| Literature DB >> 35009538 |
Karsten Glowka1, Maciej Zubko1,2, Paweł Świec1, Krystian Prusik1, Magdalena Szklarska1, Dariusz Chrobak1, János L Lábár3, Danuta Stróż1.
Abstract
The presented work was focused on investigating the influence of the (hafnium and zirconium)/molybdenum ratio on the microstructure and properties of Ti20Ta20Nb20(ZrHf)20-xMox (where: x = 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 at.%) high entropy alloys in an as-cast state. The designed chemical composition was chosen due to possible future biomedical applications. Materials were obtained from elemental powders by vacuum arc melting technique. Phase analysis revealed the presence of dual body-centered cubic phases. X-ray diffraction showed the decrease of lattice parameters of both phases with increasing molybdenum concentration up to 10% of molybdenum and further increase of lattice parameters. The presence of two-phase matrix microstructure and hafnium and zirconium precipitates was proved by scanning and transmission electron microscopy observation. Mechanical property measurements revealed decreased micro- and nanohardness and reduced Young's modulus up to 10% of Mo content, and further increased up to 20% of molybdenum addition. Additionally, corrosion resistance measurements in Ringers' solution confirmed the high biomedical ability of studied alloys due to the presence of stable oxide layers.Entities:
Keywords: corrosion resistance; high entropy alloys; mechanical properties; microstructure analysis; multi-component alloys
Year: 2022 PMID: 35009538 PMCID: PMC8746432 DOI: 10.3390/ma15010393
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Physical properties of pure alloying elements: Crystal structure, atomic radius—ri, valence electron concentration—(VEC)i, Pauling’s electronegativity—χi, and melting point—T(m)i. BCC: Body-centered cubic: HCP: hexagonal closest packed [56,57,58].
| Element | Crystal Structure | ri (Å) | VEC | χi (Pauling Units) | (Tm)i (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ti | HCP | 1.462 | 4 | 1.54 | 1660 |
| Ta | BCC | 1.430 | 5 | 1.50 | 3017 |
| Nb | BCC | 1.429 | 5 | 1.60 | 2468 |
| Zr | HCP | 1.603 | 4 | 1.33 | 1952 |
| Hf | HCP | 1.578 | 4 | 1.30 | 2233 |
| Mo | BCC | 1.363 | 6 | 2.16 | 2123 |
Thermodynamic parameters calculated for the studied high entropy alloys: Atomic size mismatch—δ, mixing enthalpy—ΔHmix, mixing entropy—ΔSmix, electronegativity differences—Δχ, valence electron concentration—VEC, and an empirical melting point of an alloy—T(m).
| Chemical | Abbreviation | δ | ΔHmix (kJ∙mol−1) | ΔSmix | Δχ (eV) | VEC | T(m) (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ti20Ta20Nb20(ZrHf)20 | Mo_0 | 4.99 | 2.72 | 13.38 | 0.118 | 4.40 | 2249 |
| Ti20Ta20Nb20(ZrHf)17,5Mo5 | Mo_5 | 5.21 | 1.49 | 14.35 | 0.190 | 4.50 | 2278 |
| Ti20Ta20Nb20(ZrHf)15Mo10 | Mo_10 | 5.31 | 0.36 | 14.68 | 0.234 | 4.60 | 2307 |
| Ti20Ta20Nb20(ZrHf)12,5Mo15 | Mo_15 | 5.30 | −0.67 | 14.72 | 0.264 | 4.70 | 2336 |
| Ti20Ta20Nb20(ZrHf)10Mo20 | Mo_20 | 5.17 | −1.60 | 14.53 | 0.285 | 4.80 | 2366 |
Figure 1Secondary electron contrast (SEI) microstructure images of Ti, Ta, Nb, Zr, Hf and Mo initial powders.
Unit cell parameters calculated from X-ray diffraction patterns after Powley refinement.
| Studied Alloy | Phase | Lattice Parameter |
|---|---|---|
| Mo_0 | BCC | 3.4031 (1) |
| Mo_5 | BCC1 | 3.3946 (1) |
| BCC2 | 3.3960 (1) | |
| Mo_10 | BCC1 | 3.3309 (2) |
| BCC2 | 3.3522 (2) | |
| Mo_15 | BCC1 | 3.3122 (1) |
| BCC2 | 3.3246 (1) | |
| Mo_20 | BCC1 | 3.2782 (1) |
| BCC2 | 3.2916 (1) |
Figure 2Measured X-ray diffraction patterns for all studied high entropy alloys.
