| Literature DB >> 35009041 |
Abstract
This paper describes the effect of mineral elements on dominant plants in the Shewushan lateritic gold deposit, China. For this purpose, 30 soil profile samples at different depths and 3 kinds of dominant plants including Populus canadensis (Populus X canadensis Moench), Cinnamomun camphora (Cinnamomum camphora (L.) Presl.) and Rhus chinensis (Rhus chinensis Mill.) were collected. The concentration of ore-forming elements including Au, Ag, Pb, Zn, Cu, As, Fe, and S were analyzed. Based on the investigation of two mine profiles, it can be found that Au, Pb, As, and Fe were mainly enriched in laterite layer and the brown clay layer at a depth of 5-11 m. Moreover, the biological accumulate coefficient (BAC) and the contrast coefficient (CM) were calculated to assess the sensitivity and concentrating ability of Populus canadensis and Cinnamomun camphora. To investigate the response of the two species to metal stress, the contents of chlorophyll, malondialdehyde (MDA), and activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) were determined. The result showed that Populus canadensis and Cinnamomun camphora have a high tolerance to metal stress and that both of the two species can indicate the content of Au, As, Pb, and Co in topsoil.Entities:
Keywords: abiotic stress; biogeochemistry; plant response; soil
Year: 2021 PMID: 35009041 PMCID: PMC8747375 DOI: 10.3390/plants11010038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1The sampling area in Shewushan gold deposit.
Figure 2The sampling profiles in Shewushan gold deposit.
Figure 3The stratified soil layers of sampling profiles.
The elements concentration of mine profiles.
| Profile I | Layer | Au | Ag | Pb | As | Sb | Fe (%) | Co |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depth (m) | μg/g | mg/kg | ||||||
| 0.7 | Top soil | 0.018 | 0.07 | 37.7 | 36.6 | 3.7 | 3.87 | 20.6 |
| 1.4 | 0.010 | 0.03 | 34.1 | 22.8 | 2.24 | 4.32 | 26.2 | |
| 2.1 | 0.012 | 0.02 | 35.3 | 30.9 | 2.78 | 3.65 | 21.3 | |
| 2.8 | Laterite | 0.009 | 0.04 | 32.4 | 25.4 | 2.43 | 4.82 | 22.3 |
| 3.5 | 0.028 | 0.05 | 32.6 | 24.7 | 2.32 | 4.87 | 16.2 | |
| 4.5 | 0.077 | 0.02 | 31.6 | 24.3 | 2.24 | 5.14 | 15.5 | |
| 5.3 | 0.115 | 0.06 | 30.3 | 28.2 | 2.06 | 6.13 | 11.4 | |
| 5.6 | Brown clay | 0.161 | 0.08 | 25.9 | 27.5 | 2.86 | 5.89 | 9.5 |
| 6.6 | 0.433 | 0.06 | 30 | 75.7 | 4.68 | 5.77 | 7.5 | |
| 7.6 | 0.613 | 0.17 | 28 | 190.6 | 33.7 | 5.29 | 4.3 | |
| 8.2 | 0.937 | 0.11 | 36.2 | 299.8 | 45.1 | 5.96 | 5.4 | |
| 8.8 | 0.876 | 0.14 | 35.7 | 314.5 | 41.3 | 5.92 | 5.8 | |
| Profile II | layer | Au | Ag | Pb | As | Sb | Fe (%) | Co |
| Depth (m) | μg/g | mg/kg | ||||||
| 0.8 | Top soil | 0.005 | 0.09 | 41 | 25 | 2.3 | 3.66 | 21.2 |
| 1.5 | 0.015 | 0.08 | 42.2 | 24.6 | 1.97 | 4.36 | 24.3 | |
| 2.4 | 0.022 | 0.09 | 42.7 | 18.1 | 1.83 | 4.95 | 23.6 | |
| 2.8 | Laterite | 0.008 | 0.05 | 36.8 | 18.4 | 1.83 | 4.25 | 34.7 |
| 3.5 | 0.006 | 0.03 | 39.6 | 17.9 | 1.79 | 4.15 | 44.8 | |
| 4.2 | 0.008 | 0.04 | 38 | 20.4 | 1.96 | 4.37 | 31.3 | |
| 4.9 | 0.017 | 0.04 | 21 | 15.4 | 3.76 | 3.58 | 7 | |
| 5.6 | 0.015 | 0.08 | 30.8 | 16.3 | 4.72 | 3.77 | 40.3 | |
| 6.5 | 0.026 | 0.05 | 27.1 | 14.4 | 6.53 | 3.48 | 13.3 | |
| 7 | Brown clay | 0.025 | 0.03 | 34.5 | 37.9 | 20.9 | 4.53 | 16.5 |
| 7.7 | 0.037 | 0.02 | 31.2 | 83.5 | 10.89 | 3.9 | 21.4 | |
| 8.4 | 0.055 | 0.02 | 19.7 | 170.1 | 52.15 | 4.73 | 23 | |
| 9.1 | 0.105 | 0.01 | 33.2 | 137.6 | 74 | 5.39 | 6.2 | |
| 9.8 | 0.252 | 0.11 | 16.6 | 174.3 | 94.1 | 6.62 | 5.1 | |
| 10.5 | 0.490 | 0.22 | 14.3 | 361.2 | 130 | 4.78 | 8.1 | |
| 11.2 | 0.763 | 0.19 | 21.2 | 258.6 | 122 | 6.17 | 4.6 | |
The elements concentration of background profiles.
