| Literature DB >> 35010705 |
Aye Myat Thi1, Cathy Zimmerman2, Nicola S Pocock2,3, Clara W Chan4, Meghna Ranganathan2.
Abstract
This rapid systematic review describes violence and health outcomes among child domestic workers (CDWs) taken from 17 studies conducted in low- and middle-income countries. Our analysis estimated the median reported rates of violence in CDWs aged 5-17-year-olds to be 56.2% (emotional; range: 13-92%), 18.9% (physical; range: 1.7-71.4%), and 2.2% (sexual; range: 0-62%). Both boys and girls reported emotional abuse and sexual violence with emotional abuse being the most common. In Ethiopia and India, violence was associated with severe physical injuries and sexual insecurity among a third to half of CDWs. CDWs in India and Togo reported lower levels of psycho-social well-being than controls. In India, physical punishment was correlated with poor psycho-social well-being of CDWs [OR: 3.6; 95% CI: 3.2-4; p < 0.0001]. Across the studies, between 7% and 68% of CDWs reported work-related illness and injuries, and one third to half had received no medical treatment. On average, children worked between 9 and 15 h per day with no rest days. Findings highlight that many CDWs are exposed to abuse and other health hazards but that conditions vary substantially by context. Because of the often-hidden nature of child domestic work, future initiatives will need to be specifically designed to reach children in private households. Young workers will also benefit from strategies to change social norms around the value and vulnerability of children in domestic work and the long-term implications of harm during childhood.Entities:
Keywords: child domestic worker; health; low-income countries; middle-income countries; violence
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35010705 PMCID: PMC8744913 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010427
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Critical appraisal of cross-sectional child domestic worker health and violence studies (n = 17).
| No | Study Author/Year | Sample Frame | Sample Selection | Sample Size | Study Description | Data Analysis | Outcome Identification | Outcome Reliability | Statistical Analysis | Response Rate | Total Score | Study Quality ** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ACPR, ILO 2006 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | 67% | Moderate |
| 2 | Alem 2006 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | 78% | Good |
| 3 | Banerjee 2008 | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | 11% | Poor |
| 4 | Benvegnu 2005 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | 78% | Good |
| 5 | Budlender & Bosch 2002 * | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | 44% | Poor |
| 6 | DeGraff 2016 * | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | 33% | Poor |
| 7 | Fassa 2005 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | 78% | Good |
| 8 | Gamlin 2015 | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Not applicable | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | 22% | Poor |
| 9 | Garnier 2003 | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | 67% | Moderate |
| 10 | Gilbert 2018 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Yes | 78% | Good |
| 11 | Hesketh 2012 | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Not applicable | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | 22% | Poor |
| 12 | ILO 2006 | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | 22% | Poor |
| 13 | Kifle 2002 | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | 11% | Poor |
| 14 | NIS Cambodia, ILO 2004 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | 56% | Moderate |
| 15 | Phlainoi 2002 | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | No | Unclear | 22% | Poor |
| 16 | Save the Children UK 2006 | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | No | No | 0% | Poor |
| 17 | Zainab and Kadir 2016 | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Not applicable | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | 22% | Poor |
* secondary data analyses, where less information is presented on the measurement tool. ** 0–50%: Poor, 51–75%: Moderate, 76–100%: Good.
Critical appraisal of survey measurement tools of health and violence studies (n = 17).
| Study | Measurement Tool | Validity in This Population or Similar Context: Pilot Test (1)** | Validity in This Population or Similar Context: Previously Used in a Similar Context/Population (1)** | Reliability in this Population or Similar Context: Internal Consistency (Cronbach-a) (1)** | Reliability in this Population or Similar Context: Inter-Rater Reliability (e.g., Training) (1)** | Cultural Adaptation (Translation, Modification for Cultural Appropriateness) (2)** | Method of Tool Administration (1) ** | Total Score *** (7) | Tool Quality *** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Violence studies ( | |||||||||
| ACPR, ILO 2006 | Adapted from ILO SIMPOC/IPEC methodology—unclear if violence questions are researcher conceived or based on ILO IPEC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | Moderate |
| Banerjee 2008 | Household survey developed by research team | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Poor |
| Budlender & Bosch 2002 * | SIMPOC South African Survey of Activities of Young People (SAYP) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Poor |
| Gamlin 2015 | Developed by research team | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | Poor |
| Gilbert 2018 | Violence Against Children Survey (2012) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | Poor |
| Hesketh 2012 | Author’s own | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | Moderate |
| ILO 2006 | Unclear if adapted from ILO IPEC SIMPOC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Poor |
| Kifle 2002 | Developed by study team | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | Moderate |
