| Literature DB >> 35008861 |
Judith M A Verhagen1, Joyce Burger1,2, Jos A Bekkers3, Alexander T den Dekker4, Jan H von der Thüsen5, Marina Zajec6,7, Hennie T Brüggenwirth1, Marianne L T van der Sterre1, Myrthe van den Born1, Theo M Luider7, Wilfred F J van IJcken4, Marja W Wessels1, Jeroen Essers2,8,9, Jolien W Roos-Hesselink10, Ingrid van der Pluijm2,8, Ingrid M B H van de Laar1, Erwin Brosens1.
Abstract
Thoracic aortic aneurysm is a potentially life-threatening disease with a strong genetic contribution. Despite identification of multiple genes involved in aneurysm formation, little is known about the specific underlying mechanisms that drive the pathological changes in the aortic wall. The aim of our study was to unravel the molecular mechanisms underlying aneurysm formation in Marfan syndrome (MFS). We collected aortic wall samples from FBN1 variant-positive MFS patients (n = 6) and healthy donor hearts (n = 5). Messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels were measured by RNA sequencing and compared between MFS patients and controls, and between haploinsufficient (HI) and dominant negative (DN) FBN1 variants. Immunohistochemical staining, proteomics and cellular respiration experiments were used to confirm our findings. FBN1 mRNA expression levels were highly variable in MFS patients and did not significantly differ from controls. Moreover, we did not identify a distinctive TGF-β gene expression signature in MFS patients. On the contrary, differential gene and protein expression analysis, as well as vascular smooth muscle cell respiration measurements, pointed toward inflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction. Our findings confirm that inflammatory and mitochondrial pathways play important roles in the pathophysiological processes underlying MFS-related aortic disease, providing new therapeutic options.Entities:
Keywords: Marfan syndrome; RNA-seq; mitochondria; proteomics; thoracic aortic aneurysms
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35008861 PMCID: PMC8745050 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23010438
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Clinical and genetic features of patients with MFS.
|
| ||||||
|
| 32 | 16 | 49 | 23 | 37 | 24 |
|
| 55 | 49 | 50 | 48 | 49 | 58 |
|
| 8.14 | 6.89 | 5.82 | 5.89 | 4.37 | 11.07 |
|
| + | + | − | + | + | + |
|
| 8 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 8 |
|
| ||||||
|
| c..2368_2369insC | c.3646G>T | 15q21 deletion (including | c.3506G>T | c.4954T>C | c.7003C>T |
|
| p.Cys790Serfs*12 | p.Glu1216* | p.Gly1169Val | p.Cys1652Arg | p.Arg2335Trp | |
|
| Heterozygous | Heterozygous | Heterozygous | Heterozygous | Heterozygous | Homozygous |
|
| HI | HI | HI | DN | DN | DN |
|
| 0/141 (0%) | 5/82 (6%) | Absent (0%) | 78/199 (39%) | 52/120 (43%) | 400/400 (100%) |
|
| 57% | 46% | 38% | 93% | 59% | 150% |
|
| 55% | NA | 98% | 106% | 80% | 96% |
DN, dominant negative; HI, haploinsufficient; NA, not available. Reference sequence: NM_000138.4. † FBN1 mRNA expression level compared with controls (n = 5). The mean level in controls was set at 100%. †† FBN1 peptide count compared with controls (n = 6). The mean level in controls was set at 100%. ‡ 15q21.1q21.2 deletion of approximately 7.6 Mb encompassing FBN1 and multiple other genes.
Figure 1Visualization of gene expression data. (A) Three-dimensional scatter plots of principal component analysis on gene expression data. Cyan and yellow dots represent MFS samples with dominant negative (DN) and haploinsufficient (HI) FBN1 variants, respectively. Magenta dots represent controls. The numbers in brackets correspond to the proportion of variance explained by the respective principal component. (B) Heat map generated from gene expression data showing hierarchical clustering of MFS samples related to the predicted effect of the FBN1 variants.
Figure 2Targeted assessment of the canonical TGF-β signaling pathway. (A) Heatmap depicting TGF-β pathway deregulation scores (fold changes) in individual MFS patients. (B) Representative images of immunohistochemical analysis of TGF-β family proteins in aortic tissue of control and MFS patient. Labeling intensity and distribution of these markers were comparable between both groups.