| Background Profile | Layer | Au | Ag | Pb | As | Sb | Fe (%) | Co |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| m | μg/g | mg/kg | ||||||
| 1 | Top soil | <0.005 | 0.08 | 20.1 | 17.5 | 1.9 | 2.78 | 3.3 |
| 1.5 | <0.005 | 0.09 | 13.2 | 18.3 | 2.08 | 1.85 | 4.7 | |
| 2 | <0.005 | 0.07 | 11.8 | 19.4 | 1.76 | 1.98 | 4.3 | |
| 3 | Laterite | <0.005 | 0.05 | 13.1 | 21.2 | 2.23 | 2.46 | 3.9 |
| 3.8 | <0.005 | 0.02 | 15.4 | 23.8 | 2.64 | 3.52 | 4.2 | |
| 5 | Brown clay | <0.005 | 0.11 | 13.4 | 24.5 | 3.51 | 2.85 | 5.1 |
| 6.5 | <0.005 | 0.09 | 12.4 | 22.8 | 2.29 | 3.44 | 4.3 | |
| 7 | <0.005 | 0.06 | 16.9 | 20.6 | 2.88 | 2.97 | 3.6 | |
| 7.8 | <0.005 | 0.07 | 14.2 | 17.4 | 2.14 | 3.71 | 4.6 | |
Figure 4The content of each ore-forming elements in ore profile.
Biological absorption coefficient of dominant plants.
| Elements | Au (SD) | Zn (SD) | Cu (SD) | Co (SD) | As (SD) | Fe (SD) | Al (SD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Populus canadensis | 0.08 (0.02) | 1.37 (0.34) | 0.33 (0.07) | 0.25 (0.03) | 0.03 (0.01) | 0.01 (0.01) | 0.01 (0.01) |
| Cinnamomun camphora | 0.04 (0.01) | 0.37 (0.25) | 0.25 (0.08) | 0.01 (0.01) | 0.21 (0.03) | 0.01 (0.01) | 0.01 (0.01) |
Elements content and contrast coefficient of dominant plants (mg/kg).
| Species | Elements | Background (Average) | SD | Mine Profile (Average) | Contrast Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Populus canadensis | Au | 0.002 | 0.08 | 0.069 | 34.50 |
| Ag | 0.015 | 0.01 | 0.038 | 2.53 | |
| Pb | 1.97 | 2.69 | 3.03 | 1.54 | |
| Ca | 2.36 | 1.48 | 2.50 | 1.06 | |
| K | 2.77 | 1.05 | 4.76 | 1.72 | |
| Mg | 1.88 | 0.39 | 3.35 | 1.78 | |
| Zn | 22.24 | 0.44 | 15.91 | 0.72 | |
| Cu | 5.23 | 0.72 | 8.11 | 1.55 | |
| Co | 0.87 | 0.56 | 3.53 | 4.06 | |
| As | 0.72 | 1.48 | 4.34 | 6.03 | |
| Fe | 5.67 | 3.3 | 6.58 | 1.16 | |
| Al | 3.42 | 2.57 | 4.34 | 1.27 | |
| S | 2.45 | 1.24 | 2.01 | 0.82 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cinnamomun camphora | Au | 0.006 | 0.14 | 0.448 | 74.60 |
| Ag | 0.011 | 0.01 | 0.029 | 2.64 | |
| Pb | 1.89 | 1.05 | 4.04 | 2.14 | |
| Ca | 1.36 | 4.32 | 1.43 | 1.05 | |
| K | 2.67 | 2.09 | 5.69 | 2.13 | |
| Mg | 3.88 | 1.35 | 2.64 | 0.68 | |
| Zn | 17.52 | 3.33 | 20.71 | 1.18 | |
| Cu | 5.12 | 0.87 | 8.03 | 1.57 | |
| Co | 0.23 | 0.64 | 1.79 | 7.78 | |
| As | 1.52 | 1.32 | 5.26 | 3.46 | |
| Fe | 7.67 | 1.81 | 7.82 | 1.02 | |
| Al | 2.32 | 2.14 | 2.06 | 0.89 | |
| S | 2.05 | 1.65 | 2.69 | 1.31 |
The enzyme content of dominant plants.
| Sampling Area | Species | MDA (SD) | SOD (SD) | POD (SD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mine soil profile | Populus canadensis | 13.78 (3.21) | 115.23 (30.67) | 429.04 (83.34) |
| Cinnamomun camphora | 4.54 (1.05) | 118.85 (27.97) | 348.06 (75.79) | |
| Background region | Cinnamomun camphora | 6.4 (1.29) | 69.82 (10.93) | 280.22 (58.27) |
| Populus canadensis | 5.29 (0.89) | 53.38 (11.58) | 160.5 (21.94) |
The contents of cholophyll and metals.
| Sample Location | Species (Sample Size) | Cholophyll a + b (SD) | Au (SD) | Co (SD) | As (SD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mg/g | μg/g | mg/kg | |||
| Mine profile | Populus canadensis (17) | 1.91 (0.42) | 0.069 (0.08) | 3.53 (0.56) | 4.34 (1.48) |
| Cinnamomun camphora (14) | 1.38 (0.27) | 0.448 (0.14) | 1.79 (0.64) | 5.26 (1.32) | |
| Background profile | Populus canadensis (5) | 2.88 (0.72) | 0.002 (-) | 0.87 (0.22) | 0.72 (0.26) |
| Cinnamomun camphora (4) | 2.03 (0.76) | 0.006 (0.005) | 0.23 (0.09) | 1.52 (0.34) | |
Figure 5The contrast coefficient, MDA content, and enzymatic activity of plants in mine and background profiles.