| Literature DB >> 35009987 |
Denis A Vinnik1, Vladimir E Zhivulin1, Evgeny A Trofimov1, Svetlana A Gudkova1, Alexander Yu Punda1, Azalia N Valiulina1, Maksim Gavrilyak1, Olga V Zaitseva1, Sergey V Taskaev1, Mayeen Uddin Khandaker2, Amal Alqahtani3, David A Bradley2,4, M I Sayyed5,6, Vitaliy A Turchenko1,7,8, Alex V Trukhanov1,9,10, Sergei V Trukhanov1,9.
Abstract
Three high-entropy Sm(Eu,Gd)Cr0.2Mn0.2Fe0.2Co0.2Ni0.2O3 perovskite solid solutions were synthesized using the usual ceramic technology. The XRD investigation at room temperature established a single-phase perovskite product. The Rietveld refinement with the FullProf computer program in the frame of the orthorhombic Pnma (No 62) space group was realized. Along with a decrease in the V unit cell volume from ~224.33 Å3 for the Sm-based sample down to ~221.52 Å3 for the Gd-based sample, an opposite tendency was observed for the unit cell parameters as the ordinal number of the rare-earth cation increased. The average grain size was in the range of 5-8 μm. Field magnetization was measured up to 30 kOe at 50 K and 300 K. The law of approach to saturation was used to determine the Ms spontaneous magnetization that nonlinearly increased from ~1.89 emu/g (Sm) up to ~17.49 emu/g (Gd) and from ~0.59 emu/g (Sm) up to ~3.16 emu/g (Gd) at 50 K and 300 K, respectively. The Mr residual magnetization and Hc coercive force were also determined, while the SQR loop squareness, k magnetic crystallographic anisotropy coefficient, and Ha anisotropy field were calculated. Temperature magnetization was measured in a field of 30 kOe. ZFC and FC magnetization curves were fixed in a field of 100 Oe. It was discovered that the Tmo magnetic ordering temperature downward-curve decreased from ~137.98 K (Sm) down to ~133.99 K (Gd). The spin glass state with ferromagnetic nanoinclusions for all the samples was observed. The <D> average and Dmax maximum diameter of ferromagnetic nanoinclusions were calculated and they were in the range of 40-50 nm and 160-180 nm, respectively. The mechanism of magnetic state formation is discussed in terms of the effects of the A-site cation size and B-site poly-substitution on the indirect superexchange interactions.Entities:
Keywords: crystal structure; high entropy perovskites; indirect superexchange interactions; magnetic properties; transition metals
Year: 2021 PMID: 35009987 PMCID: PMC8746459 DOI: 10.3390/nano12010036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Rietveld-refined XRD pattern for the Sm- (a), Eu- (b), and Gd-based (c) samples. The experimental data (cross), fitting curve (red line), theoretical Bragg positions (vertical bar), and difference curve (blue line) are presented.
Figure 2Dependence of unit cell parameters (a) a (full rectangle), b (full circle), and c/ = cr (full up-triangle), as well as unit cell volume (b) V (open circle) vs. A-site cation radius for the obtained samples. Solid line is the second-order polynomial interpolation and it is an eye guide.
Figure 3SEM image for the Sm- (a), Eu- (b), and Gd-based (c) samples. Inset demonstrates the particle size distribution.
Figure 4Dependence of magnetization vs. inverse square of the field for the Sm- (red circle), Eu- (green circle), and Gd-based (blue circle) samples at 50 K (a) and 300 K (b). Straight line is the linear extrapolation.
Figure 5Field magnetization for the Sm- (a), Eu- (b), and Gd-based (c) samples at 50 K (red circle) and 300 K (green circle). Inset demonstrates the field magnetization on a larger scale.
Figure 6Dependence of the Ms spontaneous magnetization (a), Mr residual magnetization (b), SQR = Mr/Ms squareness of the loop (c), and Hc coercive force (d) vs. A-site cation radius size at 50 K (red circle and line) and 300 K (green circle and line) for the obtained samples. The solid line is the second-order polynomial interpolation and it is an eye guide.
Figure 7M(T) temperature magnetization (a), dM/dT(T) first magnetization derivative (b), and d2M/dT2(T) second magnetization derivative for the Sm- (red circle), Eu- (green circle) (c), and Gd-based (blue circle) samples in 3 T. Inset demonstrates the temperature magnetization on a larger scale.
Figure 8ZFC (full circle) and FC (open circle) curves of M(T) temperature magnetization (a) and their dM/dT(T) first magnetization derivative (b) for the Sm-based sample in 100 Oe. Inset demonstrates the temperature magnetization on a larger scale.
Figure 9Dependence of the Tmo magnetic ordering (in 30 kOe) and Tf freezing (in 100 Oe) temperature (a), k magnetic crystallographic anisotropy coefficient (b), and Ha anisotropy field (c) vs. A-site cation radius size at 50 K (red circle and line) and 300 K (green circle and line) for the obtained samples. The solid line is the second-order polynomial interpolation and it is an eye guide.