Figure 3The changes of lattice parameters of dendritic (BCC1) and interdendritic (BCC2) phases with different Mo content for all studied high entropy alloys.
SEM Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) chemical compositions (at.%) and calculated melting temperature (T(m)) for all studied high entropy alloys for dendritic (BCC1) and interdendritic (BCC2) regions.
| Studied | Elements | Ti | Ta | Nb | Zr | Hf | Mo | T (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mo_0 | Nominal | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | ― | ― |
| BCC1 | 34.4 (0) | 12.4 (2) | 24.9 (1) | 17.9 (2) | 10.3 (1) | ― | 2135 | |
| BCC2 | 33.7 (1) | 7.5 (2) | 22.7 (1) | 25.2 (2) | 10.9 (1) | ― | 2067 | |
| Mo_5 | Nominal | 20 | 20 | 20 | 17.5 | 17.5 | 5 | ― |
| BCC1 | 14.7 (1) | 23.2 (5) | 23.5 (1) | 16.6 (5) | 17.1 (1) | 4.9 (1) | 2361 | |
| BCC2 | 16.4 (2) | 17.4 (3) | 21.9 (1) | 21.1 (3) | 19.4 (4) | 3.8 (1) | 2278 | |
| Mo_10 | Nominal | 20 | 20 | 20 | 15 | 15 | 10 | ― |
| BCC1 | 28.2 (1) | 14.5 (1) | 25.3 (1) | 9.3 (1) | 6.9 (1) | 15.8 (1) | 2285 | |
| BCC2 | 33.8 (2) | 6.5 (4) | 21.3 (1) | 20.5 (4) | 8.9 (2) | 8.8 (2) | 2104 | |
| Mo_15 | Nominal | 20 | 20 | 20 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 15 | ― |
| BCC1 | 32.1 (12) | 19.0 (12) | 19.1 (1) | 7.3 (3) | 6.7 (4) | 15.8 (1) | 2294 | |
| BCC2 | 33.2 (12) | 12.0 (9) | 17.5 (1) | 14.6 (4) | 10.2 (5) | 12.6 (2) | 2190 | |
| Mo_20 | Nominal | 20 | 20 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 20 | ― |
| BCC1 | 13.5 (1) | 24.2 (3) | 23.4 (1) | 5.6 (2) | 7.1 (2) | 26.3 (1) | 2503 | |
| BCC2 | 20.0 (1) | 10.2 (4) | 19.0 (1) | 19.8 (6) | 15.5 (6) | 15.5 (3) | 2242 |
Figure 4Backscattered electron contrast imaging mode (BSE) microstructure images of studied high entropy alloy compositions with assigned BCC solid solutions corresponding to dendritic and interdendritic regions.
Figure 5Bright-field and indexed SAED image of Hf-Zr recorded in TEM mode with the corresponding STEM high-angle annular dark-field image (HAADF), and elemental distribution maps for Mo_15 sample.
Open circuit potential and the log |Z|f→0.01Hz value registered for studied alloys with different Mo content.
| Studied Alloy | EOC vs. SCE (V) | log |Z|f→0.01Hz (Ω∙cm2) | EBD vs. SCE (V) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mo_0 | −0.423 | 4.93 | 4.33 |
| Mo_5 | −0.142 | 5.40 | 5.15 |
| Mo_10 | −0.195 | 5.84 | 5.57 |
| Mo_15 | −0.365 | 6.39 | ~6.11 |
| Mo_20 | −0.333 | 6.26 | ~6.18 |
Figure 6Bode diagram registered at EOC (a) log |Z| = f(log f) and (b) φ = f(log f), and (c) anodic polarization curves for HEA electrodes exposed in Ringer’s solution at 37 °C.
Average microhardness (HV 1), nanohardness (H) and reduced Young’s modulus (Er) for different Mo content for all studied high entropy alloys.
| Studied Alloy | Microhardness HV 1 | Nanohardness (H) (GPa) | Reduced Young’s |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mo_0 | 475 (12) | 140 (5) | 9 (1) |
| Mo_5 | 469 (12) | 130 (2) | 9 (1) |
| Mo_10 | 427 (9) | 121 (4) | 8 (1) |
| Mo_15 | 505 (16) | 156 (5) | 10 (1) |
| Mo_20 | 557 (18) | 154 (7) | 10 (1) |
Figure 7Reduced Young’s modulus (a), nanohardness and microhardness (b) values for different Mo content for studied high entropy alloys.
