Literature DB >> 35009542

Improving Fast Charging-Discharging Performances of Ni-Rich LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 Cathode Material by Electronic Conductor LaNiO3 Crystallites.

Tongxin Li1, Donglin Li1, Qingbo Zhang1, Jianhang Gao1, Long Zhang1, Xiaojiu Liu1.   

Abstract

Fast charging-discharging is one of the important requirements for next-generation high-energy Li-ion batteries, nevertheless, electrons transport in the active oxide materials is limited. Thus, carbon coating of active materials is a common method to supply the routes for electron transport, but it is difficult to synthesize the oxide-carbon composite for LiNiO2-based materials which need to be calcined in an oxygen-rich atmosphere. In this work, LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 (NCM811) coated with electronic conductor LaNiO3 (LNO) crystallites is demonstrated for the first time as fast charging-discharging and high energy cathodes for Li-ion batteries. The LaNiO3 succeeds in providing an exceptional fast charging-discharging behavior and initial coulombic efficiency in comparison with pristine NCM811. Consequently, the NCM811@3LNO electrode presents a higher capacity at 0.1 C (approximately 246 mAh g-1) and a significantly improved high rate performance (a discharge specific capacity of 130.62 mAh g-1 at 10 C), twice that of pristine NCM811. Additionally, cycling stability is also improved for the composite material. This work provides a new possibility of active oxide cathodes for high energy/power Li-ion batteries by electronic conductor LaNiO3 coating.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LaNiO3; Li-ion batteries; LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2; electron transport; fast charging; rate capability

Year:  2022        PMID: 35009542      PMCID: PMC8746607          DOI: 10.3390/ma15010396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Materials (Basel)        ISSN: 1996-1944            Impact factor:   3.623


