| Literature DB >> 35011051 |
Camille M Mba1,2, Albert Koulman1,3, Nita G Forouhi1, Fumiaki Imamura1, Felix Assah2, Jean Claude Mbanya4, Nick J Wareham1.
Abstract
A low intake of fruit and vegetables and a high intake of meat are associated with higher cardiometabolic disease risk; however much prior research has relied on subjective methods for dietary assessment and focused on Western populations. We aimed to investigate the association of blood folate as an objective marker of fruit and vegetable intake and holotranscobalamin (holoTC) as a marker of animal-sourced food intake with cardiometabolic risk factors. We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study on 578 adults (mean ± SD age = 38.2 ± 8.6 years; 64% women). The primary outcome was a continuous metabolic syndrome score. The median serum folate was 12.9 (IQR: 8.6-20.5) nmol/L and the mean holoTC was 75 (SD: 34.3) pmol/L. Rural residents demonstrated higher serum folate concentrations (15.9 (9.8-25.9) nmol/L) than urban residents (11.3 (7.9-15.8) nmol/L), but lower holoTC concentrations (rural: 69.8 (32.9) pmol/L; urban: 79.8 (34.9)) pmol/L, p < 0.001 for both comparisons. There was an inverse association between serum folate and metabolic syndrome score by -0.20 in the z-score (95% CI, -0.38 to -0.02) per 10.8 (1 SD) of folate) in a model adjusted for socio-demographic factors, smoking status, alcohol intake, BMI, and physical activity. HoloTC was positively associated with the metabolic syndrome score in unadjusted analysis (0.33 (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.56)) but became non-significant (0.17 (-0.05 to 0.39)) after adjusting for socio-demographic and behavioural characteristics. In conclusion, serum folate and holoTC were associated with the metabolic syndrome score in opposite directions. The positive association between serum holoTC and the metabolic syndrome score was partly dependent on sociodemographic characteristics. These findings suggest that, based on these biomarkers reflecting dietary intakes, public health approaches promoting a higher intake of fruit and vegetables may lower cardiometabolic risk factors in this population.Entities:
Keywords: cardiometabolic risk factors; holotranscobalamin; serum folate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35011051 PMCID: PMC8747568 DOI: 10.3390/nu14010178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Factors associated with serum folate (n = 578) and holotranscobalamin (n = 547); Cameroon study.
| Characteristics | Folate Median (IQR) = 12.9 (8.6–20.5) nmol/L | Holotranscobalamin | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 0.10 (0.04 to 0.16) | 0.001 | 5.5 (2.1 to 8.9) | 0.002 |
| Men (vs women) | 0.06(−0.05 to 0.18) | 0.273 | 0.36 (−5.71 to 6.43) | 0.908 |
| Education level | | | | |
| Urban (vs rural) | −0.29(−0.39 to −0.19) | <0.001 | 10.8(5.1 to 16.4) | <0.001 |
| Smoking status | | | | |
| Alcohol drinking | | | | |
| Fruits (times/week) | 0.003 (−0.01 to 0.02) | 0.741 | 0.28(−0.61 to 1.16) | 0.54 |
| Vegetables (times/week) | 0.001 (−0.01 to 0.01) | 0.897 | −0.46(−1.21 to 0.29) | 0.227 |
| PAEE (KJ/Kg/day) | 0.005(0.003 to 0.008) | <0.001 | −0.18(−0.32 to −0.04) | 0.011 |
| Sedentary (hour/day) | −0.04 (−0.06 to −0.02) | <0.001 | 0.81 (−0.48 to 2.1) | 0.216 |
| LPA (hour/day) | 0.03 (0.001 to 0.07) | 0.041 | 0.15 (−1.77 to 2.08) | 0.874 |
| MVPA (hour/day) | 0.06 (0.03 to 0.10) | 0.001 | −2.64 (−4.73 to −0.54) | 0.014 |
| GPAQ PAEE (KJ/Kg/day) | 0.001(0.0002 to 0.001) | 0.007 | −0.01(−0.05 to 0.02) | 0.471 |
| GPAQ work (MET-h/week) | 0.0005(0.0001 to 0.0008) | 0.013 | −0.004(−0.02 to 0.02) | 0.702 |
| GPAQ leisure (MET-h/week) | 0.0005(−0.002 to 0.003) | 0.622 | −0.03(−0.11 to 0.05) | 0.463 |
| GPAQ travel (MET-h/week) | 0.001(−0.0004 to 0.003) | 0.141 | −0.06(−0.13 to 0.008) | 0.083 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | −0.01(−0.02 to −0.004) | 0.005 | 1.21(0.65 to 1.77) | <0.001 |
| BMI categories (Kg/m2) | | | | |
| Body fat (10%) | −0.09(−0.20 to −0.03) | 0.004 | 10.0(6.8 to 14.1) | <0.001 |
| Waist circumference (10 cm) | −0.06(−0.10 to −0.02) | 0.003 | 4.1 (1.6 to 6.7) | 0.002 |
CI, confidence interval; PAEE, physical activity energy expenditure; LPA, light physical activity; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; GPAQ, global physical activity questionnaire; BMI, body mass index. β-coefficients represent the difference in holotranscobalamin in pmol/L or the log transformed value of folate in nmol/L per a unit difference in the predictor. For example, a β-coefficient of 0.01 for folate means that, for a year difference in age, folate concentration changes by exp (0.01) = 1.01 nmol/L, which corresponds to an increase of 1.0%. Estimates were adjusted for age and sex (except for age adjusted for sex only and sex adjusted for age only).
