| Literature DB >> 35009255 |
Kexin Xu1,2,3, Xing Fu4,2, Xinjie Wang1,3, Zhiwei Fu2, Xiaofeng Yang2, Si Chen2, Yijun Shi2, Yun Huang2, Hongtao Chen1,3.
Abstract
The grain orientation of Sn-based solder joints on copper pillars under the combined action of electron wind force and temperature gradient greatly affects their electromigration damage. The copper pillars with Sn-1.8Ag lead-free solder on the top was subjected to a current density of 1.5 × 104 A/cm2 at 125 °C to study the electromigration behaviors. The grain orientation was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) equipped with electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) detector. Metal dissolution and voids formation in the cathode as well as massive intermetallic compounds(IMC) accumulation in the anode were observed after electromigration. Closer examination of solder joints revealed that the Sn grain whose c-axis perpendicular to electric current may have retarded Cu diffusion to anode and IMC accumulation. In addition, the newly formed Cu6Sn5 exhibited preferred orientation related to the electric current direction.Entities:
Keywords: IMC accumulation; copper pillar; electromigration; grain orientation; preferred orientation
Year: 2021 PMID: 35009255 PMCID: PMC8745900 DOI: 10.3390/ma15010108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1The structure of tested copper pillar joint: (a) The dimension and structure of the test samples after reflow; (b) the schematic diagram of experiment setup.
Figure 2Microstructure after current stressing at 1.5 × 104 A/cm2 at 125 °C for 200 h: (a) SEM images of copper pillar joints (b) the EDS results of IMCs.
Figure 3Microstructure after current stressing at 1.5 × 104 A/cm2 at 125 °C for 200 h: (a) SEM image for the bump with downward electron flow; (b) SEM image for the bump with downward electron flow with unit cells; (c) the EBSD image corresponding to (a).
Figure 4Microstructure after current stressing at 1.5 × 104 A/cm2 at 125 °C for 200 h: (a) SEM image for the copper pillar with upward current flow; (b) SEM image for the copper pillar with downward current flow; (c) the EBSD image corresponding to (a); (d) the EBSD image corresponding to (b).
Figure 5Microstructures of copper pillars full of IMCs after current stressing at 1.5 × 104 A/cm2 at 125 °C: (a) SEM images of copper pillar joints (b) the EDS results of IMCs.
Figure 6Microstructures of copper pillars with remained Sn after current stressing at 1.5 × 104 A/cm2 at 125 °C.
Figure 7Microstructure after current stressing at 1.5 × 104 A/cm2 at 125 °C for 600 h.
Figure 8Microstructure after current stressing at 1.5 × 104 A/cm2 at 125 °C for 800 h.
Figure 9Curves of load vs indentation depth in nanoindentation experiment:(a) Cu6Sn5; (b) Cu3Sn.