| Literature DB >> 35010910 |
Yaru Guo1, Xiaojian Yin1,2, Yi Sun1, Ting Zhang1, Ming Li1, Feng Zhang1, Yuan Liu1, Jianyi Xu1, Dandan Pei1, Tianlong Huang1.
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the impact of environmental factors such as latitude, altitude, family socioeconomic status (SES), and level of urbanization on overweight and obesity (ow/ob) in children and adolescents. The participants comprised 26,120 children and adolescents aged 10-18 from 16 provinces in China. Differences in the prevalence of ow/ob under different environmental conditions were evaluated by the chi-square test. The influence of various environmental factors on ow/ob was obtained by logistic regression analysis. We found that (1) the prevalence of ow/ob fell between from 19.2% to 11.9% at 10 years old and from 13.8% to 6% at 18 years old; (2) latitude, family SES, income, and urbanization level are positively correlated with the prevalence of ow/ob; and (3) altitude has a negative correlation with the prevalence of ow/ob. The prevalence of ow/ob decreased with age in children and adolescents aged 10-18, and the risk of ow/ob showed significant differences in latitude, altitude, family SES level, gross domestic product (GDP), and level of urbanization.Entities:
Keywords: children and adolescents; environment; influencing factors; overweight and obesity
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35010910 PMCID: PMC8746339 DOI: 10.3390/nu14010035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Basic characteristics of the research objects.
| Boy ( | Girl ( | Total ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Ratio/% |
| Ratio/% |
| Ratio/% | |
| Latitude | ||||||
| Low | 4961 | 38 | 4966 | 38 | 9927 | 38 |
| Middle | 5576 | 42.7 | 5631 | 43.1 | 11,207 | 42.9 |
| High | 2531 | 19.4 | 2455 | 18.8 | 4986 | 19.1 |
| Altitude | ||||||
| Low | 9154 | 70 | 9201 | 70.5 | 18,355 | 70.3 |
| Medium | 2471 | 18.9 | 2330 | 17.9 | 4801 | 18.4 |
| High | 1443 | 11 | 1521 | 11.7 | 2964 | 11.3 |
| SES | ||||||
| Low | 1640 | 12.5 | 1862 | 14.3 | 3502 | 13.4 |
| Middle | 5682 | 43.5 | 5827 | 44.6 | 11,509 | 44.1 |
| High | 5746 | 44 | 5363 | 41.1 | 11,109 | 42.5 |
| Degree of urbanization | ||||||
| Worst | 1003 | 7.7 | 1229 | 9.4 | 2232 | 8.5 |
| Lower | 3003 | 23 | 3057 | 23.4 | 6060 | 23.2 |
| Middle and upper | 2511 | 19.2 | 2439 | 18.7 | 4950 | 19 |
| Best | 6551 | 50.1 | 6327 | 48.5 | 12,878 | 49.3 |
| GDP | ||||||
| Medium income | 788 | 6 | 766 | 5.9 | 1554 | 5.9 |
| Middle and upper | 8933 | 68.4 | 9043 | 69.3 | 17,976 | 68.8 |
| High income | 3347 | 25.6 | 3243 | 24.8 | 6590 | 25.2 |
| Engel coefficient | ||||||
| Well-off | 992 | 7.6 | 979 | 7.5 | 1971 | 7.5 |
| Rich | 6549 | 50.1 | 6525 | 50 | 13,074 | 50.1 |
| Richest | 5527 | 42.3 | 5548 | 42.5 | 11,075 | 42.4 |
Prevalence of different nutritional status in children and adolescents aged 10–18 years (%).