1. Introduction

Li-ion batteries (LIBs) have received increasing attention for electric vehicles (EVs) and portable electronics due to their high energy density and long lifespan [1,2,3]. As a result, the development of LIBs with high capacity, high power/energy density, as well as long cycle life is necessary. The power density and energy density are significant parameters for LIBs [4]. Except for improving energy density, novel technologies and materials are needed to resolve the requirement for high power densities by enabling rapid charging-discharging rates without sacrificing cycling stability and energy densities. In particular, power density is critical for most applications, such as power grid stabilization and fast-charging EVs. Recently, despite the charging technology of LIBs having been intensively investigated, the current charging capability is still far from offering consumers the same refueling experience as conventional vehicles [5]. This is a significant reason, causing “range anxiety” for EVs owners and potential customers. Consequently, a higher charging rate with a shorter charging time is essential to achieve fast charging in the future [6,7,8]. Based on previous reports, multiple properties of the applied cathode, anode, and electrolyte materials affect the fast-charging capability of LIBs. Fast charging technology mainly depends on the transport rate of electrons and Li+ between the LIBs components. To improve the fast-charging capability of LIBs, numerous research have been devoted toward reducing the diffusion length of Li+ and electrons by nanotechnology (such as nanofibers, nanotubes, or nanoparticles), and increasing the electronic and ionic conductivity by hybrid-composite design, Li-ion diffusion control, surface modification, and dopant manipulation [9,10]. Previous reports have demonstrated that electronic or ionic conductors can improve electronic or ionic conductivity, providing a positive impact on the fast charging of LIBs [11]. Compared with conductive carbon anode materials, the study on the influence of fast charging on the cathodes is still in its infancy [12]. At present, developing cathodes with high capacity, high operating voltage, and long lifespan is of great importance for practical application in LIBs. Traditional cathodes, such as LiCoO2, LiFePO4, and LiMn2O4, have limited reversible capacity (<200 mAh g−1), which cannot satisfy the requirement for high power and energy density LIBs [13,14]. Among numerous cathodes, LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 (NCM811) is considered as one of the most promising cathodes due to its high specific capacity (>200 mAh g−1), low cost, and high average redox potential [15,16]. Nevertheless, the inferior rate performance of NCM811 could be ascribed to the Li+/Ni2+ cation mixing, caused by the similar ionic radius between Ni2+ (0.69 Å) and Li+ (0.76 Å), resulting in reduced electrode kinetics and specific capacity [17,18,19]. Additionally, the poor cycling performance is closely related to moisture sensitivity and detrimental side reactions [20,21]. More importantly, the intrinsic poor electronic conductivity (10−5 S cm−1) of NCM811 restricts its transport kinetics (e.g., rate performance) and cycling stability [22]. Moreover, these problems will worsen at high current density. To resolve the above problems, surface modification is considered as an efficient strategy to enhance the electrochemical performances of NCM811 cathodes. Among various coating materials, the majority of the lithium ionic conductors (Li3PO4 [23], Li2ZrO3 [24], Li3VO4 [25]) are focused on increasing the ionic conductivity of Ni-rich cathodes. Furthermore, previous reports have demonstrated that electronic conductivity plays a crucial role in initiating the electrochemical process, and electron transport is critical to improving the electrode kinetics that dominate the power density of LIBs [26]. As a consequence, it is necessary to enhance the electronic conductivity of NCM811 cathode. It is well known that the high electronic conductivity carbon is beneficial to supply the electron transport pathway in the manufacturing process of LIBs. Thus, it is essential to add conductive agent (carbon black) into the conventional electrode materials. Moreover, many studies have reported that effective improvement of the electronic conductivity for NCM811 cathodes could be achieved by coating the carbon or conductive polymer. More recently, Sim et al. [27] prepared carbon-modified LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 cathodes using carbon black (Super P) as the carbon source, resulting in superior electrochemical performances. Furthermore, Zha et al. reported an efficient method to decorate the surface of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 (NCM811) by combining with polyimide and carbon nanotubes. Compared with the modified-NCM811 (199.6 mAh g−1), NCM811 exhibits a higher initial discharge capacity (201.1 mAh g−1). However, it can be found that surface modification with carbon and conductive polymers is usually realized under an inert atmosphere and high temperature, leading to a poor rate capability or a loss in capacity. To improve the rate performance and specific capacity, it is necessary to achieve the coating process under an oxygen or air atmosphere, and the oxides could satisfy this demand. The perovskite oxide LaNiO3 (LNO) has been intensively investigated in various applications in ferroelectric devices due to its highly electronic properties [28]. The rhombohedral structure of LaNiO3 oxide is metallic at all temperatures, and its high electronic conductivity (over 100 S cm−1) enough to act as an electrode [29,30,31,32,33]. Furthermore, LaNiO3 has been reported as a novel anode for LIBs, which exhibits superior electrochemical performances. More importantly, LaNiO3 could be annealed under an oxygen atmosphere. In this paper, we report the electronic conductor LaNiO3 as a coating layer to decorate the NCM811 surface for fast charging-discharging LIBs. The conductive LaNiO3 coating provides an effective electron transport pathway and serves as a protective layer that restrains the interfacial side reactions between the electrolyte and the NCM811 surface. Additionally, the impact of the LaNiO3 coating on the NCM811 cathodes is studied in detail.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of NCM811 Cathode Materials

NCM811 was prepared via a typical sol-gel method as follows. First of all, stoichiometric amounts of Co(COOCH3)2·4H2O, Ni(COOCH3)2·4H2O, Mn(COOCH3)2·4H2O, and LiNO3 (with 5% excess) were dissolved together in ethyl alcohol to obtain a uniform solution. An excessive amount of LiNO3 was employed to compensate for possible lithium loss at high temperature. Afterward, acetylacetone (the molar ratio of transition metal ions to acetylacetone was 1:1) was added into the metal solution. The mixed solution was then evaporated with stirring in an 80 °C water bath. The obtained gel was dried at 100 °C and annealed at 450 °C for 2 h. After that, the acquired powder was ground, and calcined at 800 °C for 12 h in oxygen (denoted as pristine NCM811).

