| Literature DB >> 35009872 |
Haifeng Shuai1, Rui Liu1, Shibing Zhu1, Changqing Li1, Yi Fang2.
Abstract
With the rapid development of land mobile satellite (LMS) systems, large scale sensors and devices are willing to request wireless services, which is a challenge to the quality of service requirement and spectrum resources utilization on onboard LMS systems. Under this situation, the non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) is regarded as a promising technology for improving spectrum efficiency of LMS systems. In this paper, we analyze the ergodic capacity (EC) of NOMA-based multi-antenna LMS systems in the presence of imperfect limitations, i.e., channel estimation errors, imperfect successive interference cancellation, and co-channel interference. By considering multiple antennas at the satellite and terrestrial sensor users, the closed-form expression for EC of the NOMA-based LMS systems with imperfect limitations is obtained. Monte Carlo simulations are provided to verify theoretical results and reveal the influence of key parameters on system performance.Entities:
Keywords: ergodic capacity; imperfect limitations; land mobile satellite (LMS) systems; non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35009872 PMCID: PMC8749839 DOI: 10.3390/s22010330
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Illustration of a NOMA-based multi-antenna LMS system.
System parameters.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Satellite Orbit | GEO |
| Carrier Frequency | 18 GHz |
| Carrier Bandwidth | |
| 3 dB angle |
|
| Maximal Beam Gain | |
| Receive Antenna Gain | |
| Noise Temperature | |
| Rain Attenuation |
|
Channel parameters.
| Shadowing |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Frequent heavy shadowing (FHS) | 1 | 0.063 | 0.0007 |
| Average shadowing (AS) | 5 | 0.251 | 0.279 |
| Infrequent light shadowing (ILS) | 10 | 0.158 | 1.29 |
Figure 2The EC versus for different SR fading channels.
Figure 3The EC versus for different CEEs situations.
Figure 4EC versus for different imperfect SIC situations.
Figure 5EC versus for different CCI situation.
Figure 6EC versus with NOMA and OMA.