| Literature DB >> 35010299 |
Sabuj Kanti Mistry1,2,3,4, Fahmida Akter1, Md Belal Hossain1,5, Md Nazmul Huda6,7, Nafis Md Irfan8,9, Uday Narayan Yadav10, Daniel M L Storisteanu11, Amit Arora12,13,14,15,16.
Abstract
Digital fingerprints are increasingly used for patient care and treatment delivery, health system monitoring and evaluation, and maintaining data integrity during health research. Yet, no evidence exists about the use of fingerprinting technologies in maternal healthcare services in urban slum contexts, globally. The present study aimed to explore the recently delivered women's willingness to give digital fingerprints to community health workers to access healthcare services in the urban slums of Bangladesh and identify the associated factors. Employing a two-stage cluster random sampling procedure, we chose 458 recently delivered women from eight randomly selected urban slums of Dhaka city, Bangladesh. Chi-square tests were performed for descriptive analyses, and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the factors associated with willingness to provide fingerprints. Overall, 78% of the participants reported that they were willing to provide digital fingerprints if that eased access to healthcare services. After adjusting for potential confounders, the sex of the household head, family type, and household wealth status were significantly associated with the willingness to provide fingerprints to access healthcare services. The study highlighted the potentials of using fingerprints for making healthcare services accessible. Focus is needed for female-headed households, women from poor families, and engaging husbands and in-laws in mobile health programs.Entities:
Keywords: Bangladesh; access; digital fingerprints; health service use; slums; social disadvantage
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35010299 PMCID: PMC8751190 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Background characteristics of the respondents (N = 458).
| Characteristics | n | % |
|---|---|---|
| Characteristics of Participants | ||
| Age (years) | ||
| 15–19 | 65 | 14.2 |
| 20–24 | 145 | 31.7 |
| 25–29 | 138 | 30.1 |
| 30–34 | 74 | 16.2 |
| 35+ | 36 | 7.9 |
| Religion | ||
| Muslim | 451 | 98.5 |
| Other 1 | 7 | 1.5 |
| Literacy (Can Read and Write) | ||
| yes | 294 | 64.2 |
| no | 164 | 35.8 |
| Level of Education | ||
| no education | 77 | 16.8 |
| primary incomplete 2 | 105 | 22.9 |
| primary or secondary incomplete 3 | 234 | 51.1 |
| secondary or higher 4 | 42 | 9.2 |
| Involved in Income-Generating Activities | ||
| yes | 76 | 16.6 |
| no | 382 | 83.4 |
| Characteristics of Their Husband | ||
| age (years) | ||
| <25 | 38 | 8.3 |
| 25–29 | 144 | 31.4 |
| 30–34 | 103 | 22.5 |
| 35–39 | 122 | 26.6 |
| 40+ | 51 | 11.1 |
| Literacy (Can Read and Write) | ||
| yes | 288 | 62.9 |
| no | 170 | 37.1 |
| Level of Education | ||
| no education | 104 | 22.7 |
| primary incomplete 2 | 77 | 16.8 |
| primary or secondary incomplete 3 | 224 | 48.9 |
| secondary or higher 4 | 53 | 11.6 |
| Current Occupation | ||
| business | 127 | 27.7 |
| labourer | 189 | 41.3 |
| regular job | 128 | 28.0 |
| others | 14 | 3.1 |
| Household Characteristics | ||
| Sex of Household Head | ||
| male | 439 | 95.9 |
| female | 19 | 4.2 |
| household size | ||
| ≤4 | 285 | 62.2 |
| >4 | 173 | 37.8 |
| Type of Family | ||
| nuclear | 377 | 82.3 |
| extended | 81 | 17.7 |
| Wealth Status | ||
| low | 126 | 27.5 |
| middle | 89 | 19.4 |
| high | 243 | 53.1 |
1 Hinduism, Christianity, Buddhism; 2 primary incomplete = completed grade 1–4; 3 primary or secondary incomplete = completed grade 5–9; 4 secondary or higher = completed grade 10 or higher.