2.2. Synthesis of LaNiO3 Surface-Modified NCM811

A simple wet chemical method was employed to prepare the LaNiO3-modified NCM811 cathodes. Firstly, deionized water was used to dissolve Ni(NO3)2·6H2O and La(NO3)3·6H2O with the stoichiometric ratio of 1:1. Citric acid was then added under vigorous stirring to obtain the LaNiO3 transparent solution. Subsequently, the as-synthesized NCM811 sample was added into a required amount of LNO solution (from 0, 1, to 3 wt%), and the obtained suspension was stirred continuously at 80 °C to evaporate the water. Finally, the powder was dried at 100 °C and subsequently calcined at 700 °C for 3 h under flowing O2 to obtain the LaNiO3 surface-modified NCM811 materials. Based on the ratio of LNO to NCM811, the LNO-modified NCM811 materials were labeled as pristine NCM811, NCM811@LNO, and NCM811@3LNO, respectively.

2.3. Material Characterization

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8 ADVANCE) using a Cu target under 40 mA and 40 kV was used to characterize the crystal structure of samples. The XRD patterns were collected over the 2θ range of 15–90° with a step size of 0.02°, and the scanning rate was 2.4° min−1. Furthermore, Rietveld refinement program—General Structure Analysis System (GSAS) software was used to further analyze the XRD data. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-4800) was employed to characterize the morphology. Elemental distribution on the surface of samples was analyzed by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).

2.4. Electrochemical Measurements

Furthermore, 20 wt% carbon black, 10 wt% polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), and 70 wt% active material were dissolved together in N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP), forming a slurry to prepare the electrodes. The slurry was cast on Al foil and dried at 100 °C. The mass loading of the active material was approximately 1–2 mg cm−2. The as-prepared electrode as the working electrode, Li metal as the reference electrode, and microporous polypropylene membrane (Celgard 2500) as the separator, assembling the CR2025-type coin cells in an argon gas-filled glove box. The electrolyte was 1 M LiPF6 dissolved in dimethyl carbonate (DMC) and ethylene carbonate (EC) (1:1 vol/vol). After aging, a multichannel battery testing system (Neware Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) was used to measure the electrochemical performances between 2.8 and 4.3 V. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests were carried out on a Princeton Applied Research VersaSTAT 3 electrochemical workstation. The EIS tests were conducted between 100 kHz and 10 mHz, and the voltage amplitude was 5 mV. The cyclic voltammetry was tested in the potential range between 2.8 and 4.5 V, and the scan rate was 0.1 mV s−1. The differential capacity versus voltage curves (dQ dV−1) were obtained according to the charge/discharge testing data of individual cycles.

3. Results

3.1. Physical Characterizations

The crystal structure of pristine NCM811, NCM811@LNO, and NCM811@3LNO samples were investigated by powder X-ray diffraction (Figure 1a) combined with Rietveld refinement (Figure 1b–d). The main diffraction peaks of NCM811@LNO and NCM811@3LNO samples are similar to those of pristine NCM811, which belong to hexagonal layered α-NaFeO2 structure (R−3m space group), suggesting that the LNO coating does not affect the crystal structure of NCM811 [34]. Additionally, all three samples exhibit clear splitting of (108)/(110) and (006)/(102), which implies a well-ordered layered structure [35]. Compared with pristine NCM811, NCM811@LNO and NCM811@3LNO samples exhibit a negligible change in lattice parameters (Table 1), suggesting that La3+ is not doped into the bulk structure. The (003)/(104) peak intensity ratio is closely related to the degree of Li+/Ni2+ cation mixing in the Li layer according to the literature [36,37]. Interestingly, NCM811@LNO and NCM811@3LNO samples exhibit higher I(003)/I(104) values compared to the pristine NCM811, suggesting that the LaNiO3-modified LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 samples have lower Li+/Ni2+ disordering. Previous research results demonstrated that Li/Ni disordering is harmful to the kinetic diffusion of Li ion during electrochemical cycling, thus deteriorating the rate capability and discharge capacity [38]. Obviously, in the NCM811@LNO sample, no diffraction peak corresponding to the LaNiO3 can be seen, which may be caused by the low content of LNO material. In addition, the relatively weaker diffraction peaks between 30 and 35° could be identified as the crystalline LaNiO3 (JCPDS #33−0711, labeled with *) in the NCM811@3LNO sample, suggesting the successful introduction of LaNiO3 nanocrystals to the NCM811 [39]. Based on these results, we can speculate that the NCM811@LNO sample contains crystalline LNO owing to the identical preparation method.
Figure 1