| Age |
| Boys |
| Girls | Total | Total | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thinness | Normal Weight | Overweight | Obesity | Thinness | Normal Weight | Overweight | Obesity | Thinness | Normal Weight | Overweight | Obesity | ||||
| 10 | 1437 | 5.2 | 54.5 | 22.6 | 17.7 | 1482 | 6.2 | 71.7 | 15.8 | 6.3 | 2919 | 5.7 | 63.2 | 19.2 | 11.9 |
| 11 | 1509 | 4.8 | 56.3 | 23.3 | 15.6 | 1476 | 7.0 | 70.0 | 17.8 | 5.2 | 2985 | 5.9 | 63.1 | 20.6 | 10.5 |
| 12 | 1473 | 5.4 | 61.4 | 21.9 | 11.3 | 1469 | 8.0 | 75.0 | 12.4 | 4.6 | 2942 | 6.7 | 68.2 | 17.1 | 7.9 |
| 13 | 1550 | 6.6 | 66.0 | 18.1 | 9.3 | 1510 | 5.4 | 79.5 | 11.5 | 3.6 | 3060 | 6.0 | 72.6 | 14.8 | 6.5 |
| 14 | 1544 | 7.6 | 71.7 | 15.1 | 5.6 | 1497 | 3.9 | 84.9 | 8.7 | 2.5 | 3041 | 5.8 | 78.2 | 11.9 | 4.0 |
| 15 | 1541 | 5.1 | 73.6 | 15.6 | 5.7 | 1500 | 4.1 | 86.1 | 8.5 | 1.3 | 3041 | 4.6 | 79.8 | 12.1 | 3.6 |
| 16 | 1473 | 6.4 | 74.1 | 13.4 | 6.0 | 1534 | 4.6 | 87.0 | 7.1 | 1.4 | 3007 | 5.5 | 80.7 | 10.2 | 3.6 |
| 17 | 1379 | 6.8 | 75.1 | 13.5 | 4.6 | 1382 | 3.3 | 90.4 | 5.5 | 0.8 | 2761 | 5.0 | 82.8 | 9.5 | 2.7 |
| 18 | 1162 | 6.4 | 80.0 | 10.1 | 3.5 | 1202 | 3.9 | 90.2 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 2364 | 5.1 | 85.2 | 7.4 | 2.3 |
|
| 13,068 | 6.0 | 67.8 | 17.2 | 8.9 | 13,052 | 5.2 | 81.4 | 10.4 | 3.0 | 26,120 | 5.6 | 74.6 | 13.8 | 6.0 |
Figure 1Prevalence of different nutritional status in children and adolescents aged 10–18 years (%).
Prevalence of nutritional status of children and adolescents in different provinces (%).
| Province |
| Boy |
| Girl | Total | Total | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thinness | Normal Weight | Overweight | Obesity | Thinness | Normal Weight | Overweight | Obesity | Thinness | Normal Weight | Overweight | Obesity | ||||
| Shanghai | 900 | 2.6 | 64.1 | 21.8 | 11.6 | 880 | 2.6 | 80.0 | 13.6 | 3.8 | 1780 | 2.6 | 72 | 17.8 | 7.7 |
| Heilongjiang | 842 | 7.1 | 58.3 | 20.7 | 13.9 | 779 | 5.4 | 75.7 | 13.9 | 5.0 | 1621 | 6.3 | 66.7 | 17.4 | 9.6 |
| Hebei | 724 | 7.0 | 65.1 | 18.2 | 9.7 | 865 | 4.9 | 80.8 | 11.4 | 2.9 | 1589 | 5.9 | 73.6 | 14.5 | 6 |
| Henan | 835 | 5.4 | 70.2 | 17.0 | 7.4 | 792 | 5.4 | 83.3 | 8.0 | 3.3 | 1627 | 5.4 | 76.6 | 12.6 | 5.4 |
| Shanxi | 819 | 4.6 | 66.2 | 19.0 | 10.1 | 768 | 3.8 | 80.5 | 11.7 | 4.0 | 1587 | 4.2 | 73.1 | 15.5 | 7.2 |
| Jiangsu | 778 | 3.5 | 72.8 | 17.6 | 6.2 | 767 | 3.3 | 85.5 | 8.6 | 2.6 | 1545 | 3.4 | 79.1 | 13.1 | 4.4 |
| Zhejiang | 900 | 6.6 | 69.4 | 16.0 | 8.0 | 900 | 6.0 | 80.9 | 10.2 | 2.9 | 1800 | 6.3 | 75.2 | 13.1 | 5.4 |
| Anhui | 738 | 6.9 | 69.5 | 15.7 | 7.9 | 733 | 9.1 | 79.8 | 8.3 | 2.7 | 1471 | 8 | 74.6 | 12 | 5.3 |