Willingness to provide digital fingerprints to access healthcare services (N = 458).
| Characteristics | n | % |
|---|---|---|
| Heard About Digital Fingerprints | ||
| yes | 316 | 69.0 |
| no | 142 | 31.0 |
| Willingness to Provide Digital Fingerprints to Access Healthcare | ||
| yes | 359 | 78.4 |
| no | 99 | 21.6 |
| Willingness to Provide Digital Fingerprints | ||
| yes | 368 | 80.4 |
| no | 90 | 19.7 |
| Reasons for Unwillingness to Provide Fingerprints | ||
| do not feel it is necessary | 16 | 17.8 |
| it might be misused or abused | 9 | 10.0 |
| it would take too much time | 6 | 6.7 |
| family permission required | 53 | 58.9 |
| other | 6 | 6.7 |
Bivariate analysis of sociodemographic characteristics of women and their willingness to provide digital fingerprints (N = 458).
| Characteristics | Women’s Willingness to Provide Digital Fingerprints | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ||
| n (%) | n (%) | ||
| Women’s Characteristics | |||
| Age (years) | |||
| 15–19 | 15(23.1) | 50(76.9) | 0.466 |
| 20–24 | 30(20.7) | 115(79.3) | |
| 25–29 | 20(14.5) | 118(85.5) | |
| 30–34 | 17(23.1) | 57(76.9) | |
| 35+ | 23(22.2) | 77(77.8) | |
| Religion | |||
| Muslim | 90(20.0) | 361(80.0) | 0.187 |
| Other 1 | 0(0.0) | 7(100) | |
| Literacy (Can Read and Write) | |||
| yes | 52(17.7) | 242(82.3) | 0.157 |
| no | 38(23.2) | 126(76.8) | |
| Level of Education | |||
| no education | 21(27.3) | 56(72.7) | 0.065 |
| primary incomplete 2 | 22(21.0) | 83(79.1) | |
| primary or secondary incomplete 3 | 44(18.8) | 190(81.2) | |
| secondary or higher 4 | 3(7.1) | 39(92.9) | |
| Involved in Income-Generating Activities | |||
| yes | 20(26.3) | 56(73.7) | 0.109 |
| no | 70(18.3) | 312(81.7) | |
| Husband Characteristics | |||
| Age (years) | |||
| <25 | 8(21.1) | 30(79.0) | 0.639 |
| 25–29 | 31(21.5) | 113(78.5) | |
| 30–34 | 22(21.4) | 81(78.6) | |
| 35–39 | 18(14.8) | 104(85.3) | |
| 40+ | 11(21.6) | 40(78.4) | |
| Literacy (Can Read and Write) | |||
| yes | 51(17.7) | 237(82.3) | 0.173 |
| no | 39(22.9) | 131(77.1) | |
| Level of Education | |||
| no education | 27(26.0) | 77(74.0) | 0.098 |
| primary incomplete | 16(20.8) | 61(79.2) | |
| primary or secondary incomplete | 42(18.8) | 182(81.3) | |
| secondary or higher | 5(9.4) | 48(90.6) | |
| Occupation | |||
| business | 22(17.3) | 105(82.7) | 0.489 |
| labourer | 42(22.2) | 147(77.8) | |
| regular job | 22(17.2) | 106(82.8) | |
| other | 4(28.6) | 10(71.4) | |
| Household Characteristics | |||
| Sex of Household Head | |||
| male | 82(18.7) | 357(81.3) | 0.012 |
| female | 8(42.1) | 11(57.9) | |
| Household Size | |||
| ≤4 | 52(18.3) | 233(81.8) | 0.331 |
| >4 | 38(22.0) | 135(78.0) | |
| Type of Family | |||
| nuclear | 65(17.2) | 312(82.8) | 0.005 |
| extended | 25(30.9) | 56(69.1) | |
| Family Income Per Month (USD) | |||
| <120 | 30(33.3) | 60(66.7) | 0.011 |
| 120–239 | 126(29.2) | 306(70.8) | |
| 240–359 | 30(18.4) | 133(81.6) | |
| 360+ | 24(20.9) | 91(79.1) | |
| Wealth Status | |||
| low | 40(31.8) | 86(68.3) | 0.000 |
| middle | 22(24.7) | 67(75.3) | |
| high | 28(11.5) | 215(88.4) | |
| Ownership of Mobile Phone | |||
| yes | 38(15.3) | 211(84.7) | 0.010 |
| no | 52(24.9) | 157(75.1) | |
1 Hinduism, Christianity, Buddhism; 2 primary incomplete = completed grade 1–4; 3 primary or secondary incomplete = completed grade 5–9; 4 secondary or higher = completed grade 10 or higher.