(a) XRD patterns of all three samples; the Rietveld refinement of (b) pristine NCM811, (c) NCM811@LNO, and (d) NCM811@3LNO samples.

Table 1

The lattice parameters of all three samples.

ParameterPristine NCM811NCM811@LNONCM811@3LNO
a (Å)2.87312.87092.8720
c (Å)14.196314.195114.1959
c/a4.94114.94444.9428
I(003)/I(104)1.58931.88201.6045
All three samples are composed of well crystalline particles, and the average particle size is approximately 300–700 nm. Clearly, the pristine NCM811 exhibits smooth and clear particle surfaces (Figure 2a,b), whereas some small nanoparticles can be seen on the rougher surface of NCM811@LNO (Figure 2c,d) and NCM811@3LNO (Figure 2e,f) samples. Clearly, with increasing LNO coating content, the amount of small nanoparticles increases gradually on the NCM811 particles surface. Additionally, Figure 3 presents the EDS elemental mapping of the NCM811@3LNO sample. Obviously, Mn, Ni, Co, O, and La elements are homogeneous distribution on the particle’s surface. In addition, the atomic percentages (at.%) of La, Ni, Mn, and Co are 1.51, 38.68, 4.62, and 4.71 at.%, respectively. According to these results, it is concluded that the LaNiO3 can be evenly coated on the NCM811 surface by a simple wet chemical process, forming a conductive coating layer. As a consequence, the electronic conductor LNO crystallites coating can facilitate the electron transport on the surface, restrain the direct contact between the electrolyte and the cathode surface, and thus reduce the transition metal ions dissolution and the interfacial side reactions.
Figure 2

SEM images of (a,b) pristine NCM811, (c,d) NCM811@LNO, and (e,f) NCM811@3LNO samples.

Figure 3

EDS elemental mapping of NCM811@3LNO sample.

3.2. Electrochemical Performance

The first charge/discharge voltage profiles of pristine NCM811, NCM811@LNO, and NCM811@3LNO electrodes at 0.1 C (1 C = 180 mA g−1) are presented in Figure 4a. Compared with the charge and discharge profiles of pristine NCM811, NCM811@LNO and NCM811@3LNO electrodes do not show any additional voltage plateau. Table 2 shows the first coulombic efficiencies and charge/discharge specific capacities of all three electrodes. It is conspicuous that the NCM811@3LNO electrode exhibits an excellent coulombic efficiency of 85.10% and an ultrahigh first discharge capacity of 246.39 mAh g−1 at 0.1 C, far surpassing the pristine NCM811 (82.12% and 194.67 mAh g−1). The significantly enhanced coulombic efficiency and specific capacity of the NCM811@3LNO electrode can be attributed to the electronic conductor LaNiO3 coating layer that provides the electronic conduction pathway between particles, leading to fast electron transport.
Figure 4

(a) First charge and discharge voltage profiles, and corresponding dQ dV−1 curves of (b) pristine NCM811, (c) NCM811@LNO, and (d) NCM811@3LNO electrodes at 0.1 C rate.

Table 2

The electrochemical performances of all three electrodes in the initial cycle at 0.1 C.