| NIS Cambodia, ILO 2004 | Developed by research team | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | Poor |
| Phlainoi 2002 | Developed by research team? Based on ILO/UNICEF RA Methods | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | Poor |
| Save the Children UK 2006 | Developed by study team | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Poor |
| Zainab and Kadir 2016 | Developed by study team | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Poor |
| Health studies ( | |||||||||
| ACPR, ILO 2006 | Adapted from ILO SIMPOC/IPEC methodology-unclear if health-related questions are researcher conceived or based on ILO IPEC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | Moderate |
| Alem 2006 | Reporting Questionnaire for Children (RQC) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | Moderate |
| Alem 2006 | Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (DICA) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | Moderate |
| Banerjee 2008 | Household survey developed by ? research team | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Poor |
| Benvegnu 2005 | Child behavior checklist (CBCL) | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | Poor |
| Budlender & Bosch 2002 * | SIMPOC South African Survey of Activities of Young People (SAYP) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Poor |
| DeGraff 2016 * | PNAD 2001 (Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicilos) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Poor |
| Fassa 2005 | Standardized Nordic questionnaire for musculoskeletal symptoms | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | Poor |
| Gamlin 2015 | Developed by research team in collaboration with ASI (originally developed by Woodhead 2004) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | Poor |
| Garnier 2003 | Developed by research team? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Poor |
| Hesketh 2012 | Developed by research team in collaboration with ASI (originally developed by Woodhead 2004) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | Moderate |
| ILO 2006 | Unclear if adapted from ILO IPEC SIMPOC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Poor |
| Kifle 2002 | Developed by study team | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | Moderate |
| NIS Cambodia, ILO 2004 | Developed by research team—Occupational risk exposures | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | Poor |
| NIS Cambodia, ILO 2004 | Developed by research team-ill-health | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | Poor |
| Phlainoi 2002 | Developed by research team? Based on ILO/UNICEF RA Methods | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | Poor |
| Zainab and Kadir 2016 | Weighing scale and height meter, against WHO Growth reference chart for 15–19 y/os | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | Poor |
* secondary data analyses, where less information is presented on measurement tool. **(x): number of score(s) provided if respective criterion of appraisal is reported in the study. *** Total scores: 0–3: poor, 4–5: moderate, 6–7: good.
Operational definitions of physical, sexual, and emotional violence (n = 12).
| Study | Types of Physical Violence | Types of Sexual Violence | Types of Emotional Violence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gilbert 2018 | have been punched, kicked, whipped, or beaten with an object; choked, smothered, or experienced an attempted drowning; intentionally burned or scalded; and/or had or been threatened to have a weapon used against them. | unwanted sexual touching, attempted sex, pressured sex, and physically forced sex by any perpetrator type. | have ever had someone “say that you were not loved or did not deserve to be loved; that they wished you had never been born or were dead; ridiculed you or put you down; threatened to abandon you or threatened you that they would force you to leave home.” |
| Zainab and Kadir 2016 | Intentional use of physical force against a child. This includes slapping, hitting, beating, kicking, shaking, pushing, and pulling, biting, scalding, and burning. | NR | NR |
| Gamlin 2015 | Physical punishment but did not ask for detail types of punishment or abuse | Know someone physically/sexually abused | NR |
| Hesketh 2012 | Deprived of food/beaten/reduced salary as punishment | NR | Scolding |
| Banerjee 2008 | Beating | sexual abuse | rebuke and mental assault |
| ACPR, ILO 2006 | Slapped/beaten | Sexual violence by family member | Scolding |
| ILO 2006 | NR | was teased and flirted | frequently reprimanded |
| Save the Children UK 2006 | Beaten, slapped, kicked, punched, hair pulled, burned, no food was given, stopped for going to center | forced sexual intercourse, molestation (private parts touched/forced to touch abusers’ private parts), forced to watch pornography | Shouted at, cursed, said she was a mistake, threatened, locked in, compared, cursed and shouted at, blamed) |
| NIS Cambodia, ILO 2004 | Slapped/beaten with bare hands, beaten with objects | Sexual violence by employers’ family (0) | Scolded, abused with harsh/vulgar words, advised/warned |
| Kifle 2002 | Beaten, kicked, slapped, whipped, pinched, punched, locked in a latrine, thrown out of house and had to stay outside, dipped up to neck in a bowl of cold water, forced to inhale red pepper, others | vulgar and obscene language, attempt amorous advances, touching sexually sensitive parts of body, ogling, flirting for sexual relations, threat to cooperate for sexual relations, attempted rape, promotion of intercourse | frequently cursed, frequently insulted/scolded, repeatedly criticized/belittled, avoiding, nagging, being threatened/despised/suspected |
| Phlainoi 2002 | Hit (others-receiving warning, salary cut, no answer given) | NR | NR |
| Budlender & Bosch 2002 | NR | Sexual harassment | NR |
Study populations as defined in the included studies.
