| Literature DB >> 35009291 |
Yijiang Peng1, Semaoui Zakaria1, Yucheng Sun1, Ying Chen1, Lijuan Zhang1.
Abstract
In this paper, a parallel homogenization model for recycled concrete was proposed. A new type of finite element method, the base force element method, based on the complementary energy principle and the parallel homogenization model, is used to conduct meso-level damage research on recycled concrete. The stress-strain softening curve and failure mechanism of the recycled concrete under uniaxial tensile load are analyzed using the nonlinear damage analysis program of the base force element method based on the parallel homogenization model. The tensile strength and destructive mechanisms of recycled concrete materials are studied using this parallel homogenization model. The calculation results are compared with the results of the experiments and meso-level random aggregate model analysis methods. The research results show that this parallel homogenization analysis method can be used to analyze the nonlinear damage analysis of recycled concrete materials. The tensile strength, stress-strain softening curve, and crack propagation process of recycled concrete materials can be obtained using the present method.Entities:
Keywords: base force element method; mesoscopic damage; parallel homogenization model; recycled concrete
Year: 2021 PMID: 35009291 PMCID: PMC8746284 DOI: 10.3390/ma15010145
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Each phase of random aggregate.
Figure 2Voigt parallel model.
Figure 3Mesh subsection diagram.
Figure 4Mesoscopic model of regenerated concrete meshes.
Figure 5Equivalent elastic modulus distribution.
Figure 6Mean stress/mean strain and damage curves under homogeneous equivalent tensile treatment.
Material parameter value.
| Parameter | New Mortar | Recycled Aggregate | Old Bond Zone | Old Mortar | New Bond Zone |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.25 | 0.65 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.23 |
|
| 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
|
| 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.15 |
|
| 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.35 |
|
| 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
|
| 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Figure 7Load model.
Figure 8Two-dimensional diagram of homogenized model.
Numerical simulation results data.
| Peak Strain (10−6) | Peak Stress (MPa) | |
|---|---|---|
| Test data [ | 102 | 2.06 |
| Parallel specimen 1 | 100 | 2.10 |
| Parallel specimen 2 | 100 | 2.11 |
| Parallel specimen 3 | 100 | 2.09 |
Figure 9Uniaxial tensile stress–strain curve of parallel model.
Figure 10Damage diagram of uniaxial tension numerical simulation.
Model data comparison.
| Model | Element Size (mm) | Element Number | Calculating Time of One Step (s) |
| Element of random aggregate model | 0.5 | 40,000 | 3062 |
| Element of homogenized equivalent model | 2 | 2500 | 10.8 |