| Literature DB >> 35009144 |
Satyabrata Mangaraj1, Rabindra Kumar Paikaray1, Sagar Maitra2, Shriram Ratan Pradhan3, Lalita Mohan Garnayak1, Manoranjan Satapathy1, Barsita Swain1, Satyananda Jena1, Bijayalaxmi Nayak4, Tanmoy Shankar2, Mohammed Alorabi5, Ahmed Gaber6, Akbar Hossain7.
Abstract
Continuous mono-cropping of rice has resulted in decline or stagnation of yield output due to the occurrence of multiple nutrient deficiencies and worsening of soil physicochemical properties accompanying increased pressure of insect pests and diseases. The basic concept of integrated nutrient management (INM) is maintenance or adjustment of soil fertility and supply of plant nutrients to an optimum level for sustaining the desired crop productivity through optimisation of benefits from all possible sources of plant nutrients in an integrated way. Augmenting a rice-based cropping system with pulses is a prevalent and indigenous cropping system under rainfed conditions. Considering the above facts, experiments were conducted to evaluate the impacts of integrated nutrient management on productivity of aromatic rice-greengram cropping system and nutrient balance of the post-harvest soil for agricultural sustainability under rainfed conditions in two consecutive years (2017-2018 and 2018-2019) with six main plots and three subplots. The experimental findings revealed that the treatment comprised of 50% recommended dose of fertiliser (RDF) through chemicals + 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through farmyard manure (FYM) increased the plant height, tillers, dry matter accumulation, leaf area and leaf area duration, and yield parameters in short grain aromatic rice. Similarly, preceding application of 50% RDF + 50% RDN through FYM to rice and further application 75% RDF + Rhizobium+ phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) to greengram increased the growth characteristics and yield parameters-such as pods/plant, seeds/pod, grain yield, stover yield, and harvest index-in greengram. It was concluded that the treatment consisting of 50% RDF (chemical fertiliser) + 50% RDN (FYM) to rice and 75% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB to greengram increased the productivity of the rice-greengram cropping system. Furthermore, the adoption of INM has positively impacted post-harvest soil nutrient balance.Entities:
Keywords: cropping system; greengram; integrated nutrient management; nutrient balance; productivity; short grain aromatic rice
Year: 2022 PMID: 35009144 PMCID: PMC8747382 DOI: 10.3390/plants11010142
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Chemical composition of the experimental site.
| Composition | Value | Method Employed |
|---|---|---|
| Bulk density (g/cc) | 1.55 | Core sampler method [ |
| Particle density (g/cc) | 2.67 | Pycnometer method [ |
| pH (1:2.5::soil:water) | 5.66 | Glass electrode Beckman’s electronic pH metre [ |
| Electrical conductivity | 0.13 | Conductivity metre [ |
| Water holding capacity (%) | 39.4 | Keen Raczkowski box method [ |
| Organic carbon (g/kg) | 3.82 | Walkley and Black method [ |
| Available N (kg/ha) | 199.3 | Alkaline permanganate method [ |
| Available P (kg/ha) | 17.3 | Bray’s-1 method [ |
| Available K (kg/ha) | 269.1 | Neutral normal ammonium acetate method [ |
| Iron (ppm) | 140.2 | DTPA method [ |
| Manganese (ppm) | 8.22 | DTPA method [ |
| Zinc (ppm) | 0.59 | DTPA method [ |
| Copper (ppm) | 1.19 | DTPA method [ |
Figure 1Month wise meteorological data during the crop growing seasons in 2017–2018 and 2018–2019 (Department of Agrometeorology, College of Agriculture, OUAT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India).
Nutrient content of organic manures used in the experiment.
| Organic Source | Year | N (%) | P (%) | K (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYM | 2017 | 0.63 | 0.36 | 0.62 |
| 2018 | 0.58 | 0.40 | 0.55 | |
| Dhaincha | 2017 | 3.44 | 0.74 | 1.12 |
| 2018 | 3.56 | 0.82 | 1.25 |
Effect of integrated nutrient management on plant height of short grain aromatic rice at different growth stages.
