| Literature DB >> 35009047 |
Xuefei Lian1,2, Feifei Li3, Yuanyuan Chang1,2, Tie Zhou1,2, Yuewen Chen1,2, Tao Yin1,2, Yunsong Li1,2, Li Ye1,2, Yan Jin1,2, Xiaopeng Lu1,2.
Abstract
Chewing texture is important for fresh citrus fruits, and the mastication trait of a segment directly determines chewing texture. Roughing disorder impairs the quality of Satsuma mandarin fruits, and it is typically correlated with intrinsic mastication inferiority (IMI). This study explored the role of segment membranes (SMs) in IMI. Similar to IMI in roughing-disordered fruits, segment shear force significantly enhanced relative to controls (CK); cell layers and cell wall thickness increased also in inferior masticating SMs. The 'Miyamoto Wase' cultivar exhibited larger segment shear force and more SM cell layers than 'Juxiangzao'. In SMs, vessel cells could be divided into outside layers where segments adjoin and inside layers where juice sacs grow from. The inside vessel cell layers in the inferior masticating SMs were denser. Vessels with a length of 200 to 300 μm and a diameter of 5 to 15 μm predominated in SMs. The average vessel diameter enlarged by 13% to 16.5% in inferior masticating SMs, depending on cultivars. Furthermore, there was a decrease in vessels with a diameter <5 μm and an increase in vessels >10 μm in the inferior masticating SMs. Between phenotypes, protopectin increased significantly throughout development of inferior masticating SMs, while water-soluble pectin increased during the later stages of development. In one inferior masticating SM sample, protopectin and water-soluble pectin levels were higher in the inner-ring area than those in the outer-ring area. Correspondingly, expression of CuPME21 which is involved in pectin hydrolysis was consistently upregulated in the inferior masticating SMs throughout fruit development. The findings in this work provide novel insights into citrus SM structure and its IMI.Entities:
Keywords: Satsuma mandarin; gene expression; intrinsic mastication inferiority; pectin; segment membrane
Year: 2021 PMID: 35009047 PMCID: PMC8747345 DOI: 10.3390/plants11010039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Characteristics of roughing disorder in Satsuma mandarin fruits and its intrinsic mastication inferiority (IMI) of segment membranes (SMs). (a) Development of SMs in roughing-disordered Satsuma mandarin fruits. (b) SMs in two Satsuma mandarins under scanning electron microscopy; the bar indicates 50 μm. (c) Ultrastructural morphology of SMs with different mastication degrees; the bars in pictures with ×1000, ×2000, ×5000 and ×10,000 magnifications indicate 10 μm, 10 μm, 5 μm and 1 μm respectively.
Segment shear force in CK and inferior masticating segments (kg segment−1). The data are presented as mean ± SD for three replicates.
| ‘Juxiangzao’ | ‘Miyamoto Wase’ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | IMI | CK | IMI | ||
| Cross-cut | July | 4.82 ± 0.65 | 7.31 ± 0.90 * | 5.04 ± 0.58 | 9.31 ± 0.67 * |
| Aug. | 2.19 ± 0.22 | 5.25 ± 0.66 * | 7.04 ± 0.89 | 10.81 ± 0.67 * | |
| Sep. | 2.65 ± 0.29 | 8.11 ± 0.40 * | 3.66 ± 0.13 | 5.78 ± 1.23 * | |
| Oct. | 1.85 ± 0.10 | 7.65 ± 0.87 * | 3.60 ± 0.11 | 5.29 ± 0.57 * | |
| Length-cut | July | 2.64 ± 0.14 | 4.01 ± 0.20 * | 2.68 ± 0.27 | 4.42 ± 0.12 * |
| Aug. | 1.62 ± 0.08 | 3.61 ± 0.76 * | 3.80 ± 0.25 | 3.59 ± 0.67 * | |
| Sep. | 1.29 ± 0.13 | 3.73 ± 0.37 * | 1.78 ± 0.12 | 2.58 ± 0.29 * | |
| Oct. | 1.19 ± 0.18 | 3.30 ± 0.43 * | 1.59 ± 0.19 | 2.40 ± 0.36 * | |
Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference relative to control (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Ultrastructural morphology of inferior masticating SMs in ‘Juxiangzao’ and ‘Miyamoto Wase’. (a,b) cross section of CK and inferior masticating SMs in ‘Juxiangzao’. (c,d) cross section of CK and inferior masticating SMs in ‘Miyamoto Wase’. (e,f) Longitudinal section of CK and inferior masticating SMs in ‘Juxiangzao’. (g,h) Longitudinal section of CK and inferior masticating SMs in ‘Miyamoto Wase’. The bars in pictures with ×1000 and ×3000 magnifications indicate 10 μm and 5 μm, respectively.
