| Literature DB >> 35010164 |
Nasibeh Y Sinaki1, Mustafa Tugrul Masatcioglu2, Jitendra Paliwal3, Filiz Koksel1.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate how extrusion cooking conditions and microwave heating play a role in enhancing physical and thermal properties of third-generation expanded cellular snacks made from yellow pea (YP) and red lentil (RL) flours for the first time. Increasing temperature and moisture content during extrusion resulted in darker, crunchier and crispier products with higher expansion index (EI). Microwave heating after extrusion led to an increase in cell size and porosity of YP and RL products when qualitatively compared to extrusion alone. Additionally, extrusion followed by microwave heating resulted in extensive damage to starch granular structure and complete denaturation of proteins. Using microwave heating, as a fast and inexpensive process, following partial cooking with extrusion was demonstrated to greatly improve the physical and thermal properties of YP and RL snacks. Microwave heating following mild extrusion, instead of severe extrusion cooking alone, can potentially benefit the development of high quality nutritionally-dense expanded cellular snacks made from pulse flours.Entities:
Keywords: expanded cellular snacks; extrusion; protein denaturation; pulses texture; starch gelatinization
Year: 2021 PMID: 35010164 PMCID: PMC8750491 DOI: 10.3390/foods11010038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Effects of feed moisture content and die temperature (DT) on torque, die pressure and specific mechanical energy (SME) values of extrudates made from red lentil (RL) and yellow pea (YP) flours. For each flour type, results in each column are significantly different if designated with different lowercase letters (p ≤ 0.05).
| Flour | Moisture Content | DT | Torque | Die Pressure | SME |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (kg water per kg dry flour) | (°C) | (%) | (kPa) | (Wh kg−1) | |
| RL | 0.20 | 100 | 34 a | 7100 a | 297 a |
| 125 | 29 b | 5350 c | 257 b | ||
| 0.24 | 100 | 25 c | 5900 b | 220 c | |
| 125 | 21 d | 4600 d | 187 d | ||
| YP | 0.20 | 100 | 25 a | 8150 a | 218 a |
| 125 | 22 ab | 6600 b | 196 ab | ||
| 0.24 | 100 | 21 bc | 5950 bc | 182 bc | |
| 125 | 19 c | 5100 c | 167 c |
Proximate composition (mean ± standard error) of red lentil and yellow pea flours.
| Composition (g per 100 g dry flour) | Red Lentil | Yellow Pea |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 25.11 ± 0.37 | 21.89 ± 0.43 |
| Ash | 3.37 ± 0.01 | 3.50 ± 0.05 |
| Lipid | 1.29 ± 0.03 | 0.80 ± 0.02 |
| Total carbohydrates | 70.23 | 73.81 |
| Total dietary fiber | 11.21 ± 0.73 | 13.54 ± 0.84 |
| Starch | 52.42 ± 0.60 | 52.20 ± 0.51 |
Figure 1Expansion index (a) and density (b) of third-generation red lentil and yellow pea products with moisture contents of 0.20 (MC 0.20) and 0.24 (MC 0.24) kg water per kg dry flour. Dashed lines refer to the minimum and maximum expansion index (a) and density (b) of second-generation products. Error bars represent ± standard error. For each flour type, expansion index and density values designated with different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
Colour parameters (mean ± standard error) of third-generation red lentil (RL) and yellow pea (YP) products as affected by feed moisture content and die temperature (DT). For each flour type, results in each column are significantly different if designated with different lowercase letters (p ≤ 0.05).
| Flour | Moisture Content | DT (°C) | Colour Parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| RL | 0.20 | 100 | 85.1 ± 0.1 a | 0.8 ± 0.0 c | 23.8 ± 0.4 b | 88.4 ± 0.0 ab |
| 125 | 80.9 ± 0.6 c | 2.7 ± 0.1 a | 25.4 ± 0.2 a | 84.9 ± 0.6 c | ||
| 0.24 | 100 | 85.7 ± 0.1 a | 0.6 ± 0.1 c | 22.6 ± 0.2 c | 88.6 ± 0.0 a | |
| 125 | 83.6 ± 0.3 b | 1.8 ± 0.1 b | 24.2 ± 0.3 b | 87.1 ± 0.3 b | ||
| YP | 0.20 | 100 | 84.5 ± 0.1 a | 2.6 ± 0.0 c | 25.5 ± 0.0 b | 88.3 ± 0.1 a |
| 125 | 84.2 ± 0.2 ab | 2.8 ± 0.1 b | 26.03 ± 0.3 b | 88.2 ± 0.1 ab | ||
| 0.24 | 100 | 83.2 ± 0.5 bc | 2.7 ± 0.1 bc | 26.5 ± 0.4 ab | 87.4 ± 0.3 bc | |
| 125 | 82.7 ± 0.3 c | 3.4 ± 0.1 a | 27.5 ± 0.3 a | 87.3 ± 0.2 c | ||
Figure 2Scanning electron micrographs of second-generation (first column) and third-generation (second column) red lentil products with feed moisture contents of 0.20 and 0.24 kg water per kg dry flour (MC 0.20 and MC 0.24, respectively) at 100 °C and 125 °C die temperature (DT 100 and DT 125, respectively). A 250× magnification was used for all images with a scale bar of 100 µm shown. Digital images in (g,h) show red lentil second- and third-generation products, respectively, produced with MC of 0.24 at 125 °C.