| Treatment | Plant Height (cm) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 DAT | 60 DAT | 90 DAT | At Harvest | |||||
| 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | |
| G1 | 43.7 bc | 45.5 b | 107.6 c | 109.9 c | 116.6 c | 119.3 cd | 119.2 c | 122.6 c |
| G2 | 45.9 b | 47.9 b | 112.3 bc | 112.1 bc | 120.7 bc | 122.6 c | 122.8 bc | 124.0 c |
| G3 | 53.0 a | 53.6 a | 123.3 a | 126.5 a | 132.0 a | 135.9 a | 135.4 a | 138.1 a |
| G4 | 39.8 c | 40.4 c | 100.8 d | 95.3 d | 108.4 d | 108.2 e | 111.9 d | 111.0 d |
| G5 | 51.3 a | 52.7 a | 116.4 b | 116.7 b | 124.9 b | 129.2 b | 127.9 b | 131.4 b |
| G6 | 45.2 b | 45.9 b | 109.6 c | 107.2 c | 115.4 c | 113.5 de | 118.6 c | 116.2 d |
| SE(m) ± | 2.28 | 2.44 | 4.13 | 5.41 | 4.24 | 4.39 | 4.19 | 5.05 |
| LSD (0.05) | 7.18 | 7.70 | 13.02 | 17.06 | 13.36 | 13.82 | 13.20 | 15.90 |
G1: 100 % recommended dose of fertiliser (60-30-30 kg/ha of N-P2O5-K2O), G2: 75% RDF + 25% RDN through FYM, G3: 50% RDF + 50% RDN through FYM, G4: 50% RDF + 25% RDN through FYM, G5:75% RDF + green manuring and G6: 50% RDF + green manuring. Data were subjected to Tukey’s HSD test. SE, Standard errors and LSD, least significance difference at 5% probability level. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences between means.
Effect of integrated nutrient management on tillers m−2 of rice at different growth stages.
| Treatment | Tillers/m2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 DAT | 60 DAT | 90 DAT | ||||
| 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | |
| G1 | 76.3 c | 88.9 c | 251.8 d | 264.4 c | 306.4 d | 313.6 d |
| G2 | 87.5 b | 100.6 b | 275.8 c | 286.7 b | 330.1 c | 336.6 c |
| G3 | 99.1 a | 111.6 a | 304.0 a | 312.5 a | 359.3 a | 372.6 a |
| G4 | 74.8 c | 87.9 c | 227.1 e | 239.0 d | 274.2 e | 292.7 e |
| G5 | 100.2 a | 106.6 ab | 289.7 b | 303.9 a | 341.9 b | 351.0 b |
| G6 | 91.7 b | 104.4 b | 260.1 d | 274.2 c | 319.3 c | 323.9 d |
| SE(m) ± | 4.25 | 5.23 | 12.42 | 14.73 | 16.23 | 14.59 |
| LSD (0.05) | 13.38 | 16.46 | 39.13 | 46.41 | 51.15 | 45.97 |
For treatment details, Table 2 may be referred. SE, Standard errors and LSD, least significance difference at 5% probability level. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences between means.
Figure 2Leaf area duration and leaf area of short grain aromatic rice influenced by integrated nutrient management practices. For treatment details, Table 2 may be referred. SE, standard errors; LSD, least significance difference at 5% probability level.
Effect of Integrated nutrient management on dry matter accumulation of short grain aromatic rice at different growth stages.
| Treatments | Dry Matter Accumulation of Rice | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 DAT | 60 DAT | 90 DAT | Harvest | |||||
| 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | |
| G1 | 132.6 d | 119.5 e | 290.5 d | 303.6 d | 545.4 d | 541.3 c | 698.4 d | 684.2 d |
| G2 | 170.7 b | 160.5 c | 328.3 b | 319.3 c | 590.9 b | 579.9 b | 738.4 b | 729.7 b |
| G3 | 181.3 a | 192.9 a | 374.8 a | 361.5 a | 617.6 a | 612.6 a | 770.4 a | 757.1 a |
| G4 | 133.9 d | 139.7 d | 282.5 d | 289.6 e | 521.7 e | 510.0 d | 600.0 e | 583.9 e |
| G5 | 173.1 ab | 175.7 b | 334.4 b | 341.7 b | 603.2 b | 608.6 a | 743.9 b | 750.7 a |
| G6 | 159.1 c | 161.7 c | 308.2 c | 318.3 c | 558.4 c | 568.8 b | 716.6 c | 702.1 c |
| SE(m) ± | 8.60 | 7.04 | 13.51 | 14.13 | 19.25 | 21.42 | 26.03 | 23.66 |
| LSD (0.05) | 27.09 | 22.18 | 42.56 | 44.51 | 60.65 | 67.48 | 82.02 | 74.56 |
For treatment details, Table 2 may be referred. SE, Standard errors and LSD, least significance difference at 5% probability level. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences between means.
Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield parameters of short grain aromatic rice.
| Treatment | EBT | Filled Grains/Panicle | Grain Yield | Straw Yield | Harvest Index | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | |
| G1 | 268.8 d | 286.4 c | 133.8 d | 142.5 d | 2983 e | 3113 e | 4609 e | 4960 c | 39.3 bc | 38.5 cd |
| G2 | 295.8 c | 302.6 b | 147.7 c | 151.0 c | 3346 c | 3328 c | 4881 c | 5111 b | 40.6 ab | 39.4 cd |
| G3 | 315.7 a | 321.0 a | 178.6 a | 182.6 a | 3837 a | 3914 a | 5278 a | 5342 a | 42.1 a | 42.2 a |
| G4 | 255.4 e | 260.4 d | 125.2 e | 132.5 e | 2580 f | 2697 f | 4297 f | 4499 e | 37.5 c | 37.4 d |
| G5 | 305.4 b | 312.6 a | 160.2 b | 164.2 b | 3438 b | 3539 b | 4924 b | 4931 c | 41.1 ab | 41.8 ab |
| G6 | 273.1 d | 290.6 c | 138.6 d | 143.4 d | 3182 d | 3224 d | 4802 d | 4864 d | 39.8 abc | 39.8 bc |
| SE(m) ± | 10.68 | 11.01 | 5.42 | 6.43 | 143.0 | 142.6 | 144.0 | 130.0 | 0.68 | 0.63 |
| LSD (0.05) | 33.65 | 34.68 | 17.07 | 20.27 | 450.6 | 449.4 | 453.7 | 409.6 | 2.14 | 1.97 |
For treatment details, Table 2 may be referred. SE, Standard errors and LSD, least significance difference at 5% probability level. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences between means.
Multiple correlations between yield parameters and grain yield of rice.
| Parameters | Ear Bearing | Panicle Length | Filled Grains/Panicle | Test Weight (g) | Grain Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ear bearing tillers/m2 | 1 | ||||
| Panicle length | 0.84 | 1 | |||
| Filled grains/panicle | 0.71 | 0.67 | 1 | ||
| Test weight | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.87 | 1 | |
| Grain yield | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 1 |
Figure 3Correlation between yield parameters and grain yield of short grain aromatic rice.
Effect on Integrated nutrient management on plant height (cm) of rabi greengram.
| Treatment | Plant Height | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 DAS | 45 DAS | 60 DAS | Harvest | |||||
| 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | |
| Nutrient management in rice | ||||||||
| G1 | 16.5 d | 18.7 c | 26.9 c | 28.1 c | 31.1 b | 31.8 b | 31.9 bc | 32.5 bc |
| G2 | 20.3 c | 20.9 b | 29.9 b | 30.1 b | 32.3 b | 33.1 b | 33.2 b | 34.3 b |
| G3 | 24.0 a | 23.8 a | 32.0 a | 32.4 a | 35.4 a | 36.2 a | 36.8 a | 37.8 a |
| G4 | 15.8 d | 17.1 d | 24.8 d | 24.9 d | 28.1 c | 28.3 c | 29.1 c | 30.1 c |
| G5 | 22.4 b | 22.9 a | 32.3 a | 31.3 ab | 35.0 a | 35.1 a | 36.0 a | 36.8 a |
| G6 | 19.6 c | 20.3 b | 28.2 c | 28.6 c | 31.9 b | 32.4 b | 32.8 b | 33.7 b |
| SE(m) ± | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.23 | 0.72 | 0.34 | 0.73 | 0.72 |
| LSD (0.05) | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.72 | 2.28 | 1.08 | 2.29 | 2.27 |
| Nutrient management in greengram | ||||||||
| P1 | 20.1 a | 20.8 b | 29.3 a | 29.8 b | 32.6 a | 33.1 b | 33.6 a | 34.6 a |
| P2 | 18.2 b | 19.5 c | 27.9 b | 26.9 c | 30.5 b | 31.3 c | 31.3 b | 32.2 b |
| P3 | 21.1 a | 21.6 a | 29.9 a | 31.0 a | 33.8 a | 34.1 a | 34.9 a | 35.8 a |
| SE(m) ± | 0.27 | 0.15 | 0.26 | 0.17 | 0.47 | 0.12 | 0.45 | 0.47 |
| LSD (0.05) | 0.78 | 0.43 | 0.76 | 0.49 | 1.38 | 0.35 | 1.33 | 1.36 |
For treatment details, Table 2 may be referred. SE, Standard errors and LSD, least significance difference at 5% probability level. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences between means.
