| Literature DB >> 35011247 |
Nisar Ahmad1, Palwasha Khan1, Abdullah Khan1, Maliha Usman1, Mohammad Ali1, Hina Fazal2, Muhammad Nazir Uddin1, Christophe Hano3, Bilal Haider Abbasi4.
Abstract
Stevia rebaudiana is an important medicinal plant that belongs to the Asteraceae family. The leaves of Stevia rebaudiana are a rich source of many health-promoting agents such as polyphenols, flavonoids, and steviol glycoside, which play a key role in controlling obesity and diabetes. New strategies such as the elicitation of culture media are needed to enhance the productivity of active components. Herein, the Cuscuta reflexa extracts were exploited as elicitors to enhance the productivity of active components. Cuscuta reflexa is one of the parasitic plants that has the ability to elongate very fast and cover the host plant. Consequently, it may be possible that the addition of Cuscuta reflexa extracts to adventitious root cultures (ADR) of Stevia rebaudiana may elongate the root more than control cultures to produce higher quantities of the desired secondary metabolites. Therefore, the main objective of the current study was to investigate the effect of Cuscuta reflexa extract as a biotic elicitor on the biomass accumulation and production of antioxidant secondary metabolite in submerged adventitious root cultures of Stevia rebaudiana. Ten different concentrations of Cuscuta reflexa were added to liquid media containing 0.5 mg/L naphthalene acetic acid (NAA). The growth kinetics of adventitious roots was investigated for a period of 49 days with an interval of 7 days. The maximum biomass accumulation (7.83 g/3 flasks) was observed on medium containing 10 mg/L extract of Cuscuta reflexa on day 49. As the concentration of extract increases in the culture media, the biomass gradually decreases after 49 days of inoculation. In this study, the higher total phenolics content (0.31 mg GAE/g-DW), total flavonoids content (0.22 mg QE/g-DW), and antioxidant activity (85.54%) were observed in 100 mg/L treated cultures. The higher concentration (100 mg/L) of Cuscuta reflexa extract considerably increased the total phenolics content (TPC), total phenolics production (TPP), total flavonoids content (TFC), total flavonoids production (TFP), total polyphenolics content (TPPC), and total polyphenolics production (TPPP). It was concluded that the extract of Cuscuta reflexa moderately improved biomass accumulation but enhanced the synthesis of phenolics, flavonoids, and antioxidant activities. Here, biomass's independent production of secondary metabolites was observed with the addition of extract. The present study will be helpful to scale up adventitious roots culture into a bioreactor for the production of secondary metabolites rather than biomass accumulation in medicinally important Stevia rebaudiana.Entities:
Keywords: Cuscuta reflexa; Stevia rebaudiana; adventitious root culture; biomass; elicitation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35011247 PMCID: PMC8746614 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27010014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Effect of different Cuscuta reflexa (Cr) extracts on the growth kinetics of adventitious roots biomass (ADR) of Stevia rebaudiana. Data were collected with 7-day intervals for a period of 49 days. Mean values with standard deviation (±SD) of the means did not exceed 5%. Mean values for each treatment were obtained from three independent experiments. Mean values with common alphabets are significantly different at p < 0.05.