ElectrodeFirst Charge Capacity (mAh g−1)First Discharge Capacity (mAh g−1)First Coulombic Efficiency (%)
pristine NCM811237.06194.6782.12
NCM811@LNO218.24192.2888.11
NCM811@3LNO289.53246.4085.10
To further investigate the phase transition behavior during the first charge and discharge process, Figure 4b–d presents the corresponding dQ dV−1 curves of pristine NCM811, NCM811@LNO, and NCM811@3LNO electrodes, respectively. All the dQ dV−1 curves exhibit the phase transitions from hexagonal to monoclinic (H1 to M) and then to other hexagonal (H2 and H3). Clearly, NCM811@LNO (0.0068 V) and NCM811@3LNO (0.0032 V) electrodes demonstrate the lower potential difference of anodic-cathodic peaks compared to that of the pristine NCM811 (0.0096 V). The decreased potential difference of NCM811@3LNO electrode implies improved electrode reversibility and reduced electrochemical polarization according to the literature [40,41]. The above results indicate that surface modification with electronic conductor LaNiO3 crystallites is beneficial to improve the electrode kinetics, leading to increasing the first coulombic efficiency and charge/discharge capacity and decreasing the electrochemical polarization degree of NCM811 cathodes. Figure 5a exhibits the rate capability of pristine NCM811, NCM811@LNO, and NCM811@3LNO electrodes. Additionally, the charge/discharge voltage profiles of all three electrodes at different rates are displayed in Figure 5b–d. Compared with the pristine NCM811, LNO surface-modified NCM811 electrodes exhibit obviously improved high-rate performance. It is conspicuous that a higher discharge capacity of 130.62 mAh g−1 is retained after 35 cycles at 10 C for the NCM811@3LNO electrode, corresponding to a capacity loss of 1.12% per cycle from an initial discharge capacity at 0.1 C. In contrast, pristine NCM811 electrode decreases dramatically to 69.50 mAh g−1, corresponding to a capacity loss of 1.81% at the same condition. More importantly, NCM811@3LNO exhibits a superior discharge capacity of 213.48 mAh g−1 when the current rate recovers back to 0.1 C, far surpassing the pristine NCM811 (147.63 mAh g−1). The above results demonstrate that the conductive LaNiO3 surface-modified NCM811 cathodes exhibit significantly improved high-rate charge-discharge performance and electrochemical reversibility, suggesting easier electron transport in the LaNiO3-modified NCM811.
Figure 5

(a) Rate performances comparison; charge and discharge profiles of (b) pristine NCM811, (c) NCM811@LNO, and (d) NCM811@3LNO electrodes at different rates.

The cycling performances of pristine NCM811, NCM811@LNO, and NCM811@3LNO electrodes at 0.5 C are displayed in Figure 6a. At 0.5 C, the NCM811@3LNO electrode exhibits an ultrahigh first discharge capacity of 213.23 mAh g−1, significantly surpassing the pristine NCM811 (177.86 mAh g−1). Pristine NCM811 exhibits obvious capacity fading with increasing cycle number, maintaining only 62.92% after 50 cycles, and the synchronous decay in the dQ dV−1 peaks (Figure 6c) can be observed. In contrast, the NCM811@3LNO electrode shows excellent capacity retention of 87.87% at the same condition, and the corresponding dQ dV−1 profiles (Figure 6d) overlap well among various cycles, suggesting outstanding electrochemical reversibility. Besides, Figure 6b shows the cycle performances of all three electrodes at a higher rate of 2 C. Remarkably, the NCM811@LNO electrode maintains 84.95% of its original capacity after 100 cycles, far surpassing 58.31% of the pristine NCM811. These results suggest that the electronic conductor LaNiO3 crystallites can provide the electronic conduction pathway between particles, restrain the direct contact between the electrolyte and the cathode surface, thus decreasing the transition metal ions dissolution and the interfacial side reactions, leading to superior cycling stability of the NCM811 cathodes.
Figure 6

Cycling performances of pristine NCM811, NCM811@LNO, and NCM811@3LNO electrodes at (a) 0.5 C and (b) 2 C; the corresponding dQ dV−1 curves of (c) pristine NCM811 and (d) NCM811@3LNO electrodes at various cycles at 0.5 C.