| No | Study | CDW Definitions/Study Population of Interest |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gilbert 2018 (37) | Adolescent males and females living in selected households in Haiti who were 13–24 years of age at the time of the survey. Child domestic servants in Haiti (known as “restavèks” aged under 18 years) perform unpaid labor at a higher-income, generally urban, in the homes of either strangers or kin in exchange for the child’s basic needs and education. |
| 2 | Degraff 2016 (31) | Child laborers aged 10 to 17 years engaged in ‘hazardous work’ categories according to the 2000 Brazilian population census data which includes domestic services, street work, construction and hazardous farming. No separate definition for CDW |
| 3 | Zainab and Kadir 2016 (30) | Children aged between 10–14 years performing domestic work at their employers’ homes. |
| 4 | Gamlin 2015 (14) | Children under 18 who work in the households of people other than their closest family doing domestic chores, caring for others, running errands and sometimes helping their employers run small businesses from home. |
| 5 | Hesketh 2012 (15) | Children under the age of 18 who work in an employer’s home performing household duties such as cooking, cleaning, child care and care of older people. |
| 6 | Banerjee 2008 (27) | Children aged under 14 performing domestic chores at others’ houses, caring for children, and running errands among other tasks |
| 7 | Alem 2006 (33) | Children aged between 8 and 15 years engaged in paid or unpaid economic activities including domestic work, weaving, street work, commercial sex work, and work in establishments (shops, garages, hotels, carpentries, and metal workshops). Controls are child non-laborers of the same age randomly picked from the same household or from a neighboring household. |
| 8 | ILO 2006 (10) | Children aged under 18 years who perform domestic chores in the households of people other than their parents, regardless of the amount or kind of remuneration they receive |
| 9 | ACPR, ILO 2006 (28) | Children aged between 7–17 who work in the households of people other than their parents, regardless of the amount or kind of remuneration they receive. |
| 10 | Save the children UK 2006 (12) | Children in urban and rural areas currently working or who once worked as a CDW and who have been associated with drop-in non-formal education centers implemented by Save the children for more than 3 months. CDWs are children aged under 18 years who carry out domestic chores within people’s homes outside of their families for a wage in cash or kind. |
| 11 | Benvengnú 2005 (36) | young people aged between 5 and 17 years living in households in the sampling areas who perform activities that contribute to the production of market products, goods, or services, including unpaid activities (domestic, non-domestic, retail and other work). No definition of CDW |
| 12 | Fassa 2005 (35) | Children aged 10–17 in each household including both workers and non-workers: domestic services, non-domestic services, retail, construction, manufacturing, and other. No definition for CDW. |
| 13 | NIS Cambodia, ILO 2004 (26) | Live-in children aged between 7–17 who perform domestic chores in the households of people other than their parents, regardless of the amount or kind of remuneration they receive. |
| 14 | Garnier 2003 (34) | Non-migrants and migrant adolescent girls aged 14.5–16.6 years working as maids in rural and urban areas (follow up survey to the longitudinal study). No definition of CDW. |
| 15 | Budlender & Bosch ILO 2002 (29) | CDWs aged below 18 years engaged in domestic work, particularly children employed as domestic workers either for payment in cash/kind or performed in the children’s own household without pay. DWs are compared against non-DWs who are either working in other sectors or for which there is no information about their occupation. Study population included all Child laborers |
| 16 | Kifle 2002 (32) | Children under 18 years employed by adults other than their parents working inside the house of others for cash or in kind, regardless of whether the child attends school on a full-time or part-time basis or not. |
| 17 | Phlainoi 2002 (25) | Children aged below 18 years currently working as a DW in Bangkok, current CDWs over 18 years who began domestic work before age 18, children of the same age residing at rural areas who are not working. CDWs perform household chores and/or help with the business of employers. |
Figure 1PRISMA flowchart of the CDW violence and health study selection.
Overview and characteristics of studies that reported violence and/or health outcomes among child domestic workers (CDW) (n = 17).