Factors associated with women’s willingness to provide digital fingerprints (N = 458).
| Crude | Adjusted | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR |
| 95% CI | OR |
| 95% CI | |
| Participant’s Characteristics | ||||||
| Age (years) | ||||||
| 15–19 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| 20–24 | 1.15 | 0.697 | 0.57–2.32 | 0.79 | 0.538 | 0.36–1.69 |
| 25–29 | 1.77 | 0.134 | 0.84–3.73 | 1.26 | 0.590 | 0.55–2.90 |
| 30–34 | 1.01 | 0.988 | 0.46–2.22 | 0.91 | 0.843 | 0.37–2.27 |
| 35+ | 1.05 | 0.922 | 0.40–2.78 | 1.00 | 0.999 | 0.33–3.01 |
| Level of Education | ||||||
| no education | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| primary incomplete 1 | 1.41 | 0.322 | 0.71–2.81 | 1.01 | 0.980 | 0.47–2.15 |
| primary or secondary incomplete 2 | 1.62 | 0.115 | 0.89–2.95 | 1.28 | 0.497 | 0.63–2.62 |
| secondary or higher 3 | 4.88 | 0.015 | 1.36–17.48 | 2.78 | 0.172 | 0.64–12.07 |
| Involved in Income-Generating Activities | ||||||
| no | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| yes | 0.63 | 0.112 | 0.35–1.11 | 1.61 | 0.139 | 0.86–3.04 |
| Husband Characteristics | ||||||
| Level of Education | ||||||
| no education | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| primary incomplete 1 | 1.34 | 0.419 | 0.66–2.70 | 1.06 | 0.880 | 0.50–2.26 |
| primary or secondary incomplete 2 | 1.52 | 0.137 | 0.87–2.64 | 1.19 | 0.610 | 0.62–2.29 |
| secondary or higher 3 | 3.37 | 0.020 | 1.21–9.34 | 1.75 | 0.353 | 0.54–5.67 |
| occupation | ||||||
| labourer | 1.00 | dropped from final model | ||||
| business | 1.36 | 0.289 | 0.77–2.42 | |||
| regular job | 1.38 | 0.274 | 0.78–2.44 | |||
| other | 0.71 | 0.585 | 0.21–2.39 | |||
| Household Characteristics | ||||||
| Sex of Household Head | ||||||
| female | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| male | 3.17 | 0.016 | 1.23–8.12 | 2.65 | 0.062 | 0.95–7.34 |
| Household Size | ||||||
| >4 | 1.00 | Dropped from final model | ||||
| ≤4 | 1.26 | 0.332 | 0.79–2.02 | |||
| Type of Family | ||||||
| extended | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| nuclear | 2.14 | 0.006 | 1.25–3.68 | 2.83 | 0.001 | 1.52–5.24 |
| Wealth Status | ||||||
| low | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| moderate | 1.42 | 0.264 | 0.77–2.61 | 1.38 | 0.333 | 0.72–2.68 |
| high | 3.57 | 0.000 | 2.07–6.15 | 2.96 | 0.000 | 1.63–5.39 |
| Ownership of Mobile Phone | ||||||
| no | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| yes | 1.84 | 0.010 | 1.15–2.93 | 1.42 | 0.191 | 0.84–2.40 |
1 Primary incomplete = completed grade 1–4; 2 primary or secondary incomplete = completed grade 5–9; 3 secondary or higher = completed grade 10 or higher.