To further investigate the redox process and the electrochemical reversibility of NCM811 cathodes during charge-discharge cycling, the first three cyclic voltammograms (Figure 7) were recorded between 2.8 and 4.5 V, and the scan rate was 0.1 mV s−1. All electrodes exhibit three redox couples. Compared with pristine NCM811, NCM811@LNO and NCM811@3LNO electrodes exhibit similar CV features, suggesting that the redox process of the NCM811 is not affected by the presence of LaNiO3 coating. The potential difference (ΔV) of oxidation-reduction peaks is closely related to the polarization degree of the electrode materials and the reversibility of the electrochemical redox reaction according to the literature [42]. Significantly, the potential difference of the pristine NCM811 electrode is 0.052 V, which surpassed the NCM811@LNO (0.044 V) and NCM811@3LNO (0.023 V) electrodes. Furthermore, compared with pristine NCM811, the CV curves of NCM811@LNO and NCM811@3LNO electrodes overlap well in the 2nd and 3rd cycles, suggesting that the LaNiO3-modified LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 electrodes have quasi-reversible electrochemical kinetics during the Li+ insertion and extraction processes [43]. These results suggest that the electronic conductor LaNiO3 coating are conducive to improving the electrochemical reversibility and reducing the polarization degree of the NCM811 cathodes, which are consistent with the results from superior cycling performance and high-rate performance of the NCM811@LNO and NCM811@3LNO electrodes.
Figure 7

CV curves of (a) pristine NCM811, (b) NCM811@LNO, and (c) NCM811@3LNO electrodes.

To study the electrochemical kinetic behaviors for the high-rate performance, EIS of the pristine NCM811, NCM811@LNO, and NCM811@3LNO electrodes were measured after 100 cycles at 2 C. Two semicircles and an inclined line can be seen in all Nyquist plots (Figure 8a). Generally, the solution resistance (Rs) is represented by the high-frequency intercept at the real axis [44,45]. The surface-film resistance (Rsf) is represented by the first semicircle at high-frequency, while the charge-transfer resistance (Rct) between the electrolyte and cathode materials is represented by the second semicircle at medium-frequency [46]. The inclined line at low-frequency stands for the Warburg impedance (Zw), which is related to the lithium ions diffusion in the bulk of cathode materials [47]. Furthermore, the following equation was used to calculate the Li+ diffusion coefficient (DLi+) from the Nyquist plots in the low-frequency region: where C represents the concentration of Li+ in the NCM811 cathode, F represents the Faraday constant, A represents the surface area of the electrode, T represents the absolute temperature, n represents the amount of the electrons per molecule participating in the electronic transfer reaction, R represents the gas constant, and σ represents the Warburg coefficient, which can be obtained by the following equation from the slope of the linear fitting of resistance (Z′) vs. the reciprocal square roots of the frequency (ω−1/2) in the low-frequency region [48]:
Figure 8

(a) Nyquist plots with an equivalent circuit (inset) of pristine NCM811, NCM811@LNO, and NCM811@3LNO electrodes; (b) the relationship plots between Z′ and ω−1/2 in the low-frequency region.

Figure 8b presents the relationship between Z′ and ω−1/2. Moreover, Table 3 exhibits the fitting resistance and calculated DLi+ values. Compared with pristine NCM811, NCM811@LNO and NCM811@3LNO electrodes exhibit lower Rsf and Rct values. Additionally, the calculated DLi+ value for the pristine NCM811 electrode is 1.17 × 10−14 cm2 s−1 after 100 cycles, whereas the DLi+ value for NCM811@LNO and NCM811@3LNO is 4.61 × 10−14 cm2 s−1 and 3.21 × 10−14 cm2 s−1, respectively. These results are consistent with the results from the cycling performances at 2 C (Figure 6b), indicating that the high conductive LNO coating layer is conducive to facilitating the electron transport, suppressing the side reactions between the electrolyte and NCM811 surface, subsequently improving the electrode kinetics and reducing the interfacial resistance.
Table 3

Impedance parameters of pristine NCM811, NCM811@LNO, and NCM811@3LNO electrodes after fitting.