| No | Study | Country | Setting | Study Population/Sample Size | Age (Years) | Study Design and Measurement Tool | Sampling Method | Primary Outcomes (Violence and Health Outcomes) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ACPR, ILO 2006 | Bangladesh | Urban and rural areas of Bangladesh including five cities (Barisal, Chittagong, Khulna, Rajshahi, Sylhet) excluding Dhaka and the remaining urban and rural areas of Bangladesh | CDWs ( | 5–17 | Cross-sectional population-based household survey with CDWs and employers in selected households from December 2005 to February 2006 | 725 urban and rural primary sampling units (PSU) were selected from 5 cities (excluding Dhaka) using the circular systematic method with probabilities proportional to size. | Abuse (scolding, slapping and beating), sexual violence, work-related illness and treatment seeking |
| 2 | Alem 2006 | Ethiopia | Four industrialized cities in Ethiopia: Addis Ababa and three other regional towns—Nazareth, Awassa and Bahirdar. | Children ( | 8–15 | Cross-sectional household survey consisting of two structured questionnaires applied in a two-stage design from October 2001 to May 2002 | Systematic (probability) sampling of households was applied to recruit child laborers and neighborhood controls. | Mental, behavioral, physical, and nutritional problems amongst child laborers, versus non-laborers. |
| 3 | Banerjee 2008 | India | Kolkata, India | CDWs ( | 8–14 | Household survey. (timeline not reported) | 2500 households surveyed—no information on sampling method. | Physical, emotional and sexual abuse, disease and nutritional status amongst CDWs |
| 4 | Benvegnu 2005 | Brazil | Low-income areas of Pelotas, Southern Brazil | Children and adolescents ( | 10–17 | Standardized pre-coded questionnaire, cross-sectional household survey. (2002) | Random selection of low-income areas in Pelotas (22 of 70 neighborhoods), based on census data—all children (10 to 17) living in households in these areas were interviewed (excluding homeless or street children). | Prevalence of behavioral problems amongst child laborers compared to non-workers |
| 5 | Budlender and Bosch 2002 | South Africa | Nine provinces in South Africa | Child laborers ( | 5–17 | Cross-sectional household survey (SIMPOC SAYP), from June to July 1999 | Household surveys in 30,550 households across 9 provinces, which provided information on 33,000 children aged 5–17, (first phase.) | Sexual violence, work-related injuries, illness and complaints |
| 6 | Degraff 2016 | Brazil | Brazil | Children ( | 10–17 | Nationally representative household survey (PNAD 2001) | Secondary data analysis of Brazil’s 2001 annual household survey, the Pesquisa Nacional por (PNAD 2001). The PNAD-2001 is a nationally representative sample survey including 126,898 households and 378,837 individuals. Of this population, children aged 10–17 years and their families were focused. | Occurrence of work-related injury/illness |
| 7 | Fassa 2005 | Brazil | Low-income areas of Pelotas, Brazil | Children and adolescents from low-income households ( | 10–17 | Cross-sectional household survey conducted from January to June 1998. | Random selection of low-income areas in Pelotas (22 of 70 neighborhoods), based on census data—all children (10 to 17) living in households in these areas were interviewed (excluding homeless or street children). | Prevalence of musculoskeletal pain at various anatomical sites amongst different categories of child laborers in the preceding 12 months |
| 8 | Gamlin 2015 | Peru, Togo, India, Tanzania, the Philippines, Costa Rica | Selected districts in six LMICs (Peru, Togo, India, Tanzania, the Philippines, Costa Rica) | Children ( | 6–18 | 100-item questionnaire (developed by research team in collaboration with ASI—based on findings from systematic review and qualitative study), administered by local research teams and partner organizations in selected districts from April to October 2009 | Opportunistic sampling-participants recruited through NGOs, schools and the neighborhood snowball technique. | Physical and sexual abuse and psycho-social wellbeing of CDWs |
| 9 | Garnier 2003 | Senegal | Niakhar (rural district) and four urban cities (Dakar, Mbour, Fatick and Joal), Senegal | Adolescent girls ( | 14.5–16.5 | Cross-sectional household survey as a part of the Cohort study “growth during adolescence” conducted from April to June 1999 | Study participants were from 30 selected villages in Naikhar district, identified through the framework of a longitudinal study of all adolescent girls born and raised there up to the age of 10 (from 1995 to the time of study). | Morbidity and healthcare behaviors during the 3 months prior to the survey. Sexual maturity, nutritional status, and health of migrant maids versus non-migrants staying in rural villages |
| 10 | Gilbert 2018 | Haiti | Haitian households displaced by 2010 earthquake (including IDP camps) | CDW (ever been restaveks—child domestic servants who perform unpaid work) ( | 13–24 | Nationally representative cross-sectional household survey of children and young people (Violence Against Children Survey 2012) conducted from May to June 2012 | Stratified, three-stage cluster design used to sample households and camps affected by the 2010 earthquake. Sample based on updated estimates from the 2003 Haitian census | Reported violence before 18 years (physical, emotional, sexual) amongst CDW vs. non-CDWs |