| Jiangxi | 880 | 9.0 | 75.6 | 10.6 | 4.9 | 900 | 9.8 | 84.0 | 4.2 | 2.0 | 1780 | 9.4 | 79.8 | 7.4 | 3.4 |
| Sichuan | 727 | 6.1 | 69.9 | 14.6 | 9.5 | 707 | 2.7 | 83.2 | 12.2 | 2.0 | 1434 | 4.4 | 76.4 | 13.4 | 5.8 |
| Guizhou | 724 | 6.2 | 74.3 | 13.0 | 6.5 | 807 | 5.0 | 86.9 | 6.7 | 1.5 | 1531 | 5.6 | 80.9 | 9.7 | 3.9 |
| Fujian | 791 | 4.7 | 61.6 | 23.5 | 10.2 | 775 | 3.6 | 81.5 | 11.1 | 3.7 | 1566 | 4.2 | 71.5 | 17.4 | 7 |
| Hainan | 900 | 8.7 | 70.8 | 13.3 | 7.2 | 900 | 5.8 | 83.1 | 8.3 | 2.8 | 1800 | 7.2 | 76.9 | 10.8 | 5 |
| Xinjiang | 788 | 3.8 | 65.1 | 20.2 | 10.9 | 775 | 4.1 | 80.5 | 13.2 | 2.2 | 1563 | 4 | 72.7 | 16.7 | 6.6 |
| Jilin | 900 | 9.3 | 59.8 | 19.0 | 11.9 | 900 | 7.3 | 75.2 | 13.1 | 4.3 | 1800 | 8.3 | 67.5 | 16.1 | 8.1 |
| Yunnan | 822 | 4.7 | 73.4 | 15.5 | 6.4 | 804 | 3.5 | 82.5 | 11.6 | 2.5 | 1626 | 4.1 | 77.9 | 13.5 | 4.5 |
Prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents under different natural environmental factors (%).
| Items | Level | Boys | χ2 |
| Girls | χ2 |
| Total | χ2 |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thinness | Overweight | Obesity | Thinness | Overweight | Obesity | Thinness | Overweight | Obesity | ||||||||
| Latitude | 100.136 | 0.000 | 61.290 | 0.000 | 157.652 | 0.000 | ||||||||||
| Low | 6.6 | 15.5 | 7.3 | 5.8 | 8.8 | 2.6 | 6.2 | 12.1 | 4.9 | |||||||
| Middle | 5.2 | 17.6 | 8.8 | 4.4 | 10.4 | 3.1 | 4.8 | 14 | 5.9 | |||||||
| High | 6.9 | 19.9 | 12.2 | 5.7 | 13.4 | 3.9 | 6.3 | 16.7 | 8.1 | |||||||
| Altitude | 56.307 | 0.000 | 49.952 | 0.000 | 99.785 | 0.000 | ||||||||||
| Low | 6.4 | 17.4 | 8.9 | 5.7 | 10 | 3.2 | 6 | 13.7 | 6 | |||||||
| Medium | 5.1 | 18.7 | 10.8 | 3.7 | 13 | 3.1 | 4.4 | 15.9 | 7.1 | |||||||
| High | 5.7 | 13.8 | 5.9 | 4.3 | 8.7 | 1.8 | 5 | 11.2 | 3.8 | |||||||
Prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents under different socioeconomic conditions (%).
| Items | Grade | Boys | χ2 |
| Girls | χ2 |
| Total | χ2 |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thinness | Overweight | Obesity | Thinness | Overweight | Obesity | Thinness | Overweight | Obesity | ||||||||
| SES | 133.566 | 0.000 | 52.566 | 0.000 | 178.592 | 0.000 | ||||||||||
| Low | 8 | 11.2 | 5.8 | 5.2 | 7.4 | 1.9 | 6.5 | 9.1 | 3.7 | |||||||
| Middle | 6.5 | 16.4 | 8.5 | 4.8 | 9.8 | 3.4 | 5.6 | 13 | 5.9 | |||||||
| High | 5 | 19.8 | 10.3 | 5.6 | 12 | 3 | 5.3 | 16.1 | 6.8 | |||||||
| Degree of urbanization | 31.001 | 0.000 | 35.200 | 0.000 | 60.137 | 0.000 | ||||||||||
| Worst | 7.8 | 15.6 | 8 | 4.8 | 9 | 2.1 | 6.1 | 12 | 4.7 | |||||||
| Lower | 6.8 | 16.6 | 9.9 | 6.4 | 10.6 | 3.1 | 6.6 | 13.6 | 6.4 | |||||||
| Middle and upper | 6.9 | 16.8 | 8.4 | 6.2 | 9.8 | 3.4 | 6.5 | 13.4 | 6 | |||||||
