| Literature DB >> 35009864 |
Quan Wang1,2,3, Hongbin Li1,4, Hao Wang4, Jun Zhang2, Jiliang Fu2.
Abstract
Power system facility calibration is a compulsory task that requires in-site operations. In this work, we propose a remote calibration device that incorporates edge intelligence so that the required calibration can be accomplished with little human intervention. Our device entails a wireless serial port module, a Bluetooth module, a video acquisition module, a text recognition module, and a message transmission module. First, the wireless serial port is used to communicate with edge node, the Bluetooth is used to search for nearby Bluetooth devices to obtain their state information and the video is used to monitor the calibration process in the calibration lab. Second, to improve the intelligence, we propose a smart meter reading method in our device that is based on artificial intelligence to obtain information about calibration meters. We use a mini camera to capture images of calibration meters, then we adopt the Efficient and Accurate Scene Text Detector (EAST) to complete text detection, finally we built the Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network (CRNN) to complete the recognition of the meter data. Finally, the message transmission module is used to transmit the recognized data to the database through Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP). Our device solves the problem that some calibration meters cannot return information, thereby improving the remote calibration intelligence.Entities:
Keywords: CRNN; edge intelligence; power system; remote calibration device; text recognition
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35009864 PMCID: PMC8749640 DOI: 10.3390/s22010322
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
International existing remote calibration projects.
| Institute | Remote Calibration Projects |
|---|---|
| NIST | measurement networks, electrical quantity calibration, high flow gas flow meters, etc. |
| FIPT | electronic calibration, AC Josephson Voltage reference, high pressure gas flow reference, etc. |
| NMIJ | temperature, pressure, optical frequency Coordinate measuring machine, radiation, etc. |
| NPL | Standard resistance, voltage remote calibration, network analyzer, etc. |
Figure 1Remote calibration service system framework.
Figure 2Main modules of the edge devices.
Figure 3Step of remote calibration.
Figure 4Heterogeneous nodes networking framework.
Figure 5Schematic diagram of wireless serial communication.
Figure 6Bluetooth system framework communication.
Figure 7The network structure of FCN.
Figure 8Simple residual block structure.
Figure 9The framework of CNN + LSTM + CTC.
Figure 10Live video framework.
Network performance test.
| Lossless Network | None | None |
|---|---|---|
| Up weak network | Up packet loss | 30%, 50%, 70% |
| Up weak network | Up delay | 200, 400, 700 (ms) |
| Down weak network | Down packet loss | 30%, 50%, 70% |
| Down weak network | Down delay | 300, 500, 1000 (ms) |
Room login and pull stream situation.
| Packet Loss | Room Login | Stream Pulling |
|---|---|---|
| Up packet loss 30% | 100% | 100% |
| Up packet loss 50% | 100% | 100% |
| Up packet loss 70% | 100% | 100% |
| Down packet loss 30% | 100% | 100% |
| Down packet loss 50% | 100% | 100% |
| Down packet loss 70% | 100% | 100% |
Detection results in different datasets based on EAST.
| Datasets | Accuracy (%) | Recall (%) | F-Measure (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICDAR2013 [ | 88.0 | 74.0 | 81.0 |
| ICDAR2015 [ | 83.27 | 78.33 | 80.72 |
| Ours | 93.3 | 87.5 | 88.0 |
Figure 11Part result of testing. (a) sample1, (b) sample2, (c) sample3, (d) sample4.
Figure 12Some raw samples of our dataset.
Figure 13Process of model training. (a) Loss curve, (b) Accuracy curve.
Model metrics.
| Model Name | Train Loss | Test Loss | Train acc | Test acc | Recall | F1 Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNN + LSTM + CTC | 0.1117 | 0.1122 | 0.9713 | 0.9343 | 0.932 | 0.9307 |
Figure 14Testing of XMPP.
Text detection results on ICDAR 2015 incidental text dataset.
| Methods | Accuracy (%) | Recall (%) | F-Measure (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zhang et al. [ | 70.8 | 43.0 | 53.6 |
| SegLink [ | 73.1 | 76.8 | 75.0 |
| EAST [ |
|
|
|
| SSTD [ | 80.0 | 73.0 | 77.0 |
| He et al. [ | 82.0 | 80.0 | 81.0 |
Recognition results on ICDAR 2013.
| Methods | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|
| Bissacco et al. [ | 87.6 |
| Jaderberg et al. [ | 81.8 |
| CRNN [ |
|
The calibration index of lightning arrester.
| Items | Index Description |
|---|---|
| Current | Measuring range (0.1–50) mA |
| Maximum allowable error ± (0.2% for reading + 2 μA) | |
| Phase | Measuring range (0–90 degree) |
| Maximum allowable error ±0.1 degree |