| 11 | Hesketh 2012 | India, the Philippines | Selected states/cities in India (Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Bihar) and the Philippines | Children ( | <18 | Cross-sectional survey—20 item questionnaire (developed by research team in collaboration with ASI—based on findings from systematic review and qualitative study), administered by local research teams and partner organizations in selected districts over a six-month period (for control group, mostly self-administered) from April to October 2009 | Opportunistic: participants recruited through NGOs, schools, and neighborhood snowball technique. | Physical abuse and psycho-social wellbeing of CDWs |
| 12 | ILO 2006 | Vietnam | Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam | CDWs ( | 6–17 | Structured surveys with CDW, employers and guardians from April to November 2005 | The sampling frame was lists of 100 clusters of households randomly selected from a total of 8989 clusters of households from the 8 selected (out of 24) districts. CDWs were identified from these lists. As the random sampling found only 20 CDWs from the 100 clusters of households, | Reported violence, self-assessed physical health and injury |
| 13 | Kifle 2002 | Ethiopia | 3 districts (woredas) in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia | CDWs ( | <18 | Quantitative survey in the form of structured questionnaires and qualitative methods (focus group discussions with key informants, in depth interviews, role plays). (2002) | Rapid assessment methodology and purposive sampling. Potential participants were recruited by facilitators/enumerators familiar with the study sites from areas frequented by child domestic workers, including schools, market places, literacy centers, water points, and domestic employment broker stands. | Physical, emotional violence (verbal abuse) and sexual harassment and medical treatment pattern |
| 14 | NIS Cambodia, ILO 2004 | Cambodia | slum and non-slum areas in the seven districts of Phnom Penh, Cambodia | Live in CDWs ( | 7–17 | Household survey conducted from September to October 2003. | Simple random sampling method used in 125 villages (primary sampling units—PSU) selected | Type of punishment, sexual violence, injuries among CDWs |
| 15 | Phlainoi 2002 | Thailand | Children from north-eastern, central, northern, and southern regions in Bangkok, Thailand | CDWs ( | 12–17 | Cross-sectional survey based on Rapid Assessment Methodology from ILO/UNICEF. (2001) | Purposive sampling. Surveys with CDWs in Bangkok (24/50 districts) and in original villages in Northeast Thailand. | Physical violence, work associated diseases and injuries among CDWs |
| 16 | Save the Children UK 2006 | West Bengal | Four districts across West Bengal (districts not reported) | Current or former CDWs ( | <18 | Quantitative survey in the form of structured questionnaires and qualitative semi-structured interviews conducted from April to September 2005 | Of 1020 former/current CDWs who participated in the Save the Children UK’s projects, those who had been engaged with the organization’s “drop-in non-formal education centers” for at least three months were recruited. | Reported physical/sexual/emotional abuse and violence |
| 17 | Zainab and Kadir 2016 | Pakistan | Squatter settlements in Gulshan town of Karachi, Pakistan | Live-out CDWs ( | 10–14 | Cross-sectional household survey from May to October 2011 | Random selection of 6/46 squatter settlements. Recruitment through non-probability snowball sampling technique | Physical abuse at their workplace in the past six months, and nutritional status among CDWs |
ACPR—Associates for Community and Population Research, ILO—International Labour Organization, CDW—child domestic worker, SIMPOC—Statistical Information and Monitoring Programme on Child Labour, SAYP—Survey of Activities of Young People, PNAD—Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios, LMIC—low and middle income countries, ASI—Anti-Slavery International, NIS—National Institute of Statistics.
Summary description of main findings from the studies that reported violence and/or health outcomes among child domestic workers (n = 17).
| No | Study | Summary Estimates | Main Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ACPR, ILO 2006 |
Of those 3841 CDWs, 60.3% had experienced abuse; 39.7% reported no abuse 59% reported good treatment by their employer | Violence: Of those who were abused: 60.1% were scolded, 19% were slapped or beaten, 0.6% reported sexual violence. 68% had fallen sick at employers’ houses. Among those who had ever fallen ill, 76% had experienced fever, 41.7% cough and cold, 9.7% headaches, 7.3% water-borne diseases Nine out of ten sick CDWs had received some kind of treatment. Of those who received medical treatment, 31.8% saw a doctor, 66% a pharmacy, 10% a traditional healer. 6% had no treatment. 34% of CDWs had to work through sickness. Average work hours—9 h per day One third work 9–10 h per day, 28% work 7–8 h per day and 23% work more than 11 h per day 87% have ≥3 h per day as break time Nearly all work 7 days per week 80% can leave the job if they want to 91.3% are allowed to visit home, 74% are allowed to meet friends 90% sleep at their employers’ houses, 72.8% said that their sleeping place is better than home, 2.6% stated that it is not good as home |
| 2 | Alem 2006 |