Effect on integrated nutrient management on dry matter accumulation (g/plant) of rabi greengram.
| Treatment | Dry Matter Accumulation (g/Plant) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 DAS | 45 DAS | 60 DAS | Harvest | |||||
| 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | |
| Nutrient management in rice | ||||||||
| G1 | 2.7 c | 2.9 c | 6.6 d | 6.8 d | 10.4 d | 10.7 d | 11.6 d | 11.8 d |
| G2 | 3.7 b | 3.7 b | 9.2 b | 9.7 b | 12.3 c | 12.5 c | 13.6 c | 13.7 c |
| G3 | 4.9 a | 5.0 a | 10.9 a | 11.4 a | 14.6 a | 14.9 a | 15.9 a | 16.3 a |
| G4 | 2.6 c | 2.6 c | 5.7 d | 5.9 d | 7.8 e | 7.9 e | 8.9 e | 9.1 e |
| G5 | 4.4 a | 4.5 a | 10.3 a | 10.9 a | 13.3 b | 13.7 b | 14.6 b | 15.0 b |
| G6 | 2.8 c | 2.8 c | 7.8 c | 8.0 c | 11.4 c | 11.8 c | 12.9 c | 13.3 c |
| SE(m)± | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.12 |
| LSD (0.05) | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.34 | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.38 |
| Nutrient management in greengram | ||||||||
| P1 | 3.6 b | 3.6 b | 8.5 b | 8.8 b | 11.6 b | 11.8 b | 12.9 b | 13.1 b |
| P2 | 3.0 c | 3.0 c | 7.4 c | 8.0 c | 10.5 c | 10.8 c | 11.7 c | 11.9 c |
| P3 | 4.0 a | 4.1 a | 9.3 a | 9.5 a | 12.8 a | 13.1 a | 14.2 a | 14.6 a |
| SE(m)± | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.08 |
| LSD (0.05) | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.31 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.23 |
For treatment details, Table 2 may be referred. SE, standard errors and LSD, least significance difference at 5% probability level. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences between means.
Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield parameters of rabi greengram.
| Treatment | Pods/Plant | Seeds/Pod | Pod Length (cm) | Seed Yield | Stover Yield | Harvest Index | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | |
| G1 | 11.4 c | 12.5 c | 7.0 c | 6.6 c | 5.4 c | 6.2 b | 511 d | 539 e | 1477 e | 1411 e | 25.6 bc | 27.6 bc |
| G2 | 13.3 b | 14.7 b | 8.7 b | 9.3 b | 6.3 bc | 6.4 b | 611 c | 629 c | 1685 c | 1612 c | 26.6 ab | 28.0 abc |
| G3 | 16.1 a | 17.0 a | 10.3 a | 11.2 a | 8.26 a | 8.30 a | 798 a | 815 a | 1993 a | 1922 a | 28.5 a | 29.7 a |
| G4 | 10.6 c | 11.9 c | 6.5 c | 6.3 c | 5.34 c | 5.7 b | 479 e | 495 f | 1462 e | 1324 f | 24.5 c | 27.1 bc |
| G5 | 15.2 a | 16.4 a | 10.6 a | 10.8 a | 7.90 a | 8.2 a | 702 b | 733 b | 1816 b | 1811 b | 27.8 a | 28.7 ab |
| G6 | 12.9 b | 14.2 b | 8.4 b | 9.9 b | 6.44 b | 6.6 b | 521 d | 558 d | 1570 d | 1563 d | 24.9 bc | 26.5 c |
| SE(m) ± | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.27 | 23.52 | 21.62 | 44.37 | 33.71 | 0.45 | 0.49 |
| LSD (0.05) | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.15 | 0.37 | 0.86 | 74.11 | 68.14 | 139.8 | 106.21 | 1.43 | 1.56 |
| P1 | 13.1 b | 14.3 b | 8.7 b | 9.0 b | 6.7 a | 7.0 a | 606 b | 620 b | 1685 b | 1603 b | 26.3 b | 27.7 b |
| P2 | 12.4 c | 13.5 c | 7.7 c | 8.7 b | 6.0 b | 6.4 b | 520 c | 554 c | 1532 c | 1468 c | 25.1 c | 27.3 c |
| P3 | 14.2 a | 15.6 a | 9.4 a | 9.4 a | 7.1 a | 7.3 a | 684 a | 710 a | 1784 a | 1749 a | 27.6 a | 28.8 a |
| SE(m) ± | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 7.08 | 8.34 | 23.37 | 16.36 | 0.29 | 0.32 |
| LSD (0.05) | 0.31 | 0.34 | 0.24 | 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 20.68 | 24.33 | 68.20 | 47.74 | 0.85 | 0.93 |
For treatment details, Table 2 may be referred. SE, standard errors and LSD, least significance difference at 5% probability level. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences between means.
