| Literature DB >> 35012095 |
Xiaoxing Yan1,2, Wenbo Li2, Yan Han2, Taiyu Yin2.
Abstract
The melamine/rice husk powder-coated shellac microcapsules were prepared by in-situ polymerization with melamine resin mixed with rice husk powder as microcapsule wall material and shellac as microcapsule core material. The effect of the addition amount of microcapsules with different wall material ratios on the performance of wood waterborne primer coating was investigated. The results show that the most important factor affecting the performance of microcapsules is the content of rice husk powder. Through the preparation and analysis of shellac microcapsule primer coating coated with melamine/rice husk powder, when the content of microcapsule powder is 0-6%, it has little effect on the optical properties of wood waterborne primer coating, and the microcapsule with 5.5% rice husk powder has little effect on the color difference of primer coating. The coating hardness increases with the increase of rice husk powder content in wall material. When the rice husk powder content in wall material is more than 5.5%, the coating hardness reaches the best. When the content of microcapsule powder is 3.0-9.0%, the adhesion of the coating is better, and the coating with rice husk powder content of 5.5% in microcapsule wall material has better impact resistance. When the content of rice husk powder was 5.5% and the content of microcapsule powder was 6%, the elongation at break of the primer coating was the highest and the tensile resistance was the best. The composition of wood waterborne primer did not change after adding microcapsule. The water-based primer with microcapsule has better aging resistance. The water-based primer coating with rice husk powder content of 5.5% and the addition amount of 6% had the best comprehensive performance, which lays the technical reference for the toughness and self-repairing of the waterborne wood coatings.Entities:
Keywords: microcapsule; preparation technology; rice husk powder; water-based primer
Year: 2021 PMID: 35012095 PMCID: PMC8747687 DOI: 10.3390/polym14010072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
List of experimental materials.
| Experimental Materials | Molecular Mass (g/mol) | CAS | Manufacturer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5% hydrogen peroxide | 34.01 | 7722-84-1 | Nanjing Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China |
| sodium hydroxide | 40.00 | 1310-73-2 | Nanjing Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China |
| 99.9% melamine | 126.12 | 108-78-1 | Shuntian Chemical Co., Ltd., Shandong, China |
| 37% formaldehyde | 30.03 | 50-00-0 | Nanjing Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China |
| triethanolamine | 149.1882 | 102-71-6 | Nanjing Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China |
| sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate | 348.476 | 25155-30-0 | Tianjin Beichen Fangzheng Reagent Factory, Tianjin, China |
| citric acid monohydrate | 210.14 | 5949-29-1 | Tianjin Beilian Fine Chemicals Development Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China |
| absolute ethanol | 46.07 | 64-17-5 | Hangzhou Outop Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China |
| 100 mesh rice husk powder | - | - | Lianfeng Agricultural Products Co., Ltd., Lianyungang, China |
| shellac | - | - | Jinan Dahui Chemical Technology Co., Ltd., Jinan, China |
| Dulux waterborne primer | - | - | Shanghai Keyuan Industrial Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China |
Influencing factors and levels.
| Level | Rice Husk Powder Content (%) | Water Bath Temperature (°C) | Stirring Speed (r) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.8 | 20 | 300 |
| 2 | 8.0 | 60 | 600 |
Orthogonal test arrangement.
| Sample | Rice Husk Powder Content (%) | Water Bath Temperature (°C) | Stirring Speed (r) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.8 | 20 | 300 |
| 2 | 2.8 | 60 | 600 |
| 3 | 8.0 | 20 | 600 |
| 4 | 8.0 | 60 | 300 |
List of consumption of each substance in the single-factor test.
| Rice Husk Powder Content (%) | Rice Husk Powder (g) | Melamine (g) | 37% Formaldehyde Solution (g) | Shellac (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 5.00 | 10.00 | 6.45 |
| 2.8 | 0.25 | 5.00 | 10.00 | 6.64 |
| 5.5 | 0.50 | 5.00 | 10.00 | 6.83 |
| 8.0 | 0.75 | 5.00 | 10.00 | 7.01 |
| 10.4 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 10.00 | 7.20 |
Experimental equipment list.
| Experimental Equipment | Manufacturer |
|---|---|
| HP-2136 color difference instrument | Hangzhou Caipu Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China |
| HG268 intelligent gloss tester | Shenzhen Sanenshi Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China |
| QHQ-A Pencil hardness tester | Dongguan Dalai Instrument Co., Ltd., Dongguan, China |
| QFH-HG600 film scribing instrument | Dongguan Huaguo Precision Instrument Co., Ltd., Dongguan, China |
| QCJ-40 coating impact tester | Dongguan Weida Instrument Co., Ltd., Dongguan, China |
| Universal mechanical testing machine | Dongguan Hongjin Testing Instrument Co., Ltd., Dongguan, China |
| Quanta-200 scanning electron microscope | Shenzhen Chenqixi Trading Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China |
| Zeiss Axio scope A1 biomicroscope | Shenzhen Chenqixi Trading Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China |
| VERTEX 80 V infrared spectrometer | Guangzhou Huruiming Instrument Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China |
Figure 1(A) Optical micrograph and (B) infrared spectrum of treated rice husk powder.