Non-labourers were significantly more likely to have a self-reported and confirmed mental disorder than non-labourers. | Behavior and mental problems The prevalence of self-reported mental health problems was nearly two times higher among non-laborers (14%) compared with child-laborers (8.5%), Specific disorders were higher in non-laborers vs. laborers: Excessive fear (3.0% vs. 0.9%, Domestic workers also reported difficulty with getting on with others compared with non-laborers (2.5% vs. 0.3%, 5.5 of children with self-reported problems met the diagnostic criteria for a mental disorder Prevalence of confirmed mental disorder diagnosis was higher in non-laborers (8.8%) versus child laborers (4.9%, The common emotional problems in child laborers were phobias (3.1%), enuresis (1.0%), and separation anxiety (0.4%). |
| 3 | Banerjee 2008 |
42.2% of CDWs had experienced different types of abuse Over 35% of CDWs had varying levels of nutritional status impairment. | Violence Abuse: beating 18.8% (62), rebuke 16.6% (55); mental assault 3.3% (11); sexual abuse 3.4% (12). Disease pattern and nutrition: Gastro-intestinal tract infection: 72.1% (238); skin disease: 53.3% (176); anemia: 52.4% (173). Nutritional status: 54.8% (154) had grade I malnutrition, 1.8% had grade II malnutrition (height for age); 45.6% had grade III malnutrition (weight for age); 20.6% had mild malnutrition, 9.3 had moderate malnutrition, 5.7 had severe malnutrition (weight for height) |
| 4 | Benvegnu 2005 |
Prevalence of behavioral problems was high in working children, younger working children, and those in the domestic sector. | Behavioral problems Younger children (10–13 years): Prevalence of behavioral problems was higher in workers (21.4%) compared with non-workers (15%); APR *** = 1.3, CI ** = 0.9–1.9, Older children (14–17 years): Prevalence of behavioral problems was lower in workers 9.5% compared with non-workers (12.8%); APR *** = 0.6, CI ** = 0.4–1.0, Prevalence among younger working children (21.4%) was more than double that of older working children (2.5%); APR *** = 2.7, CI **= 1.4–5.1, Children performing domestic services had more behavioral problems than those who did not work; APR *** = 1.6, CI ** = 1.0–2.7, |
| 5 | Budlender and Bosch 2002 |
None reported sexual harassment at work 8% of CDWs were injured while doing activity The most common complaints of both CDWs and child workers in other sector were tiring work and long working hours | Workplace injury 8% of CDW vs. 4% of children in other sectors were injured during work. No CDWs vs. 2% of children in other work sectors reported illness caused/worsened by activity. 16% (8715/53,942) of children engaged in paid domestic work reported long working houses (beyond age-specified work hours) 3% of children (≥10 years) worked 43 h or more per a week The most common complaints of CDWs were tiring work (29%), long hours (17%), and fear of being hurt (13%) 3% of CDW vs. 4% of children in other sectors often did heavy physical work. |
| 6 | Degraff 2016 |
43.2% (1129/2608) of children engaging in risky work were in the domestic sector CDWs (6.57%) vs. those in other forms of risky work (8.2% in street work, 13.85% in construction, 14.87% in hazardous farming) had experienced injury/illness from work | Workplace injury/illness Among CDWs, injuries and illness were more common amongst older children aged 15–17 years (7.56%) vs. younger ones aged 10–14 years (4%) CDWs work 41.44 h per week 42.44% had to use machines/chemicals at work, while 35% received training or safety equipment. |
| 7 | Fassa 2005 |
Self-reported musculoskeletal pain in preceding 12 months was higher in CDWs compared to non-workers. Over a quarter of CDWs had neck pain (27.8%) and knee pain (25.6%) | Musculoskeletal problems The prevalence of musculoskeletal pain (at any anatomical site) was higher amongst domestic workers than non-workers: APR *** = 1.17, CI = 1.05–1.31. Prevalence of back pain was higher amongst CDWs compared with non-workers: APR *** = 1.23, CI ** = 1.04–1.45. |
| 8 | Gamlin 2015 |
Prevalence of self-reported health and psychosocial outcomes were reported for individual countries | Violence Among CDWs, 49% Togolese, 35% Indians and no Peruvians were physically punished, 58% Filipino were “just talked to” when they made mistakes In Togo, the number of CDWs who know someone who has been physically/sexually abused is twice that of their non-CDW counterparts; In India, ~25% of CDWs vs. 1.2% of controls know someone who has been abused. Prevalence of CDWs reporting good or very good health: India (36%); the Philippines (65%); Togo (46%); Tanzania (80%); Peru (51%); Costa Rica (not reported). Filipino control children had highest psychosocial scores, while Togolese CDWs had the worst. (No summative scores, no Compared with their non-CDW counterparts, Indian and Togolese CDWs had low psycho-social outcomes while Peruvian, Philippine and Tanzanian CDWs had high levels of psychosocial satisfaction The majority of CDWs in India, Togo and Tanzania worked 10–12 h per day, six or seven days a week. 91% of CDWs in India, and 72% in Togo reported that they do not have any days off in the week. 49% have no free time at all in their working day. |
| 9 | Garnier 2003 |