Figure 3(A) Hardness, (B) crispiness, and (C) crunchiness values of third-generation (a) red lentil and (b) yellow pea products with moisture contents of 0.20 and 0.24 kg water per kg dry flour (MC 0.20 and MC 0.24, respectively). Error bars represent ± standard error. For each flour type, texture parameters designated with different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
Thermal properties of red lentil (RL) and yellow pea (YP) flours and their products as a function of die temperature (DT) and moisture content.
| Sample | DT | Moisture Content | Peak I | Peak II | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (°C) | (kg water per kg dry flour) | To | Tp | ΔH | To | Tp | ΔH | ||
| RL | Flour (raw) | 59.3 ± 0.1 | 66.2 ± 0.0 | 4.20 ± 0.3 | 79.9 ± 0.4 | 85.5 ± 0.0 | 0.52 ± 0.0 | ||
| Second-generation | 100 | 0.20 | 44.2 ± 0.4 | 55.3 ± 0.0 | 1.44 ± 0.0 | 84.5 ± 0.1 | 91.8 ± 0.0 | 0.48 ± 0.0 | |
| 0.24 | 47.2 ± 2.8 | 54.4 ± 2.7 | 1.53 ± 0.0 | nd | nd | nd | |||
| 125 | 0.20 | 46.5 ± 1.1 | 56.8 ± 0.8 | 1.33 ± 0.0 | nd | nd | nd | ||
| 0.24 | 47.7 ± 0.7 | 57.2 ± 0.1 | 1.21 ± 0.1 | nd | nd | nd | |||
| Third-generation | 100 | 0.20 | 49.9 ± 0.3 | 56.4 ± 1.4 | 0.46 ± 0.0 | nd | nd | nd | |
| 0.24 | 51.4 ± 0.0 | 56.0 ± 0.0 | 0.26 ± 0.1 | nd | nd | nd | |||
| 125 | 0.20 | 51.5 ± 0.3 | 57.7 ± 0.4 | 0.27 ± 0.0 | nd | nd | nd | ||
| YP | Flour (raw) | 62.3 ± 0.1 | 69.4 ± 0.0 | 4.57 ± 0.1 | 81.8 ± 0.2 | 86.2 ± 0.0 | 0.26 ± 0.0 | ||
| Second-generation | 100 | 0.20 | 41.9 ± 0.7 | 55.9 ± 0.0 | 1.08 ± 0.1 | 74.4 ± 0.1 | 79.2 ± 0.0 | 0.23 ± 0.0 | |
| 0.24 | 45.6 ± 0.0 | 54.5 ± 0.0 | 0.93 ± 0.0 | 75.0 ± 0.0 | 78.7 ± 0.0 | 0.13 ± 0.0 | |||
| 125 | 0.20 | 46.9 ± 0.9 | 56.7 ± 1.1 | 0.93 ± 0.0 | 86.4 ± 0.8 | 91.0 ± 1.2 | 0.04 ± 0.0 | ||
| 0.24 | 46.4 ± 0.8 | 56.1 ± 3.2 | 0.84 ± 0.0 | nd | nd | nd | |||
| Third-generation | 100 | 0.20 | 53.9 ± 4.8 | 58.4 ± 0.4 | 0.35 ± 0.0 | nd | nd | nd | |
| 0.24 | 54.3 ± 0.5 | 58.4 ± 2.2 | 0.21 ± 0.0 | nd | nd | nd | |||
| 125 | 0.20 | 53.2 ± 1.3 | 59.2 ± 0.7 | 0.24 ± 0.0 | nd | nd | nd | ||
| 0.24 | 54.3 ± 0.3 | 58.1 ± 0.9 | 0.14 ± 0.0 | nd | nd | nd | |||
To: Onset temperature; Tp: Peak temperature; ΔH: Enthalpies of starch gelatinization and protein denaturation for Peaks I and II, respectively; nd: not detected.