| Literature DB >> 35010361 |
Huan Zhang1, Hongyang Wang1, Huiyu Yan1, Xiaoyu Wang1.
Abstract
The number of elderly Internet users has increased significantly in the past few years. However, the impact of Internet use on mental health remains unclear. In this study, we performed a difference-in-differences analysis using data from the 2016 and 2018 waves of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) to evaluate the impact of Internet usage on mental health among elderly individuals. A total of 5031 validated respondents were included to explore the relationship between Internet use and reduced levels of depression as well as improved life satisfaction among elderly individuals. The results showed that Internet use significantly reduced depression levels. Unexpectedly, Internet use was not found to improve life satisfaction. Moreover, discontinuing Internet use was not significantly associated with improvements in depression or life satisfaction. More research is needed to fully elucidate the relationship between Internet use and depression levels, as well as life satisfaction among elderly individuals.Entities:
Keywords: Internet; depression level; difference-in-differences method; elderly; life satisfaction
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35010361 PMCID: PMC8749999 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Characters of study subjects.
| 2016 | 2018 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean or % | SD | Mean or % | SD | |
| Age | 69.36 | 7.54 | 68.23 | 6.36 |
| Female | 51.90 | 49.74 | ||
| Education | ||||
| Low | 76.03 | 70.56 | ||
| Middle | 21.79 | 27.09 | ||
| High | 2.18 | 2.35 | ||
| Health status | ||||
| Very healthy | 15.24 | 17.08 | ||
| Relatively healthy | 29.8 | 35.82 | ||
| Generally healthy | 23.29 | 17.10 | ||
| Unhealthy | 31.67 | 30.00 | ||
| Life satisfaction | 3.85 | 1.06 | 4.24 | 0.93 |
| Depression level | −0.26 | 4.67 | −0.15 | 4.54 |
| Use of Internet | 0.06 | 0.12 | ||
| N | 5031 | 5031 | ||
Results of the descriptive analysis on variables.
| 2016 | 2018 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Of Internet Use | Life Satisfaction | Depression Level | % Of Internet Use | Life Satisfaction | Depression Level | |||||||||
| Mean | SD | Mean Diff | Mean | SD | Mean Diff | Mean | SD | Mean Diff | Mean | SD | Mean Diff | |||
| Age | ||||||||||||||
| 60–69 | 5.49 | 3.80 | 1.07 | 0.222 *** | −0.54 | 4.51 | 0.005 | 8.49 | 4.21 | 0.94 | 0.108 *** | −0.16 | 4.44 | 0.053 |
| 70–79 | 1.11 | 4.00 | 0.99 | −0.184 *** | −0.44 | 4.68 | −0.130 | 2.62 | 4.30 | 0.89 | −0.078 *** | −0.13 | 4.79 | −0.020 |
| 80–89 | 0.12 | 4.15 | 0.90 | −0.289 *** | −1.10 | 4.56 | 0.581 * | 0.34 | 4.39 | 0.86 | −0.152 *** | 0.03 | 4.73 | −0.175 |
| 90 and above | 0.00 | 4.22 | 0.67 | −0.355 | −1.89 | 6.07 | 1.352 | 0.00 | 4.19 | 0.66 | 0.061 | −0.75 | 5.35 | 0.613 |
| Gender | ||||||||||||||
| Male | 4.27 | 3.83 | 1.03 | 0.072 ** | −1.17 | 4.34 | 1.297 *** | 7.10 | 4.22 | 0.93 | 0.064 ** | −0.79 | 4.35 | 1.344 *** |