62.9% (134/213) of migrant maids had experienced disease during the past three months Advanced sexual maturity and better nutritional status amongst non-migrants compared with migrants. | Health and care during sickness 61.5% (204/332) of study participants reported illness during the preceding three months No significant difference in the prevalence and type of illness between migrants (58.8%, 70/119) and non-migrants (62.9%, 134/213), x2—0.538, 60% of migrants vs. 34% of non-migrants worked during sickness, x2—0.267, Migrants compared to non-migrants are more likely to pay for health services themselves. Adolescents living in more socio-economically advantaged environments had more advanced puberty than those living in less socio-economically advantaged environments (difference in breast development stages: x2 = 20.78; Migrants had a more advanced puberty status than non-migrants: breast development according to Tanner’s stage ( After controlling for the effect of sexual maturation on nutrition and growth, migrants had a higher mid-arm circumference ( On average, CDWs worked for 10 h (range: 3–15) per day. |
| 10 | Gilbert 2018 |
Youths who have worked as restaveks before age 18 had a higher rate of childhood violence rather than their counterparts who had never worked as restaveks Former female restaveks had higher reported levels of physical, emotional, and sexual violence compared with their male counterparts. | Violence Physical violence among former restaveks vs. non-restaveks: Females: 76.8% (70.4–83.2) vs. 61.9% (56.5–67.3), Emotional violence among former restaveks vs. non-restaveks: Females: 54.8% (47.2–62.3) vs. 33.4% (29.9–36.9), Sexual violence among former restaveks vs. non-restaveks: Females: 39.9% (33.2–46.5) vs. 26.3% (23.3–29.4), Female former restaveks vs. controls: Physical (OR * = 2.04, 95% CI ** = 1.40–2.97); Emotional (OR * = 2.41, 95% CI ** = 1.80–3.23); Sexual (OR * = 1.86, 95% CI ** = 1.34–2.58 Male former restaveks vs. controls: Physical (OR * = 1.37, 95% CI** = 0.88–2.14); Emotional (OR * = 3.06, 95% CI ** = 1.99–4.70); Sexual (OR 1.85, 95% CI ** = 1.12–3.07). |
| 11 | Hesketh 2012 |
30% (153/500) of CDWs in India vs. 1% (2/200) of CDWs in the Philippines were beaten/deprived of food for punishment In both countries, those with poor psychosocial wellbeing were more likely to have fair/poor self-reported health and be beaten/deprived of food in India. | Punishment 51% (254/500) in India and 18% (36/200) in the Philippines had been scolded 4.2% (21/500) in India and 0% in the Philippines had been given a reduced salary 67% of CDWs in India and 36% of CDWs in the Philippines had lower levels of psychosocial wellbeing compared to 25% and 30% in the control groups, respectively Mean total psychosocial score 1 (%) CDWs vs. controls: India 17.7 vs. 25.5 ( Percentage with the lowest tertile psychosocial score (CDW vs. control): India 67% vs. 25% ( Amongst CDWs in the lowest tertile for psychosocial wellbeing, the odds of reporting fair/poor health vs. good/very good health: India, OR * = 1.4, 95% CI ** = 1.1–1.6, Indian CDWs worked very long hours and only 8.6% had a day off each week. Overall, the Filipino CDWs worked shorter hours than the Indian CDWs and were more likely to get a day off. |
| 12 | ILO 2006 |
14% ( 36% of CDWs had been sick or wounded during employment, with a higher proportion of younger children reporting this (53.3%) than older children (32.9%). 1 CDW had poor self-assessed health status | Violence: 13% ( When asking if they knew other CDWs being abused, 30 said ‘Yes’: 8 (26.7%) knew those being oppressed/shouted/reprimanded, 1 (3.3%) knew those beaten, another knew those who were flirted with and 15 knew ‘No’ abused CDWs Compared to before working as a CDW, 76% of CDWs said that their health had remained unchanged, 17% said it got better, 1% said it got worse and 6% did not answer Among those who reported the same/better health, the proportion who stayed at their employer’s house (98.7%, 76/77) was higher than among those who did not stay in the employers’ houses (73.9%, 17/23). Common illnesses reported included cough/respiratory problems (33%), back pain (25%), and wounds (cuts, burns, etc.) (11%) 19/36 (53%) of CDWs reported being sick/wounded at work but not receiving treatment. Of those 17 CDW who were treated, 7 saw a doctor/nurse, 5 saw a pharmacist, and 5 were treated by employers On average, CDWs worked 12.5 h per day, 7 days per week and 11.58 months per year. 94% worked 7 days per week, 6% worked 6 days per week. 86% worked 12 months per year while 9% worked 11 months per year 11% did not have regular free time In their free time, 47% did not go anywhere, 22% visited friends/relatives/went to public places |
| 13 | Kifle 2002 |
62% (62/100) reported “often” or “sometimes” experiencing inflicted physical violence 92% were frequently cursed at, 91% were frequently insulted/scolded, 80% repeatedly criticized/belittled 62% (52/84) of females reported any kind of sexual harassment 16% (16/100) reported being taken for medical treatment and 78% (8/23) were self-funded for health care. | Physical violence Of those who reported physical violence, 38% (32/84) of females vs. 69% (11/16) of males reported ‘often’ experiencing physical violence. No (0) boys vs. 45% girls reported ‘never’ having experienced physical violence 41% (19/46) females vs. 19% (3/16) males reported serious injuries and accidents: body swelling/bleeding, bruising, seriously hurt and could not work for some days due to violence 10% (10/100) had experienced punishment by starvation Because of the physical violence inflicted, over 90% were often depressed (57/62) and fearful (58/62) Over 90% of CDWs had experienced rows, altercation nagging, frequent scolding, and insults 93% (78/84) of females and 87.5% of (14/16) males had been cursed at, causing fear/distress amongst participants of the ‘curse coming true’ in 91% (71/78) of females and 71% (10/14) of males cursed 83% of CDWs reported that employers’ behaviors affected their feelings in some way causing worry, weeping, lack of sleep and fear. 62% felt inferior compared to others at school or in the community 46% of females (39/84) had experienced some form of sexual abuse: 3.6% ( These sexual harassments were mainly committed by employer’s sons (sexual violence not reported amongst male participants). 