| Culture Period | 7 Days | 14 Days | 21 Days | 28 Days | 35 Days | 42 Days | 49 Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADR Biomass (g/3 Flasks) | ADR Biomass (g/3 Flasks) | ADR Biomass (g/3 Flasks) | ADR Biomass (g/3 Flasks) | ADR Biomass (g/3 Flasks) | ADR Biomass (g/3 Flasks) | ADR Biomass (g/3 Flasks) | |
| 2.97 ± 0.01 c | 4.05 ± 0.05 b | 5.13 ± 0.03 ab | 5.67 ± 0.01 ab | 6.2 ± 0.1 a | 7.29 ± 0.09 a | 7.83 ± 0.08 a | |
| 2.43 ± 0.01 b | 3.5 ± 0.03 b | 4.05 ± 0.02 ab | 5.13 ± 0.03 ab | 5.49 ± 0.08 ab | 6.12 ± 0.05 a | 7.29 ± 0.08 a | |
| 1.35 ± 0.02 c | 2.16 ± 0.04 b | 3.24 ± 0.03 b | 4.32 ± 0.02 ab | 4.86 ± 0.03 ab | 5.13 ± 0.02 a | 5.94 ± 0.02 a | |
| 1.08 ± 0.01 c | 1.89 ± 0.01 c | 2.41 ± 0.01 b | 3.78 ± 0.03 b | 4.59 ± 0.02 ab | 4.86 ± 0.05 a | 5.67 ± 0.04 a | |
| 0.99 ± 0.01 c | 1.52 ± 0.01 b | 2.32 ± 0.01 b | 2.7 ± 0.02 b | 4.56 ± 0.02 a | 4.6 ± 0.04 a | 5.2 ± 0.03 a | |
| 0.81 ± 0.01 c | 1.35 ± 0.01 c | 2.16 ± 0.01 bc | 2.43 ± 0.02 bc | 3.78 ± 0.03 b | 4.59 ± 0.06 a | 5.86 ± 0.04 a | |
| 0.54 ± 0.01 c | 1.08 ± 0.01 b | 2.05 ± 0.01 b | 2.32 ± 0.01 b | 3.27 ± 0.0 ab | 4.6 ± 0.03 a | 4.8 ± 0.02 a | |
| 0.27 ± 0 c | 1.08 ± 0.01 bc | 1.86 ± 0 bc | 2.2 ± 0.01 b | 2.9 ± 0.02 b | 3.97 ± 0.03 b | 4.5 ± 0.03 a | |
| 0.27 ± 0 c | 0.54 ± 0 c | 1.73 ± 0 bc | 2.1 ± 0.01 b | 2.5 ± 0.02 b | 3.5 ± 0.01 ab | 4.1 ± 0.02 a | |
| 0.27 ± 0 c | 0.54 ± 0 bc | 1.4 ± 0 b | 1.86 ± 0.01 b | 2.3 ± 0.01 ab | 3.3 ± 0.03 a | 3.74 ± 0.03 a | |
| Control | 0.34 ± 0 e | 1.17 ± 0 d | 3.27 ± 0 cd | 5.33 ± 0.01 c | 6.94 ± 0.01 b | 7.77 ± 0.02 ab | 8.16 ± 0.01 a |
Figure 1Pictorial presentation of the effect of 10 different extracts: (a) 10 mg/3 flasks, (b) 20 mg/3 flasks, (c) 30 mg/3 flasks, (d) 40 mg/3 flasks, (e) 50 mg/3 flasks, (f) 60 mg/3 flasks, (g) 70 mg/3 flasks, (h) 80 mg/3 flasks, (i) 90 mg/3 flasks, (j) 100 mg/3 flasks, and (k) control of Cuscuta reflexa on the adventitious root culture development of Stevia rebaudiana.
Effect of different Cuscuta reflexa extracts on the fresh and dry weights of adventitious root cultures of Stevia rebaudiana after the completion of the experiments. Mean values with standard deviation (±SD) of the means did not exceed 5%. Mean values for each treatment were obtained from three independent experiments. Mean values with common alphabets are significantly different at p < 0.05.
| Plant Extracts | Fresh Weight (g/3 Flask) | Dry Weight (g/3 Flask) |
|---|---|---|
| 9.14 ± 1.2 a | 0.84 ± 0.1 a | |
| 8.9 ± 0.7 ab | 0.74 ± 0.02 ab | |
| 8.84 ± 0.3 ab | 0.82 ± 0.02 a | |
| 8.66 ± 0.1 ab | 0.64 ± 0.03 ab | |
| 8.14 ± 0.3 ab | 0.72 ± 0.01 ab | |
| 8.04 ± 0.7 ab | 0.62 ± 0.04 ab | |
| 7.4 ± 0.2 b | 0.6 ± 0.03 ab | |
| 7.54 ± 0.2 b | 0.68 ± 0.02 ab | |
| 7.26 ± 0.3 b | 0.66 ± 0.01 ab | |
| 5.42 ± 0.2 c | 0.42 ± 0.01 c | |
| Control | 10.23 ± 0.3 a | 0.877 ± 0.02 a |
The effect of different Cuscuta reflexa (Cr) extracts on total phenolics content (TPC), total phenolic production (TPP), total flavonoids content (TFC), total flavonoids production (TFP), total polyphenolics content (TPPC), and total polyphenolics production (TPPP) in Stevia rebaudiana. Mean data along with standard deviation (±SD) and least significant differences were determined using Statistix software (v. 8.2; USA). Mean values with common alphabets are significantly different at p < 0.05.