| Best | 5.1 | 18 | 8.8 | 4.3 | 10.7 | 3 | 4.7 | 14.4 | 6 | |||||||
| GDP | 61.548 | 0.000 | 23.485 | 0.001 | 64.581 | 0.000 | ||||||||||
| Medium income | 9.6 | 11.2 | 5.5 | 5.2 | 5.9 | 2.7 | 7.5 | 8.6 | 4.1 | |||||||
| Middle and upper | 6 | 17 | 9.3 | 5.4 | 10.9 | 3.1 | 5.7 | 13.9 | 6.2 | |||||||
| High income | 5.3 | 19.2 | 8.7 | 4.7 | 9.9 | 2.9 | 5 | 14.6 | 5.8 | |||||||
| Engel coefficient | 68.703 | 0.000 | 36.859 | 0.000 | 78.199 | 0.000 | ||||||||||
| Well-off | 9.3 | 11.1 | 5.5 | 4.8 | 6.5 | 2.5 | 7.1 | 8.8 | 4 | |||||||
| Rich | 5.4 | 17.4 | 9 | 5.7 | 10 | 2.7 | 5.6 | 13.7 | 5.9 | |||||||
| Richest | 6.2 | 18.1 | 9.4 | 4.7 | 11.4 | 3.5 | 5.4 | 14.8 | 6.4 | |||||||
Logistic regression of the influential factors of overweight in children and adolescents.
| OR (95%CI) |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||
| Boys | 1.00 | ||
| Girls | 0.55 (0.52–0.60) | 0.000 | |
| Latitude | |||
| Low | 1.00 | ||
| Middle | 0.99 (0.87–1.12) | 0.837 | |
| High | 1.33 (1.15–1.54) | 0.000 | |
| Altitude | |||
| Low | 1.00 | ||
| Middle | 0.99 (0.88–1.12) | 0.853 | |
| High | 0.79 (0.66–0.95) | 0.012 | |
| SES | |||
| Low | 1.00 | ||
| Middle | 1.17 (1.03–1.34) | 0.020 | |
| High | 1.41 (1.24–1.61) | 0.000 | |
| Degree of urbanization | |||
| Worst | 1.00 | ||
| Lower | 0.98 (0.83–1.16) | 0.792 | |
| Middle and upper | 0.99 (0.83–1.18) | 0.879 | |
| Best | 1.12 (0.96–1.32) | 0.149 | |
| GDP | |||
| Medium income | 1.00 | ||
| Middle and upper | 1.50 (1.02–2.21) | 0.041 | |
| High income | 1.66 (1.11–2.47) | 0.013 | |
| Engel coefficient | |||
| Well-off | 1.00 | ||
| Rich | 0.91 (0.64–1.28) | 0.579 | |
| Richest | 1.00 (0.70–1.44) | 0.982 |
Logistic regression of the influential factors of obesity in children and adolescents.
| OR (95%CI) |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||
| Boys | 1.00 | ||
| Girls | 0.31 (0.28–0.35) | 0.000 | |
| Latitude | |||
| Low | 1.00 | ||
| Middle | 0.98 (0.81–1.17) | 0.779 | |
| High | 1.52 (1.24–1.86) | 0.000 | |
| Altitude | |||
| Low | 1.00 | ||
| Middle | 0.85 (0.71–1.02) | 0.072 | |
| High | 0.60 (0.45–0.80) | 0.000 | |
| SES | |||
| Low | 1.00 | ||
| Middle | 1.13 (0.93–1.38) | 0.216 | |
| High | 1.18 (0.97–1.45) | 0.099 | |
| Degree of urbanization | |||
| Worst | 1.00 | ||
| Lower | 1.11 (0.86–1.43) | 0.425 | |
| Middle and upper | 1.01 (0.77–1.32) | 0.950 | |
| Best | 1.29 (1.01–1.65) | 0.038 | |
| GDP | |||
| Medium income | 1.00 | ||
| Middle and upper | 1.30 (0.71–2.37) | 0.392 | |
| High income | 1.30 (0.70–2.40) | 0.408 | |
| Engel coefficient | |||
| Well-off | 1.00 | ||
| Rich | 0.87 (0.50–1.50) | 0.614 | |
| Richest | 1.04 (0.59–1.82) | 0.906 |