Associations between serum folate and metabolic risk factors; Cameroon study.
| Outcome | Difference in Outcome per 1 SD (10.8 nmol/L) of Serum Folate | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
| β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | ||||
| Metabolic syndrome score ( | −0.30 (−0.51 to 0.09) | 0.005 | −0.30 (−0.50 to −0.10) | 0.004 | −0.20 (−0.38 to −0.02) | 0.029 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg), ( | −1.51 (−3.18 to 0.16) | 0.076 | −1.58 (−3.29 to 0.12) | 0.069 | −1.25 (−2.89 to 0.39) | 0.135 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), ( | −1.57 (−2.58 to −0.56) | 0.002 | −1.42 (−2.39 to −0.45) | 0.004 | −1.13 (−2.04 to −0.21) | 0.016 |
| Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L), ( | −0.003 (−0.10 to 0.10) | 0.957 | 0.01 (−0.08 to 0.11) | 0.807 | 0.03 (−0.08 to 0.12) | 0.629 |
| 2-h blood glucose (mmol/L), ( | −0.01 (−0.17 to 0.15) | 0.865 | 0.01 (−0.15 to 0.18) | 0.881 | 0.02 (−0.15 to 0.19) | 0.809 |
| HOMA_IR, ( | −0.004 (−0.09 to 0.09) | 0.932 | 0.02 (−0.06 to 0.11) | 0.603 | 0.05 (−0.03 to 0.14) | 0.224 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L), ( | 0.03 (0.002 to 0.06) | 0.037 | 0.04 (0.006 to 0.07) | 0.018 | 0.04 (0.01 to 0.07) | 0.023 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L), ( | 0.0004 (−0.04 to 0.04) | 0.983 | −0.01 (−0.05 to 0.03) | 0.525 | −0.003 (−0.04 to 0.04) | 0.883 |
HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; β, β-coefficient; CI, confidence interval. Model 1: Unadjusted. Model 2: Adjusted for age, sex, education level, smoking, alcohol intake, residential site. Model 3:Model 2 + body mass index + objectively measured physical activity.
Associations between serum holotranscobalamin (holoTC) and metabolic risk factors; Cameroon study.
| Outcome | Difference in Outcome per 1 SD (34.3 pmol/L) of Serum holoTC | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
| β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | ||||
| Metabolic syndrome score, ( | 0.33 (0.10 to 0.56) | 0.004 | 0.17 (−0.05 to 0.39) | 0.127 | 0.04 (−0.16 to 0.23) | 0.70 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg), ( | 1.72 (0.001 to 3.44) | 0.050 | 0.49 (−1.16 to 2.14) | 0.561 | 0.08 (−1.60 to 1.76) | 0.923 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), ( | 1.50 (0.39 to 2.62) | 0.008 | 0.65 (−0.42 to 1.71) | 0.234 | 0.32 (−0.75 to 1.38) | 0.561 |
| Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L), ( | 0.10 (−0.03 to 0.22) | 0.121 | 0.07 (−0.07 to 0.21) | 0.323 | 0.05 (−0.09 to 0.18) | 0.502 |
| 2-h blood glucose (mmol/L), ( | 0.22 (0.05 to 0.40) | 0.014 | 0.12 (−0.05 to 0.30) | 0.162 | 0.12 (−0.06 to 0.29) | 0.187 |
| HOMA-IR, ( | 0.09 (−0.003 to 0.18) | 0.059 | 0.12 (0.03 to 0.23) | 0.012 | 0.08 (−0.01 to 0.18) | 0.075 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L), ( | 0.03 (−0.006 to 0.07) | 0.10 | 0.02 (−0.02 to 0.06) | 0.313 | 0.01 (−0.03 to 0.05) | 0.475 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L), ( | 0.02 (−0.01 to 0.05) | 0.165 | 0.01 (−0.02 to 0.03) | 0.678 | 0.01 (−0.02 to 0.04) | 0.647 |
HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; β, β-coefficient; CI, confidence interval. Model 1: Unadjusted. Model 2: Adjusted for age, sex, education level, smoking, alcohol intake, residential site. Model 3: Model 2 + body mass index + objectively measured physical activity.