| Plant Extract | TPC mg/g-GAE-DW | TPP g/3 Flask | TFC mg/g-QE-DW | TFP g/3 Flask | TPPC g/3 Flask | TPPP g/3 Flask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.06 ± 0.01 d | 0.05 ± 0 c | 0.01 ± 0 c | 0.08 ± 0.01 c | 0.07 ± 0.01 c | 0.06 ± 0.01 c | |
| 0.1 ± 0.01 c | 0.07 ± 0.01 c | 0.04 ± 0 c | 0.03 ± 0 c | 0.14 ± 0.01 c | 0.11 ± 0 b | |
| 0.17 ± 0.02 b | 0.14 ± 0.01 ab | 0.07 ± 0.01 c | 0.06 ± 0.01 c | 0.24 ± 0.02 b | 0.19 ± 0.01 b | |
| 0.19 ± 0.02 b | 0.12 ± 0.01 b | 0.092 ± 0.02 a | 0.058 ± 0.02 a | 1.11 ± 0.09 a | 0.07 ± 0.01 c | |
| 0.19 ± 0.01 b | 0.14 ± 0.01 ab | 0.12 ± 0.01 b | 0.08 ± 0.01 c | 0.32 ± 0.02 b | 0.23 ± 0.01 ab | |
| 0.21 ± 0.02 b | 0.13 ± 0.01 b | 0.16 ± 0.01 b | 0.09 ± 0.01 c | 0.37 ± 0.03 b | 0.23 ± 0.02 ab | |
| 0.25 ± 0.02 ab | 0.15 ± 0.01 ab | 0.19 ± 0.02 b | 0.12 ± 0 b | 0.44 ± 0.02 b | 0.26 ± 0.01 ab | |
| 0.28 ± 0.02 a | 0.19 ± 0.02 a | 0.21 ± 0.01 b | 0.14 ± 0 b | 0.48 ± 0.01 b | 0.33 ± 0.02 a | |
| 0.29 ± 0.01 a | 0.19 ± 0.02 a | 0.21 ± 0.02 b | 0.14 ± 0.01 b | 0.49 ± 0.03 b | 0.33 ± 0.01 a | |
| 0.31 ± 0.03 a | 0.15 ± 0.03 ab | 0.22 ± 0.02 b | 0.11 ± 0 b | 0.53 ± 0.02 b | 0.22 ± 0.01 ab | |
| Control | 0.18 ± 0.01 b | 0.12 ± 0.02 b | 0.11 ± 0.01 b | 0.11 ± 0 b | 0.27 ± 0.01 b | 0.17 ± 0 b |
The effect of different Cuscuta reflexa (Cr) extracts on antioxidant activity in adventitious roots of Stevia rebaudiana. Mean values were taken from triplicated experiment. The mean values along with SD (±) with common alphabets was determined by Statistix v. 8.2 (USA) software.
| Plant Extract | Antioxidant Activity (%) |
|---|---|
| 54.2 ± 0.2 g | |
| 57.7 ± 0.7 f | |
| 61.6 ± 0.4 e | |
| 67.9 ± 1.0 d | |
| 72.1 ± 0.4 c | |
| 77.1 ± 1.3 b | |
| 79.8 ± 0.9 ab | |
| 81.3 ± 2.3 ab | |
| 84.7 ± 3.1 a | |
| 85.5 ± 3.3 a | |
| Control w/o extract | 74.4 ± 2.1 bc |
Figure 2Standard calibration curve for gallic acid, where “y” is the absorbance spectra of each concentration, “x” represents the concentration of gallic acid (Sigma; 1.0−10 µg/mL), and “R2” represents the correlation coefficient. A similar plot was also calibrated for the different concentrations of quercetin to compare the treated samples for the investigation of flavonoids contents where the correlation coefficient (R2) values fall within in the range of 0.9866.