Figure 3Anatomical differences between inner-ring and outer-ring parts in one inferior masticating SM. (a,b) Staining for the inner-ring and outer-ring cells of ‘Juxiangzao’. (c,d) Staining for the inner-ring and outer-ring cells of ‘Miyamoto Wase’. The bar indicates 50 μm.
Morphologic statistics for vessel molecules in SMs. The data are presented as mean ± SD for three replicates or percent to 300 vessels.
| ‘Juxiangzao’ | ‘Miyamoto Wase’ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | IMI | CK | IMI | ||
| Average vessel length/μm | 107.2 ± 3.6 | 127.7 ± 1.1 * | 125.4 ± 10.8 | 118.6 ± 8.5 | |
| Average vessel diameter/μm | 7.7 ± 0.3 | 8.7 ± 0.4 * | 7.9 ± 0.5 | 9.2 ± 0.1 * | |
| Vessel length | <50 μm | 0.7% | 0.7% | ND | 1.0% |
| 50–100 μm | 37.7% | 26.3% | 34.7% | 36.0% | |
| 100–150 μm | 41.3% | 44.3% | 39.3% | 43.3% | |
| 150–200 μm | 15.0% | 24.7% | 20.0% | 14.7% | |
| >200 μm | 5.3% | 4.0% | 6.0% | 5.0% | |
| Vessel diameter | <5 μm | 5.3% | 1.0% | 4.3% | 1.7% |
| 5–10 μm | 79.3% | 80.3% | 79.0% | 72.3% | |
| 10–15 μm | 15.3% | 17.3% | 16.3% | 23.7% | |
| >15 μm | ND | 1.3% | 0.3% | 2.3% | |
Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference relative to control (p < 0.05). ND indicates not detected.
Protopectin and water-soluble pectin contents in SMs (mg g−1). The data are presented as mean ± SD for three replicates.
| ‘Juxiangzao’ | ‘Miyamoto Wase’ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | IMI | CK | IMI | ||
| Protopectin | June | 425.69 ± 6.48 | 512.85 ± 7.85 * | 269.60 ± 21.79 | 362.47 ± 17.13 * |
| July | 370.99 ± 40.43 | 543.47 ± 32.81 * | 265.61 ± 6.74 | 319.99 ± 5.81 * | |
| August | 345.46 ± 21.79 | 431.78 ± 35.74 * | 367.44 ± 14.85 | 413.12 ± 11.66 * | |
| September | 265.17 ± 0.91 | 298.89 ± 4.46 * | 267.63 ± 20.03 | 287.82 ± 3.36 | |
| October | 168.60 ± 4.84 | 231.34 ± 4.37 * | 199.06 ± 7.15 | 253.32 ± 24.58 * | |
| Water-soluble pectin | June | 14.57 ± 4.24 | 12.65 ± 1.88 | 16.04 ± 1.13 | 17.82 ± 2.11 |
| July | 14.34 ± 1.93 | 15.92 ± 4.08 | 10.68 ± 0.48 | 10.00 ± 0.32 | |
| August | 12.33 ± 2.60 | 18.91 ± 3.15 * | 14.75 ± 1.59 | 20.40 ± 2.19 * | |
| September | 28.02 ± 4.29 | 24.82 ± 8.31 | 11.56 ± 0.33 | 32.85 ± 0.72 * | |
| October | 14.63 ± 1.62 | 25.55 ± 4.44 * | 17.95 ± 2.84 | 32.73 ± 3.17 * | |
Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference relative to control (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Lignin and cellulose accumulations in inferior masticating SMs of ‘Juxiangzao’ and ‘Miyamoto Wase’. (a,b) Lignin content of SMs in ‘Juxiangzao’ and ‘Miyamoto Wase’. (c,d) Cellulose content of SMs in ‘Juxiangzao’ and ‘Miyamoto Wase’. The data are presented as mean ± SD for three replicates. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference relative to control (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Protopectin and water-soluble pectin accumulations in inner- and outer-ring parts in one inferior masticating SM. (a) Protopectin difference between inner- and outer-ring parts. (b) Water-soluble pectin difference between inner- and outer-ring parts. The data are presented as mean ± SD for three replicates. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference relative to control (p < 0.05).
Figure 6Gene expression patterns of CuPMEs and CuPMEIs in CK and inferior masticating SMs. (a–d) Expression patterns of four CuPME genes. (e–i) Expression patterns of five CuPMEI genes. The data are presented as mean ± SD for three replicates. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference relative to control (p < 0.05).