| Literature DB >> 35010536 |
Hyeon-Hee Kim1,2, Kyung-Hun Kim1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Keywords: Kinesio taping; knee joint; lower extremities; softball plays; squat exercise
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35010536 PMCID: PMC8751181 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010276
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Flow diagram of the study.
Figure 2Kinesio taping technique. (a) vastus madialis taping; (b) vastus lateralis taping; (c) rectus femoris taping.
Figure 3Kinesio taping with squat exercise.
Figure 4Sham Kinesio taping with squat exercise.
General and clinical characteristics of subjects.
| Variable | KTSE Group | SKTSE Group |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Height (cm) a | 165.70 ± 7.41 | 164.20 ± 4.71 | 0.449 | |
| Weight (kg) a | 68.34 ± 10.54 | 70.30 ± 12.27 | 0.592 | |
| Age (year) a | 21.85 ± 1.53 | 21.95 ± 1.90 | 0.856 | |
| Career (year) a | 7.60 ± 1.54 | 7.30 ± 1.75 | 0.568 | |
| Dominant leg (right/left) | 17/3 | 16/4 | 0.677 |
a Mean ± SD. b Independent t-test, c Chi-square test. KTSE group, Kinesio taping with squatting exercise group, SKTSE group, sham Kinesio taping with squatting exercise group.
Comparison of muscle activity between the KTSE and SKTSE groups.
| KTSE Group | SKTSE Group |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vastus medialis muscle activity (%RVC) | |||||
| Pretest | 181.34 ± 18.82 a | 180.46 ± 19.84 | 0.0455 | 12.018 | 0.001 *,1 |
| Posttest | 222.55 ± 25.71 b,c | 197.23 ± 22.57 b | 1.0467 | ||
| Vastus lateralis muscle activity (%RVC) | |||||
| Pretest | 194.84 ± 23.66 | 186.04 ± 26.49 | 0.3504 | 9.814 | 0.003 *,1 |
| Posttest | 220.05 ± 25.66 b,c | 202.74 ± 24.60 b | 0.6887 | ||
| Rectus femoris muscle activity (%RVC) | |||||
| Pretest | 195.97 ± 21.55 | 191.14 ± 22.92 | 0.2171 | 11.958 | 0.001 *,1 |
| Posttest | 224.55 ± 22.56 b,c | 205.61 ± 22.93 b | 0.7887 | ||
a Mean ± SD, * p < 0.05, b Significant differences between pre- and post-test (p < 0.05). c The KTSE group improved more than the SKTSE group. 1 Analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA. KTSE group, Kinesio taping with squatting exercise group, SKTSE group, sham Kinesio taping with squatting exercise group, ES: effect sizes d.
Comparison of muscle tone between the KTSE and SKTSE groups.
| KTSE Group | SKTSE Group |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vastus medialis muscle tone (Hz) | |||||
| Pretest | 12.31 ± 0.88 a | 12.07 ± 0.61 | 0.3170 | 4.766 | 0.035 *,1 |
| Posttest | 12.62 ± 0.73 b,c | 12.22 ± 0.63 b | 0.5867 | ||
| Vastus lateralis muscle tone (Hz) | |||||
| Pretest | 13.11 ± 0.73 | 12.74 ± 0.81 | 0.4799 | 5.454 | 0.025 *,1 |
| Posttest | 13.73 ± 0.86 b,c | 13.04 ± 0.68 b | 0.8900 | ||
| Rectus femoris muscle tone (Hz) | |||||
| Pretest | 13.99 ± 0.62 | 13.65 ± 0.92 | 0.4334 | 4.673 | 0.037 *,1 |
| Posttest | 14.42 ± 0.59 b,c | 13.88 ± 0.91 b | 0.7041 | ||
a Mean ± SD, * p < 0.05, b Significant differences between pre- and post-test (p < 0.05). c The KTSE group improved more than the SKTSE group. 1 Analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA. KTSE group, Kinesio taping with squatting exercise group, SKTSE group, sham Kinesio taping with squatting exercise group, ES: effect sizes d.
Comparison of muscle power between the KTSE and SKTSE groups.
| KTSE Group | SKTSE Group |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quadriceps muscle power (N) | |||||
| Pretest | 93.04 ± 6.96 a | 92.01 ± 11.62 | 0.1075 | 4.645 | 0.038 *,1 |
| Posttest | 106.52 ± 6.69 b,c | 100.30 ± 9.01 b | 0.7838 | ||
| Soleus muscle power (N) | |||||
| Pretest | 165.72 ± 16.47 | 164.40 ± 15.59 | 0.0823 | 4.616 | 0.038 *,1 |
| Posttest | 182.54 ± 13.78 b,c | 176.20 ± 13.89 b | 0.4583 | ||
a Mean ± SD, * p < 0.05, b Significant differences between pre- and post-test (p < 0.05). c The KTSE group improved more than the SKTSE group. 1 Analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA, KTSE group, Kinesio taping with squatting exercise group, SKTSE group, sham Kinesio taping with squatting exercise group, ES: effect sizes d.
Comparison of side hop test between the KTSE and SKTSE groups.
| KTSE Group | SKTSE Group |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Side hop test (s) | |||||
| Pretest | 10.50 ± 1.72 a | 10.79 ± 2.17 | 0.1481 | 33.207 | 0.000 *,1 |
| Posttest | 9.02 ± 1.61 b,c | 10.21 ± 2.16 b | 0.6247 | ||
a Mean ± SD, * p < 0.05, b Significant differences between pre- and post-test (p < 0.05). c The KTSE group improved more than the SKTSE group. 1 Analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA. KTSE group, Kinesio taping with squatting exercise group, SKTSE group, sham Kinesio taping with squatting exercise group, ES: effect sizes d.