Figure 2Microscopic morphology of orthogonal test products: (A) sample 1, (B) sample 2, (C) sample 3, (D) sample 4.
Figure 3Infrared spectrum of wall material, core material, and microcapsule.
Results of output of microcapsules.
| Sample | Rice Husk Powder Content (%) | Water Bath Temperature (°C) | Stirring Speed (r) | Yield (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.8 | 20 | 300 | 2.64 |
| 2 | 2.8 | 60 | 600 | 3.87 |
| 3 | 8.0 | 20 | 600 | 5.21 |
| 4 | 8.0 | 60 | 300 | 6.12 |
| Mean 1 | 3.225 | 3.925 | 4.38 | |
| Mean 2 | 5.665 | 4.995 | 4.54 | |
| Range | 2.44 | 1.07 | 0.16 |
Figure 4SEM morphology of single factor microcapsules: (A) rice husk powder content 0; (B) rice husk powder content 2.8%; (C) rice husk powder content 5.5%; (D) rice husk powder content 8.0%; (E) rice husk powder content 10.4%.
Figure 5Infrared spectrum of microcapsules in the single-factor test.
Yield of microcapsules in the single-factor test.
| Sample | Rice Husk Powder Content (%) | Mass of Core Material (g) | Yield (g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 6.45 | 0.55 |
| 2 | 2.8 | 6.64 | 0.58 |
| 3 | 5.5 | 6.83 | 1.08 |
| 4 | 8.0 | 7.01 | 1.06 |
| 5 | 10.4 | 7.20 | 1.04 |
Results of microcapsule coating rate in the single-factor test.
| Sample | Rice Husk Powder Content (%) | Mass of Core Material (g) | Coating Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 6.45 | 20 |
| 2 | 2.8 | 6.64 | 23 |
| 3 | 5.5 | 6.83 | 35 |
| 4 | 8.0 | 7.01 | 47 |
| 5 | 10.4 | 7.20 | 31 |
Figure 6Effect of microcapsules with different contents of rice husk powder on the color difference.
Figure 7Effect of microcapsules with different wall material ratios on the gloss of waterborne primer coating.
Effect of microcapsule addition on the hardness of waterborne primer coating.
| Microcapsule Addition (%) | Hardness | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rice Husk Powder Content of 0 | Rice Husk Powder Content of 2.8% | Rice Husk Powder Content of 5.5% | Rice Husk Powder Content of 8.0% | Rice Husk Powder Content of 10.4% | |
| 0 | H | H | H | H | H |
| 3 | 3H | 4H | 5H | 5H | 6H |
| 6 | 4H | 5H | 6H | 6H | 6H |
| 9 | 4H | 6H | 6H | 6H | 6H |
| 12 | 5H | 6H | 6H | 6H | 6H |
| 15 | 5H | 6H | 6H | 6H | 6H |
Effect of microcapsule addition on adhesion of waterborne primer coating.
| Microcapsule Addition (%) | Adhesion (Level) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rice Husk Powder Content of 0 | Rice Husk Powder Content of 2.8% | Rice Husk Powder Content of 5.5% | Rice Husk Powder Content of 8.0% | Rice Husk Powder Content of 10.4% | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 9 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 12 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 15 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
Effect of microcapsule content on the impact resistance of waterborne primer coating.
| Microcapsule Addition (%) | Impact Strength (kg·cm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rice Husk Powder Content of 0 | Rice Husk Powder Content of 2.8% | Rice Husk Powder Content of 5.5% | Rice Husk Powder Content of 8.0% | Rice Husk Powder Content of 10.4% | |
| 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 3 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| 6 | 10 | 10 | 15 | 13 | 10 |
| 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| 12 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| 15 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
Figure 8Effect of microcapsules with different contents of rice husk powder on elongation at break of waterborne primer coating.
Figure 9SEM of waterborne coatings with different contents of microcapsules (rice husk powder content 5.5%): (A) 0%; (B) 3%; (C) 6%; (D) 9%; (E) 12%; (F) 15%.
Figure 10Infrared spectrum of waterborne primer with different contents of microcapsules.
Changes of color difference and glossiness of water-based primer with different contents of microcapsules after the aging test.
| Microcapsule Addition (%) | State | L | a | b | Chromatic Aberration | Gloss (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Before aging | 66.0 | 18.3 | 29.6 | - | 15.9 |
| After aging | 66.7 | 17.9 | 27.5 | 4.34 | 13.9 | |
| 6 | Before aging | 70.9 | 14.2 | 29.5 | - | 7.2 |
| After aging | 71.5 | 15.5 | 32.3 | 1.59 | 6.5 |
Figure 11SEM of waterborne primer coating with different content of microcapsules before and after aging; before aging: (A) 0% of the microcapsule, (B) 6% of microcapsule; after aging: (C) 0% of the microcapsule, (D) 6% of the microcapsule.
Figure 12Scratch test of coating: (A) microcapsule content 0, scratch first day, (B) microcapsule content 6.0%, scratch first day; (C) microcapsule content 0, scratch fifth day, (D) microcapsule content 6.0%, scratch fifth day.