42.6% (35/84) of CDWs feel sexually insecure at home Due to sexually incited behaviors, CDWs felt fear (73.7%), suspicion (63.2%), worthlessness (39.5%), apathy (31.6%), anger (23.7%), and depression (18.4%) 70% (16/23) of those who fell ill reported being taken for medical treatment, and 78% (5/23) paid for treatment themselves 15% did not have any rest, and many worked (number not provided) at least 11 h per day, seven days a week None were allowed to leave the premises, except to go to school A very small number were allowed to meet outsiders and play with children of neighbors. |
| 14 | NIS Cambodia, ILO 2004 |
Over 70% of the CDWs reported being “advised or warned” or being scolded for some infraction. Abuse in other forms was reported such as being slapped with bare hands, being beaten with objects or abused with harsh/vulgar words. | Violence 78.2% (21,871/27,950) had been scolded, 74% (20,670/27,950) had been advised/warned, and 3.2% (894/27,950) had been abused with harsh/vulgar words 8.9% (2510/27,950) had been slapped/beaten with bare hands, 2.4% (675/27,950) had been beaten with objects No CDWs reported sexual violence 26.4% had been slashed by sharp objects followed by 10.7% who had slipped in the bathroom and 6.2% who had experienced electrical shock. However, not all of these injuries had occurred only while working Approximately 20% of CDWs suffered from exhaustion (23%), fear (21.3%), insomnia (20.3%), and tension (12.3%) The average number of work hours was 4 h per day, six days per week: 70.7% worked 1–5 h per day, 19.1% worked 6–8 h per day, and 10.2% worked 9–13 h per day. 57% worked seven days per week, 29.3 percent worked only one to five days per week 0.7% took no rest during their workday and received no medical care when sick. 79.8% had uninterrupted sleep. 4.9% did not receive enough food to eat. Over 70% can have friends, spend recreation time with friends, chat with friends and have time for social gatherings with friends |
| 15 | Phlainoi 2002 |
20% of CDWs ( 7% of CDW reported work-related sickness (8% among girls, 3.8% among boys). | Violence Of those who had been punished, 1.7% had been hit compared to 46% who had received a warning, 0.9% who had been given a salary cut, and 47% who had been neglected Care during sickness When CDWs fell sick, 40% did not do anything, 22% self-treated, 19.2% saw doctors by themselves, 11.5% had employers who took them to doctors, and 6.7% were taken care of by employers directly. 15.7 worked >14 h, 47.8% of CDW worked 12–14 h per day, and 30.4% worked 8–11 h per day. 58.3% had to work seven days per week and 41.7% had at least one day off per week 87% and 88.9% responded that work was not hard or heavy. CDWs were expected to be available at all times. |
| 16 | Save the Children UK 2006 |
Approximately 70% were physically abused, the majority were emotionally abused, and one-third were sexually abused. | Physical violence 68.3% of participants (denominator unclear and not all questions had a complete response rate) had faced some form of physical abuse. 5.3% had experienced all forms of physical abuse (including beating and burning). 46.6% had experienced abuse that left them with a bodily injury (25.3% experienced cuts or bruises). 16% had experienced all types of abuse, except burning. 86% (441/513) of CDWs had faced some form of emotional abuse, including shouting (20.1%) or cursing (11.1%). 20.3% of CDWs (denominator unclear) reported forced sexual intercourse, including 5.7% of male CDWs. 32.2% reported molestation (private parts touched). 22.4% had been made to touch abusers’ private parts 19.5% had been made to watch pornography One third had been emotionally abused by their abusers. 41.5% of violence cases were perpetrated by family members of the employing household, 7% by someone outside employing house (e.g., employer’s neighbor, other CDW) On average, CDWs worked 15 h per day with less than 2 h of rest The majority worked everyday Most were allowed to visit their families only once every six months. |
| 17 | Zainab and Kadir 2016 |
8.3% ( One-third of CDWs had an abnormal body mass index (BMI) and 90% had stunted growth | Abuse Physical abuse: 13% had experienced more than one type of physical abuse: slapping on face (60%), hitting with hard object (6%), violent push (6%), restriction of the facilities (6%), hair pull (3%), kicking (3%), twisting of any body part (3%). BMI: 67.5% normal weight, 17.9% overweight, 8.1% thin. Stunting: 18.7% mildly stunted, 40.3% were moderately stunted, 31.4% severely stunted (according to height for age) 95% of CDW worked overtime more than once per week. 18.2% did not have any day off/week, 80% had 1 day off/week |
Note: CDW-child domestic worker, * odd ratio, ** confidence interval, *** adjusted prevalence ratio, vs. = versus, 1 Psychosocial scores comprise personal security and social integration, personal identity and valuation, sense of personal competence and emotional and somatic expressions of well-being, BMI-body mass index.