Top 10 up- and downregulated genes in MFS compared with controls.
| Symbol | Description | Location | FC | FDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
| MT-RNR2 like 12 | Cytoplasm | 18.3 | 1.94E-56 |
|
| Long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 965 | No data available | 13.1 | 3.47E-18 |
|
| Golgin A8 family, member I | Golgi apparatus | 12.5 | 2.19E-17 |
|
| Scleraxis bHLH transcription factor | Nucleus | 11.2 | 1.11E-15 |
|
| Golgin A8 family, member S | Other | 10.7 | 3.13E-15 |
|
| NBPF member 24 | Other | 10.1 | 3.99E-33 |
|
| RAS p21 protein activator 4 | Cytosplasm | 8.1 | 2.57E-16 |
|
| ADP Ribosylation Factor Like GTPase 17A | Golgi apparatus | 6.9 | 1.19E-17 |
|
| Zinc finger protein 84 | Nucleus | 6.8 | 1.26E-15 |
|
| Prion like protein doppel | Plasma membrane | 5.8 | 4.96E-07 |
|
| ||||
|
| Ribosomal protein L18a | Cytoplasm | −102.4 | 3.89E-210 |
|
| Ribosomal protein L21 | Cytoplasm | −42.7 | 7.10E-280 |
|
| Ribosomal protein S26 | Cytoplasm | −33.9 | 2.12E-103 |
|
| Alcohol dehydrogenase 1A (class I), alpha polypeptide | Cytoplasm | −33.1 | 7.95E-52 |
|
| Nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase-like | No data available | −16.9 | 4.54E-20 |
|
| Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C like | Other | −14.2 | 1.06E-35 |
|
| Coagulation factor VIII associated 3 | Nucleus | −7.1 | 2.24E-10 |
|
| H3.3 histone A | Nucleus | −5.8 | 4.71E-28 |
|
| MAGE family member D4B | Other | −5.3 | 3.18E-06 |
|
| Ribosomal protein L9 | Nucleus | −5.2 | 3.78E-07 |
FC, fold change; FDR, false discovery rate (Benjamini–Hochberg procedure); MFS, Marfan syndrome. Complete list of differentially expressed genes is provided in Supplementary Materials, Table S3.
Figure 3Expression analysis of RNA-seq data. (A) Graph depicting the top 10 canonical pathways (p-value < 0.01) derived from an IPA analysis based on differentially expressed genes (fold change ≥1.5 and false discovery rate adjusted p-value < 0.05) in aortic samples from MFS patients compared to controls. (B) Table depicting predicted activation or inhibition of key upstream transcriptional regulators (bias-corrected z-score >2 or <−2, p-value < 0.01) derived from an IPA analysis based on the observed gene expression changes.
Figure 4Expression analysis of proteomics data. (A) Graph depicting the top 10 canonical pathways (p-value < 0.01) derived from an IPA analysis based on differentially regulated proteins in aortic samples from MFS patients compared to controls. (B) Table depicting predicted activation or inhibition of key upstream transcriptional regulators (bias-corrected z-score >2 or <−2, p-value < 0.01) derived from an IPA analysis based on the observed protein expression changes. (C) Mitochondrial dysfunction network representation derived from IPA.
Figure 5Decreased mitochondrial respiration in FBN1 haploinsufficient VSMCs. (A) Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) of FBN1 haploinsufficient (HI) VSMCs at basal level and in response to 1 μM oligomycin, 1 μM fluoro-carbonyl cyanide phenylhydrazone (FCCP) and 1 μM antimycin A. (B) Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) of FBN1 dominant negative (DN) VSMCs at basal level and in response to 1 μM oligomycin, 1 μM fluoro-carbonyl cyanide phenylhydrazone (FCCP) and 1 μM antimycin A. Of note, data for controls are depicted twice, in both part A and B. (C) Basal OCR of FBN1 mutated VSMCs. (D) Maximum OCR of FBN1 mutated VSMCs after addition of 1 μM FCCP (** p-value < 0.01, **** p-value < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney U test). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM.