| Literature DB >> 35009224 |
Mehrnoosh Tavakoli1,2, Ali Ghasemian1, Mohammad Reza Dehghani-Firouzabadi1, Bartłomiej Mazela2.
Abstract
The inevitable destructive effects of moisture and temperature are obvious in cellulosic and nanocellulosic substrates. These materials are the main foundations of interdependent industries that produce products such as currency notes or high-quality packaging for sanitary, cosmetics, or ammunition in the defense industry. Therefore, it is essential to develop procedures to eliminate problems arising from humidity and fire to improve the quality of these green and sustainable materials. The production of waterproof and flame-resistant cellulose-based substrates has drawn increasing attention to resolve these drawbacks. In this review paper, we have initially summarized the most accessible cellulosic substrates, different kinds of nanocellulose, and the general information about water repellents and intumescent fireproof surfaces. Then, the potential and necessity of using cellulosic biobased substrates are addressed for use in modified shapes as waterproof and fire inhibitor coatings. Cost-effective, eco-friendly, and durable, dual-function coatings are also introduced as future challenges, which are exploited as water-repellents and flame-retardant cellulose-based surfaces for pulp and paper applications.Entities:
Keywords: cellulosic-based substances; coating; flame retardancy; nanocellulose; water repellency
Year: 2021 PMID: 35009224 PMCID: PMC8746080 DOI: 10.3390/ma15010082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Illustration of hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces based on water contact angle measurement.
Figure 2Functional mode of flame retardants.
Figure 3Different tests used to measure the effects of combustion inhibitors. Limiting oxygen index (a), vertical flammability (b), cone calorimeter (c), and pyrolysis-combustion flow calorimeter (d).
Figure 4A schematic of cellulose biopolymer derivation from wood, which is converted to CNF, CNC, or BC, as the three major nanoscale forms of cellulose.
Outstanding properties of commonly used procedures for nanocellulosic substance production.
| Type of Method | Features | Advantages | Disadvantages | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grinding/Super grinding | The fibrillation process of fibers occurs through the passing of cellulose slurries between rotor and stator, which produce shear forces that separate the nanofibers | No need for additional mechanical pretreatment | Wood fibers can expunge the grooves of the discs | [ |
| High-pressure homogenization | This method involves suspension crossing via a narrow nozzle exposed to the high-pressure piston | Higher pressure gives a higher yield | Homogenization is blocked by incomplete separation of nanofibers | [ |
| Microfluidization | Microfluidizer operates with a constant shear force opposite to the homogenizer (constant pressure) | Nanofibers can be produced with a homogeneous size distribution | Process repetition (even up to 10 times) is required for better fibrillation | [ |
| High-intensity ultrasonication | Known as the conventional mechanical lab-scale procedure in aqueous media in which the suspensions are subjected to hydrodynamic forces | The fibrillation process depends on the concentration of fiber, size of the fiber, time, and temperature | Low-scale production | [ |
| Cryocrushing | Mechanical fibrillation occurs for frozen cellulose, which produces fibers with 0.1-1 μm diameters | The crushing process requires liquid nitrogen and low temperatures | High energy consumption | [ |
| Steam explosion | Suspension is rapidly subjected to steam with intensifying pressure | Nanofibers are constituted by the swift release of pressure | Non-uniformity of the CNF quality | [ |