| Female | 2.44 | 3.90 | 1.07 | −0.072 ** | 0.13 | 4.70 | −1.297 *** | 4.35 | 4.28 | 0.91 | −0.064 ** | 0.55 | 4.71 | −1.344 *** |
| Education | ||||||||||||||
| Low | 1.37 | 3.89 | 1.07 | −0.084 ** | −0.12 | 4.68 | 1.402 *** | 3.52 | 4.29 | 0.93 | −0.151 *** | 0.30 | 4.74 | −1.615 *** |
| Medium | 4.17 | 3.79 | 0.99 | 0.100 *** | −1.60 | 4.02 | 1.402 *** | 6.66 | 4.13 | 0.89 | 0.157 *** | −1.23 | 3.90 | 1.442 *** |
| High | 1.17 | 3.96 | 0.92 | −0.091 | −2.66 | 3.60 | 2.171 *** | 1.27 | 4.22 | 0.85 | 0.025 | −2.31 | 3.41 | 2.223 *** |
| Health status | ||||||||||||||
| Very healthy | 0.76 | 4.25 | 0.91 | −0.462 *** | −2.46 | 3.61 | 1.651 *** | 1.49 | 4.51 | 0.79 | −0.319 *** | −2.04 | 3.81 | 2.281 *** |
| Relatively healthy | 3.30 | 3.91 | 0.97 | −0.065 ** | −1.66 | 3.83 | 1.651 *** | 5.57 | 4.27 | 0.86 | −0.032 | −1.16 | 3.86 | 1.605 *** |
| Generally healthy | 1.75 | 3.79 | 1.03 | 0.100 *** | −0.65 | 4.10 | 0.145 | 1.77 | 4.16 | 0.92 | 0.104 *** | −0.27 | 4.24 | 0.160 |
| Unhealthy | 0.91 | 3.63 | 1.17 | 0.319 *** | 2.14 | 5.06 | −3.667 *** | 2.62 | 4.13 | 1.02 | 0.177 *** | 2.22 | 4.96 | −3.372 *** |
| Sample size | 5031 | 5031 | ||||||||||||
Note: *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1.
Comparison of the cardinal values of the four sample groups.
| Test Statistic a, b | ||
|---|---|---|
| Depression Level | Life Satisfaction | |
| χ2 | 150.609 | 26.975 |
| df | 3 | 3 |
| Asymptotic Significance | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Note: a: Kruskal–Wallis test; b: Grouping Variable.
Results of the DiD estimation (Group A).
| Group A | Depression Level | Life Satisfaction |
|---|---|---|
| Internet Usage Access Group (ref. Internet Unused Group) | −0.4374 * | −0.0359 |
| (−1.69) | (−0.61) | |
| Age | −0.7143 | 1.1410 *** |
| (−1.34) | (9.40) | |
| Gender | −0.7039 *** | −0.0866 *** |
| (−7.65) | (−4.14) | |
| Health status | 1.2463 *** | −0.1433 |
| (34.37) | (−17.38) | |
| Education | −0.5624 | −0.0319 |
| (−12.27) | (−3.06) | |
| R-squared | 0.1467 | 0.0760 |
| N | 4693 | 4693 |
Note: *** p < 0.01, * p < 0.1.
Results of the DiD estimation (group B).
| Group B | Depression Level | Life Satisfaction |
|---|---|---|
| Internet usage exit group (ref. Internet usage persistence group) | 0.2717 | −0.0210 |
| (0.98) | (−0.16) | |
| Age | 1.1390 | 1.0835 ** |
| (0.62) | (2.016) | |
| Gender | −0.2407 | −0.0987 |
| (−0.90) | (−1.36) | |
| Health status | 1.0687 *** | −0.2137 *** |
| (7.94) | (−5.85) | |
| Education | −0.3786 *** | 0.0183 |
| (−3.53) | (0.63) | |
| R-squared | 0.1071 | 0.0859 |
| N | 338 | 338 |
Note: *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05.
Results of Placebo effect test.
| Group A | Depression Level |
|---|---|
| Internet Usage Access Group (ref. Internet Unused Group) DID_be | −0.1865 |
| (−0.73) | |
| Age | −0.2146 |
| (−0.41) | |
| Gender | −0.7107 *** |
| (−7.71) | |
| Health status | 1.2450 *** |
| (34.29) | |
| Education | −0.5628 |
| (−12.27) | |
| R-squared | 0.144 |
| N | 4693 |
Note: *** p < 0.01.