Comparison of nanohardness and reduced Young’s modulus for all studied alloys and literature-reported conventional biomedical materials and biomedical high entropy alloys.
| Chemical Composition | Nanohardness (H) | Reduced Young’s | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ti20Ta20Nb20(ZrHf)20 (Mo_0) | 9.00 | 140.00 | present work |
| Ti20Ta20Nb20(ZrHf)17,5Mo5 (Mo_5) | 9.00 | 130.00 | |
| Ti20Ta20Nb20(ZrHf)15Mo10 (Mo_10) | 8.00 | 121.00 | |
| Ti20Ta20Nb20(ZrHf)12,5Mo15 (Mo_15) | 10.00 | 156.00 | |
| Ti20Ta20Nb20(ZrHf)10Mo20 (Mo_20) | 10.00 | 154.00 | |
| Human’s tibial cortical bone | - | 21.90 | [ |
| Human’s tibial cortical bone Interstitial lamellae | - | 25.20 | |
| Human’s trabecular bone | - | 15.90 | [ |
| cp Titanium Grade 2 mechanical/abrasive | 3.88 | 127.96 | [ |
| cp Titanium Grade 2 electropolished | 2.31 | 68.56 | |
| cp Titanium Grade 2 after | 1.47 | 26.93 | |
| cp Ti as cast | 3.10 | 125.00 | [ |
| Ti64 gyroid | 5.35 | 134.52 | |
| cp Ti produced by selective laser melting | 3.61 | 122.00 | |
| cp Ti | 2.90 | 107.00 | [ |
| 316 L stainless steel | 3.68 | 196.77 | [ |
| 316 L stainless steel | 3.54 | 215.71 | [ |
| TiMo (after cold rolling in rolling direction) | 5.29 | 127.00 | [ |
| TiMo (after cold rolling in transverse direction) | 5.27 | 126.00 | |
| TiMo (without Mo segregation) | 4.94 | 115.00 | |
| Ti8Fe | 5.60 | 128.00 | [ |
| Ti74Nb26 | 3.61 | 75.10 | [ |
| Ti72Mo2Nb26 | 3.04 | 67.00 | |
| Ti70Mo4Nb26 | 2.84 | 63.60 | |
| Ti68Mo6Nb26 | 2.82 | 55.70 | |
| Ti66Mo8Nb26 | 3.22 | 54.50 | |
| TiNbZr as-cast | 3.80 | 72.00 | [ |
| TiNbZr agened for 15 min | 4.40 | 69.00 | |
| TiNbZr agened for 1.5 h | 4.40 | 66.00 | |
| TiNbZr agened for 3 h | 4.40 | 74.00 | |
| TiNbZr agened for 6 h | 5.20 | 81.00 | |
| TiNbZr agened for 12 h | 5.70 | 96.00 | |
| TiNbZr agened for 24 h | 6.20 | 97.00 | |
| Ti85Nb10Sn5 | 3.40 | 80.00 | [ |
| Ti82Nb13Sn5 | 2.90 | 75.00 | |
| Ti79Nb16Sn5 | 2.70 | 62.00 | |
| Ti75Nb20Sn5 | 2.60 | 61.00 | |
| Ti8Fe5Ta | 5.00 | 119.00 | [ |
| Ti8Fe8Ta | 4.40 | 107.50 | |
| Ti9Fe9Ta | 3.69 | 99.00 | |
| Ti10Fe10Ta | 3.45 | 92.00 | |
| Ti6Al4V | 3.62 | 131.62 | [ |
| Ti6Al4V | 6.50 | 127.90 | [ |
| TiZrNbTa | ― | 132.00 | |
| TiZrNbTa | 4.60 | 116.00 | [ |
| Ti1.5ZrTa0.5Hf0.5Nb0.5 | 3.33 | 98.68 | [ |
| TiZrTaHfNb | 3.48 | 114.13 | |
| TiZrNbTaMo | ― | 168.00 | [ |
| TiZrNbTaMo | 6.40 | 161.00 | [ |
| TiZrNbTaMo | 5.70 | 133.00 |