Nitrogen balance in the soil at the end of cropping system.
| Treatment | Initial Fertility | N Added | N Uptake | Computed Balance | Actual Fertility after Harvest | Net Gain/Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nutrient management in rice | ||||||
| G1 | 199.3 | 153.3 | 227.4 | −74.1 | 210.5 | 11.2 |
| G2 | 199.3 | 153.3 | 264.1 | −110.8 | 218.8 | 19.5 |
| G3 | 199.3 | 153.3 | 332 | −178.7 | 221.2 | 21.9 |
| G4 | 199.3 | 153.3 | 201.5 | −48.2 | 200.7 | 1.4 |
| G5 | 199.3 | 420.7 | 288.9 | 131.8 | 225.7 | 26.4 |
| G6 | 199.3 | 384.7 | 240.4 | 144.3 | 213.6 | 14.3 |
| Nutrient management in greengram | ||||||
| P1 | 199.3 | 243.1 | 257.1 | −14.0 | 215 | 15.7 |
| P2 | 199.3 | 233.1 | 243.1 | −10.0 | 213.1 | 13.8 |
| P3 | 199.3 | 233.1 | 271.9 | −38.8 | 217.1 | 17.8 |
For treatment details, Table 2 may be referred.
Phosphorus balance in soil at the end of cropping system.
| Treatment | Initial Fertility | P Added | P Uptake | Computed Balance | Actual Fertility after Harvest | Net Gain/Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nutrient management in rice | ||||||
| G1 | 17.3 | 126.7 | 37.7 | 89.0 | 20.4 | 3.1 |
| G2 | 17.3 | 130.6 | 45.1 | 85.5 | 21.5 | 4.2 |
| G3 | 17.3 | 135.6 | 57.4 | 78.2 | 24.5 | 7.2 |
| G4 | 17.3 | 115.6 | 30.7 | 84.9 | 19.6 | 2.3 |
| G5 | 17.3 | 176.6 | 53.1 | 123.5 | 26.2 | 8.9 |
| G6 | 17.3 | 161.6 | 41.1 | 120.5 | 20.9 | 3.6 |
| Nutrient management in greengram | ||||||
| P1 | 17.3 | 154.4 | 44.3 | 110.1 | 22.1 | 4.8 |
| P2 | 17.3 | 134.4 | 42.1 | 92.3 | 21.7 | 4.4 |
| P3 | 17.3 | 134.4 | 46.1 | 88.3 | 22.8 | 5.5 |
For treatment details, Table 2 may be referred.
Potassium balance in soil at the end of cropping system.
| Treatment | Initial Fertility | K Added | K Uptake | Computed Balance | Actual Fertility after Harvest | Net Gain/Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nutrient management in rice | ||||||
| G1 | 269.1 | 126.7 | 332.8 | −206.1 | 288.3 | 19.2 |
| G2 | 269.1 | 140.6 | 377.6 | −237.0 | 291.6 | 22.5 |
| G3 | 269.1 | 156.1 | 436.0 | −279.9 | 292.0 | 22.9 |
| G4 | 269.1 | 125.6 | 304.9 | −179.3 | 285.7 | 16.6 |
| G5 | 269.1 | 210.2 | 392.0 | −181.8 | 296.0 | 26.9 |
| G6 | 269.1 | 195.2 | 350.2 | −155.0 | 290.8 | 21.7 |
| Nutrient management in greengram | ||||||
| P1 | 269.1 | 172.4 | 365.9 | −193.5 | 291.3 | 22.2 |
| P2 | 269.1 | 152.4 | 357.3 | −204.9 | 289.1 | 20.0 |
| P3 | 269.1 | 152.4 | 373.4 | −221.0 | 291.8 | 22.7 |
For treatment details, Table 2 may be referred.