| Literature DB >> 35010371 |
Zhenggen Fan1, Chao Deng1, Yuqi Fan1, Puwei Zhang1, Hua Lu2.
Abstract
The cultivated land use eco-efficiency (CLUE) is an important indicator to evaluate ecological civilization construction in China. Research on the spatial-temporal pattern and evolution trend of the CLUE can help to assess the level of ecological civilization construction and reveal associated demonstration and driving effects on surrounding areas. Based on the perspective of the CLUE, this paper obtains cultivated land use data pertaining to National Pilot Zones for Ecological Conservation in China and neighboring provinces from 2008 to 2018. In this study, the SBM-undesirable, Moran's I, and Markov chain models are adopted to quantitatively measure and analyze the CLUE and its temporal and spatial patterns and evolution trend. The research results indicate that the CLUE in the whole study area exhibited the characteristics of one growth, two stable, and two decline stages, with a positive spatial autocorrelation that increased year by year, and a spatial spillover effect was observed. Geographical spatial patterns and spatial spillover effects played a major role in the evolution of the CLUE, and there occurred a higher probability of improvement in the vicinity of cities with high CLUE values. In the future, practical construction experience should be disseminated at the provincial level, and policies and measures should be formulated according to local conditions. In addition, a linkage model between prefecture-level cities should be developed at the municipal level to fully manifest the positive spatial spillover effect. Moreover, we should thoroughly evaluate the risk associated with CLUE transition from high to low levels and establish a low-level early warning mechanism.Entities:
Keywords: CLUE; land use; national pilot zone for ecological conservation in China; spatial spillover; temporal and spatial evolution
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35010371 PMCID: PMC8750054 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The geographical location of study area.
Evaluation index system of the CLUE.
| Variable Type | Variable | Index Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Input index | Cultivated land input | Actual sown area of crops/1000 hm2 |
| Labor input | Number of employees in the primary industry × (agricultural output value/total output value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery)/10,000 | |
| Pesticide and fertilizer input | Net amount of pesticide and chemical fertilizer application/t | |
| Expected output index | Agricultural output value | Output value of the planting industry/10,000 yuan |
| Grain yield | Total grain output/t | |
| Unexpected output index | Net carbon emissions | Difference between the total carbon emissions of mechanical operation and chemical fertilizer and pesticide application and the total carbon absorption of cultivated land/t |
Figure 2Change trend of the CLUE in the study region from 2008 to 2018.
Global Moran’s I of the CLUE in the study area from 2008 to 2018.
| Year | Global Moran’s I | Z-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 0.136 | 1.759 | 0.039 |
| 2009 | 0.1869 | 2.1414 | 0.032 |
| 2010 | 0.1493 | 1.9436 | 0.029 |
| 2011 | 0.3403 | 3.9418 | 0.003 |
| 2012 | 0.2308 | 2.8181 | 0.004 |
| 2013 | 0.2362 | 2.7097 | 0.003 |
| 2014 | 0.1942 | 2.3543 | 0.009 |
| 2015 | 0.2561 | 3.0089 | 0.007 |
| 2016 | 0.191 | 2.3219 | 0.009 |
| 2017 | 0.2572 | 2.9803 | 0.002 |
| 2018 | 0.3234 | 3.7426 | 0.001 |
Figure 3LISA cluster map of the CLUE in the study area from 2008 to 2018.
Traditional Markov chain probability transition matrix of the CLUE in the study area from 2008 to 2018.
| Local Status | Type Ⅰ | Type Ⅱ | Type Ⅲ | Type Ⅳ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <25% | 25–50% | 50–75% | >75% | |
| Type Ⅰ | 0.832 | 0.117 | 0.007 | 0.044 |
| Type Ⅱ | 0.190 | 0.647 | 0.085 | 0.085 |
| Type Ⅲ | 0.058 | 0.385 | 0.365 | 0.192 |
| Type Ⅳ | 0.018 | 0.048 | 0.079 | 0.855 |
Markov chain probability transition matrix of the CLUE in the study area from 2008 to 2018.
| Spatial Lag | Local Status | Type Ⅰ | Type Ⅱ | Type Ⅲ | Type Ⅳ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <25% | 25–50% | 50–75% | >75% | ||
| Type Ⅰ | Ⅰ | 0.770 | 0.148 | 0.000 | 0.082 |
| Ⅱ | 0.231 | 0.513 | 0.051 | 0.205 | |
| Ⅲ | 0.000 | 0.333 | 0.444 | 0.222 | |
| Ⅳ | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.769 | |
| Type Ⅱ | Ⅰ | 0.854 | 0.122 | 0.000 | 0.024 |
| Ⅱ | 0.179 | 0.678 | 0.143 | 0.000 | |
| Ⅲ | 0.100 | 0.400 | 0.300 | 0.200 | |
| Ⅳ | 0.000 | 0.048 | 0.065 | 0.887 | |
| Type Ⅲ | Ⅰ | 0.926 | 0.074 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Ⅱ | 0.175 | 0.750 | 0.050 | 0.025 | |
| Ⅲ | 0.063 | 0.375 | 0.313 | 0.25 | |
| Ⅳ | 0.016 | 0.049 | 0.098 | 0.836 | |
| Type Ⅳ | Ⅰ | 0.750 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0.000 |
| Ⅱ | 0.139 | 0.639 | 0.111 | 0.111 | |
| Ⅲ | 0.059 | 0.411 | 0.411 | 0.118 | |
| Ⅳ | 0.001 | 0.050 | 0.075 | 0.863 |