ElectrodeRs (Ω)Rsf (Ω)Rct (Ω)DLi+ (cm2 s−1)
pristine NCM8114.3539.94173.301.17 × 10−14
NCM811@LNO2.8824.9474.884.61 × 10−14
NCM811@3LNO4.068.96108.503.21 × 10−14

4. Conclusions

In this paper, electronic conductor LaNiO3 crystallite surface-modified LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 cathodes were prepared, and the effects of conductive LaNiO3 coating on the LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 cathodes were studied. The present work indicates that LaNiO3 nanoparticles are uniformly distributed on the NCM811 particle surface, which is beneficial towards improving the electrode kinetics caused by the fast electron transport and restraining the direct contact between the electrolyte and cathode materials, leading to excellent cycling performance and high-rate capability of LaNiO3-modified LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 cathodes. As a result, surface modification with high electronic conductivity oxide is an effective method to improve the electrochemical performances of Ni-rich LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 cathodes, which can also be extended to other electrodes for fast charging-discharging LIBs.
  10 in total

1.  Rational material design for ultrafast rechargeable lithium-ion batteries.

Authors:  Yuxin Tang; Yanyan Zhang; Wenlong Li; Bing Ma; Xiaodong Chen
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 54.564

2.  Battery materials for ultrafast charging and discharging.

Authors:  Byoungwoo Kang; Gerbrand Ceder
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Conductivity and Local Structure of LaNiO3 Thin Films.

Authors:  Jennifer Fowlie; Marta Gibert; Giulio Tieri; Alexandre Gloter; Jorge Íñiguez; Alessio Filippetti; Sara Catalano; Stefano Gariglio; Alexander Schober; Mael Guennou; Jens Kreisel; Odile Stéphan; Jean-Marc Triscone
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 30.849

4.  Li-Nb-O Coating/Substitution Enhances the Electrochemical Performance of the LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 (NMC 811) Cathode.

Authors:  Fengxia Xin; Hui Zhou; Xiaobo Chen; Mateusz Zuba; Natasha Chernova; Guangwen Zhou; M Stanley Whittingham
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 9.229

5.  Ni/Li Disordering in Layered Transition Metal Oxide: Electrochemical Impact, Origin, and Control.

Authors:  Jiaxin Zheng; Yaokun Ye; Tongchao Liu; Yinguo Xiao; Chongmin Wang; Feng Wang; Feng Pan
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 22.384

6.  Exposing the {010} Planes by Oriented Self-Assembly with Nanosheets To Improve the Electrochemical Performances of Ni-Rich Li[Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1]O2 Microspheres.

Authors:  Yuefeng Su; Gang Chen; Lai Chen; Weikang Li; Qiyu Zhang; Zhiru Yang; Yun Lu; Liying Bao; Jing Tan; Renjie Chen; Shi Chen; Feng Wu
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 9.229

7.  Long-Life Nickel-Rich Layered Oxide Cathodes with a Uniform Li2ZrO3 Surface Coating for Lithium-Ion Batteries.

Authors:  Bohang Song; Wangda Li; Seung-Min Oh; Arumugam Manthiram
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 8.  Surface/Interfacial Structure and Chemistry of High-Energy Nickel-Rich Layered Oxide Cathodes: Advances and Perspectives.

Authors:  Peiyu Hou; Jiangmei Yin; Meng Ding; Jinzhao Huang; Xijin Xu
Journal:  Small       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 13.281

9.  Use of carbon coating on LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 cathode material for enhanced performances of lithium-ion batteries.

Authors:  Seong-Ju Sim; Seung-Hwan Lee; Bong-Soo Jin; Hyun-Soo Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.