagen/cellulose [ | Significant component of native ECM, low cytotoxic response, weak mechanical properties, high degradation rate |
| Silk fibroin | silk fibroin/chitosan [ | Sufficient biocompatibility, strong mechanical properties, low degradation, easy to process, no immunogenic response in vivo | |
| Gelatin | chitosan/gelatin [ | Similar to collagen in structure, relatively high tensile modulus, suitable biocompatibility, highly affordable | |
| Chitosan | silk fibroin/chitosan [ | Suitable biocompatibility, strong fibers in combination with PVA, requires toxic acidic agents for electrospinning | |
| Cellulose | collagen/cellulose [ | Significant biocompatibility, weak mechanical properties, high degradation rate | |
|
| N6 | N6/PVA [ | Sufficient biocompatibility, controllable conformation, enhanced wettability resulting in good MC3T3-E1 cell attachment for N6/PVA |
| PCL | PCL/collagen [ | Sufficient biocompatibility and biodegradability, highly affordable, increased hydrophobicity resulting in poor cell attachment | |
| PLA | PCL/PLA [ | Sufficient biocompatibility, improved mechanical properties compare to analogs, low degradation, inflammatory reactions caused by its by-product | |
| PLGA | collagen/PLGA [ | Sufficient biocompatibility, high degradation rate compared to PLA | |
| PEO | gelatin/PEO [ | Sufficient biocompatibility, mainly used as additive to improve properties of the artificial ECM | |
| PVA | silk fibroin/PVA [ | Suitable biocompatibility, mainly used as additive to improve properties of the artificial ECM, highly affordable, process with various hydrolysis degrees, high degradation rate | |
Figure 2Transmission electron microscopy of prepared fibers: sample CA13 at image scale 1 μm (a), HAP particles dispersed inside the sample CA13 at image scale 0.5 μm (b) [77].
Figure 3Transmission electron microscopy images of (a) PCL, (b) PCL/BG, and (c,d) PCL/gelatin/BG. White arrows indicate nanoparticles within fibers. Black arrows indicate nanoparticles dispersed onto the copper grid [84].
Electrospinning techniques.
|
|
| Multiaxial electrospinning: |
| Bi-component electrospinning | ||
| Multineddle electrospinning | ||
| Electroblowing/Gas-assisted/Gas jet electrospinning | ||
| Magnetic field assisted electrospinning | ||
| Conjugate electrospinning | ||
| Centrifugal electrospinning | ||
|
| Bubble electrospinning | |
| Two-layer fluid electrospinning | ||
| Splashing electrospinning | ||
| Melt differential electrospinning | ||
| Gas-assisted melt differential electrospinning | ||
| Rotary cone electrospinning | ||
| Rotating roller electrospinning/Nanospider technology | ||
| Edge electrospinning | ||
| Blown bubble electrospinning |
Figure 4Schematic view of the electrospinning equipment with the four distinct states: Taylor cone formation area (T); stable-straight jet part (J); unstable, whipping region (W); fibers collection phase (C) [87].
Figure 5Schematic diagram depicting the rotating spinnerets: cylindric spinneret (a), disc spinneret (b), ball spineret (c), and wire/coil spinneret (d) in needleless electrospinning (upward electrospinning direction along the red arrow) [90].